Big Ideas (what you must be able to explain)
- Comparative advantage is about opportunity cost, not “who is better at everything.”
- Trade is usually positive-sum overall, but it creates winners and losers inside countries.
- Institutions (WTO rules, enforcement, predictability) reduce “trade chaos.”
- Reserve currency discussions (e.g., BRICS) depend on convertibility, deep markets, and trust.
Key Terms (one-sentence definitions)
Comparative advantage
Specialize where opportunity cost is lowest.
Trap: “absolute advantage” ≠ comparative advantage.
Opportunity cost
What you give up to produce one more unit of something else.
Tariff
Tax on imports → raises domestic price → transfers + deadweight loss.
Quota
Quantity limit on imports → creates quota rents (who gets them depends on license rules).
WTO / MFN (most favoriate nations)
MFN (most favoriate nations) = nondiscrimination across WTO members (with exceptions like FTAs/customs unions).
Trade creation vs diversion
Creation: shift toward lower-cost sources. Diversion: shift toward higher-cost inside a bloc.
Convertibility
Ability to exchange currency freely without heavy capital controls.
Network effects
The more users adopt a system (currency/hub), the more valuable it becomes.
Example (comparative advantage in 60 seconds)
Mini-example: opportunity cost T/F favorite
Country A (1 hour): 4 shirts OR 2 phones
OC(1 phone) = 2 shirts
Country B (1 hour): 1 shirt OR 1 phone
OC(1 phone) = 1 shirt
- B has lower OC for phones (1 shirt < 2 shirts) ⇒ B has comparative advantage in phones.
- A has comparative advantage in shirts (because B’s OC for shirts is higher).
Trap: Even if A is “more productive” in both goods, trade can still make sense because OC can differ.
Common Confusions (where T/F statements come from)
- “MFN (most favoriate nations) means no exceptions ever” → false.
- “Quota always gives revenue to government like a tariff” → false (depends who gets quota licenses).
- “Trade creation = buying from higher-cost producer inside bloc” → false (that’s diversion).