Chapter 9 — Capital Budgeting (MBA)
NPV • IRR • MIRR • PI • Payback • Discounted Payback — with syntax cards, mini calculators, worked examples, and homework preloads.
Intro
Capital budgeting evaluates long-term projects by turning future cash flows into today’s value or by finding required returns. For this course, focus on:
- NPV (gold standard for value creation)
- IRR & MIRR (rates of return; MIRR fixes IRR’s reinvestment assumption)
- PI (useful when capital is rationed)
- Payback / Discounted Payback (speed of recovery; screening tools)
Excel Syntax (Quick Cards)
NPV
=NPV(rate, value1, value2, ...)
- Values occur at period ends
- Add CF0 separately: NPV(...) + CF0
IRR
=IRR(values, [guess])
- Array must include CF0 and all cash flows
- Guess optional; helps convergence
MIRR
=MIRR(values, finance_rate, reinvest_rate)
- Needs at least one negative and one positive CF
- Uses explicit reinvest & finance rates
Profitability Index (PI)
PI = 1 + NPV / |CF0| (or PV of future CFs ÷ |CF0|)
Payback
Time to recover initial outlay (undiscounted). Discounted payback uses present values.
Mini Calculators
Inputs
Outputs
Manual formulas used
- NPV = Σ CF_t / (1+r)^t
- IRR solves NPV(IRR)=0 (bisection search here)
- MIRR: grow positives at reinvest rate, discount negatives at finance rate, then annualize
- PI: 1 + NPV / |CF0|
- Payback = years until cumulative CF ≥ 0 + fraction of final year
- Discounted payback uses PVs
In-Class Example — Single Project
WACC = 11%; CFs: CF0 = -800; CF1=350; CF2=350; CF3=350.
- Expected (from your notes): NPV ≈ 55.30; IRR ≈ 14.93%; PI ≈ 1.069; Payback ≈ 2.286 yrs; Disc. Payback ≈ 2.72 yrs.
Multi-Project Choice — IRR vs NPV
WACC = 7.5%. Mutually exclusive projects S and L:
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | -1,100 | 550 | 600 | 100 | 100 |
L | -2,700 | 650 | 725 | 800 | 1,400 |
Non-Conventional Cash Flows (Multiple IRRs)
CFs: CF0 = -90,000; CF1=132,000; CF2=100,000; CF3=-150,000. Required return = 15%.
- Multiple sign changes ⇒ multiple IRRs possible (here: ~10.11% and ~42.66%).
- Use NPV at required return (15%) or use MIRR to avoid ambiguity.
Method Summary (When to Use What)
Approach | Description | Pros | Cons | Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|---|
NPV | PV of CFs − initial | Direct value add; uses time value | Needs discount rate; CF estimates matter | Primary decision metric |
IRR | Rate making NPV=0 | Intuitive % return | Multiple IRRs; reinvest at IRR assumption | Supplement for conventional CFs |
MIRR | IRR with explicit rates | Fixes reinvest assumption | More inputs | Comparing projects with reinvest policy |
PI | PV future CFs ÷ |CF0| | Ranks under capital rationing | Not for mutually exclusive picks | Budget-constrained portfolios |
Payback / DPB | Time to recover outlay | Simple; liquidity focus | Ignores value after recovery | Screening / risk-averse settings |
Quick Quiz
Click to check answers.
Homework (Due with Final)
Q1
CF0 = -20,000; CFs: 8,000; 4,000; 3,000; 5,000; 10,000. r = 10%.
- Payback ≈ 4.00 yrs
- NPV ≈ 2,456.74
- IRR ≈ 14.55%
- PI ≈ 1.12
Q2
CF0 = -60,000; CFs: 25,000; 24,000; 13,000; 12,000; 11,000. r = 15%.
- Payback ≈ 2.85 yrs
- NPV ≈ 764.27
- IRR ≈ 15.64%
- PI ≈ 1.013 (Accept)
Q3 (Mutually Exclusive)
- One-year A vs B at 10%: Choose B (NPV 227.27 vs 72.73).
- 3-year A vs B at 10%: Mutually exclusive ⇒ choose A (NPV ≈ 758.83 > 616.45). Independent ⇒ choose both. Crossover ≈ 21.01%.
Resources
Note: Calculators here are for instruction; for official work, verify in Excel/approved tools.