FIN435 Class Web
Page, Spring '23
Jacksonville
University
Instructor:
Maggie Foley
Exit Exam Questions (will be posted
in week 10 on blackboard)
How to find a
good job? (video; Thanks to Dr. Simak)
Weekly SCHEDULE, LINKS, FILES and Questions
| Week | Coverage, HW, Supplements -      
  Required |  | Reading Materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Week 1 | Marketwatch Stock Trading Game (Pass code: havefun) 1.     URL for your game:  2.     Password for this private game: havefun. 3.     Click on the 'Join Now' button to get
  started. 4.     If you are an existing MarketWatch member, login. If you are a new user,
  follow the link for a Free account - it's easy! 5.     Follow the instructions and start trading! 6.   Game will be over
  on 4/22/2022 How to Use Finviz Stock
  Screener  (youtube, FYI)How To Win The MarketWatch Stock
  Market Game (youtube, FYI)How Short Selling Works (Short
  Selling for Beginners) (youtube, FYI) |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chapter 6 Interest rate Part I:  Who determines interest rates in the US?  Market data website:   Market watch on Wall Street Journal has daily yield curve and
  interest rate information.  
 
 
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAME | COUPON | PRICE | YIELD | 1 MONTH | 1 YEAR | TIME (EST) | 
| GB3:GOV 3 Month | 0.00 | 4.42 | 4.55% | +33 | +451 | 12:31 AM | 
| GB6:GOV 6 Month | 0.00 | 4.59 | 4.76% | +11 | +458 | 12:31 AM | 
| GB12:GOV 12 Month | 0.00 | 4.41 | 4.62% | -2 | +424 | 12:31 AM | 
| GT2:GOV 2 Year | 4.25 | 100.07 | 4.21% | -13 | +332 | 12:31 AM | 
| GT5:GOV 5 Year | 3.88 | 100.93 | 3.66% | -10 | +215 | 12:31 AM | 
| GT10:GOV 10 Year | 4.13 | 104.89 | 3.53% | -5 | +177 | 12:31 AM | 
| GT30:GOV 30 Year | 4.00 | 106.22 | 3.65% | +10 | +157 | 12:31 AM | 
|  | 
Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS)
  (1/10/2023)
| NAME | COUPON | PRICE | YIELD | 1 MONTH | 1 YEAR | TIME (EST) | 
| GTII5:GOV 5 Year | 1.63 | 100.66 | 1.48% | +5 | +280 | 1/9/2023 | 
| GTII10:GOV 10 Year | 0.63 | 93.91 | 1.31% | +1 | +209 | 1/9/2023 | 
| GTII20:GOV 20 Year | 0.75 | 87.82 | 1.48% | +7 | +179 | 1/9/2023 | 
| GTII30:GOV 30 Year | 0.13 | 69.44 | 1.41% | +14 | +160 | 1/9/2023 | 
Federal Reserve Rates (1/10/2023)
| RATE | CURRENT | 1 YEAR PRIOR | 
|  | 4.32 | 0.07 | 
|  | 4.50 | 0.25 | 
|  | 7.50 | 3.25 | 
Municipal Bonds (1/10/2023)
| NAME | YIELD | 1 DAY | 1 MONTH | 1 YEAR | TIME (EST) | 
|  | 2.54% | -4 | +2 | +222 | 1/9/2023 | 
|  | 2.38% | -4 | -11 | +199 | 1/9/2023 | 
|  | 2.35% | -5 | -15 | +159 | 1/9/2023 | 
|  | 2.45% | -4 | -14 | +126 | 1/9/2023 | 
|  | 3.42% | -4 | -9 | +174 | 1/9/2023 | 
https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us
In
  Class Exercise: 
·      
  Please draw the yield curve based on the
  above information; 
·      
  What can be predicted from the current
  yield curve?
·      
  What is TIPs? What is municipal bond? What
  is Fed Fund Rate? 
·      
  Why are the TIPS’ rates negative? 
For
  Daily Treasury rates such as the following, please visit
| Date             1 Mo  2 Mo  3 Mo  4
    Mo  6 Mo  1 Yr   2 Yr   3 Yr   5
    Yr   7 Yr   10 Yr 20 Yr 30 Yr 01/03/2023  4.17   4.42   4.53   4.70   4.77   4.72   4.40   4.18   3.94   3.89   3.79   4.06   3.88 01/04/2023  4.20   4.42   4.55   4.69   4.77   4.71   4.36   4.11   3.85   3.79   3.69   3.97   3.81 01/05/2023  4.30   4.55   4.66   4.75   4.81   4.78   4.45   4.18   3.90   3.82   3.71   3.96   3.78 01/06/2023  4.32   4.55   4.67   4.74   4.79   4.71   4.24   3.96   3.69   3.63   3.55   3.84   3.67 01/09/2023  4.37   4.58   4.70   4.74   4.83   4.69   4.19   3.93   3.66   3.60   3.53   3.83   3.66   | 
For class
  discussion: Why do interest rates change daily? Interest rates are
  determined by whom in the U.S.?
“ interest
  rates are determined by
  the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which consists of seven governors
  of the Federal Reserve Board and five Federal Reserve Bank presidents. The
  FOMC meets eight times a year to determine the near-term direction of
  monetary policy and interest rates.”
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/who-determines-interest-rates/By NICK K.
  LIOUDIS  Updated Aug 15, 2019
Interest rates are the cost
  of borrowing money. They represent what creditors earn for lending you money.
  These rates are constantly changing, and differ based on the lender, as well
  as your creditworthiness. Interest rates not only keep the economy
  functioning, but they also keep people borrowing, spending, and lending. But
  most of us don't really stop to think about how they are implemented or who
  determines them. This article summarizes the three main forces that control
  and determine interest rates. 
KEY TAKEAWAYS
In countries using a
  centralized banking model, short-term interest rates are determined by
  central banks. A government's economic observers create a policy that helps
  ensure stable prices and liquidity. This policy is routinely checked so the supply of money
  within the economy is neither too large, which causes prices to increase, nor
  too small, which can lead to a drop in prices. 
In the U.S., interest rates
  are determined by the Federal Open Market
  Committee (FOMC), which consists
  of seven governors of the Federal Reserve Board and five Federal Reserve Bank
  presidents. The FOMC meets eight times a year to determine the near-term
  direction of monetary policy and interest rates. The actions of central banks
  like the Fed affect short-term and variable interest rates. 
If the monetary policymakers
  wish to decrease the money supply, they will raise the interest rate, making
  it more attractive to deposit funds and reduce borrowing from the central
  bank. Conversely, if the central bank wishes to increase the money supply,
  they will decrease the interest rate, which makes it more attractive to
  borrow and spend money.
The Fed funds rate affects the prime rate—the rate banks charge their
  best customers, many of whom have the highest credit rating possible. It's
  also the rate banks charge each other for overnight loans.
The U.S.
  prime rate remained at 3.25% between Dec. 16, 2008 and Dec. 17, 2015, when it
  was raised to 3.5%.
Many of these rates are independent of the Fed funds rate,
  and, instead, follow 10- or 30-year Treasury note yields. These yields depend on demand after the U.S. Treasury
  Department auctions them off on the market. Lower demand tends to result in high interest rates. But when there
  is a high demand for these notes, it can push rates down lower.
If you have a long-term
  fixed-rate mortgage, car loan, student loan, or any similar non-revolving
  consumer credit product, this is where it falls. Some credit card annual
  percentage rates are also affected by these notes.
These rates are generally
  lower than most revolving credit products but are higher than the prime rate.
 
Many savings account rates are also determined by long-term
  Treasury notes.
Retail banks are also partly responsible for controlling interest
  rates. Loans and mortgages they offer
  may have rates that change based on several factors including their needs,
  the market, and the individual consumer.
For example, someone with a
  lower credit score may be at a higher risk of default, so they pay a higher
  interest rate. The same applies to credit cards. Banks will offer different
  rates to different customers, and will also increase the rate if there is a
  missed payment, bounced payment, or for other services like balance transfers
  and foreign exchange.
 
Monday 1/15/2020
For daily yield curve, please visit https://www.gurufocus.com/yield_curve.php


Understanding the yield curve (video)Introduction to the yield curve (khan academy)
  Summary of Yield Curve Shapes and Explanations
Normal Yield Curve
  When bond investors expect the economy to hum along at normal rates of growth
  without significant changes in inflation rates or available capital, the
  yield curve slopes gently upward. In the absence of economic disruptions,
  investors who risk their money for longer periods expect to get a bigger
  reward — in the form of higher interest — than those who risk their money for
  shorter time periods. Thus, as maturities lengthen, interest rates get
  progressively higher and the curve goes up.

 
Steep Curve –
  Economy is improving
  Typically the yield on 30-year Treasury bonds is three percentage points
  above the yield on three-month Treasury bills. When it gets wider than that —
  and the slope of the yield curve increases sharply — long-term bond holders
  are sending a message that they think the economy will improve quickly in the
  future.
 
 
Inverted Curve –
  Recession is coming
  At first glance an inverted yield curve seems like a paradox. Why would
  long-term investors settle for lower yields while short-term investors take
  so much less risk? The answer is that long-term investors will settle for
  lower yields now if they think rates — and the economy — are going even lower
  in the future. They're betting that this is their last chance to lock in
  rates before the bottom falls out.
 
 
  Flat
  or Humped Curve
To become inverted, the yield curve
  must pass through a period where long-term yields are the same as short-term rates.
  When that happens the shape will appear to be flat or, more commonly, a
  little raised in the middle.
Unfortunately, not all flat or humped curves
  turn into fully inverted curves. Otherwise we'd all get rich plunking our
  savings down on 30-year bonds the second we saw their yields start falling
  toward short-term levels.
On the other hand, you shouldn't discount a
  flat or humped curve just because it doesn't guarantee a coming recession.
  The odds are still pretty good that economic slowdown and lower interest
  rates will follow a period of flattening yields.

Formula --- Break down of interest rate
r         = r* + IP + DRP + LP + MRP
r         = required return on a debt security
r*       = real risk-free rate of interest
IP       = inflation premium
DRP  = default risk premium
LP     = liquidity premium
MRP  = maturity risk premium 
  
  
 
MRPt = 0.1% (t – 1)
DRPt  + LPt =  Corporate spread * (1.02)(t−1)




Assignments: 
·     
  Chapter six case study (due with first mid term exam)  --- video
  is available on blackboard under collaborate/recording, 
as well as here www.jufinance.com/video/fin435_chapter_6_case_video_1.mp4
  (1/18/2023)
www.jufinance.com/video/fin435_chapter_6_case_video_2.mp4
  (1/23/2023)
·       
  Critical thinking question 1: Why are TIPS yields so
  low? Shall you invest in TIPS? Why or why not? (optional for extra credits)
·       
  Critical thinking question 2: Do you think we will
  enter a recession as predicted by the inverted yield curve? (optional for
  extra credits)
What is interest rates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pod73wrvdSQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTpK6Te6tYI
How interest rates are set
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz5hNemSdWc
 
What happens if Fed raise interest rates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OP-3Ui6K1s
JEAN
  FOLGERdated Dec 6, 2019Inflation and interest rates are often linked and frequently
  referenced in macroeconomics. Inflation refers to
  the rate at which prices for goods and services rise. In the United
  States, the interest rate, or the amount charged by a
  lender to a borrower, is based on the federal funds rate that is
  determined by the Federal Reserve (sometimes called "the Fed"). 
By setting the target for the federal funds rate, the Fed has
  at its disposal a powerful tool that it uses to influence the rate of
  inflation. This tool enables the Fed to expand or contract the money supply as
  needed to achieve target employment rates, stable prices, and stable economic growth.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Under a system of fractional reserve banking, interest
  rates and inflation tend to be inversely correlated. This relationship
  forms one of the central tenets of contemporary monetary policy: Central
  banks manipulate short-term interest rates to affect the rate of inflation in
  the economy. 
The below chart demonstrates the inverse correlation between
  interest rates and inflation. In the chart, CPI refers to the Consumer Price Index, a measurement that
  tracks changes in prices. Changes in the CPI are used to identify periods of
  inflation and deflation. 
In general, as interest rates are reduced, more people
  are able to borrow more money. The result is that consumers have more money
  to spend, causing the economy to grow and inflation to increase. 
The opposite holds true for rising interest rates. As interest rates are increased, consumers tend to save as returns from
  savings are higher. With less disposable income being spent as a result of the increase in the
  interest rate, the economy slows and inflation decreases. 
To better understand how the relationship between inflation
  and interest rates works, it's important to understand the banking system,
  the quantity theory of money, and the role
  interest rates play. 
Fractional Reserve Banking
The world currently uses a fractional reserve banking system.
  When someone deposits $100 into the bank, they maintain a claim on that
  $100. The bank, however, can lend out those dollars based on the reserve ratio set by the
  central bank. If the reserve ratio is 10%, the bank can lend out the other
  90%, which is $90 in this case. A 10% fraction of the money stays in the bank
  vaults.
As long as the subsequent $90 loan is outstanding, there are
  two claims totaling $190 in the economy. In other words, the supply of money
  has increased from $100 to $190. This is a simple demonstration of how
  banking grows the money supply.
In economics, the quantity theory of money states that
  the supply and demand for money
  determines inflation. If the money supply grows, prices tend to rise, because
  each individual piece of paper becomes less valuable.
Hyperinflation is an
  economic term used to describe extreme inflation where price increases are
  rapid and uncontrolled. While central banks generally target an annual inflation rate
  of around 2% to 3% as an acceptable rate for a healthy economy,
  hyperinflation goes well beyond this. Countries that experience
  hyperinflation have an inflation rate of 50% or more per month.
The interest rate acts as a price for holding or loaning
  money. Banks pay an interest rate on savings in order to attract depositors.
  Banks also receive an interest rate for money that is loaned from their
  deposits.
When interest rates are low, individuals and businesses tend
  to demand more loans. Each bank loan increases the money supply in a
  fractional reserve banking system. According to the quantity theory of
  money, a growing money supply increases inflation.
  Thus, low interest rates tend to result in more inflation. High interest
  rates tend to lower inflation.
This is a very simplified version of the relationship, but it
  highlights why interest rates and inflation tend to be inversely correlated.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets
  eight times each year to review economic and financial conditions and decide
  on monetary policy. Monetary policy
  refers to the actions taken that affect the availability and cost of money
  and credit. At these meetings, short-term interest rate targets are
  determined.
Using economic indicators such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Producer Price Indexes (PPI), the Fed will establish interest rate
  targets intended to keep the economy in balance. By moving interest rate
  targets up or down, the Fed attempts to achieve target employment rates,
  stable prices, and stable economic growth. The Fed will raise interest rates
  to reduce inflation and decrease rates to spur economic growth.
Investors and traders keep a close eye on the FOMC rate
  decisions. After each of the eight FOMC meetings, an announcement is made
  regarding the Fed's decision to increase, decrease, or maintain key interest
  rates. Certain markets may move in advance of the anticipated interest rate
  changes and in response to the actual announcements. For example, the U.S.
  dollar typically rallies in response to an interest rate increase, while
  the bond market falls in
  reaction to rate hikes.
 
Here’s what the inverted yield curve means for your portfolio
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/31/what-an-inverted-yield-curve-means-for-the-economy.html
PUBLISHED MON, OCT 31 20223:29 PM
  EDT
Kate Dore, CFP® 
KEY POINTS
·      
  When shorter-term government bonds
  have higher yields than long-term, which is known as yield curve inversions,
  it’s one signal of a future recession.
·      
  “The yield curve is not perfect,
  but it does better in general than standard forecasts,” said Robert Barbera,
  director of Johns Hopkins Center for Financial Economics. 
·      
  As investors brace for another
  interest rate hike from the Federal Reserve, many are closely watching
  signals about the future of the economy.
This week, investors are expecting
  the fourth 0.75 percentage point increase, which may continue to affect
  government bond yields.
As the Fed takes further action to
  fight inflation, many are watching the so-called “inverted yield curve,” one
  sign there’s an economic slump on the horizon.
  The
  “yield curve” is a snapshot of the bond market, showing the interest
  investors may expect to earn from bonds with different maturities. These
  expectations may change based on what’s happening in the economy. 
What the inverted yield curve means
Generally, longer-term bonds pay more than bonds with shorter
  maturities. Since longer-maturity bonds are more vulnerable to price changes,
  investors expect a “premium,” explained Preston Caldwell, head of U.S.
  economics for Morningstar Research Services.
“In normal times, the yield curve slopes upwards,” he said. But there’s
  currently a downward sloping curve, also known as an “inverted yield,” with
  the 2-year Treasury  paying more than
  the 10-year Treasury
 We are positioning for a U.S. recession in
  2023, says JPMorgan’s Elyse Ausenbaugh
While many experts believe the
  inverted yield curve is one signal of a future recession, Caldwell said it’s
  more “correlative,” showing how the markets expect the Federal Reserve to
  respond in the near term.  
What’s more, he said there’s “too
  much focus” on the “will there or won’t there be recession” question, and not
  enough attention on the severity of a possible recession, which the yield
  curve doesn’t show, he said.
‘Real economic indicators are going
  to suffer’ 
While a yield curve inversion is only one signal of a possible
  recession, it shouldn’t be ignored, particularly at the lower end of the
  curve, experts say.
“Economists have a very, very
  consistent record of not forecasting recessions,” said Robert Barbera,
  director of the Center for Financial Economics at Johns Hopkins University.
  “The yield curve is not perfect, but it does better in general than standard
  forecasts.” 
 However,
  it “certainly looks like short rates are going up until that inflation rate
  breaks in a big way,” he said. “And unfortunately, if we look at the
  history of that dynamic, it’s likely that real economic indicators are going
  to suffer alongside or ahead of that break for inflation.”
Videos (optional)
(optional)

https://ycharts.com/indicators/10_2_year_treasury_yield_spread
2-year Treasury yield tops 10-year
  rate, a ‘yield curve’ inversion that could signal a recession
PUBLISHED THU, MAR 31 20225:09 PM
  EDTUPDATED THU, MAR 31 20229:13 PM EDT
Patti Domm
 The
  2-year  and 10-year Treasury  yields inverted for the first time since
  2019 on Thursday, sending a possible warning signal that a recession could be
  on the horizon. 
The bond market phenomenon means the rate of the 2-year note is now
  higher than the 10-year note yield.
This part of the yield curve is the most closely watched and typically
  given the most credence by investors that the economy could be heading for a
  downturn when it inverts. The 2-year to 10-year spread was last in negative
  territory in 2019, before pandemic lockdowns sent the global economy into a
  steep recession in early 2020.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury
  fell to 2.331%, while the yield on the 2-year Treasury was at 2.337% at one
  point in late trading Thursday. After a brief inversion, both yields were
  basically trading at the 2.34% level in the latest trading.
When the curve inverts, “there has been a better than two-thirds chance
  of a recession at some point in the next year and a greater than 98% chance
  of a recession at some point in the next two years,” according
  to Bespoke.
Some data providers showed the 2-10
  spread technically inverted for a few seconds earlier Tuesday, but CNBC data
  did not confirm the inversion until now. And to be sure, many economists
  believe the curve needs to stay inverted for a substantial amount of time
  before it gives a valid signal.
In general, a simple way to look at
  the importance of the yield curve is to think about what it means for a bank.
  The yield curve measures the spread between a bank’s cost of money versus
  what it will make by lending it out or investing it over a longer period of time.
  If banks can’t make money, lending slows and so does economic activity.
While the yield curve has sent
  somewhat reliable signals about pending recessions, there is often a long
  time lag and analysts say there needs to be corroborating evidence before investors
  need to fear a recession is around the corner.
Some of those other signals could include a slowdown in hiring and a
  sudden increase in unemployment, or early warnings in ISM and other data that
  manufacturing activity could be slowing. Analysts say
  the yield curve’s inversion could also reverse should there be a resolution
  to the war in Ukraine or the Federal Reserve pauses in its rate-hiking cycle.
According to MUFG Securities, the yield curve inverted 422 days ahead of
  the 2001 recession, 571 days ahead of the 2007-to-2009 recession and 163 days
  before the 2020 recession.
“Most of time, it is a recession
  harbinger but not all the time,” said Julian Emanuel, head of equity,
  derivatives and quantitative strategy at Evercore ISI. He noted one time when
  the curve inverted but the economy avoided a recession was in 1998 during the
  Russian debt crisis which was followed by the Long Term Capital Management
  failure.
“The nice thing about the last 30-year
  history is that there’s been so few recessions that you don’t want to say
  something is a golden rule, particularly when there are not enough
  observations and there’s one big standout to that rule,” he said.
Bespoke notes that after six
  instances where the 2-year and 10-year yields inverted going back to 1978,
  the stock market continued to perform positively. The S&P 500  was up an average 1.6% a month after the
  inversions but was up an average 13.3% a year later.
“Basically what tends to happen is
  over the long haul is that yes in most cases there is a recession, but many
  times it is six- to 18-months in the distance and the stock market does not
  tend to peak until between two and 12-months prior to the onset of a
  recession,” said Emanuel. “Again, while the probability of a recession in
  Europe has become a base case, that’s not the case for the U.S.”
Some bond pros do not believe the
  yield curve inversion is as reliable a recession predictor as it once was
  because the Federal Reserve has become such a big player in the market. The
  Fed’s nearly $9 trillion balance sheet holds many Treasurys, and strategists
  believe it has suppressed interest rates at the long end, meaning the yields
  of the 10-year note and the 30-year bond should be higher.
In fact, Richard Bernstein
  Associates notes that if the Fed had never engaged in quantitative easing,
  the 10-year yield could be closer to 3.7%. Were it not for the central bank’s
  bond-buying program, the yield curve for the 2-year and the 10-year would
  then be more like 100 basis points apart, instead of inverted. (1 basis point
  equals 0.01%.)
Strategists say the 2-year yield
  has climbed most rapidly since it is the part of the curve most reflective of
  Fed rate hikes. The 10-year has also moved higher on the Fed, but it has also
  been held back by flight-to-quality trades as investors keep an eye on the
  Ukraine war. Yields move opposite price.
Some market pros believe the 3-month yield to the 10-year yield is a
  more accurate recession forecaster, and that curve has not flattened at all. That spread
  has been widening, a signal for better economic growth.
Chapter 6 Interest rate Part II: Term Structure of Interest rate

Question for discussion: If
  a% and b% are both known to investors, such as the bank rates, how much is
  the future interest rate, such as c%?
(1+a)^N
  = (1+b)^m *(1+c)^(N-M)
Either
  earning a% of interest rate for N years, 
or
  b% of interest rate for M years, and then c% of interest rate for (N-M)
  years, 
investors
  should be indifferent. Right? 
Then,
  
 (1+a)^N = (1+b)^m *(1+c)^(N-M)č c = ((1+a)^N / (1+b)^m)^(1/(N-M))-1
Or
  approximately, 
N*a
  = M*b +(N-M)*(c)č c = (N*a – M*b) /(N-M)
(video)Expectations theory attempts to predict what
  short-term interest rates will be in the future based on current
  long-term interest rates. The theory suggests that an investor earns the same
  amount of interest by investing in two consecutive one-year bond
  investments versus investing in one two-year bond today. The theory is also
  known as the "unbiased expectations theory.” 
The expectations theory aims to help investors make
  decisions based upon a forecast of future interest rates. The theory uses
  long-term rates, typically from government bonds, to forecast the rate for
  short-term bonds. In theory, long-term rates can be used to indicate where
  rates of short-term bonds will trade in the future (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/expectationstheory.asp)
By CHRIS B. MURPHY Updated Apr 21, 2019
Let's say that the
  present bond market provides investors with a two-year bond that
  pays an interest rate of 20% while a one-year bond pays an interest rate of 18%.
  The expectations theory can be used to forecast the interest rate of a future
  one-year bond.
In this example, the investor is earning an equivalent return
  to the present interest rate of a two-year bond. If the investor chooses to
  invest in a one-year bond at 18% the bond yield for the following year’s bond would need to increase to 22% for this investment
  to be advantageous.
 
Expectations theory aims to help investors make decisions by
  using long-term rates, typically from government bonds, to forecast the rate
  for short-term bonds.
Investors should be aware
  that the expectations theory is not always a reliable tool. A common problem with using the
  expectations theory is that it sometimes overestimates future short-term
  rates, making it easy for investors to end up with an inaccurate
  prediction of a bond’s yield curve.
Another limitation of the
  theory is that many factors impact short-term and long-term bond yields. The
  Federal Reserve adjusts interest rates up or down, which impacts bond yields
  including short-term bonds. However, long-term yields might not be as
  impacted because many other factors impact long-term yields including
  inflation and economic growth expectations. As a result, the expectations theory doesn't take into account the outside
  forces and fundamental macroeconomic factors that drive interest rates and
  ultimately bond yields.
Chapter 6 In class exercise  
1 You read
  in The Wall Street Journal that 30-day T-bills are currently
  yielding 5.5%. Your brother-in-law, a broker at Safe and Sound Securities,
  has given you the following estimates of current interest rate premiums:
On the basis of these data, what is the real risk-free rate of
  return?  (answer: 2.25%)
Solution:
General equation: Rate = r* + Inflation + Default + liquidity +
  maturity
30-day T-bills = short term Treasury Security č Default = liquidity = maturity = 0
So 30-day T-bills = 5.5% = r* + inflation =r* + 3.25%
 2 The real risk-free rate
  is 3%. Inflation is expected to be 2% this year and 4% during the next 2
  years. Assume that the maturity risk premium is zero. What is the yield on
  2-year Treasury securities? What is the yield on 3-year Treasury securities?(answer:
  6%, 6.33%)
Solution:
General equation: Rate = r* + Inflation + Default + liquidity +
  maturity
2-year T-notes = intermediate term Treasury Security č Default = liquidity = 0, maturity=0 as given
Inflation = average of inflations from year 1 to year 2 = (2% +
  4%)/2 = 3%
So 2-year T-notes =   r* +
  inflation  = 3% + 3% = 6%
3-year T-notes = short term Treasury Security č Default = liquidity = 0, maturity=0 as given
Inflation = average of inflations from year 1 to year 2 = (2% +
  4% +4%)/3 = 3.33%
So 2-year T-notes =   r* +
  inflation  = 3% + 3.33% = 6.33%
 3 A Treasury bond that matures in 10 years has a yield of 6%. A
  10-year corporate bond has a yield of 8%. Assume that the liquidity premium
  on the corporate bond is 0.5%. What is the default risk premium on the
  corporate bond?  (answer: 1.5%)
Solution:
General equation: Rate = r* + Inflation + Default + liquidity +
  maturity
10 year T-notes = intermediate term Treasury Security č Default = liquidity = 0, maturity is not zero
So 10-year T-notes =   r*
  + inflation + maturity = 6%
10 year corporate bond 
  rate = r* + Inflation + Default + liquidity + maturity = 8%
Its liquidity = 0.5%, its maturity = 10-year-notes’ maturity. 
Comparing 10 year T-notes and 10 year corporate bonds, we get
  default = 8%-6%-0.5%=1.5%
| r* | inflation | default | liquity | maturity | |
| 10 - year-
    T-notes = 6% | same | same | 0 | 0 | same | 
| 10 year corp
    bonds = 8% | same | same | ? | 1.50% | same | 
4 The real
  risk-free rate is 3%, and inflation is expected  to be 3% for the
  next 2 years. A 2-year Treasury security yields 6.2%. What is the maturity
  risk premium for the 2-year security? (answer: 0.2%)
General equation: Rate = r* + Inflation + Default + liquidity +
  maturity
2-year T-notes = intermediate term Treasury Security č Default = liquidity = 0, maturity=?
2-year T-notes = 6.2% = r* + inflation + maturity = 3% + 3% +
  maturity
5 One-year
  Treasury securities yield 5%. The market anticipates that 1 year from now,
  1-year Treasury securities will yield 6%. If the pure expectations theory is
  correct, what is the yield today for 2-year Treasury securities? (answer: 5.5%)

Or,

Real Interest rate in the US from 2000-2022

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT1YE
Three Month
  T-Bill rate (a proxy of the risk free rate)

https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/US3M
 
Chapter 7
 Market data website:
1.   FINRA
      http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/Default.jsp (FINRA bond market data)
2.      WSJ
Market watch on Wall
  Street Journal has daily yield curve and bond yield information. 
http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/pftools/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yph8TRldW6k
 
 
Simplified Balance Sheet of WalMart
 
Balance Sheet
  of WalMart    https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/wmt/financials
 
| Period Ending: | 1/31/2022 | 1/31/2021 | 1/31/2020 | 1/31/2019 | 
| Current Assets | ||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $14,760,000 | $17,741,000 | $9,465,000 | $7,722,000 | 
| Short-Term Investments | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Net Receivables | $8,280,000 | $6,516,000 | $6,284,000 | $6,283,000 | 
| Inventory | $56,511,000 | $44,949,000 | $44,435,000 | $44,269,000 | 
| Other Current Assets | $1,519,000 | $20,861,000 | $1,622,000 | $3,623,000 | 
| Total Current Assets | $81,070,000 | $90,067,000 | $61,806,000 | $61,897,000 | 
| Long-Term Assets | ||||
| Long-Term Investments | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Fixed Assets | $112,624,000 | $109,848,000 | $127,049,000 | $111,395,000 | 
| Goodwill | $29,014,000 | $28,983,000 | $31,073,000 | $31,181,000 | 
| Intangible Assets | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Other Assets | $22,152,000 | $23,598,000 | $16,567,000 | $14,822,000 | 
| Deferred Asset Charges | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Total Assets | $244,860,000 | $252,496,000 | $236,495,000 | $219,295,000 | 
| Current Liabilities | ||||
| Accounts Payable | $82,172,000 | $87,349,000 | $69,549,000 | $69,647,000 | 
| Short-Term Debt / Current Portion of Long-Term Debt | $3,724,000 | $3,830,000 | $6,448,000 | $7,830,000 | 
| Other Current Liabilities | $1,483,000 | $1,466,000 | $1,793,000 | -- | 
| Total Current Liabilities | $87,379,000 | $92,645,000 | $77,790,000 | $77,477,000 | 
| Long-Term Debt | $39,107,000 | $45,041,000 | $48,021,000 | $50,203,000 | 
| Other Liabilities | $13,009,000 | $12,909,000 | $16,171,000 | -- | 
| Deferred Liability Charges | $13,474,000 | $14,370,000 | $12,961,000 | $11,981,000 | 
| Misc. Stocks | $8,638,000 | $6,606,000 | $6,883,000 | $7,138,000 | 
| Minority Interest | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Total Liabilities | $161,607,000 | $171,571,000 | $161,826,000 | $146,799,000 | 
| Stock Holders Equity | ||||
| Common Stocks | $276,000 | $282,000 | $284,000 | $288,000 | 
| Capital Surplus | $86,904,000 | $88,763,000 | $83,943,000 | $80,785,000 | 
| Retained Earnings | -- | -- | -- | -- | 
| Treasury Stock | $4,839,000 | $3,646,000 | $3,247,000 | $2,965,000 | 
| Other Equity | -$8,766,000 | -$11,766,000 | -$12,805,000 | -$11,542,000 | 
| Total Equity | $83,253,000 | $80,925,000 | $74,669,000 | $72,496,000 | 
| Total Liabilities & Equity | $244,860,000 | $252,496,000 | $236,495,000 | $219,295,000 | 
For discussion:
·         What is this “long term debt”?
·         Who is the lender of this “long term debt”?
So this long term debt is called bond in the financial
  market. Where can you find the pricing information and other specifications
  of the bond issued by WMT?
 
 
 
 
 
Investing Basics: Bonds(video)
FINRA – Bond market information
 http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/Default.jsp
 
Go to http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/Default.jsp  , the bond market data
  website of FINRA to find bond information. For example, find bond sponsored
  by Wal-mart
Or, just go to www.finra.org, č Investor
  center č market data č bond č corporate
  bond
 
https://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/Results.jsp 
2.     Understand what is coupon, coupon rate, yield, yield to
  maturity, market price, par value, maturity, annual bond, semi-annual bond,
  current yield.
 
Refer to the following bond at http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/BondDetail.jsp?ticker=C104227&symbol=WMT.GP
 
 

 

 
Reading
  material: 
Interest rate risk — When Interest rates Go up, Prices of Fixed-rate Bonds Fall, issued by SEC at https://www.sec.gov/files/ib_interestraterisk.pdf
  
Question:
  What shall investors do as interest
  rates are expected to rise in March 2022? 
All Bonds are Subject to
  Interest Rate Risk—Even If the Bonds Are Insured or
  Government Guaranteed 
There
  is a misconception that, if a bond is insured or is a u.s. government
  obligation, the bond will not lose value. In fact, the U.S. government does not guarantee the market price or value of
  the bond if you sell the bond before it matures. This is because the
  market price or value of the bond can change over time based on several
  factors, including market interest rates. https://www.sec.gov/files/ib_interestraterisk.pdf
Relationship between bond prices
  and interest rates (Khan academy)
Here’s how rising interest rates may affect your bond
  portfolio in retirement
PUBLISHED WED, JAN 19
  20228:00 AM EST, Kate Dore, CFP®
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/19/heres-how-rising-interest-rates-may-affect-your-bond-portfolio-.html
KEY POINTS
·      
  Generally, market interest
  rates and bond prices move in opposite directions, meaning as rates increase,
  bond values will typically fall.
·      
  Retirees may reduce interest rate
  risk by choosing bonds with a shorter duration, which are less sensitive to
  rate hikes.
·      
  However, rising interest rates
  may still be good for retirees with a longer timeline, experts say.
Many retirees rely on bonds for income, lower risk and portfolio
  growth. However, as the Federal Reserve prepares to raise interest rates,
  some worry about the effects on their nest egg.
The cost of living has swelled for months, with the Consumer
  Price Index, the key measure of inflation, rising 7% year over year in
  December, the fastest since 1982, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.
Last week, Federal
  Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said he expects a series of rate hikes this
  year, with reduced pandemic support from the central bank, to quell rising
  inflation.
This may alarm investors since
  market interest rates and bond prices typically move in opposite directions,
  meaning higher rates generally cause bond values to fall, known as interest
  rate risk.  
For example, let’s say you have a 10-year $1,000 bond paying a
  3% coupon. If market interest rates rise to 4% in one year, the asset will
  still pay 3%, but the bond’s value may drop to $925.
The reason for
  the price dip is new bonds may be issued with the higher 4% coupon, making
  the original 3% bond less attractive unless someone can buy it at a
  discount.  
With higher yields elsewhere, investors tend to sell their
  current bonds to purchase the higher-paying ones, and heavy selling causes
  prices to slide, explained certified financial planner Brad Lineberger,
  president of Carlsbad, California-based Seaside Wealth Management.
Why bond
  duration matters
Another
  fundamental concept of bond investing is so-called duration, measuring a
  bond’s sensitivity to interest rate changes. Although it’s expressed in
  years, it’s different from the bond’s maturity since it factors in the
  coupon, time to maturity and yield paid through the term.
As a rule of thumb, the longer a bond’s duration, the more
  sensitive it will be to interest rate hikes, and the more its price will
  decline, Lineberger said.
Generally, if you’re
  trying to reduce interest rate risk, you’ll want to consider bonds or bond
  funds with a shorter duration, said Paul Winter, a CFP and owner of Five Seasons Financial
  Planning in Salt Lake City. 
“Also, bonds with higher coupon rates and lower credit quality
  tend to be less sensitive to higher interest rates, other factors being
  equal,” he said.
A longer timeline
While rising interest
  rates will cause bond values to decrease, eventually, the declines will be
  more than offset as bonds mature and can be reinvested for higher yields, said CFP Anthony Watson, founder and president of Thrive
  Retirement Specialists in Dearborn, Michigan.
“Rising interest
  rates are good for retirees with a longer-term time frame,” he said, and that’s most people in their retirement years.
The best way to
  manage interest rate risk is with a diversified portfolio, including
  international bonds, with short to immediate maturities that are less
  affected by rate hikes and can be reinvested sooner, Watson said.
For class discussion:
What is duration? How to calculate a bond’s duration? a
  portfolio’s duration?
Bond Portfolio Duration (FYI) 
There are two ways to calculate the duration of a bond
  portfolio:
1)    
  The weighted average of the
  time to receipt of aggregate cash flows. This method is based on the cash
  flow yield, which is the internal rate of return on the aggregate cash flows.
Limitations: This method cannot be used for bonds with embedded
  options or for floating-rate notes due to uncertain future cash flows. The
  cash flow yield is not commonly calculated. The change in cash flow yield is
  not necessarily the same as the change in the yields-to-maturity on the
  individual bonds. Interest rate risk is not usually expressed as a change in
  the cash flow yield.
2)    
  The weighted average of the
  durations of individual bonds that compose the portfolio. The weight is the
  proportion of the portfolio that a bond comprises.
3)    
  
Portfolio Duration = w1D1 + w2D2
  + w3D3 + ... + wkDk
wi = the market value of bond i / market value of the
  portfolio
Di = the duration of bond i
k = the number of bonds in the portfolio
This method is simpler to use and quite accurate when the yield
  curve is flat. Its main limitation is that it assumes a parallel shift in the
  yield curve.
In class exercises 
Bond Pricing Excel Formula
 
To calculate bond price  in EXCEL (annual
  coupon bond):
Price=abs(pv(yield to maturity, years left to maturity,
  coupon rate*1000, 1000)
 
To calculate yield to maturity (annual coupon bond)::
Yield to maturity = rate(years left to maturity, coupon
  rate *1000, -price, 1000)
 
To calculate bond price (semi-annual coupon bond):
Price=abs(pv(yield to maturity/2, years left to
  maturity*2, coupon rate*1000/2, 1000)
 
To calculate yield to maturity (semi-annual coupon
  bond):
Yield to maturity = rate(years left to maturity*2,
  coupon rate *1000/2, -price, 1000)*2
 
1.    
  AAA firm’ bonds will mature in eight years, and coupon is $65.
  YTM is 8.2%. Bond’s market value? ($903.04,  abs(pv(8.2%, 8, 65, 1000))
·      
  Rate   8.2%
·      
  Nper    8
·      
  Pmt      65
·      
  Pv       ?  
·      
  FV       1000
2.                  AAA firm’s bonds’ market value is $1,120, with
  15 years maturity and coupon of $85. What is YTM?  (7.17%, 
  rate(15, 85, -1120, 1000))
·      
  Rate   ?
·      
  Nper    15
·      
  Pmt      85
·      
  Pv       -1120
·      
  FV       1000
3.         Sadik
  Inc.'s bonds currently sell for $1,180 and have a par value of
  $1,000.  They pay a $105 annual coupon
  and have a 15-year maturity, but they can be called in 5 years at
  $1,100.  What is their yield
  to call (YTC)? (7.74%, rate(5, 105, -1180, 1100)) What is their yield to maturity (YTM)? (8.35%, rate(15,
  105, -1180, 1000))
·      
  Rate   ?
·      
  Nper    15
·      
  Pmt      105
·      
  Pv       -1180
·      
  FV       1000
4.         Malko
  Enterprises’ bonds currently sell for $1,050.  They have a 6-year
  maturity, an annual coupon of $75, and a par value of $1,000.  What
  is their current yield? (7.14%,
   75/1050)
5.         Assume
  that you are considering the purchase of a 20-year, noncallable bond with an
  annual coupon rate of 9.5%.  The bond has a face value of $1,000,
  and it makes semiannual interest payments.  If you require an 8.4%
  nominal yield to maturity on this investment, what is the maximum price you
  should be willing to pay for the bond? ($1,105.69,  abs(pv(8.4%/2, 20*2, 9.5%*1000/2, 1000)) )
·      
  Rate   8.4%/2
·      
  Nper    20*2
·      
  Pmt      95/2
·      
  Pv       ?
·      
  FV       1000
 6.        Grossnickle
  Corporation issued 20-year, non-callable, 7.5% annual coupon bonds at their
  par value of $1,000 one year ago.  Today, the market interest rate
  on these bonds is 5.5%.  What is the current price of the bonds,
  given that they now have 19 years to maturity? ($1,232.15,  abs(pv(5.5%, 19, 75, 1000)))
·      
  Rate   7.5%/2
·      
  Nper    19
·      
  Pmt      75
·      
  Pv       ?
·      
  FV       1000
 7.        McCue
  Inc.'s bonds currently sell for $1,250. They pay a $90 annual coupon, have a
  25-year maturity, and a $1,000 par value, but they can be called in 5 years
  at $1,050.  Assume that no costs other than the call premium would
  be incurred to call and refund the bonds, and also assume that the yield curve is horizontal, with rates
  expected to remain at current levels on into the future.  What is
  the difference between this bond's YTM and its YTC?  (Subtract the
  YTC from the YTM; it is possible to get a negative answer.) (2.62%, YTM = rate(25, 90, -1250, 1000), YTC =
  rate(5, 90, -1250, 1050))
·      
  Rate   ?           ------------                ?        
·      
  Nper    25        -------------               5
·      
  Pmt      90       ------------                90
·      
  Pv       -1250   ------------                -1250
·      
  FV       1000    ------------              1000
8.         Taussig
  Corp.'s bonds currently sell for $1,150.  They have a 6.35% annual
  coupon rate and a 20-year maturity, but they can be called in 5 years at
  $1,067.50.  Assume that no costs other than the call premium would
  be incurred to call and refund the bonds, and also assume that the yield
  curve is horizontal, with rates expected to remain at current levels on into
  the future.  Under these conditions, what rate of return should an
  investor expect to earn if he or she purchases these bonds? (4.2%, rate(5, 63.5, -1150, 1067.5))
9.         A
  25-year, $1,000 par value bond has an 8.5% annual payment
  coupon.  The bond currently sells for $925.  If the yield
  to maturity remains at its current rate, what will the price be 5 years from
  now? ($930.11, rate(25, 85, -925, 1000),
  abs(pv( rate(25, 85, -925, 1000), 20, 85, 1000))
Assignment:
  
Chapter 7 Case Study – Due with the first mid term
  exam
·     Case video part I – did in
  class on 1/30/2023
·     Case video part II – did in
  class on 2/1/2023
Critical
  thinking question= (optional for extra credits)
·       
  How to trade bonds when market interest rates rise?
  (optional for extra credits)
· Critical thinking question: Calculate the duration and the convexity of the following bond:
Assume that you are considering the purchase of a 20-year,
  noncallable bond with an annual coupon rate of 9.5%.  The bond has
  a face value of $1,000, and it makes semiannual interest
  payments.  If you require an 8.4% nominal yield to maturity on this
  investment, what are the duration and the convexity of this bond?  
·      
  ---- FYI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjlq08iDlIw  
 
Bond Pricing Formula (FYI)
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Bond Pricing Excel Formula
 
To calculate bond price  in EXCEL (annual
  coupon bond):
Price=abs(pv(yield to maturity, years left to maturity,
  coupon rate*1000, 1000)
 
To calculate yield to maturity (annual coupon bond)::
Yield to maturity = rate(years left to maturity, coupon
  rate *1000, -price, 1000)
 
To calculate bond price (semi-annual coupon bond):
Price=abs(pv(yield to maturity/2, years left to
  maturity*2, coupon rate*1000/2, 1000)
 
To calculate yield to maturity (semi-annual coupon
  bond):
Yield to maturity = rate(years left to maturity*2,
  coupon rate *1000/2, -price, 1000)*2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Duration Calculator
  (FYI)
 https://exploringfinance.com/bond-duration-calculator/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Duration (FYI)
By ADAM HAYES Updated August 18, 2021, Reviewed by GORDON
  SCOTT, 
Fact checked by KIRSTEN ROHRS SCHMITT
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/duration.asp
 
What Is Duration?
Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of the price of a
  bond or other debt instrument to a change in interest rates. A bond's
  duration is easily confused with its term or time to maturity because certain
  types of duration measurements are also calculated in years.
However, a bond's term is a linear measure of the years until
  repayment of principal is due; it does not change with the interest rate
  environment. Duration, on the other hand, is non-linear and accelerates as
  the time to maturity lessens.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·      
  Duration measures a bond's
  or fixed income portfolio's price sensitivity to interest rate changes.
·      
  Macaulay duration estimates
  how many years it will take for an investor to be repaid the bond’s price by its total cash flows.
·      
  Modified duration measures
  the price change in a bond given a 1% change in interest rates.
·      
  A fixed income portfolio's
  duration is computed as the weighted average of individual bond durations
  held in the portfolio.
How Duration Works
Duration can measure how
  long it takes, in years, for an investor to be repaid the bond’s price by the bond’s total cash
  flows. Duration can also measure the sensitivity of a bond's or fixed income
  portfolio's price to changes in interest rates.
In general, the higher the duration,
  the more a bond's price will drop as interest rates rise (and the greater the
  interest rate risk). For example, if rates were to rise 1%, a bond or bond
  fund with a five-year average duration would likely lose approximately 5% of
  its value.
Certain factors can
  affect a bond’s duration, including:
Time to maturity: The longer
  the maturity, the higher the duration, and the greater the interest rate risk. Consider two bonds that each yield 5% and cost $1,000, but
  have different maturities. A bond that matures faster—say,
  in one year—would repay its true cost faster than a
  bond that matures in 10 years. Consequently, the shorter-maturity bond would
  have a lower duration and less risk.
Coupon rate: A bond’s coupon rate is a key factor
  in calculation duration. If we have two bonds that are identical with the
  exception of their coupon rates, the bond with the higher coupon rate will
  pay back its original costs faster than the bond with a lower yield. The higher the coupon rate, the lower the
  duration, and the lower the interest rate risk.
Types of Duration
The duration of a bond in practice can refer to two different
  things. The Macaulay duration is the
  weighted average time until all the bond's cash flows are paid. By accounting
  for the present value of future bond payments, the Macaulay duration helps an investor evaluate and compare bonds
  independent of their term or time to maturity.
The second type of duration is called modified duration.
  Unlike Macaulay's duration, modified
  duration is not measured in years. Modified duration measures the expected
  change in a bond's price to a 1% change in interest rates.
In order to understand modified duration, keep in mind that
  bond prices are said to have an inverse relationship with interest rates.
  Therefore, rising interest rates
  indicate that bond prices are likely to fall, while declining interest rates
  indicate that bond prices are likely to rise.
Macaulay Duration
Macaulay duration finds the present value of a bond's future
  coupon payments and maturity value. Because Macaulay duration is a partial
  function of the time to maturity, the
  greater the duration, the greater the interest-rate risk or reward for bond
  prices.
Macaulay duration can be calculated manually as follows:

  https://exploringfinance.com/bond-duration-calculator/
Modified Duration
The modified duration of a
  bond helps investors understand how much a bond's price will rise or fall if
  the YTM rises or falls by 1%. This is an important number if an investor is worried that
  interest rates will be changing in the short term. The modified duration of a
  bond with semi-annual coupon payments can be found with the following
  formula:
 
 
Usefulness of Duration
Investors need to be aware of two main risks that can affect a
  bond's investment value: credit risk (default) and interest rate risk
  (interest rate fluctuations). Duration
  is used to quantify the potential impact these factors will have on a bond's
  price because both factors will affect a bond's expected YTM.
For example, if a company begins to struggle and its credit
  quality declines, investors will require a greater reward or YTM to own the
  bonds. In order to raise the YTM of an existing bond, its price must fall.
  The same factors apply if interest rates are rising and competitive bonds are
  issued with a higher YTM.
The duration of a
  zero-coupon bond equals its time to maturity since it pays no coupon.
Duration Strategies
However, a
  long-duration strategy describes an investing approach where a bond investor
  focuses on bonds with a high duration value. In this situation, an
  investor is likely buying bonds with a long time before maturity and greater
  exposure to interest rate risks. A
  long-duration strategy works well when interest rates are falling, which
  usually happens during recessions.
A short-duration strategy is
  one where a fixed-income or bond investor is focused on buying bonds with a
  small duration. This usually means the investor is focused on bonds with a small
  amount of time to maturity. A strategy like this would be employed when investors think
  interest rates will rise or when they are very uncertain about interest rates
  and want to reduce their risk.
Why Is It Called Duration?
Duration measures a bond price's sensitivity to changes in
  interest rates—so why is it called duration? A bond with a longer time to maturity
  will have a price that is more sensitive to interest rates, and thus a larger
  duration than a short-term bond.
What Else Does Duration Tell You?
As a bond's duration rises, its interest rate risk also rises
  because the impact of a change in the interest rate environment is larger
  than it would be for a bond with a smaller duration. Fixed-income traders will use duration, along with convexity, to
  manage the riskiness of their portfolio and to make adjustments to it.
Bond Duration Calculator
  (FYI)
 https://exploringfinance.com/bond-duration-calculator/
DURATION
  function in Excel
The DURATION function, one of the Financial functions,
  returns the Macauley duration for an assumed par value of $100. Duration is defined
  as the weighted average of the present value of cash flows, and is used as a
  measure of a bond price's response to changes in yield.
Syntax
DURATION(settlement, maturity, coupon, yld, frequency,
  [basis])
Important: Dates should be entered by using the DATE
  function, or as results of other formulas or functions. For example, use
  DATE(2018,5,23) for the 23rd day of May, 2018. Problems can occur if dates
  are entered as text.
The DURATION function syntax has the following arguments:
Settlement: The security's settlement date. The security
  settlement date is the date after the issue date when the security is traded
  to the buyer.
Maturity: The security's maturity date. The maturity date
  is the date when the security expires.
Coupon: The security's annual coupon rate.
Yld    Required.
  The security's annual yield.
Frequency: The number of coupon payments per year. For
  annual payments, frequency = 1; for semiannual, frequency = 2; for quarterly,
  frequency = 4.
Basis Optional. The type of day count basis to use.
  https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/duration-function-b254ea57-eadc-4602-a86a-c8e369334038
0:02 / 1:54
Convexity in Bonds: Definition, Meaning,
  and Examples (FYI only)
By JAMES CHEN Updated January 02, 2023 Reviewed by CIERRA
  MURRY Fact checked by PETE RATHBURN



Change in price
  = [–Modified Duration *Change in yield] +[1/2 * Convexity*(change
  in yield)2]
https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/convexity-of-a-bond-formula-duration/\
What Is Convexity?
Convexity is a measure of the curvature, or the degree of the
  curve, in the relationship between bond prices and bond yields.
Convexity is thus a measure
  of the curvature in the relationship between bond prices and interest rates. It
  reflects the rate at which the duration of a bond changes as interest rates
  change. Duration is a measure of a bond's sensitivity to changes in interest
  rates. It represents the expected percentage change in the price of a bond
  for a 1% change in interest rates.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·      
  Convexity is a
  risk-management tool, used to measure and manage a portfolio's exposure to
  market risk.
·      
  Convexity is a measure
  of the curvature in the relationship between bond prices and bond yields.
·      
  Convexity demonstrates
  how the duration of a bond changes as the interest rate changes.
·      
  If a bond's duration
  increases as yields increase, the bond is said to have negative convexity.
·      
  If a bond's duration
  rises and yields fall, the bond is said to have positive convexity.
 
Before explaining convexity, it's important to know how bond
  prices and market interest rates relate to one another. As interest rates
  fall, bond prices rise. Conversely, rising market interest rates lead to
  falling bond prices. This opposite reaction is because as rates rise, the
  bond may fall behind in the payout they offer a potential investor in
  comparison to other securities.
 
Bond Duration
Bond duration measures the change in a bond's price when
  interest rates fluctuate. If the duration of a bond is high, it means the
  bond's price will move to a greater degree in the opposite direction of
  interest rates.  
 
Duration, on the other hand, measures the bond's sensitivity
  to the change in interest rates. For example, if rates were to rise 1%, a
  bond or bond fund with a 5-year average duration would likely lose
  approximately 5% of its value.
Convexity and Risk
Convexity builds on the
  concept of duration by measuring the sensitivity of the duration of a bond as
  yields change. Convexity is a better measure of interest rate risk, concerning bond
  duration. Where duration assumes that interest rates and bond prices have a
  linear relationship, convexity allows for other factors and produces a slope.
Duration can be a good measure of how bond prices may be
  affected due to small and sudden fluctuations in interest rates. However, the
  relationship between bond prices and yields is typically more sloped, or convex.
  Therefore, convexity is a better measure for assessing the impact on bond
  prices when there are large fluctuations in interest rates.
As convexity increases, the
  systemic risk to which the portfolio is exposed increases. The term systemic risk became common
  during the financial crisis of 2008 as the failure of one financial
  institution threatened others. However, this risk can apply to all
  businesses, industries, and the economy as a whole.
The risk to a fixed-income portfolio means that as interest
  rates rise, the existing fixed-rate instruments are not as attractive. As
  convexity decreases, the exposure to market interest rates decreases and the
  bond portfolio can be considered hedged. Typically,
  the higher the coupon rate or yield, the lower the convexity—or market risk—of a bond. This lessening of risk is
  because market rates would have to increase greatly to surpass the coupon on
  the bond, meaning there is less interest rate risk to the investor. However, other risks, like default risk,
  etc., might still exist.
Example of Convexity
Imagine a bond issuer, XYZ Corporation, with two bonds
  currently on the market: Bond A and Bond B. Both bonds have a face value of
  $100,000 and a coupon rate of 5%. Bond A, however, matures in 5 years, while Bond
  B matures in 10 years.
Using the concept of duration, we can calculate that Bond A
  has a duration of 4 years while Bond B has a duration of 5.5 years. This
  means that for every 1% change in interest rates, Bond A's price will change
  by 4% while Bond B's price will change by 5.5%.
Now, let's say that interest rates suddenly increase by 2%.
  This means that the price of Bond A should decrease by 8% while the price of
  Bond B will decrease by 11%. However, using the concept of convexity, we can
  predict that the price change for Bond B will actually be less than expected
  based on its duration alone. This is because Bond B has a longer maturity,
  which means it has a higher convexity. The higher convexity of Bond B acts as
  a buffer against changes in interest rates, resulting in a relatively smaller
  price change than expected based on its duration alone.
Negative and Positive Convexity
If a bond's duration
  increases as yields increase, the bond is said to have negative convexity. In
  other words, the bond price will decline by a greater rate with a rise in
  yields than if yields had fallen. Therefore, if a bond has negative
  convexity, its duration would increase—the
  price would fall. As interest rates rise, and the opposite is true.
If a bond's duration rises and
  yields fall, the bond is said to have positive convexity. In other words, as
  yields fall, bond prices rise by a greater rate—or duration—than
  if yields rose. Positive convexity leads to greater increases in bond prices.
  If a bond has positive convexity, it would typically experience larger price
  increases as yields fall, compared to price decreases when yields increase.
Under normal market conditions, the higher the coupon rate or yield, the lower a bond's degree of
  convexity. In other words, there's
  less risk to the investor when the bond has a high coupon or yield since
  market rates would have to increase significantly to surpass the bond's
  yield. So, a portfolio of bonds with high yields would have low convexity and
  subsequently, less risk of their existing yields becoming less attractive as
  interest rates rise.
Consequently, zero-coupon bonds have the highest degree of
  convexity because they do not offer any coupon payments. For investors
  looking to measure the convexity of a bond portfolio, it's best to speak to a
  financial advisor due to the complex nature and the number of variables
  involved in the calculation.
 
The Bottom Line
Convexity is a measure of
  the curvature of its duration, or the relationship between bond prices and
  yields. It is used to describe the way in which the duration of a bond
  changes in response to changes in interest rates. When
  a bond's price is more sensitive to changes in interest rates, it is said to
  have higher convexity. Convexity is important for bond investors because
  it can impact the value of their investments. For example, when interest rates rise, the prices of
  most bonds tend to fall, and the magnitude of the price decline is typically
  greater for bonds with higher convexity. Conversely, when interest rates
  fall, the prices of most bonds tend to rise, and the magnitude of the price
  increase is typically greater for bonds with higher convexity.
There are several
  factors that can impact the convexity of a bond, including the bond's coupon
  rate, maturity, and credit quality. Higher
  coupon bonds, for example, tend to have higher convexity than lower coupon
  bonds because they are more sensitive to changes in interest rates.
  Similarly, longer-term bonds tend to have higher convexity than shorter-term
  bonds because they are exposed to interest rate risk for a longer period of
  time.
Bond investors can use
  convexity to their advantage by managing their bond portfolios to take
  advantage of changes in interest rates. For example, an investor who anticipates rising interest rates might choose
  to hold a portfolio of bonds with low convexity, while an investor who
  anticipates falling interest rates might choose to hold a portfolio of bonds
  with high convexity.  
 
How companies like Amazon, Nike and FedEx
  avoid paying federal taxes (FYI) --- Special Topic
PUBLISHED THU, APR 14 20228:05 AM EDT 
 
The current United States tax code allows some of the biggest
  company names in the country to not pay any federal corporate income tax.
In fact, at least 55 of the
  largest corporations in America paid no federal corporate income taxes on
  their 2020 profits, according to the Institute
  on Taxation and Economic Policy. The companies include names like Whirlpool,
  FedEx, Nike, HP and Salesforce.
 
“If a large, very profitable company isn’t paying the federal
  income tax, then we have a real fairness problem on our hands,” Matthew
  Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
  (ITEP), told CNBC.
What’s more, it is entirely
  legal and within the parameters of the tax code that corporations can end up paying
  no federal corporate income tax, which costs the U.S. government billions of
  dollars in lost revenue.
″[There’s] a bucket of
  corporate tax breaks that are deliberately in the tax code … . And overall,
  they cost the federal government roughly $180 billion each year. And for
  comparison, the corporate tax brings in about $370 billion of revenue a year,” Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of
  the NYU Tax Law Center, told CNBC, citing research from the Tax Foundation.
CNBC reached out to FedEx, Nike, Salesforce and HP for
  comment. They either declined to provide a statement or did not respond
  before publication.
The 55 corporations cited by
  ITEP would have paid a collective total of $8.5 billion. Instead, they
  received $3.5 billion in tax rebates, collectively draining $12 billion from
  the U.S. government, according to the institute. The figures don’t include corporations that
  paid only some but not all of these taxes.
“I think the fundamental issue here is there are two different
  ways in which corporations book their profits,” Garrett Watson, senior policy
  analyst at the Tax Foundation, told CNBC. “The amount of profits that
  corporations may be reporting for financial purposes may be very different
  from the profits that they are reporting [for tax purposes.]”
Some tax expenditures, which
  come in many different forms, are used by some companies to take advantage of
  rules that enable them to lower their effective tax rates.
For example, Gardner’s research into Amazon’s taxes from 2018
  to 2021 showed a reported $79 billion of pretax U.S. income. Amazon paid a collective $4 billion in
  federal corporate income tax in those four years, equating to an effective
  annual tax rate of 5.1%, according to Gardner’s ITEP report, about a
  quarter of the federal corporate tax rate of 21%.
Amazon told CNBC in a statement, “In 2021, we reported $2.3
  billion in federal income tax expense, $5.2 billion in other federal taxes,
  and more than $4 billion in state and local taxes of all types. We also
  collected an additional $22 billion in sales taxes for U.S. states and
  localities.”
One controversial form of
  federal tax expenditure is the offshoring of profits. The foreign corporate income tax —
  anywhere between 0% and 10.5% — can incentivize the shifting of profits to
  tax havens.
For example, Whirlpool, a U.S. company known for manufacturing
  home appliances both in the U.S. and Mexico, was cited in a recent case
  involving both U.S. and Mexican taxes.
″[Whirlpool] did that by having the Mexican operation
  owned by a Mexican company with no employees, and then having that Mexican
  company owned by a Luxembourg holding company that had one employee,” Huang
  told CNBC. “And then it tried to claim that due to the combination of the
  U.S., Mexico and Luxembourg tax rules ... it was trying to take advantage of
  the disconnect between all of those tax systems to to avoid tax and all of
  those countries and of court said, no, that goes too far.”
Whirlpool defended its actions in a statement to CNBC: “The
  case before the Sixth Circuit has never been about trying to avoid U.S. taxes
  on the profits earned in Mexico. This tax dispute has always been about when
  those profits are taxed in the U.S. In fact, years before the original Tax
  Court decision in 2020, Whirlpool had already paid U.S. tax on 100% of the
  profits it earned in Mexico. Simply put, the IRS thought Whirlpool should
  have paid those U.S. taxes earlier.”
19 profitable Fortune 100 corporations that
  reported they will owe little or no taxes for 2021

Critical
  thinking question= (optional for extra credits)
·       
  Shall we fix this tax loophole problem and how?
  (optional for extra credits)
Chapter 8 Risk and
  Return
 
 
 
Equations
1.     Expected return and standard deviation
Given
  a probability distribution of returns, the expected return can be calculated
  using the following equation:

where
Given
  an asset's expected return, its variance can be calculated using the
  following equation:

where
The
  standard deviation is calculated as the positive square root of the variance.

 http://www.zenwealth.com/businessfinanceonline/RR/MeasuresOfRisk.html
 
2.   
  Two stock portfolio equations:

W1 and W2 are the
  percentage of each stock in the portfolio.

 



 
3.. Historical returns
Holding period return (HPR) = (Selling price – Purchasing price
  + dividend)/ Purchasing price
 
4.    CAPM model 
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
  describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected
  return for assets, particularly stocks. CAPM is widely used throughout
  finance for pricing risky securities and generating expected
  returns for assets given the risk of those assets and cost of capital.
 Ri = Rf + βi 
  *( Rm - Rf) ------ CAPM model
Ri = Expected return
  of investment
Rf =
  Risk-free rate
βi =
  Beta of the investment
Rm =
  Expected return of market
(Rm -
  Rf) = Market risk premium
 
 
·        What is Beta? Where to find Beta?

 
 
·        SML – Security Market Line

RISK and Return General Template
In Class Exercise  
1.      An investor currently holds the following portfolio:
  He invested 30% of the fund in Apple with Beta equal 1.1. He also invested
  40% in GE with Beta equal 1.6. The rest of his fund goes to Ford, with Beta
  equal 2.2. Use the above information to answer the following questions.
1)      The beta for the portfolio is? (1.63)
Solution:
0.3*1.1+0.4*1.6+(1-0.3-0.4)*2.2=1.63(weighted average of beta)
2)      The three month Treasury bill rate (this is
  risk free rate) is 2%. S&P500 index return is 10% (this is market
  return).  Now calculate the portfolio’s return.  15.04%
 
  Solution:
0.3*1.1+0.4*1.6+(1-0.3-0.4)*2.2=1.63--- This is beta and then
  plug into the CAPM. 
Return = 2% + 1.63*(10%-2%) = 15.04%
Refer to the following graph. The three month
  Treasury bill rate (this is risk free rate) is 2%. S&P500 index return is
  10% (this is market return). 

 
2.    
  What is the value of A?  2%
  
Solution:
  This is the intercept of the SML
3.    
  What is the value of B? 10%    
Solution:
B is the market return, so 10%, since Beta =1 
4.    
  How much is the slope of the above security market line? 8%
Solution:
Slope = rise/run = (10%-2%)/(1-0), just compare risk free rate
  (Beta=0) and market return (beta=1)
5.    
  Your uncle bought Apple in January, year 2000 for $30. The
  current price of Apple is $480 per share. Assume there are no dividend ever
  paid. Calculate your uncle’s holding period return.  15 times
Solution:
Holding period return = (480-30)/30 =1500%=15
  times 
6.    
  Your current portfolio’s BETA is about 1.2. Your total
  investment is worth around $200,000. You uncle just gave you $100,000 to
  invest for him. With this $100,000 extra funds in hand, you plan to invest
  the whole $100,000 in additional stocks to increase your whole portfolio’s
  BETA to 1.5 (Your portfolio now worth $200,000 plus $100,000). What is the
  average BETA of the new stocks to achieve your goal? (hint: write down the
  equation of the portfolio’s Beta first) 2.10
Solution:
Total amount = 200000 + 100000 +100000=400000
New portfolio beta =
  1.2*((200000+100000)/400000) + X*(100000/400000) = 1.5 č X=2.1
7.
                                           Years                  Market
  r                Stock
  A                 Stock
  B
                                               1                               3%                      16%                         5%
                                               2                             -5%                      20%                         5%
                                               3                               1%                      18%                         5%
                                               4                           -10%                      25%                         5%
                                               5                               6%                      14%                         5%
                                               
·         Calculate the average returns of the market r
  and stock A and stock B. (Answer:
  -1%, 18.6%, 5%)
·         Calculate the standard deviations of the
  market, stock A, & stock B (Answer:
  6.44%, 4.21%;  0 )
·         Calculate the correlation of stock market r
  and stock a. (Answer: -0.98)
·         Assume you invest 50% in stock A and 50% in
  stock B. Calculate the average return and the standard deviation of the
  portfolio. (Answer: 11.8%; 2.11%)
Calculate beta of
  stock A and beta of stock B, respectively (Answer:
  -0.64, 0)
 
Efficient
  Frontier Exercise ? (FYI only)
Chapter 8 Case study – due with the
  first mid term exam
 
Nov 2, 2021,07:30am EDT|86,690 views
No Recession In
  2022—But Watch Out In 2023
Bill Conerly 
A recession will come to the United States economy, but not in
  2022. Federal Reserve policy will lead to more business cycles, which many
  businesses are not well prepared for. The
  downturn won’t come in 2022, but could arrive as early as 2023. If the Fed
  avoids recession in 2023, then look for a more severe slump in 2024 or 2025.
Recessions
  usually come from demand weakness, but supply problems can also trigger a
  downturn. In 2022 demand for goods and
  services will be strong. Consumers have plenty of money, thanks to past
  earnings, stimulus payments and extra unemployment insurance. They have paid
  down their credit card balances. Even though they also increased their car
  loans outstanding as they upgraded their rides, their general condition is
  good. Employment will increase thanks to the spending, reinforcing the income
  gains that enable expenditures.
Businesses, too, have plenty of cash on hand. Not only have
  profits been good, but the Paycheck Protection Program gave nearly $800
  billion to businesses. Companies want to buy computers, equipment and
  machinery to substitute for the workers they cannot find, and this spending
  will help manufacturers of the equipment.
Homebuilders will construct as many homes as they can, though
  that will be limited by buildable lots, skilled labor and building materials.
  Non-residential construction will slowly gain ground, especially in warehouse
  space and suburban offices.
The government will spend, not only at the federal level but
  also among state and local entities. The federal government has no worries
  about deficits, while state and local governments are flush with federal
  money.
The spending
  side of the economy has little risk of recession in 2022, but could supply
  problems trigger a recession?
Supply chain
  problems can have negative impacts when factories have to shut down for lack
  of parts, as happened in the automobile industry. Recently Ford Europe’s Gunnar Herrmann told CNBC, “It’s not only semiconductors. You find shortages or
  constraints all over the place,” mentioning lithium,
  plastics and steel in particular. The automobile industry has laid off
  workers at multiple plants, mostly for a few weeks, but some long term. When
  workers are laid off for lack of materials to assemble, then the economy
  suffers. Most of the shortages under
  discussion, however, are limiting growth rather than cutting back on current
  production.
So the supply
  challenge we have is not an actual reduction in materials available, just insufficient
  materials to meet the stronger demand. Despite the snarls at the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles,
  more inbound containers are hitting the docks than in 2019. Mostly we are
  seeing supply as a limit on growth rather than a cause of recession.
Much of the
  supply limitation prevents growth, but does not push spending downward. Businesses are cutting back on variety. A shirt in a
  particular size may only be available in a few colors, not 16. That is
  unfortunate, and may discourage a few shoppers, but for the most part we’ll still be buying goods.
Job losses from
  vaccine mandate layoffs could push the economy toward recession, given that 31% of people over age 18 are not fully vaccinated.
  The various mandates cover about 100 million workers. Some of those 31
  million unvaccinated workers subject to mandates will get their shots, but
  others certainly won’t. In the worst of the pandemic
  recession, the country lost 22 million jobs. Losing 31 million jobs because
  of vaccine mandates—or even half that number—would be disastrous. And because it would be disastrous,
  it will not happen. The Biden administration almost certainly will pull back
  the mandate before accepting such a harsh result rise in unemployment.
Though 2022 is
  unlikely to host a recession, 2023 and 2024 are extremely risky. The Federal Reserve will
  start tapering its quantitative stimulus soon, and sometime in mid-2022 it
  will begin raising short-term interest rates. The economy reacts with a time
  lag of about one year, plus or minus. The greatest risk in the near term
  is that the Fed realizes that much of
  the recent inflation is long-lasting rather than transitory. They will then
  hit the brakes. Because of the
  time lag, the Fed may decide to stomp down harder on the brakes, triggering a
  recession.
If the Fed avoids an over-reaction recession, it risks not
  bringing inflation down at all. The longer the Fed waits, the more work they
  will need to do later. We’ll still have massive fiscal stimulus plus the
  lagged effects of past monetary stimulus. Public anger over inflation will
  provoke a stronger Fed response by 2025 at the latest, but probably earlier.
Can a recession
  be completely avoided in the next few years? Theoretically it’s possible. The
  Fed would have to tighten at just the right time, in just the right
  magnitude, then return to neutral at just the right time. It could happen, but the odds are very, very slim. The people
  at the Fed are smart and knowledgeable, but the task is too difficult for
  mere mortals. So businesses should enjoy their gains in 2022 while developing
  contingency plans to be ready for the nearly-inevitable recession. 
 
 
 
 
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
  describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected
  return for assets, particularly stocks. CAPM is widely used throughout
  finance for pricing risky securities and generating expected
  returns for assets given the risk of those assets and cost of capital.
 Ri = Rf + βi 
  *( Rm - Rf) ------ CAPM model
Ri = Expected return
  of investment
Rf =
  Risk-free rate
βi =
  Beta of the investment
Rm =
  Expected return of market
(Rm -
  Rf) = Market risk premium
Investors
  expect to be compensated for risk and the time value of money.
  The risk-free rate in the CAPM formula accounts for the time value
  of money. The other components of the CAPM formula account for the investor
  taking on additional risk.
 The beta of
  a potential investment is a measure of how much risk the investment will add
  to a portfolio that looks like the market. If a stock is riskier than the
  market, it will have a beta greater than one. If a stock has a beta of less
  than one, the formula assumes it will reduce the risk of a portfolio.
A
  stock’s beta is then multiplied by the market risk premium, which is the
  return expected from the market above the risk-free rate. The risk-free rate
  is then added to the product of the stock’s beta and the market risk
  premium. The result should give an investor the required
  return or discount rate they can use to find the value of an
  asset.
The
  goal of the CAPM formula is to evaluate whether a stock is fairly valued when
  its risk and the time value of money are compared to its expected return.
For example, imagine an investor is
  contemplating a stock worth $100 per share today that pays a 3% annual
  dividend. The stock has a beta compared to the market of 1.3, which means it
  is riskier than a market portfolio. Also, assume that the risk-free rate is
  3% and this investor expects the market to rise in value by 8% per year.
The expected return of the stock based
  on the CAPM formula is 9.5%.
The
  expected return of the CAPM formula is used to discount the expected
  dividends and capital appreciation of the stock over the expected holding
  period. If the discounted value of those future cash flows is equal to $100
  then the CAPM formula indicates the stock is fairly valued relative to risk.
(https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capm.asp)
 
 Finding
  Beta Value  (https://finance.zacks.com/stock-beta-value-8004.html)
The current beta
  value of a company stock is provided for free by many online financial news
  services, including Morningstar, Google Finance and Yahoo Finance. Online
  brokerage services provide more extensive tracking of a company's beta
  measurements, including historical trends. Beta is sometimes listed under
  "market data" or other similar headings, as it describes past
  market performance. A stock with a beta of 1.0 has the same price volatility
  as the market index, meaning if the market gains, the stock makes gains at
  the same rate. A stock with a beta of greater than 1.0 is riskier and has
  greater price fluctuations, while stocks with beta values of less than 1.0
  are steadier and generally larger companies.
Examples of Beta
Beta is often
  measured against the S&P 500 index. An
  S&P 500 stock with a beta of 2.0 produced a 20 percent increase in
  returns during a period of time when the S&P 500 Index grew only 10
  percent. This same measurement also means the stock would lose 20 percent
  when the market dropped by only 10 percent. High beta values, including those
  more than 1.0, are volatile and carry more risk along with greater potential
  returns. The measurement doesn't distinguish between upward and downward
  movements. Investing Daily notes that investors try to use stocks with high
  beta values to quickly recoup their investments after sharp market losses.
Small-Cap Stocks
Beta values are useful to
  evaluate stock prices of smaller companies. These small-capitalization stocks
  are attractive to investors because their price volatility can promise
  greater returns, but Market Watch recommends only buying small-cap stocks
  with beta values of less than 1.0. The beta value is also a component of the
  Capital Asset Pricing Model, which helps investors analyze the risk of an
  investment and the returns needed to make it profitable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoqAcdTFVFY 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrmoXog9zig 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V48NECmT3NsUnderstanding the Fama
  and French Three Factor Model
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/famaandfrenchthreefactormodel.asp
Nobel
  Laureate Eugene Fama and researcher Kenneth French, former professors at the
  University of Chicago Booth School of Business, attempted to better measure 
market
  returns and, through research, found that value stocks outperform growth stocks.
  Similarly, small-cap stocks tend to outperform large-cap stocks. As an 
evaluation
  tool, the performance of portfolios with a large number of small-cap or value
  stocks would be lower than the CAPM result, as the Three-Factor Model
 adjusts downward for observed small-cap and
  value stock outperformance.
The Fama and French model
  has three factors: the size of firms, book-to-market values, and excess
  return on the market. In other words, the three factors used
 are small minus big (SMB), high minus low
  (HML), and the portfolio's return less the risk-free rate of return. SMB
  accounts for publicly traded companies 
with small market caps that
  generate higher returns, while HML accounts for value stocks with high
  book-to-market ratios that generate higher returns
 in comparison to the market.
 
Fama and French’s Five
  Factor Model
Researchers have expanded
  the Three-Factor model in recent years to include other factors. These
  include "momentum," "quality," and "low
  volatility," 
among others. In 2014, Fama
  and French adapted their model to include five factors. Along with the
  original three factors, the new model adds the concept that 
companies reporting higher
  future earnings have higher returns in the stock market, a factor referred to
  as profitability.
The fifth factor, referred
  to as "investment", relates the concept of internal investment and
  returns, suggesting that companies directing profit towards 
major growth projects are
  likely to experience losses in the stock market.
 
Small Minus Big (SMB):
  Definition and Role in Fama/French Model
By
  WILL KENTON Updated November 30, 2020 Reviewed by DAVID KINDNESS
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/small_minus_big.asp
What Does Small Minus
  Big Mean?
Small
  minus big (SMB) is one of the three factors in the Fama/French stock pricing
  model. Along with other factors, SMB
  is used to explain portfolio returns. 
This
  factor is also referred to as the "small
  firm effect," or the "size effect," where size is based on
  a company's market capitalization.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·      
  Small minus big (SMB) is a factor in the
  Fama/French stock pricing model that says smaller companies outperform larger
  ones over the long-term. 
·      
  High minus low (HML) is another factor in
  the model that says value stocks tend to outperform growth stocks. 
·      
  Beyond the original three factors in the
  Fama/French model—the SMB, HML, and market factors—the model has been
  expanded to include other factors, such as momentum, quality, and low
  volatility. 
Understanding Small
  Minus Big (SMB)
Small minus big is the
  excess return that smaller market capitalization companies return versus
  larger companies. The Fama/French Three-Factor Model is an
  extension of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). CAPM is a one-factor
  model, and that factor is the performance of the market as a whole. This
  factor is known as
 the market factor. CAPM explains a
  portfolio's returns in terms of the amount of risk it contains relative to
  the market. In other words, according to CAPM, the 
primary
  explanation for the performance of a portfolio is the performance of the
  market as a whole.
The Fama/Three-Factor model
  adds two factors to CAPM. The model essentially says there are two other factors in addition to
  market performance 
that consistently contribute
  to a portfolio's performance. One is SMB, where if a portfolio has more
  small-cap companies in it, it should outperform the market 
over the long run.
Small Minus Big (SMB)
  vs. High Minus Low (HML)
The
  third factor in the Three-Factor model is High Minus Low (HML). "High" refers to companies with a
  high book value-to-market value ratio. "Low'"
 refers to companies with a low book
  value-to-market value ratio. This factor is also referred to as the
  "value factor" or the "value versus growth factor"
 because companies with a high book to market
  ratio are typically considered "value stocks." 
Companies with a low
  market-to-book value are typically "growth stocks."
  And research has demonstrated that value stocks outperform growth stocks in
  the long 
run.
  So, in the long run, a portfolio with a large proportion of value stocks
  should outperform one with a large proportion of growth stocks.
Special
  Considerations 
The
  Fama/French model can be used to evaluate a portfolio manager's returns.
  Essentially, if the portfolio's performance can be attributed to the three
  factors, then the portfolio manager has not added any value or demonstrated
  any skill. 
This
  is because if the three factors can completely explain the portfolio's
  performance, then none of the performance can be attributed to the manager's
  ability. 
A good portfolio manager
  should add to a performance by picking good stocks. This outperformance is
  also known as "alpha."
Application of the Fama French 5 factor model
https://blog.quantinsti.com/fama-french-five-factor-asset-pricing-model/
The
  theoretical starting point for the Fama-French five-factor model is the
  dividend discount model as the model states that the value of a stock today
  is dependent
 upon future dividends. Fama and French use
  the dividend discount model to get two new factors from it, investment and
  profitability (Fama and French, 2014).
The
  empirical tests of the Fama French models aim to explain average returns on
  portfolios formed to produce large spreads in Size, B/M, profitability and
  investment.
Firstly,
  the model is applied to portfolios formed on size, B/M, profitability and
  investment. The portfolio returns to be explained are from improved versions
  of the 
sorts
  that produce the factor.
Secondly,
  the five-factor model’s performance is compared to the three-factor model’s
  performance with regards to explaining average returns associated with
 major anomalies not targeted by the model
  (Fama and French, 2014).
With
  the addition of profitability and investment factors, the five-factor model
  time series regression has the equation below:
Rit - RFt
  = ai + bi(RMt — RFt) + siSMBt
  + hiHMLt + riRMWt + ciCMAt
  + eit
Where:
Rit
  is the return in month t of one of the portfolios
RFt is
  the riskfree rate
Rm -
  Rf is the return spread between the capitalization-weighted stock market and
  cash
SMB is
  the return spread of small minus large stocks (i.e. the size effect)
HML
  is the return spread of cheap minus expensive stocks (i.e. the value effect)
RMW
  is the return spread of the most profitable firms minus the least profitable
CMA
  is the return spread of firms that invest conservatively minus aggressively
  (AQR, 2014)
The
  purpose of the regression test is to observe whether the five-factor model
  captures average returns on the variables and to see which variables are
  positively
 or negatively correlated to each other and
  additionally identifying the size of the regression slopes and how all these
  factors are related to and affect average
 returns of stocks values.
The
  tests done by Fama and French (2014) show that the value factor HML is
  redundant for describing average returns when profitability and investment
  factors
 have been added into the equation and that
  for applications were sole interest is abnormal returns, a four or
  five-factor model can be used but if portfolio tilts are 
also
  of interest in addition to abnormal returns then the five-factor model is
  best to use.
The
  results also show that the Fama-French five-factor model explains between 71%
  and 94% of the cross-section variance of expected returns for the size,
 value, profitability and investment
  portfolios.
It
  has been proven that a five-factor model directed at capturing the size,
  value, profitability, and investment patterns in average stock returns
  performs better than
 the three-factor model in that it lessens
  the anomaly average returns left unexplained.
The
  new model shows that the highest expected returns are attained by companies
  that are small, profitable and value companies with no major growth prospects
  
(Fama
  and French, 2014).
The
  Fama-French five-factor model’s main setback, however, is its failure to capture
  the low average returns on small stocks whose returns perform like those of
  firms
 that invest a lot in spite of low
  profitability as well as the model’s performance being indifferent to the way
  its factors are defined (Fama and French, 2015).
Efficient Frontier
  (FYI only)
Excel template   (www.jufinance.com/efficient_frontier_excel)
Critical
  thinking challenge: Based on 8 stocks of your choice, generate an efficient
  frontier (earn
  5 extra points added to the first midterm exam)
Hint: (from chatgpt,
  FYI)
The goal of the efficient frontier is to help
  investors identify the optimal
  portfolio that provides the
  maximum return for a given level of risk, or the minimum risk for a given
  level of return. The efficient frontier is a
  graph that shows the different possible combinations of risk and return for a
  given set of investments or assets. It represents the set of portfolios that
  offer the highest expected return for a given level of risk, or the lowest
  risk for a given level of return.
By plotting different portfolios on the
  efficient frontier, investors can evaluate the risk-return trade-offs of
  different investment options and choose the portfolio that best meets their
  investment objectives. The efficient frontier provides a way to quantify the
  trade-offs between risk and return and to help investors make informed
  decisions about their investment strategies.
Step 1:
Portfolio Return:
Portfolio Return = w1 * r1 + w2 * r2 + w3 * r3 + w4 * r4 + w5 *
  r5 + w6 * r6 + w7 * r7 + w8 * r8
where: w1,
  w2, w3, w4, w5, w6, w7, w8 are the weights of each stock in
  the portfolio, and r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7,
  r8 are the returns of each stock in the portfolio.
Portfolio Standard
  Deviation:
Portfolio Standard Deviation = sqrt(w1^2 * sigma1^2 + w2^2 *
  sigma2^2 + w3^2 * sigma3^2 + w4^2 * sigma4^2 + w5^2 * sigma5^2 + w6^2 *
  sigma6^2 + w7^2 * sigma7^2 + w8^2 * sigma8^2 + 2 * w1 * w2 * rho12 * sigma1 *
  sigma2 + 2 * w1 * w3 * rho13 * sigma1 * sigma3 + 2 * w1 * w4 * rho14 * sigma1
  * sigma4 + 2 * w1 * w5 * rho15 * sigma1 * sigma5 + 2 * w1 * w6 * rho16 *
  sigma1 * sigma6 + 2 * w1 * w7 * rho17 * sigma1 * sigma7 + 2 * w1 * w8 * rho18
  * sigma1 * sigma8 + 2 * w2 * w3 * rho23 * sigma2 * sigma3 + 2 * w2 * w4 *
  rho24 * sigma2 * sigma4 + 2 * w2 * w5 * rho25 * sigma2 * sigma5 + 2 * w2 * w6
  * rho26 * sigma2 * sigma6 + 2 * w2 * w7 * rho27 * sigma2 * sigma7 + 2 * w2 *
  w8 * rho28 * sigma2 * sigma8 + 2 * w3 * w4 * rho34 * sigma3 * sigma4 + 2 * w3
  * w5 * rho35 * sigma3 * sigma5 + 2 * w3 * w6 * rho36 * sigma3 * sigma6 + 2 *
  w3 * w7 * rho37 * sigma3 * sigma7 + 2 * w3 * w8 * rho38 * sigma3 * sigma8 + 2
  * w4 * w5 * rho45 * sigma4 * sigma5 + 2 * w4 * w6 * rho46 * sigma4 * sigma6 +
  2 * w4 * w7 * rho47 * sigma4 * sigma7 + 2 * w4 * w8 * rho48 * sigma4 * sigma8
  + 2 * w5 * w6 * rho56 * sigma5 * sigma6 + 2 * w5 * w7 * rho57 * sigma5 *
  sigma7 + 2 * w5 * w8 * rho58 * sigma5 * sigma8 + 2 * w6 * w7 * rho67 * sigma6
  * sigma7 + 2 * w6 * w8 * rho68 * sigma6 * sigma8 + 2 * w7 * w8 * rho78 *
  sigma7 * sigma8)
where: sigma1, sigma2, sigma3, sigma4, sigma5,
  sigma6, sigma7, sigma8 are the standard deviations of each stock in the
  portfoliorho12, rho13, rho14, rho15, rho16, rho17,
  rho18, rho23, rho24, rho25, rho26, rho27,
  rho28, rho34, rho35, rho36, rho37, rho38,
  rho45, rho46, rho47, rho48, rho56, rho57,
  rho58, rho67, rho68, and rho78 are correlation
  coefficients between the stock returns. They represent the pairwise
  correlations between the stocks in the portfolio.
For example, rho12 represents the
  correlation coefficient between the returns of stock 1 and stock 2, rho23
  represents the correlation coefficient between the returns of stock 2 and
  stock
Step 2: Draw CML (Capital market line)
To draw a
  tangent line from the risk-free rate to the efficient frontier, follow these
  steps:
·       Determine the risk-free rate: The risk-free
  rate is the rate of return an investor can earn with zero risk. It is
  typically represented by the yield on a short-term U.S. Treasury bill.
·       Find the portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio: The Sharpe
  ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return that takes into account the
  portfolio's expected return and standard deviation. The portfolio with the
  highest Sharpe ratio is the portfolio that offers the best risk-adjusted
  return.
·       Calculate the slope of the tangent line: The slope of
  the tangent line is equal to the Sharpe ratio of the portfolio with the
  highest Sharpe ratio.
·       Draw the tangent line: The tangent
  line starts at the risk-free rate on the y-axis and has a slope equal to the
  Sharpe ratio of the portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio. The tangent line
  intersects the efficient frontier at the point where the portfolio with the
  highest Sharpe ratio is located.
The tangent line
  represents the optimal portfolio for an investor who wants to maximize their
  risk-adjusted return. Any portfolio on the tangent line is a combination of
  the risk-free asset and the portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio.
The tangent line drawn from the risk-free rate to
  the efficient frontier is called the Capital Market Line (CML). The CML is a graphical representation of
  the concept of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which is a widely
  used model in finance that describes the relationship between the risk and
  expected return of an asset or a portfolio.
The CML is the straight line that connects the
  risk-free rate to the point of tangency with the efficient frontier, which
  represents the optimal portfolio for an investor who wants to maximize their
  risk-adjusted return. The slope of the CML is the market risk premium, which is the
  excess return that investors require to invest in a risky asset rather than a
  risk-free asset. The CML can be used to determine the required return for any
  level of risk, and it provides a benchmark for evaluating the performance of
  different investment portfolios. 
In Class
  Demonstration Results:  Excel File (FYI)


Modern
  Portfolio Theory: What MPT Is and How Investors Use It
By THE
  INVESTOPEDIA TEAM Updated September 10, 2021 Reviewed by PETER WESTFALL Fact
  checked by SUZANNE KVILHAUG 
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/modernportfoliotheory.asp
What Is the Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)?
The modern portfolio theory (MPT) is a practical method for
  selecting investments in order to maximize their overall returns within an
  acceptable level of risk. This mathematical framework is used to build a
  portfolio of investments that maximize the amount of expected return for the
  collective given level of risk.
American economist Harry
  Markowitz pioneered this theory in his paper "Portfolio Selection,"
  which was published in the Journal of Finance in 1952. He was
 later awarded a Nobel Prize for his work on
  modern portfolio theory. 
A key component of the MPT
  theory is diversification. Most investments are either high risk and high
  return or low risk and low return. Markowitz argued that investors could
  achieve their best results by choosing an optimal mix of the two based on an
  assessment of their individual tolerance to risk.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·      
  The modern portfolio
  theory (MPT) is a method that can be used by risk-averse investors to
  construct diversified portfolios that maximize their returns without
  unacceptable levels of risk.
·      
  The modern portfolio
  theory can be useful to investors trying to construct efficient and
  diversified portfolios using ETFs.
·      
  Investors who are more
  concerned with downside risk might prefer the post-modern portfolio theory
  (PMPT) to MPT.
  
Understanding the Modern
  Portfolio Theory (MPT)
The modern portfolio theory argues that any given investment's
  risk and return characteristics should not be viewed alone but should be
  evaluated by how it affects the overall portfolio's risk and return. That is,
  an
  investor can construct a portfolio of multiple assets that will result in
  greater returns without a higher level of risk.
As an alternative, starting with a desired level of expected
  return, the investor can construct a portfolio with the lowest possible risk
  that is capable of producing that return.
Based on statistical measures such as variance and
  correlation, a single investment's performance is less important than how it
  impacts the entire portfolio.
 
The MPT assumes that investors are risk-averse, meaning they
  prefer a less risky portfolio to a riskier one for a given level of return.
  As a practical matter, risk aversion implies that most people should invest
  in multiple asset classes.
 
Benefits of the MPT
The MPT is a useful tool for investors who are trying to build
  diversified portfolios. In fact, the
  growth of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) made the MPT more relevant by giving
  investors easier access to a broader range of asset classes.
For example, stock investors can reduce risk by putting a
  portion of their portfolios in government bond ETFs. The variance of the
  portfolio will be significantly lower because government bonds have a
  negative correlation with stocks. Adding a small investment in Treasuries to
  a stock portfolio will not have a large impact on expected returns because of
  this loss-reducing effect.
Looking for Negative
  Correlation
Similarly, the MPT can be
  used to reduce the volatility of a U.S. Treasury portfolio by putting 10% in
  a small-cap value index fund or ETF. Although small-cap value stocks are far
  riskier than Treasuries on their own, they often do well during periods of
  high inflation when bonds do poorly. As a result, the portfolio's 
overall volatility is lower
  than it would be if it consisted entirely of government bonds. Moreover, the
  expected returns are higher.
The modern portfolio theory allows investors to construct more
  efficient portfolios. Every possible combination of assets can be plotted on
  a graph, with the portfolio's
 risk on the X-axis and
  the expected return on the Y-axis. This plot reveals the most desirable
  combinations for a portfolio.
For example, suppose Portfolio A has an expected return of
  8.5% and a standard deviation of 8%. Assume that Portfolio B has an expected
  return of 8.5% and a standard deviation of 9.5%. Portfolio A would be deemed
  more efficient because it has the same expected return but lower risk.
It is possible to draw an upward sloping curve to connect all
  of the most efficient portfolios. This curve is called the efficient
  frontier.
Investing in a portfolio underneath the curve is not desirable
  because it does not maximize returns for a given level of risk.
What Are the Benefits of the Modern
  Portfolio Theory?
The modern portfolio theory
  can be used to diversify a portfolio in order to get a better return overall
  without a bigger risk.
Another benefit of the
  modern portfolio theory (and of diversification) is that it can reduce
  volatility. The best way to do that is to choose assets that have a
 negative correlation, such as U.S.
  treasuries and small-cap stocks.
Ultimately, the goal of the modern portfolio theory is to
  create the most efficient portfolio possible.
What Is the Importance
  of the Efficient Frontier in the MPT?
The efficient frontier is a
  cornerstone of the modern portfolio theory. It is the line that indicates the
  combination of investments that will provide the highest level 
of return for the lowest
  level of risk.
When a portfolio falls to the right of the efficient frontier, it possesses greater risk relative to its predicted return. When it falls beneath the slope of the efficient frontier, it offers a lower level of return relative to risk.
Firm Mid Term exam
  around 2/22/2023
Study guide (Similar
  to case study, in class)
 
Chapter 9 Stock
  Return Evaluation
For class discussion:
·       What is dividend growth model? Why can
  we use dividend to estimate a firm’s intrinsic value?
·       Are
  future dividends predictable?
·       Refer
  to the following table for WMT’s dividend history
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/wmt/dividend-history
 
·       
   EX-DIVIDEND DATE 12/08/2022
·       
   DIVIDEND YIELD N/A
·       
   ANNUAL DIVIDEND $2.24
·       
   P/E RATIO 33.29
| Ex/EFF DATE | TYPE | CASH AMOUNT | DECLARATION
     DATE | RECORD DATE | PAYMENT DATE | 
| 12/07/2023 | CASH | $0.57 | 02/21/2023 | 12/08/2023 | 01/02/2024 | 
| 08/10/2023 | CASH | $0.57 | 02/17/2023 | 08/11/2023 | 09/05/2023 | 
| 05/04/2023 | CASH | $0.57 | 02/21/2023 | 05/05/2023 | 05/30/2023 | 
| 03/16/2023 | CASH | $0.57 | 02/21/2023 | 03/17/2023 | 04/03/2023 | 
| 12/08/2022 | CASH | $0.56 | 02/17/2022 | 12/09/2022 | 01/03/2023 | 
| 08/11/2022 | CASH | $0.56 | 02/17/2022 | 08/12/2022 | 09/06/2022 | 
| 05/05/2022 | CASH | $0.56 | 02/17/2022 | 05/06/2022 | 05/31/2022 | 
| 03/17/2022 | CASH | $0.56 | 02/17/2022 | 03/18/2022 | 04/04/2022 | 
| 12/09/2021 | CASH | $0.55 | 02/18/2021 | 12/10/2021 | 01/03/2022 | 
| 08/12/2021 | CASH | $0.55 | 02/18/2021 | 08/13/2021 | 09/07/2021 | 
| 05/06/2021 | CASH | $0.55 | 02/18/2021 | 05/07/2021 | 06/01/2021 | 
| 03/18/2021 | CASH | $0.55 | 02/18/2021 | 03/19/2021 | 04/05/2021 | 
| 12/10/2020 | CASH | $0.54 | 02/18/2020 | 12/11/2020 | 01/04/2021 | 
| 08/13/2020 | CASH | $0.54 | 02/18/2020 | 08/14/2020 | 09/08/2020 | 
| 05/07/2020 | CASH | $0.54 | 02/18/2020 | 05/08/2020 | 06/01/2020 | 
| 03/19/2020 | CASH | $0.54 | 02/18/2020 | 03/20/2020 | 04/06/2020 | 
| 12/05/2019 | CASH | $0.53 | 02/19/2019 | 12/06/2019 | 01/02/2020 | 
| 08/08/2019 | CASH | $0.53 | 02/19/2019 | 08/09/2019 | 09/03/2019 | 
| 05/09/2019 | CASH | $0.53 | 02/19/2019 | 05/10/2019 | 06/03/2019 | 
| 03/14/2019 | CASH | $0.53 | 02/19/2019 | 03/15/2019 | 04/01/2019 | 
| 12/06/2018 | CASH | $0.52 | 02/21/2018 | 12/07/2018 | 01/02/2019 | 
| 08/09/2018 | CASH | $0.52 | 02/21/2018 | 08/10/2018 | 09/04/2018 | 
| 05/10/2018 | CASH | $0.52 | 02/20/2018 | 05/11/2018 | 06/04/2018 | 
| 03/08/2018 | CASH | $0.52 | 02/20/2018 | 03/09/2018 | 04/02/2018 | 
| 12/07/2017 | CASH | $0.51 | 02/21/2017 | 12/08/2017 | 01/02/2018 | 
| 08/09/2017 | CASH | $0.51 | 02/21/2017 | 08/11/2017 | 09/05/2017 | 
| 05/10/2017 | CASH | $0.51 | 02/21/2017 | 05/12/2017 | 06/05/2017 | 
| 03/08/2017 | CASH | $0.51 | 02/21/2017 | 03/10/2017 | 04/03/2017 | 
| 12/07/2016 | CASH | $0.50 | 02/18/2016 | 12/09/2016 | 01/03/2017 | 
| 08/10/2016 | CASH | $0.50 | 02/18/2016 | 08/12/2016 | 09/06/2016 | 
| 05/11/2016 | CASH | $0.50 | 02/18/2016 | 05/13/2016 | 06/06/2016 | 
| 03/09/2016 | CASH | $0.50 | 02/18/2016 | 03/11/2016 | 04/04/2016 | 
| 12/02/2015 | CASH | $0.49 | 02/19/2015 | 12/04/2015 | 01/04/2016 | 
| 08/05/2015 | CASH | $0.49 | 02/19/2015 | 08/07/2015 | 09/08/2015 | 
| 05/06/2015 | CASH | $0.49 | 02/19/2015 | 05/08/2015 | 06/01/2015 | 
| 03/11/2015 | CASH | $0.49 | 02/19/2015 | 03/13/2015 | 04/06/2015 | 
| 12/03/2014 | CASH | $0.48 | 02/20/2014 | 12/05/2014 | 01/05/2015 | 
| 08/06/2014 | CASH | $0.48 | 02/20/2014 | 08/08/2014 | 09/03/2014 | 
| 05/07/2014 | CASH | $0.48 | 02/20/2014 | 05/09/2014 | 06/02/2014 | 
| 03/07/2014 | CASH | $0.48 | 02/20/2014 | 03/11/2014 | 04/01/2014 | 
| 12/04/2013 | CASH | $0.47 | 02/21/2013 | 12/06/2013 | 01/02/2014 | 
| 08/07/2013 | CASH | $0.47 | 02/21/2013 | 08/09/2013 | 09/03/2013 | 
| 05/08/2013 | CASH | $0.47 | 02/21/2013 | 05/10/2013 | 06/03/2013 | 
| 03/08/2013 | CASH | $0.47 | 02/21/2013 | 03/12/2013 | 04/01/2013 | 
| 12/05/2012 | CASH | $0.3975 | 03/01/2012 | 12/07/2012 | 12/27/2012 | 
| 08/08/2012 | CASH | $0.3975 | 03/01/2012 | 08/10/2012 | 09/04/2012 | 
| 05/09/2012 | CASH | $0.3975 | 03/01/2012 | 05/11/2012 | 06/04/2012 | 
| 03/08/2012 | CASH | $0.3975 | 03/01/2012 | 03/12/2012 | 04/04/2012 | 
| 12/07/2011 | CASH | $0.365 | 03/03/2011 | 12/09/2011 | 01/03/2012 | 
| 08/10/2011 | CASH | $0.365 | 03/03/2011 | 08/12/2011 | 09/06/2011 | 
| 05/11/2011 | CASH | $0.365 | 03/03/2011 | 05/13/2011 | 06/06/2011 | 
| 03/09/2011 | CASH | $0.365 | 03/03/2011 | 03/11/2011 | 04/04/2011 | 
| 12/08/2010 | CASH | $0.3025 | 03/04/2010 | 12/10/2010 | 01/03/2011 | 
| 08/11/2010 | CASH | $0.3025 | 03/04/2010 | 08/13/2010 | 09/07/2010 | 
| 05/12/2010 | CASH | $0.3025 | 03/04/2010 | 05/14/2010 | 06/01/2010 | 
| 03/10/2010 | CASH | $0.3025 | 03/04/2010 | 03/11/2010 | |
| 12/09/2009 | CASH | $0.2725 | 03/05/2009 | 12/10/2009 | |
| 08/12/2009 | CASH | $0.2725 | 03/05/2009 | 08/14/2009 | 09/08/2009 | 
| 05/13/2009 | CASH | $0.2725 | 03/05/2009 | 05/15/2009 | 06/01/2009 | 
| 03/11/2009 | CASH | $0.2725 | 03/05/2009 | 03/13/2009 | 04/06/2009 | 
| 12/11/2008 | CASH | $0.2375 | 03/06/2008 | 12/15/2008 | 01/02/2009 | 
| 08/13/2008 | CASH | $0.2375 | 03/06/2008 | 08/15/2008 | 09/02/2008 | 
| 05/14/2008 | CASH | $0.2375 | 03/06/2008 | 05/16/2008 | 06/02/2008 | 
| 03/12/2008 | CASH | $0.2375 | 03/06/2008 | 03/14/2008 | 04/07/2008 | 
| 12/12/2007 | CASH | $0.22 | 03/08/2007 | 12/14/2007 | 01/02/2008 | 
| 08/15/2007 | CASH | $0.22 | 03/08/2007 | 08/17/2007 | 09/04/2007 | 
| 05/16/2007 | CASH | $0.22 | 03/08/2007 | 05/18/2007 | 06/04/2007 | 
| 03/14/2007 | CASH | $0.22 | 03/08/2007 | 03/16/2007 | 04/02/2007 | 
| 12/13/2006 | CASH | $0.1675 | 03/02/2006 | 12/15/2006 | 01/02/2007 | 
| 08/16/2006 | CASH | $0.1675 | 03/02/2006 | 08/18/2006 | 09/05/2006 | 
| 05/17/2006 | CASH | $0.1675 | 03/02/2006 | 05/19/2006 | 06/05/2006 | 
| 03/15/2006 | CASH | $0.1675 | 03/02/2006 | 03/17/2006 | 04/03/2006 | 
| 12/14/2005 | CASH | $0.15 | |||
| 08/17/2005 | CASH | $0.15 | 03/03/2005 | 08/19/2005 | 09/06/2005 | 
| 05/18/2005 | CASH | $0.15 | 03/03/2005 | 05/20/2005 | 06/06/2005 | 
| 03/16/2005 | CASH | $0.15 | 03/03/2005 | 03/18/2005 | 04/04/2005 | 
| 12/15/2004 | CASH | $0.13 | 03/02/2004 | 12/17/2004 | 01/03/2005 | 
| 08/18/2004 | CASH | $0.13 | 03/02/2004 | 08/20/2004 | 09/07/2004 | 
| 05/19/2004 | CASH | $0.13 | 03/02/2004 | 05/21/2004 | 06/07/2004 | 
| 03/17/2004 | CASH | $0.13 | 03/02/2004 | 03/19/2004 | 04/05/2004 | 
Can you estimate the expected dividend in 2023? And in 2024? And
  on and on…

 
Can
  you write down the math equation now?
WMT
  stock price = ?
 
Can
  you calculate now? It is hard right because we assume dividend payment goes
  to infinity. How can we simplify the calculation?
 
We
  can assume that dividend grows at certain rate, just as the table on the
  right shows.
Discount
  rate is r (based on Beta and CAPM learned in chapter 6)
 
Dividend growth model:

Refer to http://www.calculatinginvestor.com/2011/05/18/gordon-growth-model/
 
·        Now let’s apply this
  Dividend growth model in problem solving.
 
 
Dividend
  Growth Model Calculator (www.jufinance.com/stock
  )
Equations
Po = D1/(r-g) = Do*(1+g)/(r-g), 
Where D1= next dividend; Do = just paid
  dividend; r=stock return; g= dividend growth rate; Po= current market
  price 
Dividend Yield = D1/Po = Do*(1+g) / Po
Capital gain yield = (P1/Po) -1 = g
Total return = dividend yield + capital gain yield = D1/Po + g
Non-constant dividend growth model (www.jufinance.com/dcf)
Equations
Pn = Dn+1/(r-g) = Dn*(1+g)/(r-g), since
  year n, dividends start to grow at a constant rate.
Where Dn+1= next dividend in year
  n+1;
Do = just paid dividend in year n; 
r=stock return; g= dividend growth rate; 
Pn= current market price in year n;
Po = npv(r, D1, D2, …, Dn+Pn)
Or, 
Po = D1/(1+r) + D2/(1+r)^2 + … +
  (Dn+Pn)/(1+r)^n 
Case
  Study (due with the Second Midterm Exam)
Case
  video in class part I (Thanks, Ethan and Ted)
Case
  video in class part II (Thanks, Ethan and Ted)
In class exercise  
1.    
  You expect AAA Corporation to
  generate the following free cash flows over the next five years:
| Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 
| FCF
    ($ millions) | 75 | 84 | 96 | 111 | 120 | 
Since
  year 6, you estimate that AAA's free cash flows will grow at 6% per year.
  WACC of AAA = 15% 
·       Calculate
  the enterprise value for DM Corporation.
·       Assume
  that AAA has $500 million debt and 14 million shares outstanding, calculate
  its stock price.
Answer: 
Enterprise
  value = npv(15%, 75, 84, 96, 111, 120+120*(1+6%)/(15%-6%)) = 1017.66
(or,
  equity value = 75/(1+15%) + 84/(1+15%)^2 + 96/(1+15%)^3 + 111/(1+15%)^4 +
  (120+120*(1+6%)/(15%-6%))/(1+15%)^5
Equity
  value = 1017.66-500 = 517.66
Stock
  price = 517.66/14=37
NPV
  Excel syntax
Syntax
  NPV(rate,value1,value2,
  ...)
  Rate    
  is the rate of discount over the length of one period.
  Value1, value2, ...    
  are 1 to 29 arguments representing the payments and income.
·         Value1, value2,
  ... must be equally spaced in time and occur at the end of
  each  period. NPV uses the order of value1, value2,
  ... to interpret the order of cash flows. Be sure to enter your payment
  and income values in the correct sequence.
 
2.  AAA’s divided yield = 2.5%, equity cost =
  10%, and its dividends will grow at a constant rate of g.  How much is g?
A) 2.5%
B) 5.0%
C) 10.0%
D) 7.5%
Answer:  
Dividend yield + capital gain
  yield = total return = 10%, and g= capital yield = dividend growth rate, so g
  = 10% - 2.5% = 7.5%
3. AAA pays no dividend
  currently. However, you expect it pay an annual dividend of $0.56/share 2
  years from now with a growth rate of 4% per year thereafter. Its equity cost
  = 12%, then its stock price=?
A) $4.67
B) $5.00
C) $6.25
D) $7.00
Answer:  
Stock price = Po = npv(12%, 0,
  0.56 + 0.56*(1+4%)/(12%-4%)) = 6.25
Or, Po = 0.56/(1+12%)^2 +
  0.56*(1+4%)/(12%-4%) /(1+12%)^2 = 6.25
4. AAA expects to have earnings
  of $2.50 per share this coming year. It will retain all of the earnings for
  the next year. For the following 4 years, it will retain 50% of its earnings.
  It will retain 25% of its earnings after that. Each year, retained earnings
  will be used in new projects with a return of 20% per year as expected. The
  rest of retained earnings will paid to shareholders as dividends. Its equity cost
  = 10%. Its stock price=?
A) $40.80
B) $44.70
C) $59.80
D) $63.50
 
| Year | EPS | Retained Earnings | Growth in Earnings
    (.20 × R.E.) | Dividends | 
| 1 | $2.50 | $2.50 |  |  | 
| 2 |  |  |  |  | 
| 3 |  |  |  |  | 
| 4 |  |  |  |  | 
| 5 |  |  |  |  | 
 Hint: after year 5, the growth rate =0.2/3.99 = 5%
Answer: 
| Year | EPS | Retained Earnings | Growth in Earnings
    (.20 × R.E.) | Dividends | 
| 1 | $2.50 | $2.50 | 0.5 | 0 | 
| 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 
| 3 | 3.3 | 1.65 | 0.33 | 1.65 | 
| 4 | 3.63 | 1.82 | 0.36 | 1.82 | 
| 5 | 3.99 | 1 | 0.2 | 3 | 
after year 5, the growth rate
  =0.2/3.99 = 5% = growth in earnings / EPS
So price at year 4 = 3/(10%-5%)
  =60
So current stock price =
  1.5/(1+10%)^2 + 1.65/(1+10%)^3 + 1.82/(1+10%)^4 + 60/(1+10%)^4 = 44.70
Or price = npv(10%, 0, 1.5, 1.65,
  1.82+60)
Stock screening tools
·      
  Reuters stock screener to help select stocks
http://stockscreener.us.reuters.com/Stock/US/
 
·      
  FINVIZ.com
http://finviz.com/screener.ashx
 
·      
  WSJ stock screen
http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/stock_screener.html
 
·      
  Simply the Web's Best Financial Charts
You can find analyst rating
  from MSN money
For instance,
ANALYSTS RATINGS
Zacks average brokerage recommendation is Moderate
  Buy
| RECOMMENDATIONS | CURRENT | 1
     MONTH AGO | 2
     MONTHS AGO | 3
     MONTHS AGO | 
| Strong
    Buy | 26 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 
| Moderate
    Buy | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 
| Hold | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 
| Moderate
    Sell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 
| Strong
    Sell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 
| Mean
    Rec. | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 
Summary of stock screening rules from class discussion
PEG<1
PE<15  (? FB’s PE>100?)
Growth rate<20
ROE>10%
Analyst ranking: strong buy only
Zacks average =1 (from Ranking stocks
  using PEG ratio)
current price>5
 
 
   How to
  pick stocks
Capital Asset Pricing Model
  (CAPM)Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JApBhv3VLTo
 
Ranking stocks using PEG ratio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bekW_hTehNU
P/E Ratio Summary by industry (FYI)
(http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html
 
| Industry Name | #of firms | Current PE | Expected growth - next 5 years | PEG Ratio | 
| Advertising | 40 | 42.07 | 7.24% | 2.19 | 
| Aerospace/Defense | 87 | 45.24 | 11.46% | 2.08 | 
| Air Transport | 17 | 12.40 | 6.46% | 2.00 | 
| Apparel | 51 | 19.94 | 11.32% | 2.33 | 
| Auto & Truck | 18 | 15.03 | 18.35% | 0.80 | 
| Auto Parts | 62 | 23.32 | 12.64% | 1.17 | 
| Bank (Money Center) | 11 | 17.09 | 7.54% | 1.86 | 
| Banks (Regional) | 612 | 33.24 | 9.43% | 1.87 | 
| Beverage (Alcoholic) | 28 | 31.31 | 20.06% | 0.95 | 
| Beverage (Soft) | 35 | 28.28 | 10.77% | 2.99 | 
| Broadcasting | 27 | 31.34 | 7.59% | 2.58 | 
| Brokerage & Investment Banking | 42 | 31.77 | 11.70% | 1.39 | 
| Building Materials | 39 | 28.83 | 14.98% | 1.58 | 
| Business & Consumer Services | 169 | 59.52 | 12.94% | 2.01 | 
| Cable TV | 14 | 25.74 | 10.25% | 2.51 | 
| Chemical (Basic) | 38 | 28.39 | 14.14% | 1.38 | 
| Chemical (Diversified) | 7 | 281.02 | 18.82% | 2.28 | 
| Chemical (Specialty) | 99 | 145.32 | 12.34% | 2.04 | 
| Coal & Related Energy | 30 | 13.36 | NA | NA | 
| Computer Services | 111 | 48.66 | 12.36% | 1.37 | 
| Computers/Peripherals | 58 | 26.11 | 15.79% | 1.14 | 
| Construction Supplies | 49 | 35.67 | 15.00% | 2.21 | 
| Diversified | 24 | 38.63 | 12.48% | 1.96 | 
| Drugs (Biotechnology) | 459 | 127.65 | 27.31% | 0.65 | 
| Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | 185 | 46.35 | 20.47% | 1.32 | 
| Education | 34 | 132.99 | 11.91% | 2.35 | 
| Electrical Equipment | 118 | 29.63 | 15.09% | 1.75 | 
| Electronics (Consumer & Office) | 24 | 35.28 | 12.77% | 4.86 | 
| Electronics (General) | 167 | 56.36 | 17.82% | 1.42 | 
| Engineering/Construction | 49 | 28.75 | 12.30% | 1.92 | 
| Entertainment | 90 | 312.73 | 11.54% | 1.56 | 
| Environmental & Waste Services | 87 | 73.67 | 12.83% | 2.43 | 
| Farming/Agriculture | 34 | 22.90 | 15.33% | 1.42 | 
| Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance) | 264 | 41.45 | 11.62% | 0.88 | 
| Food Processing | 87 | 36.08 | 9.46% | 2.55 | 
| Food Wholesalers | 15 | 50.79 | 8.70% | 3.03 | 
| Furn/Home Furnishings | 31 | 17.82 | 13.40% | 1.43 | 
| Green & Renewable Energy | 22 | 89.05 | 11.05% | 2.91 | 
| Healthcare Products | 251 | 161.11 | 16.55% | 2.27 | 
| Healthcare Support Services | 115 | 38.56 | 14.52% | 1.37 | 
| Heathcare Information and Technology | 112 | 174.42 | 15.21% | 2.52 | 
| Homebuilding | 32 | 883.19 | 17.58% | 0.99 | 
| Hospitals/Healthcare Facilities | 35 | 58.93 | 6.50% | 2.09 | 
| Hotel/Gaming | 70 | 34.20 | 13.18% | 1.90 | 
| Household Products | 131 | 46.52 | 11.60% | 1.61 | 
| Information Services | 61 | 60.11 | 14.92% | 2.42 | 
| Insurance (General) | 21 | 34.97 | 10.46% | 2.11 | 
| Insurance (Life) | 25 | 152.83 | 7.82% | 1.52 | 
| Insurance (Prop/Cas.) | 50 | 120.04 | 11.56% | 1.64 | 
| Investments & Asset Management | 165 | 99.35 | 13.11% | 1.31 | 
| Machinery | 126 | 47.35 | 14.03% | 1.82 | 
| Metals & Mining | 102 | 28.08 | 30.62% | 0.92 | 
| Office Equipment & Services | 24 | 18.92 | 12.25% | 1.72 | 
| Oil/Gas (Integrated) | 5 | 45.20 | 25.77% | 1.26 | 
| Oil/Gas (Production and Exploration) | 311 | 25.17 | 1.81% | 7.33 | 
| Oil/Gas Distribution | 16 | 313.75 | 10.00% | 3.77 | 
| Oilfield Svcs/Equip. | 130 | 87.54 | 40.24% | 0.90 | 
| Packaging & Container | 25 | 51.42 | 9.31% | 2.31 | 
| Paper/Forest Products | 21 | 40.11 | 9.62% | 2.09 | 
| Power | 61 | 25.25 | 5.41% | 2.07 | 
| Precious Metals | 111 | 29.92 | 24.26% | 2.47 | 
| Publishing & Newspapers | 41 | 53.87 | 7.90% | 2.75 | 
| R.E.I.T. | 244 | 58.88 | 6.81% | 3.65 | 
| Real Estate (Development) | 20 | 20.24 | NA | NA | 
| Real Estate (General/Diversified) | 10 | 216.85 | NA | NA | 
| Real Estate (Operations & Services) | 60 | 486.19 | 13.63% | 1.39 | 
| Recreation | 70 | 27.16 | 12.23% | 1.90 | 
| Reinsurance | 3 | 11.75 | 8.75% | 2.27 | 
| Restaurant/Dining | 81 | 37.50 | 15.04% | 1.70 | 
| Retail (Automotive) | 25 | 14.30 | 16.63% | 0.96 | 
| Retail (Building Supply) | 8 | 46.86 | 20.46% | 1.21 | 
| Retail (Distributors) | 92 | 120.38 | 15.04% | 1.45 | 
| Retail (General) | 18 | 96.81 | 7.88% | 2.93 | 
| Retail (Grocery and Food) | 14 | 28.23 | 7.90% | 1.75 | 
| Retail (Online) | 61 | 73.27 | 20.77% | 3.70 | 
| Retail (Special Lines) | 106 | 43.48 | 11.59% | 1.52 | 
| Rubber& Tires | 4 | 13.28 | 9.50% | 0.85 | 
| Semiconductor | 72 | 49.82 | 15.68% | 1.30 | 
| Semiconductor Equip | 45 | 37.81 | 16.67% | 0.97 | 
| Shipbuilding & Marine | 9 | 18.23 | 13.50% | 1.96 | 
| Shoe | 11 | 95.38 | 12.39% | 2.17 | 
| Software (Entertainment) | 13 | 67.28 | 14.94% | 2.56 | 
| Software (Internet) | 305 | 205.58 | 27.74% | 1.03 | 
| Software (System & Application) | 255 | 209.66 | 17.06% | 1.90 | 
| Steel | 37 | 28.91 | 12.22% | 1.53 | 
| Telecom (Wireless) | 18 | 64.32 | 10.83% | 2.27 | 
| Telecom. Equipment | 104 | 114.62 | 14.42% | 1.36 | 
| Telecom. Services | 66 | 61.28 | 5.99% | 2.77 | 
| Tobacco | 24 | 29.52 | 10.33% | 1.30 | 
| Transportation | 18 | 82.37 | 15.49% | 1.74 | 
| Transportation (Railroads) | 8 | 27.22 | 10.56% | 2.26 | 
| Trucking | 30 | 29.95 | 21.01% | 1.54 | 
| Utility (General) | 18 | 27.54 | 5.50% | 4.30 | 
| Utility (Water) | 23 | 141.22 | 8.99% | 3.66 | 
| Total Market | 7247 | 71.28 | 13.60% | 1.58 | 
| Total Market (without financials) | 6057 | 75.42 | 14.19% | 1.64 | 
Details about how
  to derive the model mathematically (FYI)
The Gordon growth model is a simple
  discounted cash flow (DCF) model which can be used to value a stock, mutual
  fund, or even the entire stock market.  The model is named after Myron
  Gordon who first published the model in 1959.
The Gordon model assumes that a
  financial security pays a periodic dividend (D) which
  grows at a constant rate (g). These growing dividend payments are
  assumed to continue forever. The future dividend payments are discounted at
  the required rate of return (r) to find the price (P) for the stock
  or fund.
Under these simple assumptions, the
  price of the security is given by this equation:

In this equation, I’ve used
  the “0” subscript on the price (P) and the “1” subscript
  on the dividend (D) to indicate that the price is calculated at time zero and
  the dividend is the expected dividend at the end of period one. However, the
  equation is commonly written with these subscripts omitted.
Obviously, the assumptions built
  into this model are overly simplistic for many real-world valuation
  problems. Many companies pay no dividends, and, for those that do,
  we may expect changing payout ratios or growth rates as the
  business matures.
Despite these limitations, I believe spending some
  time experimenting with the Gordon model can help develop intuition
  about the relationship between valuation and return.
The Gordon growth model calculates the
  present value of the security by summing an infinite series of discounted
  dividend payments which follows the pattern shown here:

Multiplying both sides of the previous
  equation by (1+g)/(1+r) gives:

We can then subtract the second equation
  from the first equation to get:

Rearranging and simplifying:


Finally, we can simplify further to get the Gordon growth model
  equation
What Is a DRIP
  Investment, How It Works, Benefits (FYI)
By
  BRIAN BEERS Updated December 12, 2021 Reviewed by THOMAS J. CATALANO Fact
  checked by MARCUS REEVES
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/what-is-a-drip/
What Is a Drip?
The
  word DRIP is an acronym for "dividend
  reinvestment plan", but DRIP also happens to describe the way the
  plan works. With DRIPs, the cash
  dividends that an investor receives from a company are reinvested to purchase
  more stock, making the investment in the company grow little by little.
KEY
  TAKEAWAYS
·      
  A
  DRIP is a dividend reinvestment plan whereby cash dividends are reinvested to
  purchase more stock in the company.
·      
  DRIPs
  use a technique called dollar-cost averaging (DCA) intended to average out
  the price at which you buy stock as it moves up or down.
·      
  DRIPs
  help investors accumulate additional shares at a lower cost since there are
  no commissions or brokerage fees.
  
How DRIPs
  Work
A
  dividend is a reward to shareholders, which can come in the form of a cash
  payment that is paid via a check or a direct deposit to investors. DRIPs
  allow investors the choice to reinvest the cash dividend and buy shares of
  the company's stock.
Many
  brokerage houses offer clients the ability to reinvest dividends in the
  underlying securities they hold through a DRIP program. However, investors
  have the option of purchasing shares directly from the respective company,
  through direct stock purchase plans (DSPPs).
Fractional
  Shares
The
  "dripping" of dividends is not limited to whole shares, which makes
  these plans somewhat unique. The corporation keeps detailed records of share
  ownership percentages.
For
  example, let's say that the TSJ Sports Conglomerate paid a $10 dividend on a
  stock that traded at $100 per share. Every time there was a dividend payment,
  investors within the DRIP plan would receive one-tenth of a share.
Benefits
  of DRIPs
DRIPs
  offer a number of benefits for both the investors buying shares with their
  cash dividends and the companies offering DRIP programs.
Benefits
  to Investors
DRIPs
  use a technique called dollar-cost averaging (DCA) intended to average out
  the price at which you buy stock as it moves up or down over a long period.
  You are never buying the stock right at its peak or at its low with
  dollar-cost averaging.
Company-operated
  DRIPS are popular with shareholders as a lower-cost option to accumulate
  additional shares. There are often no commissions or brokerage fees involved.
  Many companies offer shares at a discount through their DRIP ranging from 3
  to 5% off the current share price.
The
  price discount combined with no trading commissions allows investors to lower
  their cost basis for owning a company's shares. As a result, DRIPs can help investors save money on buying additional
  shares of stock versus had they bought them on the open market.
Benefits
  to Companies
Companies
  that offer DRIP programs receive investment dollars or capital from
  shareholders. Companies can use that capital to reinvest back into the
  company.
Shareholders
  or investors that are part of a company's DRIP program are less likely to
  sell their shares if the company has one bad earnings report or if the
  overall market declines. In other words, the investors that are engaged in
  the DRIP program are typically long-term investors in the company.
Special
  Considerations
It's important to note that the cash
  dividends that are reinvested into DRIPs are still considered taxable income
  by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and must be reported.
 
Also, when investors who purchased shares via
  a company's own DRIP program want to sell their shares, they must sell them
  back to the company directly. In
  other words, the shares are not sold on the open market via a broker.
  Instead, a request to sell the shares must be made with the company, whereby
  the company will, in turn, redeem the shares at the prevailing stock price. .
https://stock.walmart.com/investors/stock-information/dividend-history/default.aspx
Wal-Mart
  Stores, Inc. was incorporated on Oct. 31, 1969. On Oct. 1, 1970, Walmart
  offered 300,000 shares of its common stock to the public at a price of $16.50
  per share. Since that time, we have had 11 two-for-one (2:1) stock splits. On
  a purchase of 100 shares at $16.50 per share on our first offering, the
  number of shares has grown as follows:
| 2:1 Stock Splits | Shares | Cost per Share | Market Price on Split Date | Record Date | Distributed | 
| On the
    Offering | 100 | $16.50 | |||
| May 1971 | 200 | $8.25 | $47.00 | 5/19/71 | 6/11/71 | 
| March 1972 | 400 | $4.125 | $47.50 | 3/22/72 | 4/5/72 | 
| August 1975 | 800 | $2.0625 | $23.00 | 8/19/75 | 8/22/75 | 
| Nov. 1980 | 1,600 | $1.03125 | $50.00 | 11/25/80 | 12/16/80 | 
| June 1982 | 3,200 | $0.515625 | $49.875 | 6/21/82 | 7/9/82 | 
| June 1983 | 6,400 | $0.257813 | $81.625 | 6/20/83 | 7/8/83 | 
| Sept. 1985 | 12,800 | $0.128906 | $49.75 | 9/3/85 | 10/4/85 | 
| June 1987 | 25,600 | $0.064453 | $66.625 | 6/19/87 | 7/10/87 | 
| June 1990 | 51,200 | $0.032227 | $62.50 | 6/15/90 | 7/6/90 | 
| Feb. 1993 | 102,400 | $0.016113 | $63.625 | 2/2/93 | 2/25/93 | 
| March 1999 | 204,800 | $0.008057 | $89.75 | 3/19/99 | 4/19/99 | 
Elon Musk’s
  SpaceX to split its private stock 10-for-1
PUBLISHED FRI, FEB 18 20221:43 PM ESTUPDATED FRI, FEB 18
  20222:38 PM EST
Michael Sheetz
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/18/elon-musks-spacex-performing-10-for-1-stock-split.html
 
KEY POINTS
·      
  Elon Musk’s
  SpaceX is splitting the value of its common stock 10-for-1, CNBC has learned.
With SpaceX valued at $560 a share during its most recent
  sale, the split reduces SpaceX’s common stock to $56 a share, according to a
  company-wide email obtained by CNBC.
A stock split is cosmetic and does not fundamentally change
  anything about the company.
Elon Musk’s SpaceX is splitting the value of its common stock
  10-for-1, CNBC has learned, with the company’s valuation having soared to
  more than $100 billion.
The split means that for each share of SpaceX stock owned as
  of Thursday, a holder now has 10 shares after the conversion. With SpaceX
  valued at $560 a share during its most recent sale, the split reduces
  SpaceX’s common stock to $56 a share, according to a company-wide email
  obtained by CNBC.
“The split has no impact on the overall valuation of the
  company or on the overall value of your SpaceX holdings,”
  the email said.
SpaceX did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for
  comment.
As the email to employees emphasizes, a stock split is
  cosmetic and does not fundamentally change anything about the company.
  Companies occasionally perform stock splits, such as high-growth tech
  companies such as Apple or Google-parent Alphabet, and the move is typically
  seen as a way to make the shares more accessible or manageable.
This is the first time SpaceX has performed a stock split,
  according to multiple people familiar with the private company.
The company’s valuation has soared in the last few years as
  SpaceX has raised billions to fund work on two capital-intensive projects:
  the next generation rocket Starship and its global satellite internet network
  Starlink. 
What is SpaceX
  stock?
SpaceX is not a publicly traded company. That means you cannot
  buy SpaceX stock in the public market. Unless you are extremely wealthy or
  have a large stake in a company that has a stake in SpaceX, it’s unlikely you
  will ever be able to own anything resembling SpaceX shares, for now.
SpaceX still does of course have stakeholders. Founder Elon
  Musk, who also founded famed electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla, funded the
  company initially with funds from his sale of popular online payments
  platform PayPal. Other equity firms, like Founders Fund and Valor Equity Partners,
  also have significant stake in SpaceX.
How to buy
  SpaceX stock
As mentioned, the only people buying SpaceX stock aren’t
  individuals — they’re large corporations and equity firms. For instance,
  Google and Fidelity together invested around a billion dollars in 2015 for a
  10% stake in the company.
How much does
  SpaceX’s stock cost?
SpaceX’s
  shares are valued at $56 per share.
SpaceX is not a publicly traded company; therefore, publicly
  traded SpaceX stock (which doesn’t exist) has no price.
The only way to know how much SpaceX shares could be worth
  would be to look at the company’s last evaluation. In October of 2021, it was
  reported that a private shareholder sold shares for a price of $560 per
  share. That puts the worth of SpaceX at $100 billion, the second highest
  valued private company in the world.
However, SpaceX went through a 10-1 stock split in February of
  2022 meaning that for every one share a holder owned, they now own 10. This
  also reduces the price of the share, meaning the current price of a single
  share of SpaceX is now $56. A stock split doesn’t change anything about the
  company except for the number of shares.
SpaceX stock
  symbol
SpaceX is not a publicly traded company; therefore, publicly
  traded SpaceX stock (which doesn’t exist) has no stock ticker symbol. If it
  did have one, SPCX would probably be a good fit.
When will
  SpaceX go public?
Elon Musk has stated that SpaceX will not go public any time
  soon. Musk has stated that short-term demands of shareholders could ruin the
  company’s chance of colonizing Mars, the long term goal of SpaceX. Once that
  goal is achieved, Musk might rethink keeping SpaceX private.


   Chapter 10 WACC
 
 

 
 
 
 
One option (if beta is given)

Another option (if dividend is given):

 
WACC Formula

WACC calculator (annual coupon bond)
(www.jufinance.com/wacc)
 

WACC calculator  (semi-annual coupon bond)
 
 
WACC Calculator help videos FYI
 
 
Summary of Equations
 
Discount rate to figure out the value of projects is called WACC
  (weighted average cost of capital)
 
WACC = weight of debt * cost of debt   + weight
  of equity *( cost of equity)
 
·      
  Wd= total debt / Total capital 
  = total borrowed / total capital
·      
  We= total equity/ Total capital  
  
·      
  Cost of debt = rate(nper, coupon, -(price – flotation costs), 1000)*(1-tax rate)
·      
  Cost of Equity = D1/(Po – Flotation Cost)  + g  
  
·      
  D1: Next period dividend; Po: Current stock price; g: dividend
  growth rate
·      
  Note: flotation costs = flotation percentage * price
 
·      
  Or if beta is given, use CAPM model
1.    
  Cost of equity = risk free rate + beta *(market return – risk
  free rate)
2.    
  Cost of equity = risk free rate + beta * market risk premium
 
Discussion:
·         Cheaper to raise capital from debt market.
  Why? Why not 100% financing via borrowing?
·         Why tax rate cannot reduce firms’ cost of
  equity?
·         Please refer to the following excel worksheet
  to learn how to calculate WACC of Hertz (7.99%).
·       Excel file is here. Thanks to Chris, Brian and Hanna, the
  CFA competition team of 2017.
(FYI: Hertz Global Holdings Inc  (NYSE:HTZ) WACC
  %:3.74% As of 2/26/2022 
 
As of today, Hertz Global
  Holdings Inc's weighted average cost of capital is 3.74%. Hertz
  Global Holdings Inc's ROIC % is 7.26% (calculated
  using TTM income statement data). Hertz Global Holdings Inc generates higher
  returns on investment than it costs the company to raise the capital needed
  for that investment. It is earning excess returns. A firm that expects to
  continue generating positive excess returns on new investments in the future
  will see its value increase as growth increases.  https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/HTZ/WACC/Hertz+Global+Holdings+Inc)
 
 
In Class Exercise     
1.    
  IBM financed 10m via debt coupon 5%, 10 year, price is $950 and
  flotation is 7% of the price, tax 40%.
IBM financed 20m via equity. D1=$5. Po=50, g
  is 5%. Flotation cost =0. So WACC?
Answer: 
·      
  Wd=1/3. We=2/3.
·      
  Kd = rate(10, 5%*1000, -(950-950*7%), 1000)*(1-40%)------ after tax
  cost of debt
·      
  Ke = 5/(50 – 0) + 5%  
  -------- cost of equity
·      
  WACC = Wd*Kd +We*Ke = 
 
2.     Firm AAA sold a
  noncallable bond now has 20 years to maturity.  9.25% annual coupon
  rate, paid semiannually, sells at a price = $1,075, par =
  $1,000.  Tax rate = 40%, calculate after tax cost of debt (5.08%)
Answer: 
·      
  after tax cost of debt = rate(nper, coupon, -(price-flotation),
  1000)*(1-tax rate)
·      
  After tax of debt = rate(20*2, 9.25%*1000/2, -(1075-0),
  1000)*(1-40%)=5.08%
3.    
    Firm AAA’s equity condition is as follows. D1 =
  $1.25; P0 = $27.50; g = 5.00%; and Flotation = 6.00% of
  price.  Calculate cost of equity (9.84%)
Answer:
·      
  Cost of equity = D1/(Po-flotation) + g= 1.25/(27.5-6%*27.5) + 5%
  = 9.84%
4.    
  Continue from above. Firm AAA raised 10m from the capital
  market. In it, 3m is from the debt market and the rest from the equity
  market. Calculate WACC.
Answer:
·      
  WACC = Wd*Kd +We*Ke = 
·      
  WACC = (3/10)*5.08% + (7/10)*9.84% 
5.    
  Common
  stock currently sells =
  $45.00 /
  share; and earn $2.75 /share this year, payout
  ratio is 70%, and its constant growth rate = 6.00%. 
  New stock can
  be sold at the current price, a flotation cost =8%. How much would the cost
  of new stock beyond
  the cost of retained earnings?
Answer: 
Expected EPS1                           $2.75
Payout ratio                                 70%
Current stk price                      $45.00
g                                                6.00%
F                                               8.00%
D1                                             $1.925
rs = D1/P0 + g                          10.28%
re = D1/(P0 ×
  (1 − F)) + g        10.65%
Difference = re – rs                   0.37%
6.      (1) The firm's noncallable bonds mature in
  20 years, an 8.00% annual coupon, a market price of $1,050.00.  (2)   tax rate = 40%. 
  (3) The risk-free rate=4.50%,
  the market risk premium =
  5.50%, stock’s
  beta =1.20.  (4)  capital
  structure consists of 35% debt and
  65% common equity. 
  What is its WACC?
Answer:
  
Coupon rate                                          8.00%
Maturity                                                      20
Bond price                                      $1,050.00
Par value                                              $1,000
Tax rate                                                   40%
rRF                                                         4.50%
RPM                                                      5.50%
b                                                               1.20
Weight debt                                             35%
Weight equity                                         65%
Bond yield                                            7.51%
A-T cost of debt                                   4.51%
Cost of equity, rs = rRF + b(RPM)        11.10%
WACC = wd(rd)(1
  – T) + wc(rs) =        8.79%
WACC Case study (due with the 2nd mid term exam)
Case
  Video in class completed (Thanks, Ethan and Maggie)
FYI: WACC calculator   https://fairness-finance.com/fairness-finance/finance/calculator/wacc.dhtml
   Cost of Capital
  by Sector (US)
 
 https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.html
| Industry Name | Number of Firms | Beta | Cost of Equity | E/(D+E) | Std Dev in Stock | Cost of Debt | Tax Rate | After-tax Cost of Debt | D/(D+E) | Cost of Capital | 
| Advertising | 58 | 1.63 | 13.57% | 68.97% | 52.72% | 5.88% | 6.39% | 4.41% | 31.03% | 10.73% | 
| Aerospace/Defense | 77 | 1.41 | 12.28% | 79.33% | 37.56% | 5.50% | 8.60% | 4.13% | 20.67% | 10.59% | 
| Air
    Transport | 21 | 1.42 | 12.29% | 34.92% | 37.73% | 5.50% | 10.47% | 4.13% | 65.08% | 6.98% | 
| Apparel | 39 | 1.32 | 11.75% | 65.98% | 38.51% | 5.50% | 12.04% | 4.13% | 34.02% | 9.15% | 
| Auto
    & Truck | 31 | 1.54 | 13.03% | 66.58% | 52.61% | 5.88% | 3.00% | 4.41% | 33.42% | 10.15% | 
| Auto
    Parts | 37 | 1.47 | 12.64% | 70.10% | 39.52% | 5.50% | 9.30% | 4.13% | 29.90% | 10.09% | 
| Bank
    (Money Center) | 7 | 1.08 | 10.30% | 31.61% | 19.59% | 4.73% | 16.25% | 3.55% | 68.39% | 5.68% | 
| Banks
    (Regional) | 557 | 0.5 | 6.88% | 60.75% | 16.76% | 4.73% | 18.84% | 3.55% | 39.25% | 5.57% | 
| Beverage
    (Alcoholic) | 23 | 1.01 | 9.90% | 81.36% | 49.87% | 5.50% | 9.39% | 4.13% | 18.64% | 8.82% | 
| Beverage
    (Soft) | 31 | 1.3 | 11.62% | 86.75% | 41.72% | 5.50% | 6.42% | 4.13% | 13.25% | 10.63% | 
| Broadcasting | 26 | 1.32 | 11.73% | 40.51% | 46.90% | 5.50% | 15.76% | 4.13% | 59.49% | 7.21% | 
| Brokerage
    & Investment Banking | 30 | 1.2 | 11.04% | 33.21% | 28.00% | 5.50% | 15.32% | 4.13% | 66.79% | 6.42% | 
| Building
    Materials | 45 | 1.28 | 11.47% | 77.56% | 29.19% | 5.50% | 16.71% | 4.13% | 22.44% | 9.82% | 
| Business
    & Consumer Services | 164 | 1.17 | 10.84% | 78.45% | 45.78% | 5.50% | 9.43% | 4.13% | 21.55% | 9.39% | 
| Cable
    TV | 10 | 1.26 | 11.34% | 48.25% | 25.41% | 5.50% | 21.95% | 4.13% | 51.75% | 7.60% | 
| Chemical
    (Basic) | 38 | 1.25 | 11.29% | 67.43% | 46.58% | 5.50% | 9.83% | 4.13% | 32.57% | 8.95% | 
| Chemical
    (Diversified) | 4 | 1.41 | 12.27% | 63.19% | 39.49% | 5.50% | 12.02% | 4.13% | 36.81% | 9.27% | 
| Chemical
    (Specialty) | 76 | 1.28 | 11.47% | 78.49% | 42.32% | 5.50% | 10.75% | 4.13% | 21.51% | 9.89% | 
| Coal
    & Related Energy | 19 | 1.45 | 12.51% | 82.16% | 61.96% | 5.88% | 2.28% | 4.41% | 17.84% | 11.06% | 
| Computer
    Services | 80 | 1.17 | 10.84% | 75.44% | 47.78% | 5.50% | 6.47% | 4.13% | 24.56% | 9.19% | 
| Computers/Peripherals | 42 | 1.29 | 11.55% | 91.31% | 48.73% | 5.50% | 9.13% | 4.13% | 8.69% | 10.90% | 
| Construction
    Supplies | 49 | 1.26 | 11.39% | 76.85% | 35.11% | 5.50% | 10.52% | 4.13% | 23.15% | 9.71% | 
| Diversified | 23 | 1.04 | 10.05% | 82.48% | 57.84% | 5.88% | 2.98% | 4.41% | 17.52% | 9.06% | 
| Drugs
    (Biotechnology) | 598 | 1.24 | 11.26% | 86.71% | 58.41% | 5.88% | 0.94% | 4.41% | 13.29% | 10.35% | 
| Drugs
    (Pharmaceutical) | 281 | 1.27 | 11.41% | 88.02% | 64.88% | 5.88% | 2.37% | 4.41% | 11.98% | 10.57% | 
| Education | 33 | 1.1 | 10.42% | 76.56% | 41.81% | 5.50% | 7.10% | 4.13% | 23.44% | 8.94% | 
| Electrical
    Equipment | 110 | 1.59 | 13.32% | 81.62% | 58.55% | 5.88% | 4.47% | 4.41% | 18.38% | 11.68% | 
| Electronics
    (Consumer & Office) | 16 | 1.54 | 13.02% | 85.87% | 39.56% | 5.50% | 3.98% | 4.13% | 14.13% | 11.76% | 
| Electronics
    (General) | 138 | 1.2 | 11.02% | 84.16% | 44.94% | 5.50% | 6.29% | 4.13% | 15.84% | 9.92% | 
| Engineering/Construction | 43 | 1.2 | 10.99% | 75.99% | 35.17% | 5.50% | 13.30% | 4.13% | 24.01% | 9.34% | 
| Entertainment | 110 | 1.45 | 12.49% | 75.03% | 57.81% | 5.88% | 3.45% | 4.41% | 24.97% | 10.47% | 
| Environmental
    & Waste Services | 62 | 1.02 | 9.91% | 79.66% | 48.09% | 5.50% | 5.42% | 4.13% | 20.34% | 8.73% | 
| Farming/Agriculture | 39 | 1.14 | 10.65% | 74.70% | 54.43% | 5.88% | 6.64% | 4.41% | 25.30% | 9.07% | 
| Financial
    Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance) | 223 | 0.89 | 9.14% | 9.05% | 27.15% | 5.50% | 14.61% | 4.13% | 90.95% | 4.58% | 
| Food
    Processing | 92 | 0.92 | 9.33% | 77.60% | 34.23% | 5.50% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 22.40% | 8.16% | 
| Food
    Wholesalers | 14 | 1.12 | 10.55% | 68.42% | 32.42% | 5.50% | 11.94% | 4.13% | 31.58% | 8.52% | 
| Furn/Home
    Furnishings | 32 | 1.27 | 11.43% | 64.13% | 41.91% | 5.50% | 12.67% | 4.13% | 35.87% | 8.81% | 
| Green
    & Renewable Energy | 19 | 1.6 | 13.39% | 45.23% | 67.60% | 7.01% | 6.73% | 5.26% | 54.77% | 8.93% | 
| Healthcare
    Products | 254 | 1.16 | 10.78% | 88.81% | 50.94% | 5.88% | 3.70% | 4.41% | 11.19% | 10.07% | 
| Healthcare
    Support Services | 131 | 1.16 | 10.77% | 80.90% | 47.79% | 5.50% | 6.74% | 4.13% | 19.10% | 9.50% | 
| Heathcare
    Information and Technology | 138 | 1.47 | 12.62% | 87.56% | 53.87% | 5.88% | 4.30% | 4.41% | 12.44% | 11.60% | 
| Homebuilding | 32 | 1.5 | 12.80% | 75.57% | 33.33% | 5.50% | 17.81% | 4.13% | 24.43% | 10.68% | 
| Hospitals/Healthcare
    Facilities | 34 | 1.17 | 10.85% | 53.41% | 51.19% | 5.88% | 9.56% | 4.41% | 46.59% | 7.85% | 
| Hotel/Gaming | 69 | 1.46 | 12.55% | 60.03% | 38.05% | 5.50% | 8.14% | 4.13% | 39.97% | 9.18% | 
| Household
    Products | 127 | 1.16 | 10.74% | 86.56% | 56.83% | 5.88% | 6.73% | 4.41% | 13.44% | 9.89% | 
| Information
    Services | 73 | 1.4 | 12.22% | 88.45% | 45.11% | 5.50% | 12.45% | 4.13% | 11.55% | 11.29% | 
| Insurance
    (General) | 21 | 1.23 | 11.17% | 76.63% | 43.76% | 5.50% | 10.26% | 4.13% | 23.37% | 9.53% | 
| Insurance
    (Life) | 27 | 0.94 | 9.46% | 51.97% | 28.89% | 5.50% | 11.41% | 4.13% | 48.03% | 6.90% | 
| Insurance
    (Prop/Cas.) | 51 | 0.8 | 8.65% | 82.33% | 27.67% | 5.50% | 10.92% | 4.13% | 17.67% | 7.85% | 
| Investments
    & Asset Management | 600 | 0.62 | 7.58% | 72.28% | 9.91% | 4.73% | 4.01% | 3.55% | 27.72% | 6.47% | 
| Machinery | 116 | 1.22 | 11.16% | 82.75% | 32.36% | 5.50% | 10.37% | 4.13% | 17.25% | 9.94% | 
| Metals
    & Mining | 68 | 1.29 | 11.54% | 82.27% | 70.06% | 7.01% | 4.15% | 5.26% | 17.73% | 10.43% | 
| Office
    Equipment & Services | 16 | 1.18 | 10.87% | 59.95% | 35.22% | 5.50% | 19.53% | 4.13% | 40.05% | 8.17% | 
| Oil/Gas
    (Integrated) | 4 | 0.98 | 9.69% | 89.68% | 30.55% | 5.50% | 14.22% | 4.13% | 10.32% | 9.11% | 
| Oil/Gas
    (Production and Exploration) | 174 | 1.26 | 11.35% | 83.28% | 56.98% | 5.88% | 4.60% | 4.41% | 16.72% | 10.19% | 
| Oil/Gas
    Distribution | 23 | 0.99 | 9.77% | 58.34% | 33.55% | 5.50% | 6.90% | 4.13% | 41.66% | 7.42% | 
| Oilfield
    Svcs/Equip. | 101 | 1.38 | 12.05% | 75.41% | 46.90% | 5.50% | 7.07% | 4.13% | 24.59% | 10.10% | 
| Packaging
    & Container | 25 | 0.95 | 9.54% | 61.74% | 24.43% | 4.73% | 14.66% | 3.55% | 38.26% | 7.25% | 
| Paper/Forest
    Products | 7 | 1.38 | 12.10% | 69.51% | 42.84% | 5.50% | 12.76% | 4.13% | 30.49% | 9.66% | 
| Power | 48 | 0.73 | 8.19% | 56.45% | 17.18% | 4.73% | 12.30% | 3.55% | 43.55% | 6.17% | 
| Precious
    Metals | 74 | 1.23 | 11.21% | 85.97% | 72.54% | 7.01% | 2.87% | 5.26% | 14.03% | 10.37% | 
| Publishing
    & Newspapers | 20 | 1.11 | 10.50% | 70.34% | 30.92% | 5.50% | 9.67% | 4.13% | 29.66% | 8.61% | 
| R.E.I.T. | 223 | 1.06 | 10.20% | 56.39% | 21.54% | 4.73% | 3.38% | 3.55% | 43.61% | 7.30% | 
| Real
    Estate (Development) | 18 | 1.52 | 12.89% | 47.05% | 51.25% | 5.88% | 6.66% | 4.41% | 52.95% | 8.40% | 
| Real
    Estate (General/Diversified) | 12 | 0.79 | 8.57% | 71.52% | 28.66% | 5.50% | 9.37% | 4.13% | 28.48% | 7.31% | 
| Real
    Estate (Operations & Services) | 60 | 1.35 | 11.87% | 47.79% | 44.43% | 5.50% | 5.47% | 4.13% | 52.21% | 7.83% | 
| Recreation | 57 | 1.42 | 12.30% | 65.76% | 42.13% | 5.50% | 9.49% | 4.13% | 34.24% | 9.50% | 
| Reinsurance | 1 | 0.83 | 8.81% | 68.92% | 19.37% | 4.73% | 6.48% | 3.55% | 31.08% | 7.17% | 
| Restaurant/Dining | 70 | 1.41 | 12.26% | 76.47% | 41.15% | 5.50% | 8.54% | 4.13% | 23.53% | 10.34% | 
| Retail
    (Automotive) | 30 | 1.52 | 12.91% | 63.50% | 35.71% | 5.50% | 15.84% | 4.13% | 36.50% | 9.70% | 
| Retail
    (Building Supply) | 15 | 1.79 | 14.51% | 82.50% | 37.55% | 5.50% | 13.39% | 4.13% | 17.50% | 12.69% | 
| Retail
    (Distributors) | 69 | 1.28 | 11.45% | 71.65% | 37.08% | 5.50% | 13.59% | 4.13% | 28.35% | 9.38% | 
| Retail
    (General) | 15 | 1.36 | 11.98% | 83.35% | 31.53% | 5.50% | 21.26% | 4.13% | 16.65% | 10.67% | 
| Retail
    (Grocery and Food) | 13 | 0.67 | 7.85% | 60.31% | 28.26% | 5.50% | 16.45% | 4.13% | 39.69% | 6.37% | 
| Retail
    (Online) | 63 | 1.49 | 12.71% | 83.91% | 59.41% | 5.88% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 16.09% | 11.38% | 
| Retail
    (Special Lines) | 78 | 1.48 | 12.64% | 71.86% | 38.59% | 5.50% | 15.02% | 4.13% | 28.14% | 10.25% | 
| Rubber&
    Tires | 3 | 0.84 | 8.86% | 23.24% | 39.79% | 5.50% | 0.00% | 4.13% | 76.76% | 5.22% | 
| Semiconductor | 68 | 1.61 | 13.43% | 89.88% | 38.40% | 5.50% | 8.18% | 4.13% | 10.12% | 12.49% | 
| Semiconductor
    Equip | 30 | 1.76 | 14.32% | 89.46% | 41.57% | 5.50% | 10.94% | 4.13% | 10.54% | 13.24% | 
| Shipbuilding
    & Marine | 8 | 0.94 | 9.49% | 71.93% | 41.16% | 5.50% | 6.23% | 4.13% | 28.07% | 7.98% | 
| Shoe | 13 | 1.33 | 11.77% | 91.73% | 39.37% | 5.50% | 10.70% | 4.13% | 8.27% | 11.13% | 
| Software
    (Entertainment) | 91 | 1.36 | 11.98% | 95.42% | 58.71% | 5.88% | 3.82% | 4.41% | 4.58% | 11.63% | 
| Software
    (Internet) | 33 | 1.55 | 13.09% | 84.99% | 55.24% | 5.88% | 2.37% | 4.41% | 15.01% | 11.79% | 
| Software
    (System & Application) | 390 | 1.47 | 12.61% | 91.44% | 52.11% | 5.88% | 3.40% | 4.41% | 8.56% | 11.91% | 
| Steel | 28 | 1.34 | 11.85% | 77.76% | 38.30% | 5.50% | 14.95% | 4.13% | 22.24% | 10.14% | 
| Telecom
    (Wireless) | 16 | 1.03 | 10.00% | 60.55% | 51.92% | 5.88% | 3.83% | 4.41% | 39.45% | 7.80% | 
| Telecom.
    Equipment | 79 | 1.23 | 11.20% | 89.54% | 41.35% | 5.50% | 4.06% | 4.13% | 10.46% | 10.46% | 
| Telecom.
    Services | 49 | 0.88 | 9.12% | 45.93% | 55.37% | 5.88% | 6.54% | 4.41% | 54.07% | 6.57% | 
| Tobacco | 15 | 2 | 15.76% | 80.61% | 44.06% | 5.50% | 9.83% | 4.13% | 19.39% | 13.51% | 
| Transportation | 18 | 1.06 | 10.17% | 77.21% | 28.05% | 5.50% | 16.39% | 4.13% | 22.79% | 8.79% | 
| Transportation
    (Railroads) | 4 | 1.11 | 10.46% | 78.46% | 16.34% | 4.73% | 16.57% | 3.55% | 21.54% | 8.97% | 
| Trucking | 35 | 1.55 | 13.06% | 69.49% | 41.17% | 5.50% | 14.79% | 4.13% | 30.51% | 10.33% | 
| Utility
    (General) | 15 | 0.64 | 7.65% | 57.41% | 14.97% | 4.73% | 13.20% | 3.55% | 42.59% | 5.90% | 
| Utility
    (Water) | 16 | 1.15 | 10.73% | 69.74% | 27.96% | 5.50% | 8.45% | 4.13% | 30.26% | 8.73% | 
| Total
    Market | 7165 | 1.16 | 10.75% | 65.14% | 41.37% | 5.50% | 7.52% | 4.13% | 34.86% | 8.44% | 
| Total
    Market (without financials) | 5649 | 1.29 | 11.56% | 79.11% | 47.98% | 5.50% | 6.38% | 4.13% | 20.89% | 10.01% | 
 Recommended websites for WACC
Tesla
·       
  https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/TSLA/WACC-Percentage/Tesla  
·       
  https://valueinvesting.io/TSLA/valuation/wacc  // cost of equity = long term bond rate +
  premium
Wal-Mart
·      
  https://valueinvesting.io/WMT/valuation/wacc
Apple
·      
  https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/AAPL/WACC-Percentage/Apple
·      
  https://valueinvesting.io/AAPL/valuation/wacc
Amazon
·      
  https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/valuation/wacc
·      
  https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/AMZN/WACC-Percentage/Amazon.com
Chapter 11: Capital Budgeting
 
1.      NPV Excel syntax
Syntax
  NPV(rate,value1,value2, ...)
  Rate     is the rate of discount over the
  length of one period.
  Value1, value2, ...     are 1 to 29 arguments
  representing the payments and income.
·         Value1, value2, ... must be equally spaced in
  time and occur at the end of each    period. NPV uses the
  order of value1, value2, ... to interpret the order of cash flows.
  Be sure to enter your payment and income values in the correct sequence.
 
2.      IRR Excel syntax
Syntax
   IRR(values, guess)
   Values  is an array or a reference to cells that
  contain numbers for which you want to calculate the internal rate of return.
  Guess     is a number that you guess is
  close to the result of IRR.
 
 
 


Or, PI =
  NPV / CFo +1
Profitable
  index (PI) =1 + NPV / absolute value of CFo
3.     MIRR( values, finance_rate, reinvest_rate )
Where the function arguments are as follows:
| Values | - | An array of values
    (or a reference to a range of cells containing values) representing the
    series of cash flows (investment and net income values) that occur at
    regular periods. These must contain at least one negative value
    (representing payment) and at least one positive value (representing
    income). | 
| finance_rate | - | The interest rate paid on the money used in the cash
    flows. | 
| reinvest_rate | - | The interest rate paid on the reinvested cash flows. | 

4)   
  

By ADAM HAYES  Updated
  June 12, 2022 Reviewed by DAVID KINDNESS Fact checked by JIWON MA
Video   https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mirr.asp
What Is
  Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)?
The modified
  internal rate of return (MIRR) assumes that positive cash flows are
  reinvested at the firm's cost of capital and that the initial outlays are
  financed at the firm's financing cost. By contrast, the traditional internal rate of return (IRR)
  assumes the cash flows from a project are reinvested at the IRR itself. The
  MIRR, therefore, more accurately reflects the cost and profitability of a
  project.
Meanwhile, the internal rate of return (IRR) is a discount rate
  that makes the net present value (NPV) of all cash flows from a particular
  project equal to zero. Both MIRR and IRR calculations rely on the formula for
  NPV.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·      
  MIRR improves on IRR by
  assuming that positive cash flows are reinvested at the firm's cost of
  capital.
·      
  MIRR is used to rank
  investments or projects a firm or investor may undertake.
·      
  MIRR is designed to generate
  one solution, eliminating the issue of multiple IRRs.
  
What MIRR Can Tell You
The MIRR is used
  to rank investments or projects of unequal size. The calculation is a solution to two major problems that exist
  with the popular IRR calculation. The first main problem with IRR is that
  multiple solutions can be found for the same project. The second problem is
  that the assumption that positive cash flows are reinvested at the IRR is
  considered impractical in practice. With the MIRR, only a single solution
  exists for a given project, and the reinvestment rate of positive cash flows
  is much more valid in practice. The MIRR allows project managers to change
  the assumed rate of reinvested growth from stage to stage in a project. The
  most common method is to input the average estimated cost of capital, but there
  is flexibility to add any specific anticipated reinvestment rate.
The Difference
  Between MIRR and IRR
Even though the internal
  rate of return (IRR) metric is popular among business managers, it tends to
  overstate the profitability of a project and can lead to capital budgeting
  mistakes based on an overly optimistic estimate. The modified internal
  rate of return (MIRR) compensates for this flaw and gives managers more
  control over the assumed reinvestment rate from future cash flow. An IRR
  calculation acts like an inverted compounding growth rate. It has to discount
  the growth from the initial investment in addition to reinvested cash flows.
  However, the IRR does not paint a realistic picture of how cash flows are
  actually pumped back into future projects. Cash flows are often reinvested at
  the cost of capital, not at the same rate at which they were generated in the
  first place. IRR assumes that the growth rate remains constant from project
  to project. It is very easy to overstate potential future value with basic
  IRR figures. Another major issue with IRR occurs when a project has different
  periods of positive and negative cash flows. In these cases, the IRR produces
  more than one number, causing uncertainty and confusion. MIRR solves this
  issue as well. 
 Limitations of Using MIRR
The first
  limitation of MIRR is that it requires you to compute an estimate of the cost
  of capital in order to make a decision, a calculation that can be subjective
  and vary depending on the assumptions made. As with IRR, the MIRR can provide information that leads to
  sub-optimal decisions that do not maximize value when several investment
  options are being considered at once. MIRR does not actually quantify the
  various impacts of different investments in absolute terms; NPV often provides a more effective
  theoretical basis for selecting investments that are mutually exclusive.
  It may also fail to produce optimal results in the case of capital rationing.
  MIRR can also be difficult to understand for people who do not have a financial
  background. Moreover, the theoretical basis for MIRR is also disputed among
  academics.
·      
  Sorry for the mistake in class
  for accidentally closing the recording in class
·      
  Thanks to Ted and Maggie for
  taking the lead in class for this case study.
Case
  study video in class 3/23/2023 – Part II (Thanks, Ted and Christian)
| Let’s have some fun with ChatGPT – generate NPV
    Calculator by ChatGPT Here are step-by-step instructions: 1.     Ask
    ChatGPT to generate a NPV calculator using JavaScript in HTML format. You
    can ask something like: "Hey ChatGPT, could you please generate a NPV
    calculator using JavaScript in HTML format to calculate the NPV, given cash
    flows and the discount rate?" 2.     ChatGPT
    should respond with the code for the calculator. Copy the code to your
    clipboard. 3.     Open
    Notepad or any other text editor and paste the code into a new document. 4.     Save
    the file as an HTML file. You can name it anything you like, but make sure
    the file extension is ".html". For example, you can name it
    "npv_calculator.html". 5.     Open
    the saved HTML file in your web browser (e.g. Chrome, Firefox, etc.) by double-clicking
    on the file or right-clicking and selecting "Open with". The NPV
    calculator should load and be ready to use. 6.     Test
    the calculator by entering different values for the cash flows and the
    disount rate. Make sure the calculated NPV is correct and matches your
    expectations. 7.    
    If you find any
    issues with the calculator, you can ask ChatGPT to generate it again with
    the desired changes. Or use the code from my experiment with
    ChatGPT earlier this week to get both NPV and NFV <!DOCTYPE
    html> <html> <head>     <title>Net Present and Future
    Value Calculator</title>     <script>         function calculateNPV() {             var initialInvestment =
    parseFloat(document.getElementById("initial-investment").value);             var discountRate = parseFloat(document.getElementById("discount-rate").value);             var cashFlows =
    document.getElementById("cash-flows").value.trim();             // check for empty input             if (cashFlows === "")
    {                
    document.getElementById("npv-result").innerHTML =
    "";                
    document.getElementById("nfv-result").innerHTML =
    "";                
    document.getElementById("error-message").innerHTML =
    "Please enter at least one cash flow.";                 return;             }             // split input into an array of cash
    flows             cashFlows =
    cashFlows.split(",");             // parse each cash flow and
    check for invalid input             for (var i = 0; i <
    cashFlows.length; i++) {                 var cashFlow = parseFloat(cashFlows[i]);                 if (isNaN(cashFlow)) {                    
    document.getElementById("npv-result").innerHTML =
    "";                    
    document.getElementById("nfv-result").innerHTML =
    "";                    
    document.getElementById("error-message").innerHTML =
    "Invalid cash flow entered at position " + (i+1) + ".";                     return;                 }                 cashFlows[i] = cashFlow;             }             // calculate net present value             var npv = -initialInvestment;             for (var i = 0; i <
    cashFlows.length; i++) {                 npv += cashFlows[i] /
    Math.pow(1 + discountRate, i+1);             }             // calculate net future value             var nfv = npv * Math.pow(1 + discountRate,
    cashFlows.length);             // display results            
    document.getElementById("npv-result").innerHTML =
    "Net Present Value: $" + npv.toFixed(2);            
    document.getElementById("nfv-result").innerHTML =
    "Net Future Value: $" + nfv.toFixed(2);            
    document.getElementById("error-message").innerHTML =
    "";         }     </script> </head> <body>     <h1>Net Present and Future Value
    Calculator</h1>     <label
    for="initial-investment">Initial Investment:</label>     <input type="number"
    id="initial-investment" value="10000"
    step="any"><br><br>     <label
    for="discount-rate">Discount Rate:</label>     <input type="number"
    id="discount-rate" value="0.1"
    step="any"><br><br>     <label
    for="cash-flows">Cash Flows:</label>     <textarea id="cash-flows"
    rows="5"
    cols="50"></textarea><br><br>     <button
    onclick="calculateNPV()">Calculate NPV and NFV</button>     <p
    id="npv-result"></p>     <p
    id="nfv-result"></p>     <p class="error"
    id="error-message"></p> </body> </html> | ||
Another
  example for MIRR: 
<!DOCTYPE
  html>
<html>
<head>
               <meta
  charset="utf-8">
               <title>Modified Internal
  Rate of Return (MIRR) Calculator</title>
</head>
<body>
               <h1>Modified Internal
  Rate of Return (MIRR) Calculator</h1>
               <label
  for="initial-investment">Initial Investment:</label>
               <input
  type="number" id="initial-investment"
  step="any">
               <br><br>
               <label
  for="cash-flows">Cash Flows (comma separated):</label>
               <input type="text"
  id="cash-flows">
               <br><br>
               <label
  for="finance-rate">Finance Rate (%):</label>
               <input
  type="number" id="finance-rate">
               <br><br>
               <label
  for="reinvest-rate">Reinvestment Rate (%):</label>
               <input
  type="number" id="reinvest-rate">
               <br><br>
               <button
  onclick="calculateMIRR()">Calculate MIRR</button>
               <br><br>
               <label for="result">MIRR:</label>
               <input type="text"
  id="result" readonly>
               <script>
                              function
  calculateMIRR() {
                                             const
  initialInvestment =
  parseFloat(document.getElementById("initial-investment").value);
                                             const
  cashFlows = document.getElementById("cash-flows").value.split(",").map(Number);
                                             const
  financeRate =
  parseFloat(document.getElementById("finance-rate").value) / 100;
                                             const
  reinvestRate =
  parseFloat(document.getElementById("reinvest-rate").value) / 100;
                                             
                                             //
  Calculate terminal value of cash flows
                                             const
  terminalValue = cashFlows.reduce((pv, cf, i) => {
                                                            return
  pv + cf / Math.pow(1 + reinvestRate, i + 1);
                                             },
  0);
                                             
                                             //
  Calculate MIRR
                                             const
  numerator = terminalValue + initialInvestment;
                                             const
  denominator = Math.pow(1 + financeRate, cashFlows.length);
                                             const
  mirr = Math.pow(numerator / denominator, 1 / cashFlows.length) - 1;
                                             
                                             document.getElementById("result").value
  = mirr.toFixed(4);
                              }
               </script>
</body>
</html>
Second Midterm Exam 
·    
  3/27/2023
·    
  in class
·    
  similar to case studies
·    
  chapters 9, 10, 11
One common
  method for evaluating a firm is the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis. This method involves estimating the future cash flows of the firm and
  discounting them back to their present value using a discount rate.
Video – General
  Introduction DCF
Here are the
  detailed steps and equations involved in the DCF analysis:
·      
  Estimate
  future cash flows: The first step is to estimate the future cash flows that
  the firm is expected to generate. This typically involves forecasting
  revenue, expenses, and capital expenditures for a number of years into the
  future. Let's denote these cash flows as CF1, CF2, ..., CFn.
·      
  Determine
  the discount rate: The discount rate is the rate of return that an investor
  requires to invest in the firm. This rate should reflect the risk associated
  with the investment, with higher-risk investments requiring a higher rate of
  return. Let's denote the discount rate as r.
·      
  Calculate
  the present value of future cash flows: Once the future cash flows and
  discount rate have been determined, we can calculate the present value of
  each cash flow using the following formula:
PV
  = CF / (1 + r)^n
where
  PV is the present value of the cash flow, CF is the cash flow for a given
  year, r is the discount rate, and n is the number of years into the future
  that the cash flow occurs.
·      
  Calculate
  the terminal value: After estimating cash flows for a number of years, we
  need to estimate the value of the firm beyond the forecast period. Let's
  denote the terminal value as TV.
·      
  Calculate
  the total present value: Once we have calculated the present value of each
  cash flow and the terminal value, we can sum them up to get the total present
  value (PV) of the firm:
PV
  = PV1 + PV2 + ... + PVn + PV of TV
·      
  Subtract
  the firm's debt: Finally, we need to subtract the firm's outstanding debt
  from the total present value to arrive at the firm's equity value:
·      
  Equity
  value = PV - Debt
·      
  Overall,
  the DCF analysis provides an estimate of the intrinsic value of the firm
  based on its expected future cash flows and the WACC. However, it should be
  noted that the accuracy of the analysis is highly dependent on the accuracy
  of the cash flow and discount rate estimates. --- ChatGPT
DCF - An
  Example – ChatGPT (FYI)
XYZ
  Corp. DCF Analysis Report
Introduction:
This
  report is a DCF analysis of XYZ Corp., a publicly traded company with a current
  market capitalization of $10 billion. The purpose of this report is to
  estimate the intrinsic value of the company using a discounted cash flow
  (DCF) model. Assuming that the
  company’s funding is entirely based on equity. 
Step 1: Forecast Future Cash Flows
To
  forecast future cash flows, we have assumed that the company's cash flows
  will grow at a rate of 5% per year for the next five years. The forecasted
  cash flows are as follows:
Year 0:
  $1.00 billion
Year 1:
  $1.05 billion
Year 2:
  $1.10 billion
Year 3:
  $1.16 billion
Year 4:
  $1.22 billion
Year 5:
  $1.28 billion
Step 2: Estimate the Terminal Value
To
  estimate the terminal value, we have assumed that the cash flows beyond Year
  5 will grow at a rate of 2% per year, which is lower than the growth rate
  assumed for the forecasted cash flows. The terminal value is calculated as
  follows:
Terminal
  Value = Year 6 Cash Flow / (Discount Rate - Growth Rate)
Year 6
  Cash Flow = $1.28 billion *(1+ 2%) = $1.30 billion
Discount
  Rate = 10%
Growth
  Rate = 2% 
Therefore,
  Terminal Value = $1.30 billion / ( cost of equity  - 2%) 
  
Step 3: Determine the Discount Rate
To
  determine the discount rate, we have used the Capital Asset Pricing Model
  (CAPM) to estimate the company's cost of equity. The CAPM formula is:
Cost of
  Equity = Risk-Free Rate + Beta * (Market Risk Premium)
where:
Risk-Free
  Rate = 2%
Beta =
  1.2 (estimated based on industry comparables)
Market
  Risk Premium = 7% (historical average)
Therefore,
  Cost of Equity = 2% + 1.2 * 7% = 10.4%
Terminal
  Value = $1.30 billion / (cost of equity - 2%) 
  = $1.30 billion / (10.4% - 2%) = $15.50 billion
Step 4:
  Calculate the Present Value of Future Cash Flows
To
  calculate the present value of each cash flow, we have used the following
  formula:
Present
  Value = Cash Flow / (1 + Discount Rate) ^ Year
Using
  this formula, we can calculate the present value of each cash flow as
  follows:
Year 1:
  $1.05 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^1 = $951 million
Year 2:
  $1.10 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^2 = $905 million
Year 3:
  $1.16 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^3 = $860 million
Year 4:
  $1.22 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^4 = $818 million
Year 5:
  $1.28 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^5 = $778 million
Terminal
  Value: $15.50 billion / (1 + 10.4%)^5 = $9.45 billion
Step 5: Sum the present value of cash flows and
  terminal value
We can
  now sum up the present value of each cash flow and the terminal value to get
  the total intrinsic value of XYZ Corp.
Total
  Intrinsic Value = Present Value of Cash Flows + Terminal Value
= $951
  million + $905 million + $860 million + $818 million + $778 million + $9.45
  billion
=
  $13.76 billion
Step 6: Compare the intrinsic value with the
  market capitalization
Finally,
  we need to compare the intrinsic value of XYZ Corp. with its market
  capitalization to determine whether the stock is undervalued, overvalued, or
  fairly valued. In this case, the intrinsic value of XYZ Corp. is $13.76
  billion, while its market capitalization is $10 billion. This suggests that
  the stock is undervalued and may be a good investment opportunity.
Note that
  this example is simplified and does not take into account other factors such
  as changes in working capital or debt payments. Also, it's important to keep
  in mind that DCF analysis is only one of several methods used to value a
  company and should be used in conjunction with other valuation techniques.
Overall,
  based on the DCF analysis, XYZ Corp. appears to be undervalued relative to
  its intrinsic value. However, investors should conduct further research and
  analysis before making any investment decisions.
Step 7: Sensitivity Analysis (Monte Carlo
  Analysis is a method used for conducting sensitivity analysis)
Sensitivity
  analysis is an important tool in determining the robustness of our valuation.
  It helps us understand how changes in assumptions can affect the estimated
  intrinsic value. In our DCF analysis of XYZ Corp., we assumed a 5% growth
  rate for the next five years and a 2% growth rate beyond that. Let's see how
  our intrinsic value would change if we vary these assumptions.
Assumption 1: Growth Rate
If we
  assume a lower growth rate of 4% for the next five years, the intrinsic value
  of XYZ Corp. decreases to $13.20 billion. On the other hand, if we assume a
  higher growth rate of 6%, the intrinsic value increases to $14.34 billion.
  This tells us that our estimate is sensitive to changes in the growth rate
  assumption.
Assumption 2: Terminal Growth Rate
If we
  assume a lower terminal growth rate of 1%, the intrinsic value of XYZ Corp. decreases
  to $12.67 billion. Conversely, if we assume a higher terminal growth rate of
  3%, the intrinsic value increases to $15.14 billion. Again, this tells us
  that our estimate is sensitive to changes in the terminal growth rate
  assumption.
Overall,
  our DCF analysis suggests that XYZ Corp. is undervalued, with an intrinsic
  value of $13.76 billion compared to its market capitalization of $10 billion.
  However, we must keep in mind that this is just one method of valuation and
  there are many other factors that can affect the stock price. As always,
  investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with financial
  professionals before making any investment decisions.
Evaluation of
  Amazon based on  DCF - ChatGPT
DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) analysis is a commonly used method
  for evaluating the intrinsic value of a company. It is based on the idea that
  the value of a company is determined by the present value of its expected
  future cash flows.
Here are the steps to evaluate Amazon using DCF:
Step 1: Estimate Amazon's
  Free Cash Flow (FCF)
FCF is the cash generated by a company after accounting for
  all capital expenditures needed to maintain or grow the business. To calculate
  Amazon's FCF, we can start with its operating cash flow and subtract its
  capital expenditures.
Operating cash flow for the last 12 months (as of September
  2021) was $92.5 billion, and capital expenditures were $24.5 billion.
  Therefore, Amazon's FCF is:
FCF = Operating cash flow - Capital expenditures
FCF = $92.5 billion - $24.5 billion
FCF = $68 billion
Step 2: Estimate Amazon's
  growth rate
Next, we need to estimate the rate at which Amazon's FCF is likely
  to grow in the future. One way to do this is to look at the historical growth
  rates and make an educated guess about future growth.
Amazon's FCF has grown at an average rate of 25% over the past
  five years. Assuming a conservative growth rate of 15% for the next five
  years, and then a terminal growth rate of 3% after that, we can estimate
  Amazon's future FCF as follows:
Year 1 FCF = $68 billion x (1 + 15%) = $78.2 billion
Year 2 FCF = $78.2 billion x (1 + 15%) = $89.9 billion
Year 3 FCF = $89.9 billion x (1 + 15%) = $103.4 billion
Year 4 FCF = $103.4 billion x (1 + 15%) = $119 billion
Year 5 FCF = $119 billion x (1 + 15%) = $137 billion
Terminal FCF = $137 billion x (1 + 3%) / (11% - 3%) = $1760.94
  billion (11% is the WACC)
Step 3: Determine Amazon's
  Discount Rate
The discount rate is the rate of return required by investors
  to compensate for the risk of investing in a company. A higher discount rate
  indicates a higher level of risk. To determine Amazon's discount rate, we can
  use the CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model), which takes into account the
  risk-free rate, market risk premium, and Amazon's beta.
Assuming a risk-free rate of 2%, a market risk premium of 6%,
  and Amazon's beta of 1.5, we can calculate Amazon's discount rate as follows:
Discount rate = Risk-free rate + Beta x Market risk premium
Discount rate = 2% + 1.5 x 6%
Discount rate = 11%
Step 4: Calculate Amazon's
  Intrinsic Value
Finally, we can calculate Amazon's intrinsic value using the
  discounted cash flow formula, which is the sum of the present value of all
  future cash flows.
Intrinsic value = (Year 1 FCF / (1 + Discount rate)^1) + (Year
  2 FCF / (1 + Discount rate)^2) + ... + (Terminal FCF / (1 + Discount rate)^5)
Intrinsic value = ($78.2 billion / (1 + 11%)^1) + ($89.9 billion
  / (1 + 11%)^2) + ($103.4 billion / (1 + 11%)^3) + ($119 billion / (1 +
  11%)^4) + ($137 billion / (1 +11%)^5) + ($1.76 trillion / (1 + 11%)^5)
Intrinsic value = $1,423 billion
We made the assumption that AMAZON's cost of equity is roughly
  equivalent to its WACC for the purpose of simplifying the calculation.
  However, according to gurufocus.com, as of the end of March 2023, AMAZON's
  WACC is 9.65%.
Step 5: Compare Intrinsic
  Value with Market Value
The last step is to compare the intrinsic value we calculated
  with the current market value of Amazon. As of March 2023, Amazon's market
  capitalization is around $2.4 trillion.
Comparing the intrinsic value of $1,423 billion with the
  market capitalization of $2.4 trillion, we can see that the market value is
  higher than the intrinsic value, which suggests that the stock may be
  overvalued. However, it's important to keep in mind that the DCF analysis is
  based on various assumptions and estimates, and the actual value of a company
  may differ from the calculated intrinsic value.
Therefore, it's important to use multiple valuation methods
  and take into account other factors such as industry trends, competitive
  landscape, and management quality to make an informed investment decision.
To calculate the estimated per-share stock price based on the
  DCF analysis, we can divide the intrinsic value by the total number of shares
  outstanding. As of December 2021, Amazon had around 500 million shares
  outstanding.
Estimated Per-Share Stock Price = Intrinsic Value / Shares
  Outstanding
Estimated Per-Share Stock Price = $1,423 billion / 500 million
Estimated Per-Share Stock Price = $2,847
Therefore, based on this DCF analysis, the estimated per-share
  stock price for Amazon is $2,847. However, it's important to note that this
  is just an estimate based on certain assumptions and estimates, and the
  actual stock price may differ based on various factors such as market
  sentiment, company performance, and global economic conditions.
 
In discounted
  cash flow (DCF) valuation techniques the value of the stock is estimated
  based upon present value of some measure of cash flow. Free cash flow to the
  firm (FCFF) is generally described as cash flows after direct costs and
  before any payments to capital suppliers.
 
Amazon.com
  Inc., free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) forecast
 
| Year | Value | FCFFt or
    Terminal value (TVt) | Calculation | Present value at 16.17% | 
| 01 | FCFF0 | (4,286) | ||
| 1 | FCFF1 | – | = (4,286) ×
    (1 + 0.00%) | – | 
| 2 | FCFF2 | – | = – ×
    (1 + 0.00%) | – | 
| 3 | FCFF3 | – | = – ×
    (1 + 0.00%) | – | 
| 4 | FCFF4 | – | = – ×
    (1 + 0.00%) | – | 
| 5 | FCFF5 | – | = – ×
    (1 + 0.00%) | – | 
| 5 | Terminal value (TV5) | – | = – ×
    (1 + 0.00%) ÷ (16.17%
    – 0.00%) | – | 
| Intrinsic value
    of Amazon.com's capital | – | |||
| Less: Debt (fair value) | 45,696 | |||
| Intrinsic value
    of Amazon.com's common stock | – | |||
| Intrinsic value
    of Amazon.com's common stock (per share) | $– | |||
| Current share price | $1,642.81 | |||
1
Amazon.com
  Inc., cost of capital
 
| Value1 | Weight | Required rate of return2 | Calculation | |
| Equity (fair value) | 803,283  | 0.95 | 16.97% | |
| Debt (fair value) | 45,696  | 0.05 | 2.10% | = 2.99%
    × (1 – 29.84%) | 
1 USD $ in millions
   Equity (fair value) = No. shares
  of common stock outstanding × Current share price
  = 488,968,628 × $1,642.81 =
  $803,282,551,764.68
   Debt (fair value). See Details »
2 Required rate of return on equity
  is estimated by using CAPM. See Details »
   Required rate of return on
  debt. See Details »
   Required rate of return on debt
  is after tax.
   Estimated (average) effective
  income tax rate
  = (20.20% + 36.61%
  + 60.59% + 0.00%
  + 31.80%) ÷ 5 = 29.84%
WACC = 16.17%
Amazon.com
  Inc., PRAT model
 
| Average | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | ||
| Selected Financial Data
    (USD $ in millions) | |||||||
| Interest expense | 848  | 484  | 459  | 210  | 141  | ||
| Net income (loss) | 3,033  | 2,371  | 596  | (241) | 274  | ||
| Effective income tax rate
    (EITR)1 | 20.20% | 36.61% | 60.59% | 0.00% | 31.80% | ||
| Interest expense, after tax2 | 677  | 307  | 181  | 210  | 96  | ||
| Interest expense (after
    tax) and dividends | 677  | 307  | 181  | 210  | 96  | ||
| EBIT(1 – EITR)3 | 3,710  | 2,678  | 777  | (31) | 370  | ||
| Current portion of long-term
    debt | 100  | 1,056  | 238  | 1,520  | 753  | ||
| Current portion of capital
    lease obligation | 5,839  | 3,997  | 3,027  | 2,013  | 955  | ||
| Current portion of finance
    lease obligations | 282  | 144  | 99  | 67  | 28  | ||
| Long-term debt, excluding
    current portion | 24,743  | 7,694  | 8,235  | 8,265  | 3,191  | ||
| Long-term capital lease
    obligations, excluding current portion | 8,438  | 5,080  | 4,212  | 3,026  | 1,435  | ||
| Long-term finance lease
    obligations, excluding current portion | 4,745  | 2,439  | 1,736  | 1,198  | 555  | ||
| Total stockholders' equity | 27,709  | 19,285  | 13,384  | 10,741  | 9,746  | ||
| Total capital | 71,856  | 39,695  | 30,931  | 26,830  | 16,663  | ||
| Ratios | |||||||
| Retention rate (RR)4 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.77 | – | 0.74 | ||
| Return on invested capital
    (ROIC)5 | 5.16% | 6.75% | 2.51% | -0.12% | 2.22% | ||
| Averages | |||||||
| RR | 0.80 | ||||||
| ROIC | 3.31% | ||||||
| Growth rate of FCFF (g)6 | 0.00% | ||||||
2017
  Calculations
2 Interest expense, after tax =
  Interest expense × (1 – EITR)
  = 848 × (1 – 20.20%)
  = 677
3 EBIT(1 – EITR) = Net income
  (loss) + Interest expense, after tax
  = 3,033 + 677 = 3,710
4 RR = [EBIT(1 – EITR) – Interest
  expense (after tax) and dividends] ÷ EBIT(1 – EITR)
  = [3,710 – 677]
  ÷ 3,710 = 0.82
5 ROIC = 100 × EBIT(1 – EITR) ÷
  Total capital
  = 100 × 3,710 ÷ 71,856 = 5.16%
6 g = RR × ROIC
  = 0.80 × 3.31%
  = 0.00%
Amazon.com
  Inc., H-model
 
| Year | Value | gt | 
| 1 | g1 | 0.00% | 
| 2 | g2 | 0.00% | 
| 3 | g3 | 0.00% | 
| 4 | g4 | 0.00% | 
| 5 and thereafter | g5 | 0.00% | 
where:
  g1 is implied by PRAT model
  g5 is implied by single-stage model
  g2, g3 and g4 are calculated using
  linear interpoltion between g1 and g5
Calculations
g2 = g1 + (g5 – g1) × (2 – 1) ÷ (5 – 1)
  = 0.00% + (0.00%
  – 0.00%) × (2 – 1) ÷ (5 – 1) = 0.00%
g3 = g1 + (g5 – g1) × (3 – 1) ÷ (5 – 1)
  = 0.00% + (0.00%
  – 0.00%) × (3 – 1) ÷ (5 – 1) = 0.00%
g4 = g1 + (g5 – g1) × (4 –
  1) ÷ (5 – 1)
  = 0.00% + (0.00%
  – 0.00%) × (4 – 1) ÷ (5 – 1) = 0.00%
Chapter 3 Financial Statement
 
 
http://www.jufinance.com/10k/bs
 
http://www.jufinance.com/10k/is
  
http://www.jufinance.com/10k/cf
 
 
Note:
  All companies, foreign and domestic, are required to file registration
  statements, periodic reports, and other forms electronically through
  EDGAR. 
 
************
  What is Free Cash Flow **************
What is free cash flow (video)
What
  is free cash flow (FCF)? Why is it important?
•       FCF is
  the amount of cash available from operations for distribution to all
  investors (including stockholders and debtholders)
  after making the necessary investments to support operations.
•       A
  company’s value depends on the amount of FCF it can
  generate.
 
 
What are the five uses
  of FCF?
o  
  Pay interest on debt.
o  
  Pay back principal on debt.
o  
  Pay dividends.
o  
  Buy back stock.
o  
  Buy nonoperating assets
  (e.g., marketable securities, investments in other companies, etc.)

Capital expenditure =
  increases in NFA + depreciation
Or, capital expenditure
  = increases in GFA
What
  are operating current assets?
•      Operating
  current assets are the CA needed to support operations.
•      Op CA
  include: cash, inventory, receivables.
•      Op CA
  exclude: short-term investments, because these are not a part of operations.
What
  are operating current liabilities?
•      Operating
  current liabilities are the CL resulting as a normal part of operations.
•      Op CL
  include: accounts payable and accruals.
•      Op
  CL exclude: notes payable, because this is a
  source of financing, not a part of operations.
Note:
  All companies, foreign and domestic, are required to file registration
  statements, periodic reports, and other forms electronically through
  EDGAR.  https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html
 
In class exercise
Firm AAA has EBIT (operating income) of $3
  million, depreciation of $1 million. Firm AAA’s
  expenditures on fixed assets = $1 million. Its net operating working capital
  = $0.6 million.  Calculate for free cash flow. Imagine that the tax
  rate =40%.
FCF = EBIT(1
  – T) + Deprec. – (Capex + NOWC)
answer:
EBIT                  $3
Tax
  rate                40%
Depreciation        $1
Capex + NOWC    $1.60
So, FCF =  3*(1-40%) + 1 –(1+0.6) =
  1.2
 
Case study of chapter 3 
·     
  FCF
·     
  MVA: How to calculate market
  value added | MVA calculation | FIN-Ed (video)
·      
  EVA:  Economic Value Added: EVA
  Explained (video)
·     
  Balance Sheet 
·     
  Income Statement
 
·        Excel File here  (due with the final exam,)    ‘
 
| Industry name | Number of firms |    Dividends   |   Net Income   | Dividends + Buybacks - Stock Issuances | FCFE (before debt cash flows) | FCFE (after debt cash flows) | 
| Advertising | 58 | $1,053.13  | $1,557.12  | $2,099.32  | $701.92  | $1,441.35  | 
| Aerospace/Defense | 77 | $10,261.13  | $14,514.28  | $26,339.72  | $11,777.55  | $7,574.30  | 
| Air Transport | 21 | $0.00  | ($3,270.31) | ($143.96) | ($7,598.89) | ($21,052.22) | 
| Apparel | 39 | $1,985.68  | $3,655.80  | $7,841.46  | ($2,499.16) | ($1,233.15) | 
| Auto & Truck | 31 | $2,124.50  | $20,137.80  | ($7,894.97) | $2,434.31  | ($3,779.69) | 
| Auto Parts | 37 | $694.40  | $1,869.70  | $1,567.87  | ($1,796.70) | ($246.25) | 
| Bank (Money Center) | 7 | $29,107.12  | $102,625.92  | $40,338.00  | $141,352.92  | $280,520.92  | 
| Banks (Regional) | 557 | $19,659.99  | $67,543.37  | $32,945.14  | $58,434.71  | $192,772.18  | 
| Beverage (Alcoholic) | 23 | $1,270.60  | $1,608.29  | $2,592.31  | ($195.71) | ($105.87) | 
| Beverage (Soft) | 31 | $12,915.35  | $22,852.32  | $15,024.79  | $21,780.18  | $25,887.17  | 
| Broadcasting | 26 | $1,266.31  | $8,817.25  | $3,464.83  | ($5,822.60) | ($7,578.38) | 
| Brokerage & Investment Banking | 30 | $11,022.99  | $38,423.51  | $23,872.69  | $100,348.33  | $171,525.17  | 
| Building Materials | 45 | $1,861.54  | $14,370.39  | $11,720.67  | $9,419.22  | $13,041.20  | 
| Business & Consumer Services | 164 | $3,112.87  | $11,028.56  | $8,943.99  | $11,231.01  | $16,410.59  | 
| Cable TV | 10 | $5,128.40  | $17,653.30  | $36,833.00  | $18,830.08  | $28,294.38  | 
| Chemical (Basic) | 38 | $4,333.80  | $15,819.51  | $9,182.00  | $9,847.05  | $6,877.91  | 
| Chemical (Diversified) | 4 | $330.00  | $2,259.24  | $1,683.10  | $1,824.07  | $1,901.91  | 
| Chemical (Specialty) | 76 | $7,557.41  | $18,677.57  | $19,090.45  | $5,618.06  | $25,052.17  | 
| Coal & Related Energy | 19 | $513.96  | $2,515.23  | ($345.25) | $2,307.19  | $1,255.10  | 
| Computer Services | 80 | $7,172.66  | $7,664.51  | $12,895.07  | $7,927.03  | $13,115.96  | 
| Computers/Peripherals | 42 | $18,124.95  | $106,948.54  | $123,564.50  | $107,732.42  | $105,646.15  | 
| Construction Supplies | 49 | $4,538.96  | $14,115.59  | $12,082.06  | $4,323.04  | $10,297.31  | 
| Diversified | 23 | $6,865.35  | $4,556.31  | $23,473.13  | ($8,333.02) | ($28,355.90) | 
| Drugs (Biotechnology) | 598 | $17,685.00  | $1,336.62  | $13,735.23  | $6,456.49  | $513.27  | 
| Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | 281 | $37,183.45  | $72,397.57  | $50,169.94  | $75,076.60  | $72,293.14  | 
| Education | 33 | $90.00  | $516.08  | $2,104.63  | $407.23  | ($685.19) | 
| Electrical Equipment | 110 | $2,409.19  | $6,991.17  | $3,687.43  | ($116.23) | $10,494.28  | 
| Electronics (Consumer & Office) | 16 | $0.00  | $39.39  | $230.06  | ($353.91) | ($344.21) | 
| Electronics (General) | 138 | $916.43  | $8,638.31  | $4,921.24  | $486.37  | $7,877.66  | 
| Engineering/Construction | 43 | $432.10  | $2,558.96  | $2,727.69  | ($1,888.01) | $3,697.80  | 
| Entertainment | 110 | $959.84  | $1,903.67  | $2,560.07  | $5,417.98  | ($1,283.68) | 
| Environmental & Waste Services | 62 | $2,146.70  | $4,640.61  | $3,975.31  | $3,314.61  | $8,304.54  | 
| Farming/Agriculture | 39 | $3,015.71  | $14,341.24  | $8,068.02  | ($4,214.13) | $4,957.79  | 
| Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance) | 223 | $13,017.30  | $95,373.69  | $60,726.69  | $86,528.70  | ($162,222.92) | 
| Food Processing | 92 | $10,574.62  | $19,663.08  | $15,571.88  | $11,098.26  | $9,624.51  | 
| Food Wholesalers | 14 | $1,021.60  | $2,343.41  | $1,699.52  | ($1,201.28) | ($540.28) | 
| Furn/Home Furnishings | 32 | $796.43  | $1,170.87  | $3,857.91  | ($1,718.25) | $507.55  | 
| Green & Renewable Energy | 19 | $657.02  | $1,155.76  | $196.87  | ($392.33) | $2,042.75  | 
| Healthcare Products | 254 | $6,570.31  | $14,242.60  | $14,559.38  | $8,342.26  | $21,726.15  | 
| Healthcare Support Services | 131 | $13,557.74  | $41,031.69  | $44,679.36  | $39,997.55  | $35,170.62  | 
| Heathcare Information and Technology | 138 | $1,581.92  | ($529.78) | $8,491.10  | ($3,101.06) | $4,235.22  | 
| Homebuilding | 32 | $1,361.39  | $24,986.04  | $7,894.75  | $9,262.75  | $10,501.21  | 
| Hospitals/Healthcare Facilities | 34 | $949.00  | $6,999.96  | $9,476.79  | $2,703.89  | $9,327.11  | 
| Hotel/Gaming | 69 | $793.83  | $1,606.13  | $15,579.42  | $4,108.84  | $1,538.00  | 
| Household Products | 127 | $14,431.34  | $22,657.09  | $19,606.34  | $17,895.42  | $24,106.84  | 
| Information Services | 73 | $10,475.09  | $37,313.93  | $46,377.01  | $41,679.42  | $56,500.60  | 
| Insurance (General) | 21 | $3,403.41  | $20,197.72  | $13,417.34  | $11,622.09  | $16,243.71  | 
| Insurance (Life) | 27 | $5,853.45  | $15,306.23  | $18,439.95  | $15,021.27  | $10,250.87  | 
| Insurance (Prop/Cas.) | 51 | $7,922.51  | $10,805.47  | $16,179.26  | $7,392.63  | $8,226.39  | 
| Investments & Asset Management | 600 | $15,100.19  | $35,375.45  | ($17,337.91) | $32,624.12  | $62,520.16  | 
| Machinery | 116 | $5,613.08  | $15,291.50  | $13,889.15  | $8,070.20  | $26,845.63  | 
| Metals & Mining | 68 | $4,009.40  | $6,414.92  | $6,402.72  | $3,994.43  | $5,889.08  | 
| Office Equipment & Services | 16 | $392.50  | $473.13  | $576.86  | ($167.91) | $929.15  | 
| Oil/Gas (Integrated) | 4 | $26,119.36  | $99,099.30  | $40,345.10  | $111,781.80  | $75,992.90  | 
| Oil/Gas (Production and Exploration) | 174 | $20,127.07  | $86,953.77  | $41,719.95  | $59,398.57  | $46,696.46  | 
| Oil/Gas Distribution | 23 | $8,450.90  | $2,683.10  | $9,512.83  | ($192.46) | $1,748.88  | 
| Oilfield Svcs/Equip. | 101 | $7,323.11  | $41,659.69  | $25,266.85  | $34,325.07  | $24,456.82  | 
| Packaging & Container | 25 | $2,718.41  | $9,491.27  | $8,916.47  | $2,669.65  | $2,600.74  | 
| Paper/Forest Products | 7 | $99.00  | $1,255.70  | $1,313.61  | $921.51  | $905.06  | 
| Power | 48 | $21,251.45  | $35,093.37  | $13,635.40  | ($35,714.94) | $17,634.52  | 
| Precious Metals | 74 | $1,943.35  | $1,211.84  | $1,658.21  | $243.93  | $1,104.43  | 
| Publishing & Newspapers | 20 | $407.90  | $778.84  | $989.17  | $715.58  | $1,365.97  | 
| R.E.I.T. | 223 | $51,601.83  | $47,868.79  | $1,818.52  | $88,400.76  | $150,282.44  | 
| Real Estate (Development) | 18 | $0.00  | $538.86  | $469.87  | $787.35  | $879.40  | 
| Real Estate (General/Diversified) | 12 | $48.10  | $144.88  | $89.51  | $60.37  | $160.86  | 
| Real Estate (Operations & Services) | 60 | $229.56  | ($830.15) | $4,494.01  | $2,587.49  | $2,975.10  | 
| Recreation | 57 | $1,069.82  | $784.68  | $1,160.86  | ($4,087.93) | ($1,988.65) | 
| Reinsurance | 1 | $201.00  | $575.00  | $306.00  | $533.30  | $1,264.30  | 
| Restaurant/Dining | 70 | $8,430.28  | $13,628.14  | $20,501.45  | $10,248.10  | $15,970.87  | 
| Retail (Automotive) | 30 | $738.77  | $11,025.24  | $12,507.54  | $7,563.78  | $22,789.96  | 
| Retail (Building Supply) | 15 | $10,186.13  | $24,750.59  | $37,174.05  | $12,747.23  | $25,674.25  | 
| Retail (Distributors) | 69 | $3,130.07  | $14,460.39  | $8,006.13  | ($3,931.77) | $3,217.19  | 
| Retail (General) | 15 | $10,568.63  | $26,032.60  | $33,456.72  | ($5,214.18) | $12,954.65  | 
| Retail (Grocery and Food) | 13 | $1,013.25  | $5,113.51  | $2,585.48  | $2,892.69  | $1,299.14  | 
| Retail (Online) | 63 | $513.40  | $3,688.55  | $12,759.24  | ($51,160.77) | ($39,972.87) | 
| Retail (Special Lines) | 78 | $5,685.91  | $17,547.91  | $22,107.18  | $3,438.49  | $8,185.60  | 
| Rubber& Tires | 3 | $0.00  | $864.12  | ($1.46) | ($352.39) | $295.70  | 
| Semiconductor | 68 | $23,911.23  | $72,801.99  | $62,269.76  | $36,738.16  | $41,487.00  | 
| Semiconductor Equip | 30 | $2,591.80  | $18,191.87  | $16,041.22  | $8,840.69  | $20,856.58  | 
| Shipbuilding & Marine | 8 | $256.30  | $2,071.70  | $629.34  | $2,064.45  | $1,634.49  | 
| Shoe | 13 | $2,072.05  | $7,698.70  | $1,090.41  | $6,060.83  | $8,598.47  | 
| Software (Entertainment) | 91 | $60.03  | $91,628.19  | $103,663.72  | $56,468.04  | $67,774.87  | 
| Software (Internet) | 33 | $0.34  | ($5,178.90) | $3,398.96  | ($7,707.22) | ($6,077.91) | 
| Software (System & Application) | 390 | $24,238.73  | $71,266.94  | $64,479.06  | $48,833.83  | $71,160.04  | 
| Steel | 28 | $1,342.77  | $25,593.54  | $9,591.24  | $18,329.90  | $16,980.17  | 
| Telecom (Wireless) | 16 | $145.71  | $2,321.21  | $1,011.06  | ($3,333.42) | ($1,972.90) | 
| Telecom. Equipment | 79 | $7,183.58  | $14,067.43  | $19,482.92  | $9,251.85  | $11,450.13  | 
| Telecom. Services | 49 | $21,546.93  | $41,509.34  | $13,044.09  | $38,803.38  | ($4,787.07) | 
| Tobacco | 15 | $14,569.30  | $13,594.15  | $17,637.73  | $12,523.43  | $11,467.92  | 
| Transportation | 18 | $6,209.10  | $18,562.94  | $13,749.07  | $10,682.41  | $10,330.74  | 
| Transportation (Railroads) | 4 | $5,115.98  | $14,258.80  | $19,545.00  | $11,470.98  | $18,925.38  | 
| Trucking | 35 | $729.19  | $2,048.54  | $9,226.79  | ($11,721.86) | ($3,931.09) | 
| Utility (General) | 15 | $9,711.00  | $16,381.30  | $8,442.10  | ($12,850.02) | ($2,207.72) | 
| Utility (Water) | 16 | $937.33  | $2,065.11  | $677.24  | ($1,100.09) | $656.97  | 
| Total Market | 7165 | $636,300.29  | $1,834,489.12  | $1,464,406.32  | $1,330,007.52  | $1,727,349.81  | 
| Total Market (without financials) | 5649 | $531,213.34  | $1,448,837.76  | $1,275,825.16  | $876,682.75  | $1,147,513.33  | 
Note:  Dividends and Free Cash Flows to Equity, i.e.,
  cash flows left over after taxes, reinvestment needs and debt payments
  (FCFE), by industry 
https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
FYI: Market Value Added (MVA)
By
  JAMES CHEN Updated May 26, 2021, Reviewed by DAVID KINDNESS, Fact checked by
  HANS DANIEL JASPERSON
What Is
  Market Value Added?
Market value added (MVA) is a calculation
  that shows the difference between the market value of a company and the
  capital contributed by all investors, both bondholders and shareholders. In other words, it is the market value of debt and equity minus all
  capital claims held against the company. It is calculated as:
MVA = V
  - K
where MVA
  is the market value added of the firm, V is the market value of the firm,
  including the value of the firm's equity and debt (its enterprise value), and
  K is the total amount of capital invested in the firm.

MVA is
  closely related to the concept of economic value added (EVA), representing
  the net present value (NPV) of a series of EVA values.
Understanding
  Market Value Added (MVA)
When investors want to look under the hood to
  see how a company performs for its shareholders, they first look at MVA. A company’s MVA is an indication of its capacity to increase
  shareholder value over time. A high
  MVA is evidence of effective management and strong operational capabilities.
  A low MVA can mean the value of management’s actions and investments is less
  than the value of the capital contributed by shareholders. A negative MVA
  means the management's actions and investments have diminished and reversed
  the value of capital contributed by shareholders.
FYI: Economic Value Added (EVA)
By
  JAMES CHEN Updated March 22, 2022, Reviewed by JANET BERRY-JOHNSON, Fact
  checked by KIRSTEN ROHRS SCHMITT
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eva.asp
What Is
  Economic Value Added (EVA)?
Economic value added (EVA) is a measure of a
  company's financial performance based on the residual wealth calculated by
  deducting its cost of capital from its operating profit, adjusted for taxes
  on a cash basis. EVA can also be referred to as economic
  profit, as it attempts to capture the true economic profit of a company. This
  measure was devised by management consulting firm Stern Value Management,
  originally incorporated as Stern Stewart & Co.
Understanding Economic Value Added
  (EVA)
EVA is
  the incremental difference in the rate of return (RoR) over a company's cost
  of capital. Essentially, it is used to measure the value a company generates
  from funds invested in it. If a
  company's EVA is negative, it means the company is not generating value from
  the funds invested into the business. Conversely, a positive EVA shows a
  company is producing value from the funds invested in it.
The formula for calculating EVA is:
EVA = NOPAT - (Invested Capital * WACC)
Where:
NOPAT = Net operating profit after taxes
Invested capital = Debt + capital leases +
  shareholders' equity
WACC = Weighted average cost of capital2

Chapter 12: Cash
  Flow Estimation (2nd step
  of DCF)
Chapter
  12  case study (due with final. Monte
  Carol is not required. FYI only)
Monte
  Carlo Demonstration Based on Case in Class (FYI, Video)
Critical thinking
  challenge (due with final, optional for extra credits):  
·      Recalculate 100 times of the NPV based on the Monte Carlo
  simulation method by randomly changing the tax rate and the WACC
·      Report
  statistical results: Mean, Standard Deviation, Min, Max of the NPV. 
·      Report the
  Histogram of the NPV, or the probability distribution of the NPV, such as the
  following:

Monte Carlo
  Simulation Demonstration (FYI)
 
| Structure
    or template: | 
 | |||||||||||
| 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 | |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||
| Investment Outlay | ||||||||||||
| Equipment
    cost |  $(----------) | |||||||||||
| Installation |     (--------) | |||||||||||
| Increase
    in inventory |     (-------) | |||||||||||
| Increase
    in A/P |        ------- | |||||||||||
| Initial
    net investment |  $(-------) | |||||||||||
| Operating Cash Flows | ||||||||||||
| Units
    sales | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Price
    per unit | *
     $     --- |  $     --- |  $        --- |  $     --- | ||||||||
|   Total
    revenues | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Operating
    costs (w/o deprn) | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Depreciation | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
|   Total
    costs | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Operating
    income | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Taxes
    on operating income | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| A-T
    operating income | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Depreciation | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
| Operating
    cash flow | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ||||||||
Terminal Year Cash
  Flows
Recovery of net
  working capital                                                                              -------
| 
 | Salvage
    value |     ------- | ||||||||||
| 
 | Tax
    on salvage value |    (-------) | ||||||||||
| 
 | Total
    termination cash flow |     ------- | ||||||||||
| 
 | Project Cash Flows |   |   |   |   |   | ||||||
| Net
    cash flows |  $(-------) |  $  ------- |  $  ------- |  $    ------- | ||||||||
In class exercise (self-study)
1.     What is the project's Year 1 cash
  flow?
Sales revenues                                                                               $22,250
Depreciation                                                                                    $8,000
Other operating costs                                                                  $12,000
Tax rate                                                                                              35.0%
Answer:
  
Sales revenues                                       $22,250
−  Operating costs (excl. deprec.)             12,000
−  Depreciation                                         8,000
Operating income (EBIT)                       $  2,250
   − 
  Taxes        Rate = 35%                         788
After-tax EBIT                                      $  1,463
   + 
  Depreciation                                      8,000
Cash
  flow, Year 1                                 $  9,463
 
2.     The required equipment has a
  3-year tax life, and it will be depreciated by the straight-line method over
  3 years.  What is the project's Year 1
  cash flow?
Equipment cost (depreciable basis)                                          $65,000
Straight-line depreciation rate                                                  33.333%
Sales revenues, each year                                                           $60,000
Operating costs (excl. deprec.)                                                  $25,000
Tax rate                                                                                              35.0%
Answer: 
Equipment life, years                                       3
Equipment cost                                      $65,000
Depreciation:    rate = 33.333%              $21,667
Sales revenues                                       $60,000
− Basis x rate  = 
  depreciation                  21,667
−  Operating costs (excl. deprec.)            
  25,000
Operating income (EBIT)                       $13,333
−  Taxes           Rate
  = 35.0%                    4,667
After-tax EBIT                                      $  8,667
   + 
  Depreciation                                    21,667
Cash
  flow, Year 1                                  $30,333
 
3.     The equipment that would be used
  has a 3-year tax life, and the allowed depreciation rates for such property
  are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7% for Years 1 through 4.  Revenues and other operating costs are
  expected to be constant over the project's 10-year expected life.  What is the Year 1 cash flow?
Equipment cost (depreciable basis)                                                         $65,000
Sales revenues, each year                                                                          $60,000
Operating costs (excl. deprec.)                                                                 $25,000
Tax rate                                                                                                             35.0%
Answer: 
Equipment cost                                      $65,000
Depreciation rate                                      33.0%
Sales revenues                                       $60,000
−  Operating costs (excl. deprec.)             25,000
−  Depreciation                                       21,450
Operating income (EBIT)                       $13,550
   − 
  Taxes        Rate = 35%                       4,743
After-tax EBIT                                      $  8,808
   + 
  Depreciation                                    21,450
Cash
  flow, Year 1                                  $30,258
4.     The equipment that would be used
  has a 3-year tax life, would be depreciated by the straight-line method over
  its 3-year life, and would have a zero salvage value.  No new working capital would be
  required.  Revenues and other operating
  costs are expected to be constant over the project's 3-year life.  What is the project's NPV?
Risk-adjusted WACC                                                                                       10.0%
Net investment cost (depreciable
  basis)                                                 $65,000
Straight-line deprec. rate                                                                        33.3333%
Sales revenues, each year                                                                          $65,500
Operating costs (excl. deprec.),
  each year                                             $25,000
Tax rate                                                                                                             35.0%
Answer: 
WACC             10.0%               Years                        0                1                2                3        
Investment cost                                                      -$65,000
Sales revenues                                                                           $65,500      $65,500      $65,500
−  Operating costs (excl. deprec.)                                                 25,000        25,000        25,000
−  Depreciation rate = 33.333%                                                    21,667        21,667        21,667
Operating income (EBIT)                                                           $18,833      $18,833      $18,833
   − 
  Taxes        Rate = 35%                                                           6,592          6,592          6,592
After-tax EBIT                                                                          $12,242      $12,242      $12,242
   + 
  Depreciation                                                                        21,667       
  21,667        21,667
Cash flow                                                              -$65,000      $33,908      $33,908      $33,908
NPV                 $19,325
5.     The equipment originally cost
  $22,500, of which 75% has been depreciated. 
  The firm can sell the used equipment today for $6,000, and its tax
  rate is 40%.  What is the equipment’s
  after-tax salvage value for use in a capital budgeting analysis?  Note that if the equipment's final market
  value is less than its book value, the firm will receive a tax credit as a
  result of the sale.
Answer: 
% depreciated on equip.                                          75%
Tax rate                                                                 40%
Equipment cost                                                  $22,500
−  Accumulated deprec.                                       16,875
Current book value of equipment                        $  5,625
Market value of equipment                                    6,000
Gain (or loss):  Market value − Book value         $    
  375
Taxes paid on gain (−) or
  credited (+) on loss           -150
AT
  salvage value = market value +/− taxes         $ 
  5,850
FYI:   Analyzing
  Business Performance through Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis – ChatGPT 
Let's
  consider an example of a coffee shop that sells coffee and baked goods. The
  coffee shop has historical data for the past year, which shows that the
  average daily revenue is $1000 with a standard deviation of $100, and the
  average daily cost is $600 with a standard deviation of $50.
To use Monte
  Carlo simulation to simulate the profits, we can follow the following steps:
Determine the distribution of the revenue and
  costs data:
Based
  on the historical data, we can assume that revenue and costs follow a normal distribution. We can estimate the
  distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation) for each variable as
  follows:
Revenue:
  Mean = $1000, Standard Deviation = $100
Costs:
  Mean = $600, Standard Deviation = $50
Generate
  random values for revenue and costs based on their respective distributions:
We can
  use a Monte Carlo simulation software like Excel or Python to generate random
  values. Let's say we want to simulate 1000 days of operation for the coffee
  shop. We can use the following formulas in Excel to generate random values
  for revenue and costs:
Revenue:
  =NORM.INV(RAND(), 1000, 100)
Costs:
  =NORM.INV(RAND(), 600, 50)
We can
  copy these formulas down for 1000 rows to generate 1000 random values for
  revenue and costs.
Calculate the profit for each set of random
  values:
We can
  use the following formula in Excel to calculate the profit for each set of
  random values:
Profit: =
  Revenue - Costs
We can
  copy this formula down for 1000 rows to calculate the profit for each set of
  random values.
Repeat steps 2
  and 3 thousands of times:
We can
  repeat steps 2 and 3 thousands of times to get a large sample size of
  profits. 
In Excel, we
  can use the data table feature to simulate profits for thousands of
  iterations. 
We can set up
  the data table as follows:
Column A:
  Iteration number (1 to 1000)
Column
  B: Random revenue (generated using the formula above)
Column
  C: Random costs (generated using the formula above)
Column
  D: Profit (calculated using the formula above)
We can then
  select columns B, C, and D and go to Data > What-If Analysis > Data
  Table. In the "Column Input Cell" box, we can enter a reference to
  a cell that contains a random number (e.g., =RAND()). Excel will then
  simulate profits for thousands of iterations.
Analyze the
  simulated profit distribution:
We can
  use the simulation results to analyze the profit distribution. In Excel, we
  can calculate the mean, standard deviation, and other statistical measures
  for the profit column. We can also create a histogram or probability density
  plot to visualize the distribution.  
Use the
  simulation results to make business decisions:
We can
  use the simulation results to estimate the probability of different profit
  outcomes. 
For example,
  we can use the following formulas in Excel to estimate the probability of making
  a profit of at least $500 or at least $600:
Probability of
  profit >= $500: =1-COUNTIF(D2:D1001,"<500")/1000
Probability of
  profit >= $600: =1-COUNTIF(D2:D1001,"<600")/1000
Based
  on the simulation results, we can estimate that the probability of making a
  profit of at least $500 is around 76%, and the probability of making a profit
  of at least $600 is around 50%. We can use these probabilities to make
  decisions such as setting pricing strategies, reducing costs, or investing in
  new products or services.
Overall, Monte Carlo simulation is a powerful
  tool for analyzing uncertainty and risk in business operations. By simulating
  different scenarios, we can estimate the probability of different outcomes
  and make informed decisions based on the simulation results. However, it's important to note that the accuracy of the simulation
  depends on the quality of the input data and assumptions made about the
  distribution of revenue and costs. Therefore, it's important to carefully
  analyze the input data and assumptions to ensure that the simulation results
  are reliable.  However, the accuracy of
  the simulation depends on the quality of the input data and assumptions made
  about the distribution of revenue and costs. It's crucial to carefully
  analyze the input data and assumptions to ensure that the simulation results
  are reliable. Monte Carlo simulation is not a crystal ball and cannot predict
  future outcomes with certainty, but it can help businesses analyze
  uncertainty and risk.
Chapter 19 Derivatives
Chapter 19 Case Study
  Part I -  due with final
Chapter 19 Case
  Study part II – due with final
Case
  video in class Part I (4.10.2023)
Case
  video in class part II (4.12.2023)
Case
  video in class -----    Part I        Part II
1st, understand what is call and put
  option
2nd,
  understand the pay off of call and put option
3rd,
  can draw payoff profile of call and put option
Call
  and Put Option Calculator
Call and Put Option Diagram Illustration Excel
(Thanks to
  Dr. Greence at UAH)
4th, can calculate call option
  pricing using binomial model  
 
Instruction on Binomial
  model - in class exercise - case study
·      
  In the first step, you are calculating the
  range of values at expiration by considering the two possible ending stock
  prices of $30 and $50. You then calculate the ending option and portfolio
  values for each of these stock prices.
·      
  Next, in step 2, you are equalizing the
  range of payoffs for the stock and the option by buying 0.75 shares and selling 1 option.
  This allows you to create a riskless hedged investment in step 3, where you
  calculate the ending values of the portfolio for the two possible ending
  stock prices.
·      
  Finally, in step 4, you are pricing the
  call option by calculating the present value of the portfolio using the
  risk-free rate of 8%. The calculated present value of the portfolio is
  $20.83, which can be used to calculate the call option value.
5th, can calculate call
  option price using black-scholes model
https://www.mystockoptions.com/black-scholes.cfm
or
Black Scholes Option
  Calculator (at jufinance.com) 
www.jufinance.com/https://www.jufinance.com/option_chatgpt/
Black-Scholes Model Illustration
  Excel
(Thanks to
  Dr. Greence at UAH)
Binomial Tree (FYI)
A binomial tree is a representation of the intrinsic values an option may take at
  different time periods. The value of the
  option at any node depends on the probability that the price of the
  underlying asset will either decrease or increase at any given node.

Black-Scholes model (reference only)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9-_Jar2UpQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_z1Zx_BALo
 
Binomial Option Pricing Model Explained  ----
using In Class Case Study as an example (FYI only)
The
  binomial option pricing model is a mathematical formula that allows us to
  calculate the fair value of an option by modeling the possible future prices
  of the underlying asset, and calculating the probability of each price
  occurring. 
The model works by
  creating a binomial tree that represents the possible future prices of the
  asset, and then working backward through the tree to calculate the expected
  value of the option at each node.
Here
  are the steps to use the binomial option pricing model:
Step 1: Determine the
  Inputs
The
  first step is to gather the inputs needed for the model. These include:
·      
  The current price of the underlying asset
·      
  The range of possible future prices of the
  asset
·      
  The exercise price of the option
·      
  The risk-free rate of interest
·      
  The time until expiration of the option
Let’s
  try to work on the same question as we did in class. A stock that is currently trading at $40, and two possible future
  prices at the end of one year are: $30 and $50. The exercise price of the
  option is $35, the risk-free rate is 8%, and the time until expiration is one
  year --- our case study example
Step 2: Calculate the Up
  and Down Factors
The
  next step is to calculate the up and down factors, which represent the
  expected percentage increase and decrease in the stock price over one period.
  These factors are calculated as:
·      
  Up factor (u) = Future price if stock goes
  up / Current stock price
·      
  Down factor (d) = Future price if stock
  goes down / Current stock price
In
  our example, the up factor is $50 /
  $40 = 1.25, and the down factor is $30 / $40 = 0.75.
Step 3: Create the
  Binomial Tree
This
  step involves creating the binomial tree as below.   
Binomial Tree
         $40
        /     
  \
     $50    
  $30
Step 4: Calculate the
  Risk-Neutral Probability
The
  next step is to calculate the probability of each future price occurring,
  using the risk-neutral probability. The
  risk-neutral probability is the probability of the stock going up or down,
  assuming that the market is risk-neutral and the expected return of the stock
  is equal to the risk-free rate. 
The
  risk-neutral probability is calculated as:
Risk-neutral probability
  (p) = (1+r-d)/(u-d)
where
  r is the risk-free rate and t is the time until expiration.
In
  our example, the risk-neutral probability is approximately:
Pu =
  (1+0.08-0.75)/(1.25-0.75)= 0.66
 
Or
  use the more accurate model:
Risk-neutral
  probability Pu = (e^((r * t)/n) - d) / (u - d)
where
  r is the risk-free rate and t is the time until expiration, and n is the
  height of the binomial tree. In our example, n=1. 
In
  our example, the risk-neutral probability is:
Pu
  = (e^(0.08 * 1) - 0.75) / (1.25 - 0.75) = 0.6666
Step 5: Calculate the Option
  Value at Each Node of the Tree
To
  get the value of the option at each node of the tree, we should work backward
  from the end of the tree to the current price of the stock. 
Simply
  speaking, at the end of the tree, the option value = difference between the
  stock price and the exercise price, or zero if the stock price is below the
  exercise price.
For
  example, we need to calculate the value of the option if the stock price goes
  up to $50, and if it goes down to $30. The results are as follows. 
Vu
  = Max($50 - $35, 0) = $15
Vd
  = $0
Working
  backward up the tree, we can calculate the option value at each node as the
  discounted expected value of the option at the next period:
Option
  value = v = (Pu * Vu + Pd * Vd) / (1 + r)^t;
Option
  Value at $40 = (0.66 x $15 + (1 - 0.66) x $0) / (1 + 0.08)^1 = $9.17
Therefore,
  the value of the option is approximately $9.17 if the stock price is $40.
 
 
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model Explained  ----
using In Class Case Study as an example (FYI only)
C = SN(d1) –
  X*exp(-r*t)*N(d2)
where:
·      
  S
  = the current stock price
·      
  X
  = the option strike price
·      
  r
  = the risk-free interest rate
·      
  t
  = time until expiration, expressed as a fraction of a year
| V   = | P[
    N (d1) ] − Xe-rRF t [ N (d2) ] | ||||
| d1   = | {
    ln (P/X) + [rRF + s2 /2) ] t } / s (t1/2) | ||||
| d2
      = | d1
    − s (t 1 / 2) | ||||
d1 = [ln(S/X) + (r + σ^2/2)t] / [σsqrt(t)]  
  
d2 = d1 - σ*sqrt(t)
σ
  = the annualized standard deviation of stock returns
Using
  the values used in the case study in class:
·      
  S
  = X = 21
·      
  r
  = 0.05
·      
  σ
  = 0.3
·      
  t
  = 0.36
First,
  we calculate d1 and d2:
d1 = ln(21/21)+(0.05+0.3^2/2)*0.36)/(0.3*sqrt(0.36))
  =0.19
d2 =
  0.19 - 0.3*sqrt(0.36) = 0.01
Next,
  we calculate the call option price using the Black-Scholes formula:
C = SN(d1) –
  X*exp(-r*t)*N(d2)
C =
  21*normdist(0.19, 0, 1, true) - 21*exp(-0.05*0.36)*normdist(0.01, 0, 1, true)
  = 1.687 (rounded to three decimal places)
Therefore,
  the expected result for the call option price using
  the Black-Scholes formula with the given inputs is
  approximately 1.687.  
By the
  way, based on Put - Call Parity, the put option price (P) is the following: 
P = C - S +
  Xe^(-rt)
= 1.687
  - 21 + 21*exp(-0.05*0.36) = 1.3124
 
FYI – normdist
  function in Excel
The
  normdist function is used in Excel to calculate the probability density
  function of a normally distributed random variable. This function takes four
  arguments: x, mean, standard_dev, and cumulative.
Here is
  a brief explanation of each argument:
·      
  x:
  This is the value for which you want to calculate
  the probability density function. It must be a numeric value.
·      
  mean: This is the mean of
  the distribution. It must be a numeric value.
·      
  standard_dev: This is
  the standard deviation of the distribution. It must be a numeric value.
·      
  cumulative: This is an
  optional argument that specifies whether you want to calculate the cumulative
  distribution function or the probability density function. If this argument
  is omitted or set to TRUE, the function will calculate the cumulative
  distribution function. If it is set to FALSE, the function will calculate the
  probability density function.
To use the normdist function in Excel, follow these steps:
.
·      
  In a cell, type
  =NORMDIST(x, mean, standard_dev, cumulative) and replace the values of x,
  mean, standard_dev, and cumulative with the values you want to use.
·      
  Press Enter. Excel will
  calculate the probability density function or the cumulative distribution
  function of the normally distributed random variable, depending on the value
  of the cumulative argument.
For example, 
1)    
  if you want to calculate
  the probability density function of a normally distributed random variable
  with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 2 at the value of 12, use the following:
  =NORMDIST(12, 10, 2, FALSE) = probability density at that point.
2)     =NORMDIST(12, 10, 2, true) calculates the
  cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a normally distributed random
  variable with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 2, evaluated at the
  value of 12. 
·      
  The true value of the
  fourth argument - calculate the CDF.  
Chapter 15  Distributions to Shareholders
  
·       This
  chapter will not be covered in the final exam
Theory one: Indifference
  theory
n 
  Assuming:
–      
  No transactions costs to buy
  and sell securities
–      
  No flotation costs on new
  issues
–      
  No taxes
–      
  Perfect information
–      
  Dividend policy does not
  affect ke 
n 
  Dividend policy is
  irrelevant. If dividends are too high, investors may use some of the funds to
  buy more of the firm’s stock. If dividends are too low, investors may sell
  off some of the stock to generate additional funds.
Theory two: bird in hand
  theory – High dividend can increase firm value
Dividends
  are less risky. Therefore, high dividend payout ratios will lower ke
  (reducing the cost of capital), and increase stock price
Theory three: Tax effect
  theory – Low dividend can increase firm value
1)    
  Dividends received are taxable in the
  current period. Taxes on capital gains, however, are deferred into the future
  when the stock is actually sold. 
2)    
  The maximum tax rate on capital gains is
  usually lower than the tax rate on ordinary income. Therefore, low dividend
  payout ratios will lower ke (reducing the cost of capital), raise
  g, and increase stock price.
Which theory is most
  correct? – again, results are mixed. 
1)    
  Some research suggests that high payout
  companies have high required return on stock, supporting the tax effect
  hypothesis.
2)    
  But other research using an international
  sample shows that in countries with poor investor protection (where agency
  costs are most severe), high payout companies are valued more highly than low
  payout companies.
 
Stock
  Repurchase:  Buying
  own stock back from stockholders.
Reasons
  for repurchases:
·      
  As an alternative to distributing cash as
  dividends.
·      
  To dispose of one-time cash from an asset
  sale.
·      
  To make a large capital structure change.
·      
  May be viewed as a negative signal (firm
  has poor investment opportunities).
·      
  IRS could impose penalties if repurchases
  were primarily to avoid taxes on dividends.
·      
  Selling stockholders may not be well
  informed, hence be treated unfairly.
·      
  Firm may have to bid up price to complete
  purchase, thus paying too much for its own stock.
Stock Split: Firm
  increases the number of shares outstanding, say 2:1.  Sends shareholders more shares.
Reasons
  for stock split:
·      
  There’s a widespread belief that the
  optimal price range for stocks is $20 to $80.
·      
  Stock splits can be used to keep the price
  in the optimal range.
·      
  Stock splits generally occur when
  management is confident, so are interpreted as positive signals.
Chapter 21  Mergers and Divestitures
  
·     
  This chapter will not be covered in the final
  exam
·       watch TV series Succession and gain insights of  the
  dynamics of such corporate fights
Mergers are business
  combination transactions involving the combination of two or more companies
  into a single entity. Most state laws
  require that mergers be approved by at least a majority of a company's
  shareholders if the merger will have a significant impact on either the
  acquiring or target company.  
If the company you've
  invested in is involved in a merger and is subject to the SEC disclosure
  rules, you will receive information about the merger in the form of either
  a proxy statement on Schedule 14A or
  an information statement on Schedule
  14C.  
The proxy or information statement will describe the terms of
  the merger, including what you will receive if the merger proceeds. If you believe the amount you will
  receive is not fair, check the statement for information on appraisal or
  dissenter's rights under state law. You must follow the procedures precisely
  or your rights may be lost.
You can obtain a copy of a
  company's proxy or information statement by using the SEC's EDGAR
  database. 
Summary
  of key M&A documents for finding deal terms of public targets
(www.wsp.com)
| Acquisition
    type | Document | Date filed | Best place to find it | 
| Mergers | Press release | Announcement
    date | 1.      Target (likely also acquirer) will file SEC form
    8K (could be in an 8K exhibit) | 
| 2.      Target (likely also acquirer) website | |||
| Mergers | Definitive
    agreement | Announcement
    date | 1.      Target 8K (often the same 8K that contains press release) | 
| Mergers | Merger proxy | Several weeks after
    the announcement date | 1.      Target PREM14A and DEFM14A | 
| Tender/exchange
    offers | Tender offer
    (or exchange offer) | Upon initiation
    of tender offer | 1.      Target Schedule TO (attached as exhibit) | 
|   | |||
| Tender/exchange
    offers | Schedule 14D-9 | Within 10 days
    of filing of Schedule TO | 1.      Target Schedule 14D-9 | 
| Mergers and
    exchange offers | Registration
    statement/prospectus | Several weeks
    after the announcement date | 1.      Acquirer Form S-4 | 
  ******* Whole Foods SEC Filing (FYI)********
Whole foods form 8k filed with SEC on
  8/23/2017
“As a result of the Merger, each share of common stock……was converted
  into the right to receive $42.00 in cash, without interest (the
  “Merger Consideration”).”
Whole Foods DEFA 14A 8k form with SEC 6/14/2017
Whole foods DEFA 14A 8k form with SEC 6/16/2017
Whole foods DEFA 14A 8k form with SEC 6/16/2017
Whole foods is providing materials for the upcoming shareholder
  voting.
Whole foods DEFA 14A 8k with SEC 7/21/2017
Has law suit documents
Whole foods DEFA 14A 8k with SEC 7/21/2017
Notifying shareholders for upcoming special shareholder meeting
 
********* Amazon SEC filing *********
Amazon Form 8k with SEC on 6/15/2017
Financing of the Merger
The Company expects to
  finance the Merger with debt financing ……
Amazon Whole Foods Merger Agreement on
  6/15/2017
For the term project, if you work on this M&A case, you
  should be able to find most of the information in this agreement.
Amazon 8k form Completion of acquisition or
  disposition of assets 8/28/2018
 
********** Miscellaneous **********
7 potential bidders, a call to Amazon, and an ultimatum:
  How the Whole Foods deal went down (from business
  insider.com)
 
********** SDC Amazon Whole Foods Deal Record
  (For this class only)*****
Tear Sheet (SDC) (on blackboard)

For discussion:
·       Why
  does Amazon want to buy Whole Foods?
·       Did
  Whole Foods want to be acquired? What can Whole Foods do to defend itself?
  (poison pill, white knight, classified board, golden parachute, etc.)
·       What
  can Amazon do to persuade Whole Foods shareholders to sell their stocks?
·       Why
  does Elon Musk want to acquire Twitter?
·       Did
  Twitter want to be acquired? What can Twitter do to defend itself? (poison
  pill, white knight, classified board, golden parachute, etc.)  
For
  your knowledge (FYI): 
·       In
  reality, dividends are
  more predictable than earnings .
·       You own
  around 100 shares of the stock of AAA, which is currently being sold for
  around $120 per share. A 2-for-1 stock split is about to be declared by the
  company. After the split has taken place, which of the following describes
  your probable position? You
  own 200 shares of AAA’s stock. Meanwhile, the AAA stock price will be near
  $60 per share.
·       Alice
  Gordan and Alex Roy believe that when the dividend payout ratio is lowered,
  the required return on equity tends to increase. On which of the following
  assumptions is their argument based? dividends are viewed as less risky than future capital
  gains.
·       A
  strict residual dividend policy is followed by your firm. Everything remains
  constant, which of the factors mentioned below are most probably going to
  result in an increase in the dividend per share of a firm? when a company’s profit (net
  income) rises 
·      
  Horizontal merger would be an example of The Home Depot and
  Lowe’s getting merged. 
·      
  When the merger of two companies in a similar industry takes
  place in order to develop products that are needed at various stages of the
  production cycle, it is referred to as: integration vertically
.
·      
  A rights offering that provides the existing target
  shareholders with the rights to purchase shares in the acquirer of the target
  at an extremely discounted price after particular conditions are met is
  referred to as a: poison
  pill  
(Twitter POISON Pill
  Explained by a Lawyer (youtube), FYI)
·      
  A scenario where each and every director gets a three-year
  term to provide their services and the terms are arranged in a staggered
  manner so that just one-third of the directors are eligible for the election
  every year is referred to as a: classified board
·      
  In a situation where it becomes inevitable that a hostile
  takeover may take place, and a target company may at times search for another
  friendlier company in order to acquire it, is referred to as a:  white knight   
  
·      
  When a firm is being taken over and the senior managers of
  that firm are let go, a very lucrative severance package is offered to those
  senior managers. It is referred to as a: 
  golden
  parachute
 
Final Exam (during final week, in class,
  non-cumulative, similar to case study)
Finance Exit Exam (with final, in class,
  close book close notes, 40 multiple choice questions)
  __ _ _ __ __ _  __| |_  
  _  __ _| |_(_) ___  _ __
 / _` | '__/ _` |/ _` | | | |/ _` | __| |/ _
  \| '_ \
| (_| | | | (_| | (_| | |_| |
  (_| | |_| | (_) | | | |   
 \__, |_| 
  \__,_|\__,_|\__,_|\__,_|\__|_|\___/|_| |_|
 |___/
╔═╗───────────╔╗───────╔╗╔╗
  ║╔╬═╦═╦╦═╦╦╦═╗║╚╦╦╦╗╔═╗║╚╬╬═╦═╦╗
  ║╚╣╬║║║║╬║╔╣╬╚╣╔╣║║╚╣╬╚╣╔╣║╬║║║║
  ╚═╩═╩╩═╬╗╠╝╚══╩═╩═╩═╩══╩═╩╩═╩╩═╝
  ───────╚═╝
