| Year | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|
| 0 | –20,000 |
| 1 | 8,000 |
| 2 | 4,000 |
| 3 | 3,000 |
| 4 | 5,000 |
| 5 | 10,000 |
Payback (undiscounted):
Year 1 cum = 8,000
Year 2 cum = 12,000
Year 3 cum = 15,000
Year 4 cum = 20,000 → Payback = 4.00 years
Does payback consider time value of money?
No (standard payback does not discount).
NPV at 10%:
NPV ≈ +2,456.74
Interpretation:
NPV > 0 → accept (value-creating at 10% hurdle rate).
Does NPV consider time value of money?
Yes.
IRR:
IRR ≈ 14.55%
Interpretation:
IRR > 10% → accept (subject to usual IRR caveats).
Does IRR consider time value of money?
Yes (implicitly via discounting).
| Year | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|
| 0 | –60,000 |
| 1 | 25,000 |
| 2 | 24,000 |
| 3 | 13,000 |
| 4 | 12,000 |
| 5 | 11,000 |
Required return = 15%
Payback (undiscounted):
After Year 2 cum = 49,000
Need 11,000 more; Year 3 CF = 13,000
Payback = 2 + (11,000 / 13,000) = 2.8462 years
NPV at 15%:
NPV ≈ +764.27 → accept
IRR:
IRR ≈ 15.64%
IRR > 15% → accept (barely above hurdle rate)
Initial Outlay: A = 200; B = 1,500
Inflow (Year 1): A = 300; B = 1,900
r = 10%
NPV(A) = -200 + 300/1.10 ≈ +72.73
NPV(B) = -1500 + 1900/1.10 ≈ +227.27
Decision (mutually exclusive, choose one):
Choose B (higher NPV).
Note:
IRR(A) = 50%; IRR(B) ≈ 26.67%
This is a classic scale problem: IRR ranks A higher, but NPV ranks B higher.
Initial outlay for both: 1,000
r = 10%
Cash flows:
A: Year1=100, Year2=200, Year3=2,000
B: Year1=650, Year2=650, Year3=650
NPV(A) @10% ≈ +758.83
NPV(B) @10% ≈ +616.45
→ Mutually exclusive: choose A at 10%
→ Independent: accept both (both NPVs > 0)
IRR(A) ≈ 34.84%
IRR(B) ≈ 42.57%
Crossover rate (rate where NPV(A) = NPV(B)):
≈ 21.01%
Below ~21.01% → A has higher NPV
Above ~21.01% → B has higher NPV
| Period | Project A | Project B |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | -500 | -400 |
| 1 | 325 | 325 |
| 2 | 325 | 200 |
At required return = 10%:
NPV(A) @10% ≈ +64.05
NPV(B) @10% ≈ +60.74
→ Mutually exclusive: choose A at 10%
→ Independent: accept both (both NPVs > 0)
IRR(A) ≈ 19.43%
IRR(B) ≈ 22.17%
Crossover rate:
≈ 11.80% (given; computed from incremental cash flows)
If required return = 13%:
NPV(A) @13% ≈ +42.13
NPV(B) @13% ≈ +44.24
→ Mutually exclusive: choose B at 13%
→ Independent: accept both
| Project | Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Discount Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | -100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | N/A | 0.15 |
| B | -73 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0.15 |
NPV(A) ≈ -8.67
NPV(B) ≈ +12.65
Mutually exclusive: choose B
Independent: accept B (reject A)
IRR ≈ 17.53%
Since IRR > 15.5%, accept (based solely on IRR rule).
Cost = 6,000
Annual cash flow = 3,600 for 3 years
Salvage = 0
Payback = 6,000 / 3,600 = 1.67 years
Payback = 8,000 / 1,190 = 6.72 years
| Year | Cash Flow (A) | Cash Flow (B) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | (10,110) | (10,110) |
| 1 | 5,373 | 4,443 |
| 2 | 3,373 | 3,543 |
| 3 | 4,473 | 5,343 |
NPV(A) ≈ 922.78 ; IRR(A) ≈ 15.33%
NPV(B) ≈ 871.47 ; IRR(B) ≈ 14.68%
Crossover rate ≈ 6.29%
IRR ≈ 20.03% (≈ 20% to nearest whole percent)
Cost = 1,875,000
Annual net cash flow = 650,000 for 5 years
After-tax salvage value at end of year 5 = 120,000
Required return = 13.5%
Hint: Year 5 cash flow = 650,000 + 120,000 = 770,000
NPV ≈ 447,291.91