FIN415 Class Web
Page, Spring '23
Jacksonville
University
Instructor:
Maggie Foley
Term Project Part I (due with
final) Part
I video
Term project part II (excel
questions) (due with final)
part
II - A video part
II – B video
Weekly SCHEDULE,
LINKS, FILES and Questions
Week |
Coverage, HW, Supplements -
Required |
Supplemental Reaching Materials |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1 |
Marketwatch Stock Trading Game (Pass
code: havefun) 1. URL for your game: 2. Password for this private
game: havefun. 3. Click on the 'Join Now'
button to get started. 4. If you are an existing MarketWatch member,
login. If you are a new user, follow the link for a Free account - it's easy! 5. Follow the instructions and
start trading! 6. Game will be over
on 4/17/2019 How to Use
Finviz Stock Screener (youtube, FYI)
How To Win
The MarketWatch Stock Market Game (youtube, FYI)
How Short
Selling Works (Short Selling for Beginners) (youtube,
FYI)
|
- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
World Economy of 2022 by World Bank https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2022/12/15/2022-in-nine-charts Highlights from the World
Bank Group-IMF 2022 Annual Meetings: Navigating an Uncertain World (youtube)
World Bank
shares its 2022 review after a challenging year https://en.hespress.com/56355-jenna-ortega-accused-of-anti-semitism-for-supporting-palestine.html Hespress
EN, Thursday 5 January 2023 - 19:21 In a study
summarizing 2022, the World Bank provided charts showing how various factors
disrupted the world and led to a crisis in global development. “Slowing growth contributed to a reversal
of progress on the global poverty agenda and an increase in global debt,”
said the World Bank. Global
vaccination campaigns helped nations to begin recovering from the pandemic
and brought millions of children back to school, but the report noted that
the long-term effects of recent learning losses could linger for years. It highlighted that as a result of climate
change and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, food inflation and food insecurity
increased considerably throughout the year, pushing up the cost of food,
fuel, and fertilizer. The
World Bank worked with its partners all year to help turn shareholder
contributions and equity into expanded support for countries to meet their
most pressing needs, as stated in the report, in order to combat these
multiple crises and contribute to a more stable and equitable recovery. The first element that the World Bank
elaborated on is slowing growth. With
worldwide consumer confidence already experiencing a considerably greater
decrease than during the lead-up to past global recessions, the global
economy is currently experiencing its worst slowdown since a post-recession
recovery began in 1970. The three largest economies in the world, the
US, China, and the euro area, have all seen a significant slowdown. Given the
situation, even a slight blow to the world economy over the course of the
ensuing year might send it into a recession, explained World Bank. The second element is poverty, as the
COVID-19 pandemic dealt the largest setback to global poverty reduction efforts
in decades, and the recovery has been highly uneven,” declared the
organization. The
year 2022 will now go down in history as the second-worst year for reducing
poverty (after 2020). According
to current projections, 7% of the world’s population, or around 574 million
people, will still be living in extreme poverty in 2030, which is well behind
the worldwide target of 3%. The third factor is the evolving nature of
debt, as overall debt levels for developing nations have risen over the past
ten years, with almost 60% of the world’s poorest nations either in debt
crisis or at risk of it. World
Bank said that “over-encumbered with debt, the world’s poorest are not able
to make critical investments in economic reform, health, climate action, or
education, among other key development priorities. The COVID-19 health response has received the most funding from the World Bank Group, making the
disease the fourth aspect of the report. Over
100 nations received about $14 billion from the organization, including over
30 that were affected by violence, war, and fragility. The fifth factor is rising food insecurity
and inflation as 2022 was characterized by a sharp increase in food
insecurity globally. The
World Bank Group has responded by allocating $30 billion over the course of
15 months to alleviate food insecurity. Ramping up Climate Investment is the
organization’s sixth priority on the list. Delivering
a record $31.7 billion in climate finance, the highest ever in a single year
in its history, the World Bank Group increased its assistance to help
countries address climate and development issues jointly. Energy was the seventh component because, in the first half of 2022, the world’s energy markets
experienced one of the biggest shocks in decades, which caused energy prices
to soar, exacerbated energy shortages and security concerns, and slowed down
efforts to achieve universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and
modern energy by 2030. “The
vulnerability and isolation of populations without electricity have prompted
countries to increase their focus on energy access and affordability in their
COVID-19 recovery plans,” noted the organization. The eighth element is the body’s response to
the learning crisis. The World
Bank recommends that nations keep schools open and extend instructional time
in order to address this issue, evaluate students and equip teachers to adapt
their instruction to students’ levels of learning. It also
suggested streamlining the curriculum and concentrating on the fundamentals,
and establishing a national political commitment to learning recovery that is
informed by reliable learning measurement. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part II In class exercise – practice of
converting currencies If the dollar is pegged to gold at US $1800 =
1 ounce of gold and the British pound is pegged to gold at £1200 = 1 ounce of
gold. What should be the exchange rate between US$ and British £? How much
can you make without any risk if the exchange rate is 1£ = 2$? Assume that your
initial investment is $1800. What about the exchange rate set
at 1£ = 1.2$? What about your initial investment is £1200? Solution: 1£ = 2$ (note
that the exchange rate is set at 1£ = 1.5$ since $1800 = £1500=1 ounce of
gold è $1.5=1£). è With $1800, you can buy 1 ounce of gold at US $1800
= 1 ounce of gold. èWith
one ounce of gold, you can sell it in UK at £1200 = 1 ounce of gold, so you
can get back £1200 è convert
£ to $ at $2=1£ as given èget
back £1200 * 2$/£ = $2400 > $1800, initial investment è you could make a profit of $600 ($2400 -
$1800=$600) è Yes. 1£ = 1.2$ (note
that the exchange rate is set at 1£ = 1.5$ since $1800 = £1500=1 ounce of
gold è $1.5=1£). è With $1800, you can buy either 1 ounce of gold at US
$1800 = 1 ounce of gold. è With
one ounce of gold, you can sell it in UK at £1200 = 1 ounce of gold, so you
can get back £1200 è convert
£ to $ at $1.2=1£ as givenèget
back £1200 * 1.2$/£ = $1440 < $1800 è you will lose $360 ($1440 - $1800=$-360) è No. è So should convert to £ first and then buy gold in
UK è With $1800, you can convert to £1500 ($1800 /
(1.2$/£ = £1500 ). è buy
gold in UK at £1200 = 1 ounce of gold, so you can get back £1500/£1200 = 1.25
ounce of gold è Sell gold in US at US $1800 = 1 ounce of
gold è So get back 1.25 ounce of gold * $1800 = $2250 >
$1800 è you will make a profit of $450 ($2250 -
$1800=$450) è Yes. Homework chapter1-1 (due with first
midterm exam) 1.
If the dollar is pegged to gold at US $1800 = 1 ounce of
gold and the British pound is pegged to gold at €1500 = 1 ounce of gold. What
should be the exchange rate between US$ and Euro €? How much can you make
without any risk if the exchange rate is 1€ = 1.5$? (hint: $1800 è get gold
è sell
gold for euro è convert
euro back to $) How much can you make
without any risk if the exchange rate is 1€ = 0.8$? (hint: $1800 è get euro
è buy gold
using euro è sell
gold for $) Assume that your initial investment is
$1800. (answer: $1.2/euro, $450, $900) 2.
What is your opinion on
arbitrage across borders? Do you think that arbitrage crypto will work? (Optional homework question) Crypto
arbitrage:Cryptocurrency arbitrage is a strategy in which investors buy a
cryptocurrency on one exchange, and then quickly sell it on another exchange
for a higher price. Cryptocurrencies trade on hundreds of different
exchanges, and often the price of a coin or token may differ on one exchange
versus another. How I Became A Crypto
Billionaire In 5 Years (CNBC)
The FTX Collapse, Explained
| What Went Wrong | WSJ (youtube)
Jan 11 Class video (covers in class
exercise) |
Sam Bankman Fried Explains His Arbitrage Techniques Nicholas Pongratz, April 9, 2021·3 min read https://www.yahoo.com/video/sam-bankman-fried-explains-arbitrage-132901181.html A former ETF trader at Jane Street, Sam Bankman-Fried developed a net
worth of $9 billion from trading crypto in three and a half years. He
explained his success comes from lucrative arbitrage opportunities in crypto. Bankman-Fried launched a crypto-trading firm called Alameda Research
in 2017. The company now manages over $100 million in digital assets. The
firm’s large-scale trades made Bankman-Fried a self-made billionaire by the
age of 29. He is also the CEO and founder of the FTX Exchange, a
cryptocurrency derivatives trading exchange. Upon
entering the crypto markets, he discovered that Bitcoin was growing very
rapidly in trading volumes. This meant there would also be large price
discrepancies, making it ideal for arbitrage, taking advantage of the price
differences. The
Kimchi Premium One
opportunity he exploited was what is known as the kimchi premium. While
Bitcoin was pricing at around $10,000 in the US, it traded for $15,000 on
Korean exchanges. This was because of a huge demand for Bitcoin in Korea,
Bankman-Fried said. Around its peak, there was a vast spread of around 50%, he said. However,
because the Korean won is a regulated currency, it was difficult to scale
this arbitrage. Bankman-Fried said: “Many found a way to do it for small size. Very, very hard to do it
for big size, even though there are billions of dollars a day volume trading
in it because you couldn’t offload the Korean won easily for non-crypto.” Although nowhere near as significant, the premium still exists today.
According to CryptoQuant, the premium is listed at 18%. 10% Daily Returns in Japan Bankman-Fried
then sought a similar opportunity in other markets, which he found in Japan.
He said: “It
wasn’t trading quite the same premium. But it was trading at a 15% premium or
so at the peak, instead of 50%.” After
buying Bitcoin for $10,000 in the US, investors could send it to a Japanese
exchange. There they could sell it for $11,500 worth of Japanese yen. At that
point, they could convert the amount back to dollars. Because
of the trade’s global nature and the wire transfers involved, it would take
up to a day to perform. ”But it was doable, and you could scale it, making
literally 10% per weekday, which is just absolutely insane,” Bankman-Fried
said. Bankman-Fried was successful where others were not because he managed
to facilitate all the different components involved in the trade. For
example, finding the right platform to buy Bitcoin at scale, then getting
approval to use Japanese exchanges and accounts. There was also the
difficulty of even getting millions of dollars out of Japan and into the US
every day. “You do have to put together this incredibly sophisticated global
corporate framework in order to be able to actually do this trade,”
Bankman-Fried said. “That’s the real task, the real hard part.” High
Edge, Low Risk The
decentralized aspect of the crypto ecosystem enables these large arbitrage
premiums to exist. With other financial markets, there is a cross merging
between exchanges and central clearing firms or brokers, Bankman-Fried
explained. “So it’s really capital-intensive, and also you have to worry about
counterparty risk,” he added. But once investors and traders come to understand the crypto space
intimately, they can figure out where the counterparty risk is close to zero,
but the edge is still high. According to Bankman-Fried: “There’s a lot of money to be made, if you can really figure out and
pinpoint when there is and isn’t a ton of edge and when there is and isn’t a
ton of actual counterparty risk.” |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part III: Multilateral
Trade vs. Bilateral Trade Trade agreement
(video)
What is MULTILATERALISM?
(youtube)
Take
away: ·
Multilateral trade
agreements strengthen the global economy by making developing countries
competitive. ·
They standardize
import and export procedures giving economic benefits to all member
nations. ·
Their complexity
helps those that can take advantage of globalization, while those who cannot
often face hardships. For
class discussion: Do you agree with the above points?
Why or why not? Multilateral
Trade Agreements With Their Pros, Cons and Examples
5 Pros and 4 Cons to the World's
Largest Trade Agreements https://www.thebalance.com/multilateral-trade-agreements-pros-cons-and-examples-3305949 BY KIMBERLY AMADEO REVIEWED
BY ERIC ESTEVEZ Updated October
28, 2020 Multilateral trade
agreements are commerce treaties among three or more nations. The
agreements reduce tariffs and make
it easier for businesses to import and export. Since they are
among many countries, they are difficult to negotiate. That same broad scope makes them more
robust than other types of trade agreements once all
parties sign. Bilateral agreements are
easier to negotiate but these are only between two countries. They don't
have as big an impact on economic growth as does a multilateral
agreement. 5 Advantages of multilateral
agreements · Multilateral
agreements make all signatories treat each other equally. No country can
give better trade deals to one country than it does to another. That
levels the playing field. It's especially critical for emerging
market countries. Many of them are smaller in
size, making them less competitive. The Most
Favored Nation Status confers the
best trading terms a nation can get from a trading partner. Developing
countries benefit the most from this trading status. · The
second benefit is that it increases trade for every participant. Their
companies enjoy low tariffs. That makes their exports
cheaper. · The
third benefit is it standardizes commerce regulations for
all the trade partners. Companies save legal costs since they follow the same
rules for each country. · The
fourth benefit is that countries can negotiate trade deals with
more than one country at a time. Trade agreements undergo
a detailed approval process. Most countries would prefer to get one
agreement ratified covering many countries at once. · The
fifth benefit applies to emerging markets. Bilateral trade agreements
tend to favor the country with the best economy. That puts the weaker nation
at a disadvantage. But making emerging markets stronger helps the
developed economy over time. As those emerging markets become
developed, their middle class population increases. That creates
new affluent customers for everyone. 4 Disadvantages of multilateral
trading · The
biggest disadvantage of multilateral agreements is that they are
complex. That makes them difficult and time consuming to
negotiate. Sometimes the length of negotiation means it won't take place
at all. · Second,
the details of the negotiations are particular to trade and business
practices. The public often misunderstands them. As a result, they receive
lots of press, controversy, and protests. · The
third disadvantage is common to any trade agreement. Some companies and
regions of the country suffer when trade borders disappear. · The
fourth disadvantage falls on a country's small businesses. A
multilateral agreement gives a competitive advantage to giant
multi-nationals. They are already familiar with operating in a
global environment. As a result, the small firms can't compete. They lay off
workers to cut costs. Others move their factories to countries with a
lower standard of living. If a region depended on that industry, it
would experience high unemployment rates. That makes multilateral
agreements unpopular. Pros
Cons
Examples Some regional trade
agreements are multilateral. The largest had been the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was ratified on
January 1, 1994. NAFTA quadrupled trade between the United
States, Canada, and Mexico from its 1993 level to
2018. On July 1, 2020, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) went
into effect. The USMCA was a new trade agreement between the three countries
that was negotiated under President Donald Trump. The Central American-Dominican
Republic Free Trade Agreement was signed on August 5, 2004. CAFTA-DR
eliminated tariffs on more than 80% of U.S. exports to six countries: Costa
Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. As
of November 2019, it had increased trade by 104%, from $2.44 billion in
January 2005 to $4.97 billion. The Trans-Pacific
Partnership would have been bigger than NAFTA.
Negotiations concluded on October 4, 2015. After becoming
president, Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement. He promised to
replace it with bilateral agreements. The TPP was between
the United States and 11 other countries bordering the Pacific
Ocean. It would have removed tariffs and standardized business
practices. All global trade agreements
are multilateral. The most successful one is the General
Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. Twenty-three countries signed GATT in
1947. Its goal was to reduce tariffs and other trade barriers. In September 1986, the Uruguay
Round began in Punta del Este, Uruguay. It centered on extending
trade agreements to several new areas. These included services and
intellectual property. It also improved trade in agriculture and
textiles. The Uruguay Round led to the creation of the World Trade
Organization. On April 15, 1994, the 123 participating governments
signed the agreement creating the WTO in Marrakesh, Morocco. The
WTO assumed management of future global multilateral negotiations. The WTO's first project
was the Doha round of
trade agreements in 2001. That was a
multilateral trade agreement among all WTO members. Developing countries
would allow imports of financial services, particularly banking. In so
doing, they would have to modernize their markets. In return, the developed
countries would reduce farm subsidies. That would boost the growth
of developing countries that were good at producing food. Farm lobbies in the United States and
the European Union doomed
Doha negotiations. They refused to agree to lower subsidies or accept
increased foreign competition. The WTO abandoned the Doha round in July 2008. On December 7, 2013, WTO
representatives agreed to the so-called Bali package. All countries
agreed to streamline customs standards and reduce red tape to expedite
trade flows. Food security is an issue. India wants to subsidize food so
it could stockpile it to distribute in case of famine. Other countries worry
that India may dump the cheap food in the global market to gain market
share. Bilateral
Trade By JULIA KAGAN Updated December 21,
2020, Reviewed by TOBY WALTERS, Fact checked by ARIEL COURAGE https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bilateral-trade.asp What Is Bilateral Trade? Bilateral
trade is the exchange of goods between two nations promoting trade and
investment. The two countries will
reduce or eliminate tariffs, import quotas, export restraints, and other
trade barriers to encourage trade and investment. In the United States, the Office of
Bilateral Trade Affairs minimizes trade deficits through negotiating free
trade agreements with new countries, supporting and improving existing trade
agreements, promoting economic development abroad, and other actions. KEY TAKEAWAYS ·
Bilateral trade
agreements are agreements between countries to promote trade and commerce. ·
They eliminate trade
barriers such as tariffs, import quotas, and export restraints in order to
encourage trade and investment. ·
The main advantage
of bilateral trade agreements is an expansion of the market for a country's
goods through concerted negotiation between two countries. ·
Bilateral trade agreements can also result in the closing
down of smaller companies unable to compete with large multinational
corporations. Understanding Bilateral Trade The goals of bilateral trade
agreements are to expand access between two countries’ markets and increase
their economic growth. Standardized business operations in five general areas
prevent one country from stealing another’s innovative products, dumping
goods at a small cost, or using unfair subsidies. Bilateral
trade agreements standardize regulations, labor standards, and environmental
protections. The
United States has signed bilateral trade agreements with 20 countries,
some of which include Israel, Jordan, Australia, Chile, Singapore, Bahrain,
Morocco, Oman, Peru, Panama, and Colombia. The Dominican Republic-Central America
FTR (CAFTA-DR) is a free trade agreement signed between the United States and
smaller economies of Central America, as well as the Dominican Republic.
The Central American countries are El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica,
Nicaragua, and Honduras. NAFTA replaced the bilateral agreements with Canada
and Mexico in 1994. The U.S. renegotiated NAFTA under the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which went into effect in 2020.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of
Bilateral Trade Compared to multilateral trade
agreements, bilateral trade agreements
are negotiated more easily, because only two nations are party to the
agreement. Bilateral trade agreements initiate and reap trade benefits faster
than multilateral agreements. When negotiations for a multilateral
trade agreement are unsuccessful, many nations will negotiate bilateral
treaties instead. However, new agreements often result in competing
agreements between other countries, eliminating the advantages the Free Trade
Agreement (FTA) confers between the original two nations. Bilateral trade agreements also expand
the market for a country's goods. The United States vigorously pursued free
trade agreements with a number of countries under the Bush administration
during the early 2000s. In addition to creating a market for
U.S. goods, the expansion helped spread the mantra of trade liberalization
and encouraged open borders for trade. However, bilateral trade agreements can skew a country's markets when large
multinational corporations, which have significant capital and resources to
operate at scale, enter a market dominated by smaller players. As a
result, the latter might need to close shop when they are competed out of
existence. Examples of Bilateral Trade In October 2014, the United States and
Brazil settled a longstanding cotton dispute in the World Trade Organization
(WTO). Brazil terminated the
case, relinquishing its rights to countermeasures against U.S. trade or
further proceedings in the dispute. Brazil also agreed to not bring new
WTO actions against U.S. cotton support programs while the current U.S. Farm
Bill was in force, or against agricultural export credit guarantees under the
GSM-102 program. Because of the agreement, American businesses were no longer
subject to countermeasures such as increased tariffs totaling hundreds of
millions of dollars annually. In March 2016, the U.S. government and
the government of Peru reached an agreement removing barriers for U.S. beef
exports to Peru that had been in effect since 2003. The agreement opened one of the
fastest-growing markets in Latin America. In 2015, the United States exported
$25.4 million in beef and beef products to Peru. Removal of Peru’s
certification requirements, known as the export verification program, assured
American ranchers expanded market access. The agreement reflected the U.S.
negligible risk classification for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) by
the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). The United States and Peru agreed to
amendments in certification statements making beef and beef products from
federally inspected U.S. establishments eligible for export to Peru, rather
than just beef and beef products from establishments participating in the
USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Export Verification (EV) programs
under previous certification requirements. How Geopolitics Is Redrawing the World’s
Busiest Trade Routes By Bryce
Baschuk, December 5, 2022 at 7:00 AM EST American
astronomer Carl Sagan once said “you have to know the
past to understand the present.” It’s good advice for anyone looking to make sense of a world
still reeling from a pandemic, Brexit, Russia’s war
with Ukraine and a trade war between the world’s two
largest economies. This tumultuous
period has encouraged C-suites and governments around the world to rethink
the economic strategies that have driven the past three decades of
globalization. To understand
the forward trajectory of globalization, Bloomberg dove into some data from
the past three years to see what trends have emerged since the pandemic first
roiled global markets. In a nutshell,
here’s what we found: ·
The US is regularly importing
more goods from Europe than from China ·
China is exporting a greater
share of its goods to non-US markets ·
Brexit is increasing costs and
reducing market access for UK exporters ·
China uses its economic might
achieve strategic goals ·
Germany was slow to cut off imports
from Russia after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine ·
Breaking Up Is Hard to Do ·
German imports of Russian
goods peaked after Putin invaded Ukraine Source: Eurostat Broadly, the
data show that the world’s largest trading powers are rewiring their traditional
relationships. That’s led to a new focus on
strengthening the reliability of supply chains, shifting from “just in time” to “just
in case” trade strategies and reducing dependence on
authoritarian regimes like China. Some of these
shifts are marginal, and temporary, while others represent the beginnings of
longer-term structural realignments. Here are a few conclusions we can draw about the future: ·
The US and China aren’t engaged in a
wholesale decoupling of their economies, but both nations are hedging their
bets and deepening their trade flows with other nations ·
A strong, mutually beneficial US-EU trade relationship is more
valuable and important at a time when both regions are reducing their
dependence on China. ·
The shift towards market concentration among regional economic
hubs will take on increased importance in the coming years —
particularly so in the Asia-Pacific region ·
The UK must find ways to mitigate the harmful effects of Brexit
as EU producers rely less and less on UK exports to feed, clothe and service
European citizens ·
Russia’s economic influence is
approaching a generational nadir and it's likely to remain a pariah state for
many years to come ·
What’s happening is a kind of “reglobalization” where governments
and multinational companies adapt their trade links to accommodate the new
economic and geopolitical challenges. And while supply chains may be more
insulated against shocks, the next chapter also has the potential to increase
costs and make the world a less productive place. —Bryce Baschuk
in Geneva Homework chapter1-2 (due with first
midterm exam) 1)
Do you support
bilateral trading or multi-lateral trading? Why? 2)
What is your opinion
about CPTPP? Do you think that the
member countries can benefit from the CPTPP? Why or why not? 3)
Optional question (for extra credit): Shall the U.S.A. join and lead RCEP? Why do we need both
CPTPP and RCEP? World's Biggest Trade Deal
– RCEP (video)
Who will benefit from the
world's largest free trade deal? | Inside Story (youtube)
|
What is the
RCEP? | CNBC Explains (youtube)
China and 14
partners sign world's biggest trade deal without US | DW News (video)
The world needs more
economic alliances than security ones, analyst says (video) PUBLISHED WED, NOV
16 20221:02 AM EST, Su-Lin Tan
KEY POINTS Countries should
strike up more economic alliances than security and defense ones, as those
could make the world “more dangerous,” the president of the Center for China
and Globalization said on Tuesday. “I hope that the
U.S. now has settled this midterm, we can get towards economic, global
alliances rather than have a lot of security, military, defense alliances
which will make us more and more dangerous,” Henry Wang said at the SALT
iConnections conference in Singapore. Echoing Wang’s
point, Nicolas Aguzin, CEO of the Hong Kong stock exchange HKEX, said on the
same panel that the globalization of trade has created many benefits,
including bringing the East and West closer to each other. Countries should
strike up more economic alliances than security and defense ones, as those
could make the world “more dangerous,” the president of the Center for China
and Globalization said on Tuesday. Doing that would
also circumvent a slide toward deglobalization, which could hold back
economic development across the world. The U.S. for example, could consider
joining — or “re-joining” — the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for
Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), Henry Wang said at the SALT iConnections
conference in Singapore. “The U.S. is the
vibe of globalization and [has] always taken the lead on globalization,” Wang
said. “It was a pity to see
the U.S. pulling out of the [Trans-Pacific Partnership, which] ... set higher
standards for global trade, including the digital economy, and also the
liberalization of trade and facilitation of investments.” Wang added that
there should be more economic alliances and fewer security ones such as the
AUKUS, Five Eyes and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, an informal
strategic alliance. (L-R) Singapore's
Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang, New Zealand's Minister for
Trade and Export Growth David Parker, Malaysia's Minister for Trade and
Industry Datuk J. Jayasiri, Canada's International Trade Minister
Francois-Phillippe Champagne, Australia's Trade Minister Steven Ciobo,
Chile's Foreign Minister Heraldo Munoz, Brunei's Acting Minister for Foreign
Affairs Erywan Dato Pehin, Japan's Minister of Economic Revitalization
Toshimitsu Motegi, Mexico's Secretary of Economy Ildefonso Guaj The Comprehensive
and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership is a multilateral
trade deal signed in 2018 that was formed after the United States, under the
Trump administration, withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. “I hope that the
U.S. now has settled this midterm, we can get towards economic, global
alliances rather than have a lot of security, military, defense alliances
which will make us more and more dangerous,” Wang said. The CPTPP was
formerly known as the TPP, which was part of the United States’ economic and
strategic pivot to Asia. Former U.S.
President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of the trade pact in 2017, after
it drew criticism from the protectionist end of the U.S. political spectrum. The TPP has since
evolved into the CPTPP after other members of the pact forged on with it. It
is now one of the biggest trade blocs in the world, attracting applicants
such as China. The U.S. has not
indicated any desire to rejoin the CPTPP. Instead, it launched its own
separate non-trade relationship network with Asia-Pacific, the Indo-Pacific
Economic Framework. Echoing Wang’s
point, Nicolas Aguzin, CEO of the Hong Kong stock exchange HKEX, said on the
same panel that the globalization of trade has created many benefits,
including bringing the East and West closer to each other. “I mean, it had kept
prices very low around the world in a lot of areas; we had productivity,” he
said, adding that he doubts deglobalization would become a reality, in light
of the complex interconnectedness of global supply chains. We welcome anyone to
join the CPTPP, including the United States, says Canadian ministerWATCH NOW VIDEO02:47 We welcome anyone to
join the CPTPP, including the U.S.: Canadian minister With new powers
emerging, tensions are bound to arise at this juncture of globalization,
Aguzin said. “Asia, as a region, over
the next 10 years, we represent about half of the output of the world. I mean
you’re going to have some rocky moments, because it’s a big shift. There’s a
big shift of power and influence from West to East,” he said. ‘Olympic-style’
competition Economic alliances
and healthy “Olympic-style” competition between the U.S. and China would
therefore be better than confrontation, Wang added. Wang said notes from
the Chinese Communist Party meeting in Beijing indicate that Chinese
policymakers are keen on “opening up,” which suggests Beijing still has
appetite to promote trade and multilateralism. The appointment of
new Cabinet members from developed areas in China, such as Guangdong and
Jiangsu, suggests Beijing has its eyes on more development, private businesses
and investments from multinational companies, according to Wang. Rust Belt https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rust-belt.asp (FYI) By JAMES CHEN Updated Aug 25, 2020 What
Is the Rust Belt? The Rust Belt is a colloquial term used to
describe the geographic region stretching from New York through the Midwest
that was once dominated by the coal industry, steel production,
and manufacturing. The Rust Belt became an industrial hub due to its proximity to
the Great Lakes, canals, and rivers, which allowed companies to
access raw materials and ship out finished products. The region received the name Rust Belt in the late 1970s,
after a sharp decline in industrial work left many factories abandoned
and desolate, causing increased rust from exposure to the elements. It is
also referred to as the Manufacturing Belt and the Factory Belt. KEY TAKEAWAYS
Understanding
the Rust Belt The term Rust Belt is often used in a derogatory sense to
describe parts of the country that have seen an economic decline—typically
very drastic. The rust belt region
represents the deindustrialization of an area, which is often
accompanied by fewer high-paying jobs and high poverty rates. The result
has been a change in the urban landscape as the local population has moved to
other areas of the country in search of work. Although there is no definitive boundary, the states that are
considered in the Rust Belt–at least partly–include the following:
There are other states in the U.S. that have also experienced
declines in manufacturing, such as states in the deep south, but they are not
usually considered part of the Rust Belt. The region was home to some of
America's most prominent industries, such as steel production
and automobile manufacturing. Once recognized as the industrial
heartland, the region has experienced a sharp downturn in industrial activity
from the increased cost of domestic labor, competition from overseas,
technology advancements replacing workers, and the capital
intensive nature of manufacturing. Poverty in the Rust Belt Blue-collar jobs have increasingly moved
overseas, forcing local governments to rethink the type of manufacturing
businesses that can succeed in the area. While some cities managed to adopt new technologies, others
still struggle with rising poverty levels and declining populations. Below are the poverty rates from the U.S. Census
Bureau as of 2018 for each of the Rust Belt states listed above. Poverty Rates in the Rust Belt. There are other U.S. states that have high poverty rates, such
as Kentucky (16.9%), Louisiana (18.6%), and Alabama (16.8%). However, the
rust belt states have–at a minimum–a double-digit percentage of their
population in poverty. History
of the Rust Belt Before being known as the Rust Belt, the area was generally
known as the country's Factory, Steel, or Manufacturing Belt. This area, once
a booming hub of economic activity, represented a great portion of U.S.
industrial growth and development. The natural resources that were found in the area led to its
prosperity—namely coal and iron ore—along with labor and ready access to
transport by available waterways. This led to the rise in coal and steel
plants, which later spawned the weapons, automotive, and auto parts
industries. People seeking employment began moving to the area, which was
dominated by both the coal and steel industries, changing the overall
landscape of the region. But that began to change between the 1950s and 1970s. Many
manufacturers were still using expensive and outdated equipment and
machinery and were saddled with the high costs of domestic labor and
materials. To compensate, a good portion of them began looking elsewhere for
cheaper steel and labor—namely from foreign sources—which would ultimately
lead to the collapse of the region. There is no definitive boundary for the Rust
Belt, but it generally includes the area from New York through the Midwest. Decline
of the Rust Belt Most research suggests the Rust Belt started to falter in the
late 1970s, but the decline may have started earlier, notably in the 1950s,
when the region's dominant industries faced minimal competition.
Powerful labor unions in the automotive and steel manufacturing
sectors ensured labor competition stayed to a minimum. As a result, many of
the established companies had very little incentive to innovate or expand
productivity. This came back to haunt the region when the United States
opened trade overseas and shifted manufacturing production to the south. By the 1980s, the Rust Belt faced competitive
pressure—domestically and overseas—and had to ratchet down wages and prices. Operating in
a monopolistic fashion for an extended period of time played an
instrumental role in the downfall of the Rust Belt. This shows that
competitive pressure in productivity and labor markets are important to
incentivize firms to innovate. However, when those incentives are weak,
it can drive resources to more prosperous regions of the country. The region's population also showed a rapid
decline. What was once a hub
for immigrants from the rest of the country and abroad, led to an exodus of
people out of the area. Thousands of
well-paying blue-collar jobs were eliminated, forcing people to move away in
search of employment and better living conditions. Politics
and the Rust Belt The term Rust Belt is generally attributed to Walter Mondale,
who referred to this part of the country when he was the Democratic
presidential candidate in 1984. Attacking President Ronald Reagan, Mondale
claimed his opponent's policies were ruining what he called the Rust
Bowl. He was misquoted by the media as saying the rust belt, and the term
stuck. Since then, the term has consistently been used to describe the area's
economic decline. From a policy perspective, addressing the specific needs of the
Rust Belt states was a political imperative for both parties during the 2016
election. Many believe the national
government can find a solution to help this failing region succeed again. This Could Be a Record Year for US-China
Trade ByShawn Donnan, December 3, 2022 at
6:45 AM EST Bloomberg Cites Trade War
as 'Failure of Our Government' (youtube)
Here’s a data point you won’t hear
discussed very often: If the last few months of this year hold to trend, the US will have imported more goods from
China in 2022 than in any year prior. The next chunk of data will come Dec.
6 with the US release of October trade numbers, and there’s still time for
the trend to shift— especially with China’s current Covid lockdown travails.
But what’s already in the books is clear. In the first nine months of the
year, the US imported $418 billion in goods from China, or $23.7 billion more
than it did in the same period of 2018, the current record holder. That’s
worth thinking about given that, in the six years since Donald Trump launched
his trade assault on China, the dominant story has been the supposed
decoupling of the world’s two largest economies. The prevailing narrative of
late suggests we’re living through the unwinding of an era of
hyper-globalization, and that the world is busy reorganizing itself around
geopolitical poles centered on Washington and Beijing. But the trade data is a reminder that
rhetoric and even policy don’t always reflect the global economy. There’s no doubt we’ve been going
through a prickly period in the US-China diplomatic and trade relationships,
and that there are more hawks than doves these days on both sides. But for all the pandemic-driven talk
of shifting supply chains away from China and reshoring factories, the value
of Chinese goods purchased by the US is higher than it’s ever been. (The
value of US exports to China this year has also been near record levels. In
the first nine months of 2022, US companies sent $108.8 billion in goods to
China versus $105.6 billion in the same period of 2021, the last record
year.) That surge in US imports has come
despite the Trump tariffs that were meant to rewrite the economic
relationship, and without any apparent shock to US employment. All of this is
at odds with what protectionists have been arguing for years. Indeed, based
on the November jobs numbers, the US has managed to add a whopping 379,000
manufacturing positions in 2022 despite all of those Chinese imports . There are at least three things to
take away from all of this: 1.
The trade
relationship with China remains America’s largest by some distance. Imports
from China accounted for 17% of total US imports through September of this
year. No single country comes close, though Canada and Mexico together
accounted for a bigger share of total US trade. For America, this state of
affairs is kind of a big deal— and a major foreign policy complication— given
that China is seen as its main economic and geopolitical rival. 2.
The pandemic has made
all data messy, so we should be cautious. It’s not just inflation at 40-year
highs and the impact on the value of imports that’s affecting the data.
American retailers have tended to over-order from China during the pandemic,
which likely affected the trade figures as well. It could be that, over the
coming years, the change in the relationship everyone is talking about will
slowly be reflected in the data. 3.
Sometimes it’s
worth being wary of rhetoric and narratives. An economy
is its people, and people often confound the intentions and expectations of
policymakers. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter 2 Let’s watch this video together. Imports, Exports,
and Exchange Rates: Crash Course Economics #15 Topic
1- What is BOP? The balance of payment of a country contains two
accounts: current and capital. The current account records exports and imports of goods and services
as well as unilateral transfers, whereas the capital account records purchase and sale transactions of foreign
assets and liabilities during a particular year. What
is the current account? Balance
of payments: Current account (video, Khan academy)
From
khan academy Current vs. Capital Accounts: What's the
Difference? By
THE INVESTOPEDIA TEAM, Updated June
29, 2021, Reviewed by ROBERT C. KELLY Current
vs. Capital Accounts: An Overview The current
and capital accounts represent two halves of a nation's balance of payments. The current account represents a
country's net income over a period of time, while the capital account records
the net change of assets and liabilities during a particular year. In
economic terms, the current account deals with the receipt and payment in
cash as well as non-capital items, while the capital account reflects sources
and utilization of capital. The sum of
the current account and capital account reflected in the balance of payments
will always be zero. Any surplus or deficit in the current account is matched
and canceled out by an equal surplus or deficit in the capital account. KEY
TAKEAWAYS ·
The current and
capital accounts are two components of a nation's balance of payments. ·
The current account
is the difference between a country's savings and investments. ·
A country's capital
account records the net change of assets and liabilities during a certain
period of time. Current Account The
current account deals with a country's short-term transactions or the
difference between its savings and investments. These are also referred to as
actual transactions (as they have a real impact on income), output and
employment levels through the movement of goods and services in the economy. The current account consists of visible trade
(export and import of goods), invisible trade (export and import of services),
unilateral transfers, and investment income (income from factors such as land
or foreign shares). The credit and debit of foreign exchange from these
transactions are also recorded in the balance of the current account. The
resulting balance of the current account is approximated as the sum total of
the balance of trade. Current Account vs. Capital Account Transactions
are recorded in the current account in the following ways: Exports are noted as credits in the balance
of payments Imports are recorded as debits in the
balance of payments The
current account gives economists and other analysts an idea of how the country
is faring economically. The difference
between exports and imports, or the trade balance, will determine whether a
country's current balance is positive or negative. When it is positive, the
current account has a surplus, making the country a "net lender" to
the rest of the world. A deficit means the current account balance is
negative. In this case, that country is considered a net borrower. If
imports decline and exports increase to stronger economies during a
recession, the country's current account deficit drops. But if exports
stagnate as imports grow when the economy grows, the current account deficit
grows. Capital Account The capital account is a record of the
inflows and outflows of capital that directly affect a nation’s foreign assets
and liabilities. It is concerned with
all international trade transactions between citizens of one country and
those in other countries. The
components of the capital account include foreign investment and loans,
banking, and other forms of capital, as well as monetary movements or changes
in the foreign exchange reserve. The capital account flow reflects factors
such as commercial borrowings, banking, investments, loans, and capital. A surplus in the capital account means
there is an inflow of money into the country, while a deficit indicates money
moving out of the country. In this case,
the country may be increasing its foreign holdings. In
other words, the capital account is concerned with payments of debts and
claims, regardless of the time period. The balance of the capital account
also includes all items reflecting changes in stocks. The
International Monetary Fund divides capital account into two categories: The
financial account and the capital account. The term capital account is also used in accounting. It
is a general ledger account used to record the contributed capital of
corporate owners as well as their retained earnings. These balances are
reported in a balance sheet's shareholder's equity section. https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-investment/international-transactions
U.S.
Current-Account Deficit Narrows in 3rd Quarter 2022 U.S. International
Transactions The U.S. current-account deficit, which reflects the combined
balances on trade in goods and services and income flows between U.S.
residents and residents of other countries, narrowed by $21.6 billion, or 9.1
percent, to $217.1 billion in the third quarter of 2022. The narrowing mostly
reflected a decreased deficit on goods that was partly offset by a decreased
surplus on primary income and an increased deficit on secondary income. The
third-quarter deficit was 3.4 percent of current-dollar gross domestic
product, down from 3.8 percent in the second quarter. https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/trans322-fax_0.pdf •
Exports of goods increased $7.2 billion to $547.0 billion, while imports of
goods decreased $32.5 billion to $818.2 billion. •
Exports of services increased $4.9 billion to $234.0 billion, while imports
of services increased $1.6 billion to $173.5 billion. •
Receipts of primary income increased $15.2 billion to $314.0 billion, while
payments of primary income increased $26.8 billion to $268.4 billion. •
Receipts of secondary income decreased $0.8 billion to $42.7 billion, while
payments of secondary income increased $9.0 billion to $94.9 billion. •
Net financial-account transactions were −$294.2
billion in the third quarter, reflecting net U.S. borrowing from foreign
residents. · Trade in goods (table 2) Exports of goods increased $7.2 billion to $547.0 billion, reflecting increases in nonmonetary gold and in capital goods, mostly civilian aircraft engines and parts and other industrial machinery, that were partly offset by a decrease in foods, feeds, and beverages, mostly soybeans and corn. Imports of goods decreased $32.5 billion to $818.2 billion, reflecting widespread decreases in consumer goods and in industrial supplies and materials. The decrease in consumer goods was led by household and kitchen appliances and other household goods, and the decrease in industrial supplies and materials was led by metals and nonmetallic products. · Trade in services (table 3) Exports of services increased $4.9 billion to $234.0 billion, reflecting increases in other business services, mainly professional and management consulting services, and in travel, mostly education-related travel and other personal travel. Imports of services increased $1.6 billion to $173.5 billion, reflecting increases in travel, mostly other personal travel and education-related travel, and in financial services, mostly financial intermediation services indirectly measured and financial management services, that were partly offset by a decrease in transport, mostly sea freight transport. · Primary income (table 4) Receipts of primary income increased $15.2 billion to $314.0 billion, and payments of primary income increased $26.8 billion to $268.4 billion. The increases in both receipts and payments primarily reflected increases in other investment income, mostly interest on loans and deposits. These increases were mainly due to higher short-term interest rates that resulted from significant federal funds rate hikes by the Federal Reserve Board in May, June, July, and September. U.S. other investment assets and liabilities are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars. · Secondary income (table 5) Receipts of secondary income decreased $0.8 billion to $42.7 billion, reflecting a decrease in general government transfers, mostly fines and penalties. Payments of secondary income increased $9.0 billion to $94.9 billion, reflecting an increase in general government transfers, mostly international cooperation. ·
Financial-Account Transactions (tables 1,
6, 7, and 8) Net financial-account transactions were −$294.2
billion in the third quarter, reflecting net U.S. borrowing from foreign
residents. ·
Financial assets (tables 1, 6, 7, and 8)
Third-quarter transactions increased U.S. residents’
foreign financial assets by $411.0 billion. Transactions increased portfolio
investment assets, mostly equity and long-term debt securities, by $368.9
billion; direct investment assets, mainly equity, by $56.7 billion; and
reserve assets by $0.8 billion. Transactions decreased other investment
assets by $15.5 billion, resulting from partly offsetting transactions in
loans and deposits. ·
Liabilities (tables 1, 6, 7, and 8)
Third-quarter transactions increased U.S. liabilities to foreign residents by
$671.2 billion. Transactions increased portfolio investment liabilities,
mostly long-term debt securities and equity, by $463.2 billion; other investment
liabilities, mostly loans, by $106.6 billion; and direct investment
liabilities, mostly equity, by $101.4 billion. What is the Capital Account
Balance of
payments: Capital account (video, Khan Academy) https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=capital+account Top Trading Partners - November 2021 https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html
· JANUARY 5, 2023 — The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis announced today that the goods and services deficit was $61.5 billion in November, down $16.3 billion from $77.8 billion in October, revised. · Exports, Imports, and Balance (Exhibit 1) November exports were $251.9 billion, $5.1 billion less than October exports. November imports were $313.4 billion, $21.5 billion less than October imports. The November decrease in the goods and services deficit reflected a decrease in the goods deficit of $15.3 billion to $84.1 billion and an increase in the services surplus of $1.0 billion to $22.5 billion. Year-to-date, the goods and services deficit increased $120.1 billion, or 15.7 percent, from the same period in 2021. Exports increased $439.4 billion or 18.9 percent. Imports increased $559.5 billion or 18.1 percent. Topic 2: Trade war with China to
reduce trade deficit (current account deficit) For Class Discussion: Has the US won the trade war against
China? Can trade war help reduce the US current account deficit? America v China: why the trade war won't end soon | The Economist (youtube)
2022
: U.S. trade in goods with China
NOTE:
All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars on a nominal basis. https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html 2022 : U.S. trade in goods with China
NOTE: All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars on a
nominal basis, not seasonally adjusted unless otherwise specified. Details may not equal totals due to rounding.
Table reflects only those months for which there was trade.
U.S. tariffs on
Chinese goods didn’t bring companies back to the U.S., new research finds These tariffs instead resulted in collateral damage to the
U.S. economy By Jiakun Jack Zhang and Samantha A. Vortherms, September
22, 2021 at 5:00 a.m. EDT Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen recently argued that tariffs from the U.S.-China trade war —
covering more than $307 billion worth of goods — “hurt American consumers,”
yet the negotiations “really didn’t address in many ways the fundamental
problems we have with China.” U.S. tariffs on
Chinese exports jumped sixfold between 2018 and 2020, but tariffs failed to decouple the two economies. As the Biden
administration conducts its comprehensive review of China trade policy and
contemplates new tariffs, our research helps explain whether existing tariffs
achieved their policy objective. Tariffs increase the
cost of doing business overseas by making those goods more expensive to
import. The Trump administration’s logic was that tariffs would hurt U.S. and
other multinational corporations engaged in U.S.-China trade — and push more
companies to divest from China and shift supply chains to the United States. Tariff proponents
argued the Chinese economy would suffer, giving U.S. negotiators more
leverage over China at the negotiating table. Fear of ‘terrorism’ shaped U.S. foreign policy after 9/11.
Will the U.S. make China the next big obsession? In fact, these
tariffs resulted in collateral damage to the U.S. economy without pressuring
China to change its economic policies. Here’s why. The U.S. hoped to see
multinationals walk away from China. In a recent working paper, we built a new data set on foreign-invested
enterprises registered in China to identify multinationals that choose to
divest each year. We found that new
U.S. tariffs in 2018 and 2019 had a minimal effect on divestment. More
than 1,800 U.S.-funded subsidiaries closed in the first year of the trade
war, a 46 percent increase over the previous year. U.S. company exits
immediately after the onset of the trade war were not concentrated in
manufacturing or information technology, two sectors most directly affected
by the trade war. We estimate that
less than 1 percent of the increase in U.S. firm exits during this period was
due to U.S. tariffs. And U.S. firms were no more likely to divest than
firms from Europe or Asia. Instead, company exits were driven more by the
company’s capacity to mitigate political risk. Larger and older multinational were significantly less likely to exit
China after the onset of the trade war. These findings may surprise politicians, but are fully in
line with recent research explaining how tariffs pass through to U.S.
consumers. Rather than leaving China
or finding alternative suppliers, U.S. firms simply raised prices for their
customers. Survey data show large
U.S. businesses remain optimistic about the Chinese market and plan to
increase their investments there. Most of these firms are already “In
China, for China” — those that are exposed to tariffs are taking advantage of
workarounds such as the first sale rule or passing on costs to suppliers. Tariffs provided little leverage — for either country If U.S. multinationals aren’t rushing to exit China, are
they pressuring the U.S. government for tariff relief, as the Chinese
government hoped? Many analysts believed the U.S. business community would
push back, and stop the trade war from escalating. We investigated the
political behavior of a sample of 500 large U.S. multinationals with
subsidiaries in China to see if they engaged in political activities such as
commenting, testifying or lobbying in opposition to the U.S. Section 301
tariffs. We found that most U.S. companies adopted an apolitical
strategy. They didn’t exit China, but
also didn’t put public pressure on Washington to roll back the tariffs.
Even though 63 percent of U.S. multinationals in our sample were adversely impacted
by the trade war, only 22 percent chose to voice opposition and 7 percent
chose to exit China. The majority (65 percent) did neither. The U.S. and China finally signed a trade agreement. Who
won? Many of the
multinationals we coded as “voicing opposition” did so through associations
such as the US-China Business Council rather than under their own name. An even larger number unsuccessfully lobbied for tariff
exclusion for specific products, rather than a more general rollback of
Section 301 tariffs. Smaller businesses saw greater collateral damage Our findings suggest
that U.S. companies aren’t divesting from China as much as U.S. policymakers
would like — or pushing back against tariffs as much as Chinese policymakers
had hoped. Instead, large
companies responded to the increased cost of business by passing the cost of
tariffs on to their customers. And individual consumers in the United States
paid higher prices for imports from China. Smaller companies and
those newer to China were more likely to exit. Firms with older and larger
subsidiaries in China face higher sunk costs from leaving China altogether,
which makes them more likely to continue China operations. This finding parallels reports about small businesses in
the United States who were unable to find alternative suppliers or afford
expensive lobbyists during the trade war. The higher tariffs on raw materials imported from China made it
tougher for some small businesses, particularly if they lacked the leverage
to pass these costs on to customers or the resources to mitigate them. Would other trade tools work? Despite intensifying political hostility between Beijing
and Washington and the mounting economic cost of tariffs, Chinese and U.S.
businesses remain deeply integrated in terms of financial, knowledge and
production networks. And despite the trade war, foreign investment inflows
into China grew by 4.5 percent from 2019 — and hit a record $144.37 billion
in 2020. There‘s little sign that U.S. multinationals have embraced the idea
of decoupling from China. While U.S. Trade
Representative Katherine Tai justified the Biden administration’s hesitancy
to remove tariffs on the grounds that tariffs provide leverage against China,
our research demonstrates that U.S. tariffs haven’t produced the intended
results. Instead, multinationals continue to navigate the uncertain
U.S.-China relationship and related political risks. Smaller firms, in
particular, may find it difficult to absorb the costs generated by the trade
war. The lack of U.S. leverage resulting from the trade war may
dispel the notion that tariffs are “tough on China” and may help focus the
policy debate on the harm to U.S. consumers from tariffs that remain in
place. The Biden administration has at its disposal an array of alternative
tools besides tariffs for economic competition with China that may result in
less collateral damage on the U.S. economy. After all, economic coercion can be a double-edged sword:
These tools tend to inflict collateral damage on one’s economy while hurting
that of the target, but tariffs are the bluntest tool of all. Chapter 2 part
1 (Due with the first mid term exam) 1. Based on the classroom
discussion, and documents posted and available online, do you think that the
trade war against China could help US to reduce its trade deficit (or current
account deficit)? Please be specific. 2. United
States Current Account deficit accounted for 3.4 % of the country's Nominal
GDP in Sep 2022, compared with a 3.8 % deficit in the previous quarter. What is
your opinion about the increasing current account deficit since the outbreak
of the Covid 19 pandemic? Is the US current account deficit a problem? Why or
why not? For reference, please visit https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/current.htm 3-. Internet
exercises (not required, information for intereted students only) a. IMF,
world bank and UN are only a few of the major organizations that
track, report and aid international economic and financial
development. Based on information provided in those websites, you could learn
about a country’s economic outlook. IMF: www.imf.org/external/index.htm UN: www.un.org/databases/index.htm World
bank: www.worldbank.org’ Bank
of international settlement: www.bis.org/index.htm b. St. Louis
Federal Reserve provides a large amount of recent open economy macroeconomic
data online. You can track down BOP and GDP data for the major industrial
countries. Recent
international economic data: research.stlouisfed.org/publications Balance of Payments
statistics: research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/125 |
Balance
of payments: Current account (video, Khan academy) (FYI)
Balance of payments:
Capital account (video, Khan Academy) (FYI) Current vs.
capital accounts: what is the difference (youtube)? Reference
of useful websites for global economy International Trade
Statistics (PDF) Current
Account (BOP) Data – World Bank http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BN.CAB.XOKA.CD IMF,
world bank and UN are only a few of the major organizations that
track, report and aid international economic and
financial development. Using these website, you can summarize the
economic outlook for each country. IMF: www.imf.org/external/index.htm UN: www.un.org/databases/index.htm World
bank: www.worldbank.org Bank
of international settlement: www.bis.org/index.htm St.
Louis Federal Reserve provides a large amount of recent open economy
macroeconomic data online. You can track down BOP and GDP data for the major
industrial countries. Recent international
economic data: research.stlouisfed.org/publicaitons/ie Global Current Account
Balances Widen Amid War and Pandemic The war in Ukraine and
resulting increase in commodity prices are expected to contribute to a
further widening this year. Giovanni Ganelli, Pau
Rabanal, Niamh Sheridan August 4, 2022 The lingering pandemic and Russia’s invasion of
Ukraine are dealing a setback to the global economy. This is affecting trade,
commodity prices, and financial flows, all of which are changing current
account deficits and surpluses. Global current account balances—the overall size
of deficits and surpluses across countries—are widening for a second straight
year, according
to our latest External Sector Report. After years of narrowing, balances
widened to 3 percent of global gross domestic product in 2020, grew further
to 3.5 percent last year, and are expected to expand again this year. Larger current account
balances aren’t necessarily negative on their own. But global excess
balances—the portion not justified by differences in countries’ economic
fundamentals, such as demographics, income level and growth potential, and
desirable policy settings, using the Fund’s revised methodology—could fuel
trade tensions and protectionist measures. That would be a setback for the
push for greater international economic cooperation and could also increase
the risk of disruptive currency and capital flow movements. Pandemic effects in
2021 The pandemic widened global current account
balances, and it’s still having an asymmetric impact on countries depending,
for example, on whether they are exporters or importers of tourism and
medical goods. The pandemic and
associated lockdowns also shifted consumption to goods from services as
people reduced travel and entertainment. This also widened global balances as
advanced economies with deficits increased goods imports from emerging market
economies with surpluses. In 2021, we estimate that this shift increased
the United States deficit by 0.4 percent of gross domestic product and
contributed to an increase of 0.3 percent of GDP in China’s surplus. Surplus economies like
China saw also increases due to greater shipments of medical goods that often
flowed to the United States and other deficit economies. Surging
transportation costs also contributed to widening global balances in 2021. War and tightening in
2022 Commodity prices are one of the biggest drivers
of external positions, and last year’s rally in oil prices from pandemic lows
affected exporters and importers asymmetrically. Russia’s February
invasion of Ukraine exacerbated the surge in energy, food, and other
commodity prices, widening global current account balances by raising
surpluses for commodity exporters. Monetary policy tightening is driving currency
movements as rising inflation is leading many central banks to accelerate the
withdrawal of monetary stimulus. Revised expectations about the pace of the
US monetary tightening brought about sizable currency realignment this year,
contributing to the projected widening of balances. Capital flows to emerging markets were disrupted
so far in 2022 by increased risk aversion triggered by the war, with further
outflows amid changing expectations about the increased pace of monetary
tightening in advanced economies. Cumulative outflows from emerging markets
have been very large, about $50 billion, with a magnitude that’s similar to
outflows during March 2020 but a pace that’s slower. Our outlook for next
year and beyond is for a steady decline of global current account balances as
pandemic and war impacts moderate, though this expectation is subject to considerable
uncertainty. Global current account balances could continue to widen should
fiscal consolidation in current account deficit countries take longer than
expected. Moreover, the stronger dollar could widen the US current account
deficit and increase global current account balances. Other factors that
could widen these balances include a prolonged war that keeps commodity
prices elevated for longer, the varying degrees of central bank
interest-rate increases, and greater geopolitical tension causing economic
fragmentation, disrupting supply chains, and potentially triggering a
reorganization of the international monetary system. A more fragmented trade
system could either increase or decrease global balances, depending on how
trade blocs are reconfigured. Either way, though, it would reduce technology
transfers, and decrease the potential for export-led growth in low-income
countries and thus unambiguously erode welfare gains from globalization. Policy priorities The war in Ukraine has
exacerbated existing trade-offs for policymakers, including between fighting
inflation and safeguarding economic recovery and between providing support to
those affected and rebuilding fiscal buffers. Multilateral cooperation is
key in dealing with the policy challenges generated by the pandemic and the
war, including to tackle the humanitarian crisis. Policies to promote
external rebalancing differ based on individual economies’ positions and
needs. For economies with larger-than-warranted current account deficits that
reflect large fiscal shortfalls, such as the United States, it’s critical to
reduce government deficits with a combination of higher revenue and lower
spending. Rebalancing is a
different proposition for countries with excessive surpluses, such as Germany
and the Netherlands, which can be reduced by intensifying reforms that
encourage public and private investment and discourage excessive private
saving, including by expanding social safety nets in some emerging markets. Rolling back U.S.-China tariffs would ease
inflation in the U.S., former Treasury secretary says PUBLISHED TUE, NOV 30
2021, Weizhen Tan https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/30/removing-us-china-trade-tariffs-would-ease-inflation-jacob-lew.html KEY POINTS ·
Eliminating tariffs imposed on goods during
the worst of the trade war would help ease inflation in the U.S., former
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew told CNBC. ·
But there’s currently “no political space”
to do so, he said on CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia.” ·
Worries over inflation have shot up this
year, as energy prices spiked and the ongoing supply chain crisis led to
shortages of goods. But Lew said there’s been “a bit of excess nervousness
about inflation.” U.S. fiscal stimulus
package is unlikely despite omicron: Ex-Treasury Secretary Eliminating tariffs
imposed on goods during the worst of the trade war would help ease inflation
in the U.S., former Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew told CNBC on Tuesday. But there’s currently
“no political space” to do so, he said on CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia.” “I think that the
United States and China have deep differences. I’ve never thought it should
just be about negotiating the exchange of one good or another on one side or
the other. It should be about a level playing field,” Lew said. He served as
treasury secretary from 2013 to 2017 during the Obama administration. He continued: “I’ve
thought from the beginning that the tariffs were an ineffective way to deal
with their attacks on American consumers. And right now, with inflation being
an issue, rolling back tariffs would actually reduce inflation in the United
States.” Relations between
Washington and Beijing took a turn for the worse in 2018, when the Trump
administration imposed tariffs on billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods
and Beijing retaliated with similar punitive measures, drawing both sides
into a protracted trade war. U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods stood at an average
of 19.3% on a trade-weighted basis in early 2021, while Chinese tariffs on
American products were at about 20.7%, according to data compiled by think tank
Peterson Institute for International Economics earlier this year. Before the trade war, U.S. tariffs on Chinese
goods were on average 3.1% in early 2018 while China’s tariffs on American
goods were at 8%, the data
showed. Referring to rolling
back tariffs, Lew said: “Both the leaders have to, I think, create political
space in our two countries for these issues to be issues where you can move
and make progress, because otherwise we either stay where we are. It gets
worse. I think we can do better.” American businesses are bearing most of the cost burden
from the elevated tariffs imposed at the height of the U.S.-China trade war, according to a report
from Moody’s Investors Service earlier this year. The ratings agency said
that U.S. importers absorbed more than 90% of additional costs resulting
from the 20% U.S. tariff on Chinese goods. That means U.S. importers pay
around 18.5% more in price for a Chinese product subject to that 20% tariff
rate, while Chinese exporters receive 1.5% less for the same product,
according to the report. ‘Excess nervousness’
about inflation Worries over inflation
have shot up this year, as energy prices spiked and the ongoing supply chain
crisis led to shortages of goods. The U.S. consumer price
index, which tracks a basket of products ranging from gasoline and health
care to groceries and rent, rose 6.2% in October from a year ago, the highest
in 30 years. But Lew told CNBC it’s
likely “much of the inflation that we’re seeing will work its way through.” “I don’t think anyone
is predicting hyperinflation,” he said. “But I think there’s been a bit of
excess nervousness about inflation. And candidly, the public reaction to
inflation is very strong.” But Lew warned that
policymakers have to walk a fine line and ensure that measures used to combat
inflation don’t slow the economy down so much that they dampen growth. — CNBC’s Yen Nee Lee,
Jeff Cox contributed to this report. Khan Academy’s
view of the trade deficit with China (video) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In class exercise: 3.
If U.S. imports > exports, then the supply of
dollars > the demand of the dollars in the foreign exchange market, ceteris
paribus. True/False? Solution: Import means
using $ (spending $, or out flow of $) to buy foreign goods è In
the FX market, supply of $ increases è So when
supply increases and assume that demand is unchanged, the value of
$ will drop 2. If Japan exports
> imports, then yen would appreciate against other
currencies. True/False? Solution: Export means
selling domestic products for yen ( in flow of yen from importers who will
pay yen for the goods made in Japan; there is an increased demand for
yen) è In
the FX market, demand of yen increases è So when
demand increases and assume that supply is unchanged, the value of
yen will rise. 3. If the interest rate
rises in the U.S., ceteris paribus, then capital will flow out of
the U.S. True/False? Solution: Interest rate
rises è financial
market will become more attractive to foreign investorsècapital
will flow in, not out of the U.S. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part II of Chapter 2 --- Evolution
of international monetary system Finance: The History of Money (combined) (video,
fan to watch)
Review of history of money: A brief history of money -
From gold to bitcoin and cryptocurrencies (video)
· Bimetallism:
Before 1875 · Classical
Gold Standard: 1875-1914 The Gold Standard Explained in One
Minute (video)
§ International
value of currency was determined by its fixed relationship to gold. § Gold
was used to settle international accounts, so the risk of trading with other
countries could be reduced. · Interwar
Period: 1915-1944 § Countries
suspended gold standard during the WWI, to increase money supply and pay for
the war. § Countries
relied on a partial gold standard and partly other countries’ currencies during the WWII · Bretton Woods System: 1945-1972 The Bretton Woods Monetary
System (1944 - 1971) Explained in One Minute (video)
§ All
currencies were pegged to US$. § US$ was
the only currency that was backed by gold. § US$ was
world currency at that time. · The
Flexible Exchange Rate Regime: 1973-Present FLOATING AND FIXED EXCHANGE RATE (video)
For class discussion: Read
the following. Is there any knowledge that is new to you? Bretton Woods Agreement and System By
JAMES CHEN Updated April 28, 2021, Reviewed by SOMER ANDERSON What
Was the Bretton Woods Agreement and System? The Bretton Woods Agreement was
negotiated in July 1944 by delegates from 44 countries
at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference held in Bretton
Woods, New Hampshire. Thus, the name “Bretton Woods Agreement.” Under
the Bretton Woods System, gold was the
basis for the U.S. dollar and other currencies were pegged to the U.S.
dollar’s value. The Bretton Woods
System effectively came to an end in the early 1970s when President Richard
M. Nixon announced that the U.S. would no longer exchange gold for U.S.
currency. The
Bretton Woods Agreement and System Explained Approximately
730 delegates representing 44 countries met in Bretton Woods in July 1944 with the principal goals of creating an
efficient foreign exchange system, preventing competitive devaluations of
currencies, and promoting international economic growth. The Bretton Woods
Agreement and System were central to these goals. The Bretton Woods Agreement
also created two important organizations—the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) and the World Bank. While the Bretton Woods System was dissolved in
the 1970s, both the IMF and World Bank have remained strong pillars for the
exchange of international currencies. Though
the Bretton Woods conference itself took place over just three weeks, the
preparations for it had been going on for several years. The primary
designers of the Bretton Woods System were the famous British economist John
Maynard Keynes and American Chief International Economist of the U.S.
Treasury Department Harry Dexter White. Keynes’ hope was to establish a
powerful global central bank to be called the Clearing Union and issue a new
international reserve currency called the bancor. White’s plan envisioned a
more modest lending fund and a greater role for the U.S. dollar, rather than
the creation of a new currency. In the end, the adopted plan took ideas from
both, leaning more toward White’s plan. It wasn't until 1958 that the Bretton
Woods System became fully functional. Once implemented, its
provisions called for the U.S. dollar to be pegged to the value of gold.
Moreover, all other currencies in the system were then pegged to the U.S.
dollar’s value. The exchange rate
applied at the time set the price of gold at $35 an ounce. KEY
TAKEAWAYS ·
The Bretton Woods
Agreement and System created a collective international currency exchange
regime that lasted from the mid-1940s to the early 1970s. ·
The Bretton Woods
System required a currency peg to the U.S. dollar which was in turn pegged to
the price of gold. ·
The Bretton Woods
System collapsed in the 1970s but created a lasting influence on
international currency exchange and trade through its development of the IMF
and World Bank. Benefits
of Bretton Woods Currency Pegging The
Bretton Woods System included 44 countries. These countries were brought
together to help regulate and promote international trade across borders. As
with the benefits of all currency pegging regimes, currency pegs are expected
to provide currency stabilization for
trade of goods and services as well as financing. All
of the countries in the Bretton Woods System agreed to a fixed peg against
the U.S. dollar with diversions of only 1% allowed. Countries were required
to monitor and maintain their currency pegs which they achieved primarily by
using their currency to buy or sell U.S. dollars as needed. The Bretton Woods System, therefore,
minimized international currency exchange rate volatility which helped
international trade relations. More stability in foreign currency
exchange was also a factor for the successful support of loans and grants
internationally from the World Bank. The
IMF and World Bank The
Bretton Woods Agreement created two Bretton Woods Institutions, the IMF and
the World Bank. Formally introduced in December 1945 both institutions have
withstood the test of time, globally serving as important pillars for
international capital financing and trade activities. The
purpose of the IMF was to monitor exchange rates and identify nations that
needed global monetary support. The World Bank, initially called the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, was established to
manage funds available for providing assistance to countries that had been
physically and financially devastated by World War II.1
In the twenty-first century, the IMF has 189 member countries and still
continues to support global monetary cooperation. Tandemly, the World Bank
helps to promote these efforts through its loans and grants to governments.2 The Bretton Woods System’s Collapse In 1971, concerned that the U.S. gold
supply was no longer adequate to cover the number of dollars in circulation,
President Richard M. Nixon devalued the U.S. dollar relative to gold. After a
run on gold reserve, he declared a temporary suspension of the dollar’s
convertibility into gold. By 1973 the Bretton Woods System had collapsed. Countries
were then free to choose any exchange arrangement for their currency, except
pegging its value to the price of gold. They could, for example, link its
value to another country's currency, or a basket of currencies, or simply let
it float freely and allow market forces to determine its value relative to
other countries' currencies. The
Bretton Woods Agreement remains a significant event in world financial
history. The two Bretton Woods Institutions it created in the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank played an important part in helping to
rebuild Europe in the aftermath of World War II.
Subsequently, both institutions have continued to maintain their founding
goals while also transitioning to serve global government interests in the
modern-day. The Evolution of US Currency
At times, America
may not be the most popular nation in the world, but one thing is for sure:
it is famous for its green. The greenback has been iconic since its
inception. This infographic
above misses a few key instances in US currency history – namely the birth of
the Federal Reserve in 1913 and Nixon ending convertibility to gold in
1971. Both events were catalysts to massive money printing which leaves
the USD with only a fraction of the purchasing power that it once had. |
Bitcoin Could Become World Reserve
Currency, Says Senator Rand Paul CONTRIBUTOR Namcios Bitcoin Magazine, PUBLISHED OCT
25, 2021 1:55PM EDT Bitcoin could rise to that spot as people keep losing faith and
confidence in governments and their policies, Paul said. As people lose
confidence in the government institutions, bitcoin could benefit and rise to
become the world's reserve currency, Senator Rand Paul said. "I've started to question now whether or not cryptocurrency
could actually become the reserve currency of the world as more and more
people lose confidence in the government," he said. Senator Paul has never publicly endorsed any cryptocurrency
other than Bitcoin. Bitcoin could become
the world's reserve currency if more people lose trust in the government,
said Senator Rand Paul, who accepted BTC donations in its 2016 campaign. The Republican Senator was interviewed on
Axios, discussing the future of bitcoin and fiat currency in the U.S. "The government currencies are so unreliable — they're
also fiat currencies. They're not backed by anything," Sen. Paul said. A Gallup poll published on September 30 highlighted how
Americans' trust in government remains low. The survey found that overall
trust in the federal government to handle international problems sits at a
record-low 39%, whereas confidence in the judicial branch is at 54%, down 13
points since 2020. U.S. citizens' trust in their state (57%) and local (66%)
governments continues to be higher than trust in the federal government. As people keep losing
faith in their government's ability to handle problems and best represent
their interests, Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are set to benefit and be even
more embraced, Senator Paul highlighted. - "I've started to question now whether or not cryptocurrency
could actually become the reserve currency of the world as more and more
people lose confidence in the government," he said. The Senator has touted cryptocurrency before. During his
presidential campaign in 2016, in addition to donations in U.S. dollars, Paul
accepted donations in bitcoin. Even though the Republican Senator was not specific about which
cryptocurrency he was referring to in the interview, he has not publicly
endorsed any cryptocurrency other than BTC, indicating he was likely
referring to bitcoin itself. Which shouldn't come as a surprise, given that
BTC is the only cryptocurrency suitable to function as currency. Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) By SHOBHIT SETH Updated August 25, 2021, Reviewed by ERIKA
RASURE https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc.asp What Is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)? The term central bank digital currency
(CBDC) refers to the virtual form of a fiat currency. A CBDC is an
electronic record or digital token of a country's official currency. As
such, it is issued and regulated by the nation's monetary authority or
central bank. As such, they are
backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing government. CBDCs can simplify the
implementation of monetary and fiscal policy and promote financial inclusion
in an economy by bringing the unbanked into the financial system. Because
they are a centralized form of currency, they may erode the privacy of
citizens. CBDCs are
in various stages of development around the world. KEY TAKEAWAYS · A central bank digital currency is the virtual
form of a country's fiat currency. · A CBDC is issued and regulated by a nation's
monetary authority or central bank. · CBDCs promote financial inclusion and simplify
the implementation of monetary and fiscal policy. · As a centralized form of currency, they may
erode the privacy of citizens. Although they aren't formally being used, many countries are
exploring the introduction and use of CBDCs in their economy. How Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) Work Fiat money is the term that refers to currency issued by a
country's government. It comes in the form of banknotes and coins. It is
considered a form of legal tender that can be used for the sale and purchase
of goods and services along with kinds of transactions. A central bank digital currency is the virtual form of fiat money.
As such, it has the full faith and
backing of the issuing government, just like fiat money does. CBDCs are meant to represent fiat currency. The goal is to
provide users with convenience and security of digital as well as the
regulated, reserve-backed circulation of the traditional banking system. They are designed to function as a unit of account, store of
value, and medium of exchange for daily transactions. CBDCs will be backed by the full faith of the
issuing government—just like fiat currency. Central banks or monetary
authorities will be solely liable for their operations. There were 83 countries around the
world pursuing CBDC development as of October 2021.Their reasons for pursuing this venture
varied. For example: Sweden's Riksbank began developing an electronic version of the
krona (called e-krona) after the country experienced a decline in the use of
cash. The United States wants to introduce CBDCs in its monetary
system to improve the domestic payments system. Developing countries may have other reasons. For instance, a
significant number of people in India are unbanked. Setting up the physical
infrastructure to bring the unbanked into the financial ecosystem is costly.
But establishing a CBDC can promote financial inclusion in the country's
economy. CBDCs are not meant to be interchangeable with the
national currency (fiat or otherwise) of a country or region. Types of CBDCs There are two types of CBDCs: Wholesale and retail central bank
digital currencies. We've listed some of the main features of each below. Wholesale CBDCs Wholesale CBDCs use the existing tier of banking and financial
institutions to conduct and settle transactions. These types of CBDCs are
just like traditional central bank reserves. One type of wholesale CBDC transaction is the interbank payment.
It involves the transfer of assets or money between two banks and is subject
to certain conditions. This transfer comes with considerable counterparty
risk, which can be magnified in a real-time gross settlement (RTGS) payment
system. A digital currency's ledger-based system enables the setting of
conditions, so a transfer won't occur if these conditions are not satisfied.
Wholesale CBDCs can also expedite and automate the process for cross-border
transfers. Current real-time settlement systems mostly work in single
jurisdictions or with a single currency. The distributed ledger technology
(DLT) available in wholesale CBDCs can extend the concept to cross-border
transfers and expedite the process to transfer money across borders.5 Retail CBDCs Wholesale CBDCs improve upon a system of transfers between
banks. Retail CBDCs, on the other hand, involve the transfer of
central government-backed digital currency directly to consumers. They eliminate the intermediary risk or the risk that banking
institutions might become illiquid and sink depositor funds. There are two possible variants of retail CBDCs are possible,
depending on the type of access they provide: Value- or cash-based access: This system involves CBDCs that are
passed onto the recipient through a pseudonymous digital wallet. The wallet will be
identifiable on a public blockchain and, much like cash transactions, will be
difficult to identify parties in such transactions. According to
Riksbank, the development of a value- or cash-based access system is easier
and quicker compared to token-based access. Token- or account-based access: This
is similar to the access provided by a bank account. Thus,
an intermediary will be responsible for verifying the identity of the
recipient and monitoring illicit activity and payments between accounts. It
provides for more privacy. Personal transaction data is shielded from
commercial parties and public authorities through a private authentication
process. The two types of CBDCs are not mutually exclusive. It is
possible to develop a combination of both and have them function in the same
economy. Advantages and Disadvantages of CBDCs Advantages CBDCs simplify the process of implementing monetary policy and
government functions. They automate the process between banks through
wholesale CBDCs and establish a direct connection between consumers and
central banks through retail CBDCs. These digital
currencies can also minimize the effort and processes for other government
functions, such as distribution of benefits or calculation and collection of
taxes. Disbursement of money through intermediaries introduces
third-party risk to the process. What if the bank runs out of cash deposits?
What if there is a bank run due to a rumor or an external event? Events like
these have the potential to upset the delicate balance of a monetary system. A CBDC eliminates third-party risk. Any
residual risk that remains in the system rests with the central bank. One of the roadblocks to financial inclusion for large parts of the
unbanked population, especially in developing and poor countries, is the cost
associated with developing the banking infrastructure needed to provide them
with access to the financial system. CBDCs can establish a direct
connection between consumers and central banks, thus eliminating the need for
expensive infrastructure. CBDCs can prevent illicit activity because they exist in a
digital format and do not require serial numbers for tracking. Cryptography and a public ledger make it easy for a
central bank to track money throughout its jurisdiction, thereby preventing
illicit activity and illegal transactions using CBDCs. Disadvantages CBDCs don't necessarily solve the problem of centralization. A central
authority (the central bank) is still responsible for and invested with the
authority to conduct transactions. Therefore, it still
controls data and the levers of transactions between citizens and banks. Users would have to give up some degree of privacy since the
administrator is responsible to collect and disseminate digital
identifications. The provider would become privy to every transaction conducted.
This can lead to privacy issues, similar to the ones that plague tech
behemoths and internet service providers (ISPs). For example, criminals could
hack and misuse information, or central banks could disallow transactions
between citizens. The legal and regulatory issues pertaining to CBDCs are a black
hole. What will be the role of these currencies and who will regulate them? Considering their benefits in
cross-border transfers, should they be regulated across borders? Experiments
in CBDCs are ongoing, and this could translate to a long-term frame. The portability of these systems means that a strong CBDC issued
by a foreign country could end up substituting a weaker country's currency. A digital U.S. dollar could substitute the local currency
of a smaller country or a failing state. Let's look at Ecuador, which replaced its official currency (the
sucre) with the U.S. dollar in 2000 after high inflation forced citizens to
convert their money to U.S. dollars. CBDCs vs. Cryptocurrencies The idea for central bank digital currencies owes its origins to
the introduction of cryptocurrencies which are digital currencies secured by
cryptography. This makes them hard to duplicate or counterfeit. They
are decentralized networks that are based on blockchain technology. The
invention of a secure and immutable ledger allows transactions to be
tracked. It also enables
seamless and direct transfers, without intermediaries and between recipients
simplifies the implementation of monetary policy in an economy. The cryptocurrency
ecosystem also provides a glimpse of an alternate currency system in which
cumbersome regulation does not dictate the terms of each transaction. Established in 2009, Bitcoin is one of the
world's most popular cryptocurrencies. No physical coins actually trade
hands. Instead, transactions are traded and recorded on a public, encrypted
ledger, which can be accessed by anyone. The process of mining allows all
transactions to be verified. No governments or banks back Bitcoin. Though the current
cryptocurrency ecosystem does not pose a threat to the existing financial
infrastructure, it has the potential to disrupt and simplify the existing
system. Some experts believe the moves by central banks to design and develop
their own digital currencies will act as a measure to pre-empt such an
eventuality. Facebook's, now
Meta's (FB), proposed cryptocurrency, formerly known as Libra, was an example
of such a system, one that existed beyond borders and was not regulated by a
single regime. Examples of CBDCs Central-bank-backed digital currencies haven't been formally
established yet. Many central banks have pilot programs and research projects
in place that are aimed at determining the viability and usability of a CBDC
in their economy. China is the
furthest along this route, having already laid down the groundwork and
initiated a pilot project for the introduction of a digital yuan. Russia's plan to create the
CryptoRuble was announced by Vladimir Putin in 2017. Speculators
suggest that one of the main reasons for Putin's interest in blockchain is
that transactions are encrypted, making it easier to discreetly send money
without worrying about sanctions placed on the country by the international
community. A number of other central banks have been researching the
implementation of a CBDC, including: Sweden's Riksbank, which began exploring the issuance of a
digital currency in its economy in 2017 and has published a series of papers
exploring the topic. The Bank of England (BoE), which is among the pioneers to
initiate the CBDC proposal. The Bank of Canada (BOC). The central banks of Uruguay, Thailand, Venezuela, and
Singapore.1 Gold at $4,000? Analysts share their 2023 outlook as inflation,
recession fears linger DEC 22 20222:10 AM Charmaine
Jacob https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/22/gold-at-4000-analysts-share-their-2023-outlook-for-prices.html KEY POINTS ·
Gold prices could surge to $4,000 an ounce in
2023 as recession fears persist, said Juerg Kiener, managing director and
chief investment officer of Swiss Asia Capital. ·
Kiener explained that many economies could face
“a little bit of a recession” in the first quarter, which would lead to many
central banks slowing their pace of interest rate hikes and make gold
instantly more attractive. Gold
prices could surge to $4,000 per ounce in 2023 as interest rate hikes and
recession fears keep markets volatile, said Juerg Kiener, managing director
and chief investment officer of Swiss Asia Capital. The price of the precious metal could reach between $2,500 and $4,000
sometime next year, Kiener told CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia” on Wednesday. There is a good chance the gold market sees a major move, he said,
adding “it’s not going to be just 10% or 20%,” but a move that will “really
make new highs.” Kiener explained that many economies could face “a little bit of a
recession” in the first quarter, which would lead to many central banks
slowing their pace of interest rate hikes and make gold instantly more
attractive. He said gold is also the only asset which every central bank
owns. According to the World Gold Council, central banks bought 400
tonnes of gold in the third quarter, almost doubling the previous record of
241 tonnes during the same period in 2018. “Since [the] 2000s, the average return [on] gold in any currency is
somewhere between 8% and 10% a year. You haven’t achieved that in the bond
market. You have not achieved that in the equity market.” Kiener
also said investors would look to gold with inflation remaining high in many
parts of the world. “Gold is a very good inflation hedge, a great catch
during stagflation and a great add onto a portfolio.” Investors should have some gold in their portfolios: Indian brokerage
firm Despite
strong demand for gold, Kenny Polcari, senior market strategist at Slatestone
Wealth, disagreed that prices could more than double next year. “I don’t have a $4,000 price target on it, although I’d love to see
it go there,” he said on CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia” on Thursday. Polcari
argued that gold prices would see some pullback and resistance at $1,900 an
ounce. Prices would be
determined by how inflation responds to interest rate hikes globally, he
said. “I like gold. I’ve always liked gold,” he said. “Gold should be a
part of your portfolio. I think it is going to do better, but I don’t have a
$4,000 price target on it.” Gold rallied on Tuesday as the U.S. dollar weakened after Japan’s
central bank adjusted its yield curve control policy. The announcement caused
gold prices to rise 1% above the key $1,800 level, before dipping lower
Wednesday as the dollar recovered ground. China’s a big buyer When asked if supply is low due to high demand, Swiss Asia Capital’s
Kiener said “there’s always supply, but maybe not at the price you want.” But high prices are no match for buyers in China who are paying a
premium for the precious metal, he said. Earlier this month, China’s central bank announced it added about
$1.8 billion worth of gold to its reserves, bringing the cumulative value to
around $112 billion, Reuters reported. “Asia has been a big buyer. And if you look at the whole trade,
essentially gold is leaving the West, and it’s going into Asia,” he added. Advice for investors Nikhil Kamath, co-founder of India’s largest brokerage Zerodha, said
investors should allocate 10% to 20% of their portfolio to gold, adding that
it’s a “relevant strategy” going into 2023. “Gold also traditionally has been inversely proportional to
inflation, and it has been a good hedge against inflation,” Kamath told CNBC
on Wednesday. “If you look at how much gold you require to buy a mean home in the
70s, you probably require the same or lesser amount of gold today than you
did back in the 70s, or the 80s, or the 90s,” he added. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 27, 2020,04:54pm
EDT|30,167 views What
If We Had A Gold Standard System, Right Now? Nathan
LewisContributor https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanlewis/2020/03/27/what-if-we-had-a-gold-standard-right-now/?sh=1bfba3313e58 For most of the 182 years between 1789 and 1971, the United
States embraced the principle of a dollar linked to gold — at first, at
$20.67/oz., and then, after 1933, $35/oz. Nearly every economist today will
tell you that was a terrible policy. We can tell it was a disaster because,
during that time, the United States became the wealthiest
and most prosperous country in the history of the world. This is economist logic. But, even if some economists might agree with the general
principle, they might be particularly hesitant to apply such monetary
discipline right now, in the midst of economic and financial turmoil. This
kind of event is the whole reason why we put up with all the chronic
difficulties of floating currencies, and economic manipulation by central
banks. Isn't it? So, let's ask: What if we were on a gold standard system, right
now? Or, to be a little more specific, what if we had been on a gold standard
system for the last ten years, and continued on one right now, in the midst
of the COVID-19 panic and economic turmoil? In the end, a gold standard system is just a fixed-value
system. The International Monetary Fund tells us that more than half the
countries in the world, today, have some kind of fixed-value system —
they link the value of their currency to some external standard, typically
the dollar, euro, or some other international currency. They have fixed
exchange rates, compared to this external benchmark. The best of these
systems are currency boards, such as is used by Hong Kong vs. the U.S.
dollar, or Bulgaria vs. the euro. If you think of a gold standard as just a "currency
board linked to gold," you would have the general idea. These currency boards
are functioning right now to keep monetary stability in the midst of a lot of
other turmoil. If you had all the problems of today, plus additional monetary
instability as Russia or Turkey or Korea has been experiencing (or the euro
...), it just piles more problems on top of each other. Actually, it would probably be easier to link to gold
than the dollar or euro, because gold's value tends to be stable, while the
floating fiat dollar and euro obviously have floating values, by design. If
you are going to link your currency to something, it is easier to link it to
something that moves little, rather than something that moves a lot. Big
dollar moves, such as in 1982, 1985, 1997-98 and 2008, tend to be accompanied
by currency turmoil around the world. But, even within the discipline of a gold standard system, you
could still have a fair amount of leeway regarding central bank activity, and
also various financial supports that arise via the Treasury and Congress. Basically, you could do just about anything that is compatible
with keeping the value of the dollar stable vs. gold. In the pre-1914 era, there was a suite of policies to this
effect, generally known as the "lender of last resort," and
described in Walter Bagehot's book Lombard Street (1873).
Another set of solutions resolved the Panic of 1907, without ever leaving the
gold standard. The Federal Reserve was explicitly designed to operate on a
gold standard system; and mostly did so for the first 58 years of its
existence, until 1971. Others have argued that a functional "free
banking" system, as Canada had in the pre-1914 era, would allow private
banks to take on a lot of these functions, without the need for a central bank
to do so. What could the Federal Reserve do today, while still adhering to
the gold standard? First: It could expand the monetary base, by any amount
necessary, that meets an increase in demand to hold cash (base money). Quite commonly, when
things get dicey, people want to hold more cash. Individuals might withdraw
banknotes from banks. Banks themselves tend to hold more "bank
reserves" (deposits) at the Federal Reserve — the banker's equivalent of
a safe full of banknotes. This has happened, for example, during every major
war. During the Great Depression, the Federal Reserve expanded its balance
sheet by a huge amount, as banks increased their bank reserve holdings in the
face of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the dollar's value remained at its $35/oz.
parity. Federal Reserve Liabilities 1917-1941. NATHAN LEWIS Second: The Federal Reserve could extend loans to certain entities
- banks, or corporations - as long as this lending is consistent with the
maintenance of the currency's value at its gold parity. In the pre-1914 era, this was done via
the "discount window." One way this could come about is by swapping
government debt for direct lending. For example, the Federal Reserve could
extend $1.0 trillion of loans to banks and corporations, and also reduce its
Treasury bond holdings by $1.0 trillion. This would not expand the monetary
base. But, it might do a lot to help corporations with funding issues. What the Federal Reserve would not be able to do is: expand the
"money supply" (monetary base) to an excessive amount — an amount
that tended to cause the currency's value to fall due to oversupply, compared
to its gold parity. Now we come to a wide variety of actions that are not really
related to the Federal Reserve, but rather, to the Treasury and Congress. In 1933, a big change was Deposit Insurance. The Federal
Government insured bank accounts. It helped stop a banking panic at the time.
This is a controversial policy even today, and some think it exacerbated the
Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980s, not to mention more issues in 2008.
But, nevertheless, it didn't have anything to do with the Federal Reserve. In 2009, the stock market bottomed when there was a rule change
that allowed banks to "mark to model" rather than "mark to
market." Banks could just say: "We are solvent, we promise."
It worked. Today, Congress has been making funds available to guarantee business
lending, and for a wide variety of purposes that should help maintain
financial calm. Whether this is a good idea or not will be debated for a long
time I am sure. But, it has nothing to do with the Federal Reserve. All of
these actions are entirely compatible with the gold standard. What about interest rates? Don't we want the Federal Reserve to
cut rates when things get iffy? In the 1930s, interest rates were set by
market forces. Given the economic turmoil of the time, government bond rates,
and especially bill rates, were very low. The yield on government bills
spent nearly
the whole decade of the 1930s near 0%. Markets lower "risk-free" rates
automatically, during times of economic distress, when you just allow them to
function without molestation. Every bond trader already knows this. U.S. interest rates, 1919-1941 NATHAN LEWIS When we go down the list of all the things that the Federal
Reserve, the Treasury, Congress and other regulatory bodies could do, while
also adhering to the gold standard, we find that there is really not much
left. It turns out that many of the things that supposedly justify floating
currencies, are also possible with a gold standard system. Homework of chapter 2 part ii (due with the
first midterm exam) ·
Do you support returning to gold standard? Why or why not? ·
Do you believe that bitcoin would be the future currency?
Why or why not? ·
What is the Bretton Woods agreement? Why is the Bretton Woods Agreement a
significant event in world financial history? Optional critical thinking
question: Do you think that gold might replace the $ as the world
reserve currency in the future? Why or why not? Can the Bitcoin replace the
$? For
example, Here’s
what would happen if the dollar lost its status as the world’s reserve
currency |
Even Central Banks Are Buying Gold for the Zombie Apocalypse Governments in developing
economies are building up their bullion holdings as trust breaks down. By David Fickling November 6, 2022 at 4:30 PM EST The instruction manual for surviving a zombie apocalypse is pretty straightforward.
Once you’ve kitted out your bunker with canned goods and firearms, get a
supply of bullion. You’ll need it to buy bullets and bribe your way out of a
death fight in Thunderdome. That’s a line of thinking you might associate with cranky gold bugs,
but it’s not a million miles away from the rationale behind fund flows in the
precious metals market right now — and nations are in the driving seat. Central
banks bought 400 metric tons of gold in the September quarter, the World Gold
Council reported this week. That’s a record inflow on a par with what
they’d purchase over a whole year in normal times. In
the notoriously opaque world of government gold trading, it’s not always
immediately clear who the biggest buyers are. Monetary authorities are such
big players that they can distort the entire market by showing their hands,
one reason that prices plummeted in the 1990s and 2000s when some of the European
central banks sold in unison. There is one obvious factor in common between the declared buyers,
however: All are from nations facing serious problems. Turkey, whose lira
slumped 52% over the year through September, added 95.5 tons to its gold
holdings in the same period. Egypt bought 44.8 tons while its pound fell
by 20%. India’s 40.5-ton purchase was matched by an 8.7% weakening of the
rupee. Iraq’s dinar is fixed against the dollar, but credit-default swaps
protecting against non-payment of its debts surged to nearly 9% in September,
even after it bought 33.9 tons of the metal. That’s
a curious situation. Stacking up bullion in the central bank’s vault has long
been a powerful signal to investors that a government is going to be a prudent
and reliable borrower.
No amount of gold buying, though, is going to convince anyone that the
fiscally incontinent Egyptian government is a good credit. US 10-year
Treasuries, currently yielding 4.2%, also look a much better proposition than
a metal that pays no interest, especially now that gold is no longer
outperforming the total returns on government debt. Choose Your Poison The
end of the long bond bull market in 2020 caused gold to outperform the total
return on US government debt. They're now moving in parallel again Bullion
does have one crucial advantage: unlike bonds, it doesn’t bind you into a
relationship with an unreliable counterparty. US government debt was at one
time the hardest form of currency, a true risk-free investment. Then, in
February, coordinated sanctions on Russia’s central bank vaporized most of
the $498 billion in reserves sitting on its balance sheet. The European Union
is now looking at using those funds to pay for the rebuilding of Ukraine,
Bloomberg News reported last week. In a world where you can trust no one, it
makes sense to bulletproof yourself with metal. Looked at through that lens, the purchases by Turkey and Egypt come
into focus. Though both nations are key US allies, they’ve seen relations
deteriorate substantially over the past decade as their governments have
found themselves more simpatico with rising authoritarian powers. The path
ahead for international relations is more uncertain now than it has been in
decades. It makes sense in that world for central bank reserves not to be too
heavily committed to ties with any one country. The behavior of those smaller nations is a clue to the identity of
the biggest buyers in the market, too. Declared purchasers only account
for about 120 tons of the 400 tons that central banks bought in the September
quarter, but you can get a good idea of the other candidates by looking at
which countries have been racking up the largest current account surpluses.
(Such surpluses, after all, are the balances which governments use to buy
their foreign exchange reserves.) Outside of Europe, which stopped
large-scale bullion purchases decades ago, the biggest players are all
nations whose ties with the US are fraying by the day: China, Russia, and
Saudi Arabia. Follow the Money Some of the world's biggest current account surpluses are being run
up in authoritarian countries whose relations with the US are worsening The
dollar’s role as the world’s preeminent medium of exchange remains
unassailable. Some 88% of currency transactions involved the greenback this year,
according to the Bank for International Settlements. Still, its share in
central bank reserves has been falling rapidly, from 65% at the end of 2016
to 59% earlier this year. That’s
almost certainly a result of Washington’s increasingly muscular view of its
currency dominance in recent years, whether it means coercing French banks to
obey US sanctions, forcing Hong Kong politicians to be paid with stacks of
banknotes, or blockading Russia’s reserves from the global economy. Going Out of Style The US dollar has been losing ground as a share of central bank
foreign exchange reserves Such a situation makes gold look like an appealing alternative. Even
then, though, there are risks. Venezuela is currently three years into a
series of legal cases in London about whether its de facto president or his
political rival should control its bullion reserves in the city’s bank
vaults. So far, opposition leader Juan Guaido, who’s recognized by the UK
government, seems to be winning. When the zombie apocalypse comes, even
gold might not be enough to save you. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter 3 International Financial Market/ References: Go to www.forex.com and set up a practice account
and you can trade with $50,000 virtue money. Visit http://www.dailyfx.com/to get daily foreign
exchange market news. Part I: international financial centers *Ranking The ranking is an aggregate of indices
from five key areas: "business environment", "financial sector
development", "infrastructure factors", "human
capital", "reputation and general factors". As of September
2022, the top centres worldwide are: Key 2022 Highlights
· 3 of
the top 10 are United States cities: New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco · 4 of
the top 10 are China’s cities: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen · 2 of
the top 10 are European cities: London, Paris · Singapore
is the top financial centre in Asia-Pacific (APAC) · The
top 5 financial centres in APAC: Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing,
Shenzhen · The
top 5 financial centres in Europe: London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam,
Geneva · The
top 5 financial centres in MENA: Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Tel Aviv, Casablanca, Doha By Industry Sector
· Top
5 Banking Centre: Shenzhen, New York, London, Shanghai, Hong Kong · Top
5 Investment Mgmt Centre: New York, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai · Top 5
Trading Centre: New York, London, Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Singapore · Top
5 Insurance Centre: New York, Luxembourg, London, Shenzhen, Hong Kong · Top
5 Finance: New York, Shenzhen, London, Luxembourg, Singapore · Top
5 Fintech: New York, London, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai · Top
5 Govt & Regulatory: New York, London, Seoul, Singapore, Dubai · Top
5 Professional Services: New York, London, Seoul, Singapore, Hong Kong What Makes a City a
Financial Hub? https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/091114/worlds-top-financial-cities.asp A financial center, or a financial hub,
refers to a city with a strategic location, leading financial institutions,
reputed stock exchanges, a dense concentration of public and private banks
and trading and insurance companies. In addition, these hubs are equipped with
first-class infrastructure, communications and commercial systems, and there
is a transparent and sound legal and regulatory regime backed by a stable political
system. Such cities are favorable destinations for professionals because
of the high living standards they offer along with immense growth
opportunities. Here
is a look at the top financial hubs across the globe, in no particular order. KEY TAKEAWAYS ·
Cities that are
concentrations of commerce, trading, real estate, and banking tend to become
global financial hubs. ·
These important
cities employ a large number of financial professionals and are home to stock
exchanges and corporate headquarters for investment banks. ·
Found around the
world, examples include New York City, Frankfurt, and Tokyo. London Since
the middle ages, London has been one of the most prominent trade and business
centers. The city is one of the most visited places on earth and is among the
most preferred places to do business. London is a well-known center for
foreign exchange and bond trading in addition to banking activities and
insurance services. The city is a
trading hub for bonds, futures, foreign exchange and insurance. The United
Kingdom’s central bank, the Bank of England, is the second oldest central
bank in the world and is located in London. The bank controls the
monetary system and regulates the issue of currency notes in the United
Kingdom. London is also the seat of
the London Stock Exchange, which is the second largest stock exchange in
Europe. Another financial paragon is The London bullion market, managed
by London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), which is the world's largest
market for gold and silver bullion trading. Due to Brexit uncertainty,
London may ultimately lose its stature as a global financial hub. Singapore From
a business perspective, Singapore's attractiveness lies in its transparent
and sound legal framework complementing its economic and political stability.
The small island located in the Southeast Asia region has emerged as one of
the Four Asian Tigers and established itself as a major financial center.
Singapore has transformed its economy despite the disadvantages of limited
land and resources. Singapore is both
diversified and specialized across industries such as chemicals, biomedical
sciences, petroleum refining, mechanical engineering and electronics.
Singapore has deep capital markets and is a leading insurance and wealth
management marketplace. It has a disciplined and efficient workforce with
a population made up of people of Chinese, Malay and Indian origin. Zurich Zurich,
the largest city in Switzerland, is recognized as a financial center
globally. The city has a disproportionately large presence of financial
institutions and banks and has developed into a hub for insurance and asset
management companies. The low tax regime makes Zurich a good investment
destination, and the city attracts a large number of international companies.
Switzerland’s primary stock exchange, the SIX Swiss Exchange, is in Zurich
and is one of the largest in the world, with a market capitalization of $1.4
trillion as of July 2021. The city has a robust business environment and
offers many finance sector jobs. Zurich is one of the cleanest, most
beautiful and crime free places to live and work. New
York City New
York, commonly regarded as the finance capital of the world, has been ranked
first in the World’s Financial Centers by the Global Financial Centres Index.9
New York is famous for Wall Street, the most happening stock market and the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the largest stock exchange by market
capitalization. The city is a mix of various cultures from across the globe
providing a diverse population and workforce. It plays host to some of the
largest and finest companies (Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000), biggest banks
(Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan) and industries.
It is difficult to find a big name in the world of business that does not
have a presence in the city. Hong
Kong Hong
Kong is a key financial hub with a high number of banking institutions. The
former British colony also has a sound legal system for both residents and
companies and is the home of many fund management companies. Hong Kong has
benefited from its strategic location. For
more than a century, the city has been a conduit of trade between China and
the world. Hence, Hong Kong is China's second largest trading partner
after the United States. Its proximity to other countries in the region has
also worked in its favor. Hong Kong has an efficient and transparent judicial
and legal system with excellent infrastructure and telecommunication
services. It has a favorable tax
system in place with very few and low tax rates, which adds to its
attractiveness. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange is the fourth largest in the
world. Chicago Chicago owes its fame to the derivative
market (CME group), which started at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) in 1848
with commodity futures trading. It is the oldest futures exchange in the
world and the second largest by volume, behind the National Stock Exchange of
India. The Chicago-based Options
Clearing Corporation (OCC) clears all U.S. option contracts. Chicago is
the headquarters of over 400 major corporations, and the state of Illinois
has more than 30 Fortune 500 companies, most of which are located in Chicago.
These companies include State Farm Insurance, Boeing, Archer Daniels Midland
and Caterpillar. Chicago also one of the most diverse economies excelling
from innovation in risk management to information technology to manufacturing
to health. Another financial notable
is the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Tokyo Tokyo
is the capital of the third-largest economy in the world and a major
financial center.16 The city is the headquarters of many of the world’s
largest investment banks and insurance companies. It is also the hub for the
country’s telecommunications, electronic, broadcasting and publishing industries.
The Japan Exchange Group (JPX) was
established January 1, 2013, by combining the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE)
Group and the Osaka Securities Exchange. The exchange had a market
capitalization of $5.9 trillion as of July 2021. The Nikkei 225 and the TOPIX are the main indices tracking the buzz
at the TSE. Tokyo has time and
again been rated among the most expensive cities in the world. Frankfurt
Frankfurt is home to the European Central
Bank (ECB) and the Deutsche Bundesbank, the central bank of Germany. It has one of the busiest airports in the world and is
the address of many top companies, national and international banks. In 2014,
Frankfurt became Europe's first renminbi payment hub. Frankfurter
Wertpapierbörse, the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, is among the world’s largest
stock exchanges. It had a $2.65 trillion market capitalization as of July
2021. Deutsche Börse Group operates the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Shanghai Shanghai
is the world's third most populous city, behind Tokyo and Delhi. The Chinese
government in early 2009 announced its ambition of turning Shanghai into an
international financial center by 2020. The
Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) is mainland China’s most preeminent market for
stocks in terms of turnover, tradable market value and total market value.
The SSE had a market capitalization of $7.63 trillion as of July 2021.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) directly governs the SSE.
The exchange is considered restrictive in terms of trading and listing
criteria. For Discussion: What makes an
international financial centre? (video)
Asia’s top financial hub –
Singapore or Hong Kong? (youtube)
|
What
Is Libor And Why Is It Being Abandoned? Here's What
Went Wrong With Libor (youtube)
LIBOR vs. SOFR :
Introduction, Scandals & Replacement : The Interest-Rate Benchmark
What
Is Libor And Why Is It Being Abandoned? Miranda Marquit, Benjamin Curry Updated: Nov 7, 2022, 7:38pm https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/what-is-libor/ For more than 40 years, the London Interbank Offered Rate—commonly
known as Libor—was a key benchmark for setting the interest rates charged on
adjustable-rate loans, mortgages and corporate debt. Over the last decade, Libor has been burdened by scandals and crises.
Effective January 2022, Libor will no longer be used to issue new loans in
the U.S. It is being replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR),
which many experts consider a more accurate and more secure pricing
benchmark. Understanding Libor Libor
provided loan issuers with a benchmark for setting interest rates on
different financial products. It was set each day by collecting estimates
from up to 18 global banks on the interest rates they would charge for
different loan maturities, given their outlook on local economic conditions. Libor was calculated in five currencies: UK
Pound Sterling, the Swiss Franc, the Euro, Japanese Yen and the U.S. Dollar. The London Interbank Offered Rate was used to price adjustable-rate
mortgages, asset-backed securities, municipal bonds, credit default swaps,
private student loans and other types of debt. As of 2019, $1.2 trillion
worth of residential mortgage loans and $1.3 trillion of consumer loans had
been priced using Libor. When
you applied for a loan based on Libor, a financial firm would take a Libor
rate and then tack on an additional percentage. Here’s how it worked for a private student
loan, based on the Libor three-month rate plus 2%. If the Libor three-month
rate was 0.22%, the base rate for the loan would be 2.22%. Other factors,
such as your credit score, income and the loan term, are also factored in. While
Libor is no longer being used to price new loans, it will formally stick
around until at least 2023. One-week and two-month Libor have ceased being published, while
overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month maturities will continue
to be published through June 2023. With an adjustable-rate loan, your lender sets regular periods where
it makes changes to the rate you’re being charged. The lender referenced
Libor when adjusting the interest rate on your loan, changing how much you
pay each month. How Is Libor Calculated? Each day, 18 international banks submit their ideas of the rates they
think they would pay if they had to borrow money from another bank on the
interbank lending market in London. To help guard against extreme highs or lows that might skew the
calculation, the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Benchmark Administration
strips out the four highest submissions and the four lowest submissions
before calculating an average. It’s
important to note that Libor isn’t set on what banks actually pay to borrow
funds from each other. Instead, it’s based on their submissions related to
what they think they would pay. As a result, it’s possible for banks to
submit lower rates and manipulate Libor fairly easily. In the past, a panel of bankers oversaw Libor in each currency, but
scandals exposing manipulation of Libor has led many national regulators to
identify alternatives to Libor. Libor Scandals and the 2008 Financial Crisis Libor is being phased out in large part because of the role it played
in worsening the 2008 financial crisis, as well as scandals involving Libor
manipulation among the rate-setting banks. Libor and the 2008 Financial Crisis The use and abuse of credit default swaps (CDS) was one of the major
drivers of the 2008 financial crisis. A very wide range of interrelated
financial companies insured risky mortgages and other questionable financial
products using CDS. Rates for CDS were set using Libor, and these derivative
investments were used to insure against defaults on subprime mortgages. American International Group (AIG) was the biggest player in the CDS
disaster. The firm issued vast quantities of CDS on subprime mortgages and
countless other financial products, like mortgaged-backed securities. The
crash of the real estate market in 2007, followed by the even larger market
meltdown in 2008, forced AIG into bankruptcy, resulting in one of the largest
government bailouts in history. Once AIG started falling apart, it became clear that failing subprime
mortgages and the securities built on top of them weren’t properly insured,
many banks became reluctant to lend to each other. Libor transmitted the
crisis far and wide since every day Libor rate-setting banks estimated higher
and higher interest rates. Libor rose, making loans more expensive, even as
global central banks rushed to slash interest rates. With rates on trillions of dollars of financial products soaring day
after day, and fears about stunted bank lending reducing the flow of money
through the economy, markets crashed. Libor was only one of the many factors
that created the financial industry disasters of 2008, but its key role in
transmitting the crisis to all parts of the global economy has driven many
nations to seek safer alternatives. Libor Manipulation In 2012, extensive investigations into the way Libor was set
uncovered a widespread, long-lasting scheme among multiple banks—including
Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Rabobank, UBS and the Royal Bank of Scotland—to
manipulate Libor rates for profit. Barclays was a key player in this complicated scam. Barclays would
submit its Libor estimates, claiming that it was lower than what other banks
actually charged it. Because a lower rate supposedly indicates a smaller risk
of default, it is considered a sign that a bank is in better shape than
another bank with a higher rate. It wasn’t just Barclays, though. At UBS, one trader involved in Libor
setting, Thomas Hayes, managed to rake in hundreds of millions of dollars for
the bank over the course of three years. Hayes also colluded with traders at
the Royal Bank of Scotland on rigging Libor. UBS executives denied all
knowledge of what had been going on, although the ring managed to manipulate
rate submissions across multiple institutions. SOFR Is Replacing Libor in the U.S. It’s not just these scandals that undercut Libor. According to ICE,
banks have been changing the way they transact business, and, as a result, Libor
rate became a less reliable benchmark. SOFR
is the main replacement for Libor in the United States. This benchmark is
based on the rates U.S. financial institutions pay each other for overnight
loans. These
transactions take the form of Treasury bond repurchase agreements, otherwise
known as repos agreements. They allow banks to to meet liquidity and reserve
requirements, using Treasurys as collateral. SOFR comprises the weighted
averages of the rates charged in these repo transactions. How Does the End of Libor Impact Your Loans? Even if Libor doesn’t completely disappear as soon as expected,
there’s a good chance banks and other lenders will start looking for other
ways to determine market rates. If you have an adjustable-rate loan, check to see if it’s based on
Libor. For loans based on Libor, find out what index your lender will be
switching to. While there might not be a set answer now, keep an eye on the
situation. A switch to a different index might mean a higher base rate in the
future. Libor
demise and Brexit reshape derivatives market, says BIS By Huw Jones October 27, 20229:08 AM EDT LONDON, Oct 27 (Reuters) - Brexit and the demise of Libor are reshaping
the world's over-the-counter (OTC) interest rate derivatives market,
where daily turnover totalled $5.2 trillion in April, down from $6.4 trillion
in April 2019, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said on Thursday. "The most significant factor contributing to the decline in
turnover is the continuing shift away from Libor for major currencies,"
the BIS said in its latest triennial snapshot of the global OTC interest rate
derivatives market. After banks were fined for trying to rig the London Interbank Offered
Rate, or Libor, the bulk of the benchmark's permutations were scrapped at the
end of 2021 and replaced with rates compiled by central banks. Replacing Libor shrank turnover in forward rate agreements or FRAs, a
type of derivatives contract, with turnover in dollar FRAs tumbling by 98%. Sales desks in Britain recorded the highest turnover of interest rate
derivatives, at $2.6 trillion, or 46% of global 'net-gross' turnover, down
from 51% in 2019. "Turnover in U.S. dollar swaps has partially shifted from sales
desks in the United Kingdom to the United States and Asian financial
centres," the BIS said. "Similarly, turnover in euro swaps has shifted from the United
Kingdom to the euro area." Brexit
from the end of 2020 meant that EU banks could no longer trade OTC
derivatives in London, forcing them to trade on platforms in the United
States in some cases. Turnover in euro contracts reached $1.8 trillion per day in April
2022 to 34% of global turnover, up from 25% in 2019, as dollar contracts fell
from roughly half of the global market in 2019 to 44% in April. Turnover
of euro rate swaps in Britain fell 18% to $1 trillion over the three years,
while turnover by dealers, particularly in Germany and France more than
tripled, from $124 billion in 2019 to $385 billion in 2022. Euro-denominated
contracts, excluding FRAs, traded in euro area countries accounted for more
than a quarter of the global total, the highest share since 2010, BIS said. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part II: Floating exchange rate system vs. fixed exchange
rate system Currency
exchange introduction (khan acadymy)
Supply
and demand curves in foreign exchange (khan academy)
Floating and
Fixed Exchange Rates- Macroeconomics (youtube)
How Are International
Exchange Rates Set? https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/forex/how-forex-exchange-rates-set.asp By
CAROLINE BANTON Updated March 04, 2021, Reviewed by GORDON SCOTT, Fact checked
by YARILET PEREZ International
currency exchange rates display how much one unit of a currency can be
exchanged for another currency. Currency
exchange rates can be floating, in which case they change continually based
on a multitude of factors, or they can be pegged (or fixed) to another
currency, in which case they still float, but they move in tandem with the
currency to which they are pegged. Knowing
the value of a home currency in relation to different foreign currencies
helps investors to analyze assets priced in foreign dollars. For example, for
a U.S. investor, knowing the dollar to euro exchange rate is valuable when
selecting European investments. A declining U.S. dollar could increase the
value of foreign investments just as an increasing U.S. dollar value could
hurt the value of your foreign investments. KEY
TAKEAWAYS ·
Fixed exchange rate regimes are set to a
pre-established peg with another currency or basket of currencies. ·
A floating exchange rate is one that is
determined by supply and demand on the open market as well as macro factors. ·
A floating exchange rate doesn't mean
countries don't try to intervene and manipulate their currency's price, since
governments and central banks regularly attempt to keep their currency price
favorable for international trade. ·
Floating exchange rates are the most
common and became popular after the failure of the gold standard and the
Bretton Woods agreement. Floating vs. Fixed Exchange
Rates Currency
prices can be determined in two main ways: a floating rate or a fixed rate. A floating rate is determined by the open
market through supply and demand on global currency markets. Therefore, if
the demand for the currency is high, the value will increase. If demand is
low, this will drive that currency price lower. Of course, several
technical and fundamental factors will determine what people perceive is a
fair exchange rate and alter their supply and demand accordingly. The currencies of most of
the world's major economies were allowed to float freely following the
collapse of the Bretton Woods system between 1968 and 1973. Therefore, most
exchange rates are not set but are determined by on-going trading activity in
the world's currency markets. Factors That Influence
Exchange Rates Floating rates are
determined by the market forces of supply and demand.
How much demand there is in relation to supply of a currency will determine
that currency's value in relation to another currency. For example, if the
demand for U.S. dollars by Europeans increases, the supply-demand
relationship will cause an increase in the price of the U.S. dollar in
relation to the euro. There are countless geopolitical and economic
announcements that affect the exchange rates between two countries, but a few of the most common include interest
rate changes, unemployment rates, inflation reports, gross domestic product
numbers, manufacturing data, and commodities. A fixed or pegged rate is
determined by the government through its central bank. The rate is set
against another major world currency (such as the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen).
To maintain its exchange rate, the government will buy and sell its own
currency against the currency to which it is pegged.Some
countries that choose to peg their currencies to the U.S. dollar include
China and Saudi Arabia. Short-term
moves in a floating exchange rate currency reflect speculation, rumors,
disasters, and everyday supply and demand for the currency. If supply
outstrips demand that currency will fall, and if demand outstrips supply that
currency will rise. Extreme short-term
moves can result in intervention by central banks, even in a floating rate
environment. Because of this, while most major global currencies are
considered floating, central banks and governments may step in if a nation's
currency becomes too high or too low. A currency that is too high
or too low could affect the nation's economy negatively, affecting trade and
the ability to pay debts. The government or central bank will attempt to
implement measures to move their currency to a more favorable price. Macro Factors More
macro factors also affect exchange rates. The 'Law of One Price' dictates that in a world of international
trade, the price of a good in one country should equal the price in another.
This is called purchasing price parity (PPP). If prices get out of whack, the
interest rates in a country will shift—or else the
exchange rate will between currencies. Of course, reality doesn't always
follow economic theory, and due to several mitigating factors, the law of one
price does not often hold in practice. Still, interest rates and relative prices will influence exchange rates. Another macro factor is the
geopolitical risk and the stability of a country's government. If the
government is not stable, the currency in that country is likely to fall in
value relative to more developed, stable nations. Generally,
the more dependent a country is on a primary domestic industry, the stronger
the correlation between the national currency and the industry's commodity
prices. There
is no uniform rule for determining what commodities a given currency will be
correlated with and how strong that correlation will be. However, some
currencies provide good examples of commodity-forex relationships. Consider
that the Canadian dollar is positively correlated to the price of oil.
Therefore, as the price of oil goes up, the Canadian dollar tends to
appreciate against other major currencies. This is because Canada is a net
oil exporter; when oil prices are high, Canada tends to reap greater revenues
from its oil exports giving the Canadian dollar a boost on the foreign
exchange market. Another
good example is the Australian dollar, which is positively correlated with
gold. Because Australia is one of the world's biggest gold producers, its
dollar tends to move in unison with price changes in gold bullion. Thus, when
gold prices rise significantly, the Australian dollar will also be expected
to appreciate against other major currencies. Maintaining Rates Some
countries may decide to use a pegged exchange rate that is set and maintained
artificially by the government. This rate will not fluctuate intraday and may
be reset on particular dates known as revaluation dates. Governments of emerging
market countries often do this to create stability in the value of their
currencies. To keep the pegged foreign
exchange rate stable, the government of the country must hold large reserves
of the currency to which its currency is pegged to control changes in supply
and demand. The Impossible
Trinity or "The Trilemma" – can a country controls its interest rates, exchange
rates, and capital flow simultaneously? Impossible
Trinity (youtube)
A - set a fixed exchange rate between its currency and
another while allowing capital to flow freely across its borders, B - allow capital to flow freely and set
its own monetary policy, or C - set its own monetary policy and
maintain a fixed exchange rate. The Impossible Trinity or "The
Trilemma", in which two policy positions are possible. If a nation were
to adopt position a, for example,
then it would maintain a fixed exchange rate and allow free capital flows,
the consequence of which would be loss of monetary sovereignty.
The Impossible Trinity - 60 Second
Adventures in Economics (5/6) (video)
The impossible trinity (also
known as the trilemma) is a concept in international
economics which states that it is
impossible to have all three of the following at the same time: · free capital movement
(absence of capital controls) · an
independent monetary policy It
is both a hypothesis based on the uncovered interest rate
parity condition, and a finding from empirical studies where governments
that have tried to simultaneously pursue all three goals have failed. The
concept was developed independently by both John Marcus Fleming in
1962 and Robert Alexander Mundell in different
articles between 1960 and 1963. Policy
choices
According to the impossible trinity, a central bank can only
pursue two of the above-mentioned three policies simultaneously. To see why,
consider this example: Assume that world interest rate is at 5%. If the home central bank tries
to set domestic interest rate at a rate lower than 5%, for example at 2%,
there will be a depreciation pressure on the home currency, because
investors would want to sell their low yielding domestic currency and buy
higher yielding foreign currency. If the central bank also wants to have free
capital flows, the only way the central bank could prevent depreciation of
the home currency is to sell its foreign currency reserves. Since foreign
currency reserves of a central bank are limited, once the reserves are
depleted, the domestic currency will depreciate. Hence, all three of the policy objectives
mentioned above cannot be pursued simultaneously. A central bank has to forgo one of the three objectives.
Therefore, a central bank has three policy combination options. Options
In terms of the diagram above (Oxelheim, 1990), the options are: ·
Option (a): A stable exchange rate and free capital
flows (but not an independent monetary policy because setting a domestic
interest rate that is different from the world interest rate would undermine
a stable exchange rate due to appreciation or depreciation pressure on the
domestic currency). ·
Option (b): An independent monetary policy and free
capital flows (but not a stable exchange rate). ·
Option (c): A stable exchange rate and independent
monetary policy (but no free capital flows, which would require the use
of capital controls. Currently, Eurozone members have chosen
the first option (a) while most other countries have opted for the second one
(b). By contrast, Harvard
economist Dani Rodrik advocates
the use of the third option (c) in his book The Globalization Paradox,
emphasizing that world GDP grew fastest during the Bretton Woods era when
capital controls were accepted in mainstream economics. Rodrik also argues
that the expansion of financial globalization and the free movement
of capital flows are the reason why economic crises have become more frequent
in both developing and advanced economies alike. Rodrik has also developed
the "political trilemma of the world economy", where
"democracy, national sovereignty and global economic
integration are mutually incompatible: we can combine any two of the
three, but never have all three simultaneously and in full." (from
Wikipedia) Summary
Key Terms (Lesson
summary: the foreign exchange market (article) | Khan Academy)
·
Why the demand
for a currency is downward sloping
When the exchange rate of a currency increases, other
countries will want less of that currency. When a currency appreciates (in
other words, the exchange rate increases), then the price of goods in the
country whose currency has appreciated are now relatively more expensive than
those in other countries. Since those goods are more expensive, less is
imported from those countries, and therefore less of that currency is needed.
·
The
equilibrium exchange rate is the interaction of the supply of a currency and
the demand for a currency
As in any market, the foreign exchange market will be in
equilibrium when the quantity supplied of a currency is equal to the quantity
demanded of a currency. If the market has a surplus or a shortage, the
exchange rate will adjust until an equilibrium is achieved. 1. Who are the major
players in the FX market?
2.
As compared with stock market,
FX market is more volatile or less? Why? |
What’s Ahead for the US
Dollar in 2023? (youtube)
Barclays shares its
forecast for the Japanese yen (youtube)
Europe's economy and
markets could outperform the U.S. in 2023: Deutsche Bank (youtube)
Currency experts are turning bullish on the euro as Europe looks to
hold off a recession PUBLISHED WED, JAN 11 20235:37 AM EST Elliot Smith https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/11/experts-bullish-on-euro-as-europe-looks-to-hold-off-a-recession.html KEY POINTS ·
“The euro is trading within its late December
range, but incoming data since the beginning of 2023 suggest to us that it
should be stronger,” Steve Englander, head of global G-10 FX research at
Standard Chartered, said in a note Monday. ·
Incoming data trends suggest a need for continued
hawkishness in Frankfurt and a potential cooling of rate hikes in Washington,
some analysts highlighted this week. ·
This would be positive for the euro. As
markets head into a year of uncertainty against a backdrop of shifting
economic data and monetary policy, analysts are turning positive on the
outlook for the euro . Having fallen below parity with the U.S. dollar in the second half of
2022, the common currency recovered in recent months to trade within a
tight range at just above $1.07 on Wednesday morning. Central
to the euro’s weakness last year was aggressive monetary policy tightening
from the U.S. Federal Reserve while the European Central Bank was much later
out of the blocks in hiking interest rates to contain runaway inflation. However,
incoming data trends suggest a need for continued hawkishness in Frankfurt
and a potential cooling of rate hikes in Washington, several analysts
highlighted this week. This closing of the interest rate gap would be
positive for the euro. The
economic threat posed by sky-high energy prices in the euro zone has also
faded amid an unseasonably mild winter in much of northern Europe. “The euro is trading within its late December range, but incoming
data since the beginning of 2023 suggest to us that it should be stronger,”
Steve Englander, head of global G-10 FX research at Standard Chartered, said
in a note Monday. “Both
euro area core inflation and economic surprises have continued to strengthen,
making it easier for the European Central Bank to maintain a hawkish tone.
Energy concerns that loomed large as a EUR-negative in mid-2022 are beginning
to ebb.” Euro
zone annual headline inflation slid to 9.2% in December from 10.1% in
November, Eurostat preliminary
figures revealed last week. But core inflation, which excludes volatile
energy, food, alcohol and tobacco prices, rose by more than expected to hit a
new record high of 5.2%. Both the ECB and the Fed have continued to strike a hawkish tone in
recent weeks as they focus on dragging inflation back toward target. ECB
policymaker Robert Holzmann told a conference on Wednesday that “policy
interest rates will have to rise significantly further to reach levels that
are sufficiently restrictive to ensure a timely return of inflation to the 2%
medium-term target.” However, Englander pointed out that the data surprises in the U.S. have
been “middling to weaker” than in Europe, indicating less upward pressure on
rates. He highlighted that the average hourly earnings (AHE) trend in the
latest release was “far more benign” than those the Federal Open Market
Committee (FOMC) was working with in mid-December, when 6-month annualized
earnings growth through November was 5.3% and rising. “The 6M annualised wage increase in December fell to 4.4% in the
latest release. The December non-manufacturing ISM was the lowest since 2010,
other than when COVID struck with all its force in 2020,” Englander noted. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has repeatedly emphasized the importance
of wages in bringing core services inflation down, pointing to wage growth as
a risk factor in the Fed’s mission to reduce it. “If productivity growth trends have not changed since pre-Covid, this
would leave AHE growth consistent with 3-3.5% underlying inflation,”
Englander said. “This is not 2%, but wage growth consistent with 3-3.5% inflation is
not an acute inflation problem, especially if the wage trend continues to
head lower.” Reduced
core services inflation would allow the Fed room to half its aggressive rate
hiking cycle later in the year, and perhaps even begin to reverse it. The ‘Fed pivot’ This potential turning point for markets, widely referred to as the
“Fed pivot,” would be the “missing link” to catalyze a more robust upward
trajectory for the euro, according to Deutsche Bank The
U.S. dollar “defied historical experience last year by overshooting relative
to the prevailing growth, inflation and monetary policy mix,” Saravelos said
in a note Monday. “With negative China and European drivers turning more supportive
quicker than we anticipated a few months ago the risks are shifting towards
an earlier dollar drop. We would buy EUR/USD targeting 1.10 by Q2 and
move up our year-end forecast to 1.15,” he said. Saravelos agreed with Englander’s assessment that the relative policy
cycles in the U.S. and the euro zone point to the Fed pivoting before the
ECB. “In
Europe, the latest PMI numbers show there may not even be a recession this
winter, the unemployment rate is still declining and fiscal policy is
structurally easy,” he said. “In
contrast, the debt ceiling poses downside risks to U.S. fiscal policy this
year, the market is already pricing the Fed’s desired level of real rates,
and U.S. labor tightness metrics (e.g. the vacancy rate) are turning faster
than Europe.” What’s more, after 2022′s global uncertainty, markets are
sitting on “extremely large USD cash exposure,” Saravelos said. He
suggested this could be vulnerable to further liquidation given that two of
the main drivers of the greenback’s safe-haven appeal last year — Europe’s
energy shock and China’s zero-Covid policy — have turned a corner. China’s
reopening in itself could also provide a boost to the euro, he argued, since
it is a pro-cyclical currency and “turning points over the last decade have
coincided with a turn in the external growth cycle.” “Tight
central bank policy is a big headwind to global growth, but China’s shift
away from zero-Covid policy is a tailwind, while also helping prevent upside
pressure on the broad dollar via USDCNY (U.S. dollar versus Chinese yuan).” |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part III: Forex quote
What Are Currency Pairs? (youtube)
Live Forex Quotes & Currency Rates | Forexlive 2/2/2022 When a
currency is quoted, it is done in relation to another currency, so that the
value of one is reflected through the value of another.
Therefore, if you are trying to determine the exchange rate between the U.S.
dollar (USD) and the Japanese yen (JPY), the forex quote would look like this:
Base
currency vs. quote currency (counter currency) This is referred to as
a currency pair.
The currency to the left of the slash
is the base currency,
while the currency on the right is called the quote or
counter currency. The base
currency (in this case, the U.S. dollar) is always equal to one unit (in this
case, US$1), and the quoted currency (in this case, the Japanese yen) is what
that one base unit is equivalent to in the other currency. The
quote means that US$1 = 119.50 Japanese yen. In other words, US$1 can buy
119.50 Japanese yen. The forex quote includes the currency abbreviations for
the currencies in question. Direct Currency Quote vs. Indirect
Currency Quote There are two ways to quote a currency
pair, either directly or indirectly. A direct currency quote is
simply a currency pair in which the domestic currency is the quoted currency; while an indirect quote, is a currency
pair where the domestic
currency is the base currency. So if you were looking at the
Canadian dollar as the domestic currency and U.S. dollar as the foreign
currency, a direct quote would be USD/CAD, while an indirect quote would be
CAD/USD. The direct quote varies the domestic currency, and the base, or
foreign currency, remains fixed at one unit. In the indirect quote, on the
other hand, the foreign currency is variable and the
domestic currency is fixed at one unit. · Direct currency quote: foreign
currency / domestic currency, such as JPY / USD (one JPY for how many USD) For example, if Canada is the
domestic currency, a direct quote would be 1.18 USD/CAD and means that USD$1
will purchase C$1.18 . The indirect quote for this would be the inverse
(1/1.18), 0.85 CAD/USD, which means with C$1, you can purchase US$0.85. In the forex spot market, most currencies are traded against the
U.S. dollar, and the U.S. dollar is frequently the base currency in the
currency pair. In these cases, it is called a direct quote. This would
apply to the above USD/JPY currency pair, which indicates that US$1 is equal
to 119.50 Japanese yen. However, not all currencies have the U.S.
dollar as the base. The Queen's
currencies - those currencies that historically have had a tie
with Britain, such as the British pound, Australian Dollar and New
Zealand dollar - are all quoted as the base currency against the U.S.
dollar. The euro is quoted the
same way as well. In these cases, the U.S. dollar is the counter
currency, and the exchange rate is referred to as an indirect quote. This is
why the EUR/USD quote is given as 1.25, for example, because it means that
one euro is the equivalent of 1.25 U.S. dollars. - Most
currency exchange rates are quoted out to four digits after
the decimal place, with the exception of the Japanese yen
(JPY), which is quoted out to two decimal places. Cross Currency ( You can
find the cross exchange rates at www.forex.com Summary: USD / JPY = 119.50 è 1
US$ = 119.5 YEN, to US residents this is an indirect quote;
to a Japanese, it is a indirect quote. JPY / USD = 1/119.50 è 1
YEN = (1/119.5)$, to US residents this is a direct quote; to
a Japanese, it is a direct quote. Base / quote Direct quote = 1/(indirect
quote) or indirect
quote = 1/ (direct quote) *** Inverse relationship
|
USD/CAD
= 1.2000/05 |
If you want
to buy this currency pair, this means that you intend to buy the base
currency and are therefore looking at the ask price to see how much (in
Canadian dollars) the market will charge for U.S. dollars.
According to the ask price, you can buy one U.S. dollar with 1.2005 Canadian
dollars.
However,
in order to sell this currency pair, or sell the base currency in exchange
for the quoted currency, you would look at the bid price. It
tells you that the market will buy US$1 base currency (you will be selling the
market the base currency) for a price equivalent to 1.2000 Canadian dollars,
which is the quoted currency.
Whichever
currency is quoted first (the base currency) is always the one in which the
transaction is being conducted. You
either buy or sell the base currency. Depending on what currency you want to
use to buy or sell the base with, you refer to the corresponding currency
pair spot exchange rate to determine the price.
(https://www.investopedia.com/university/forexmarket/forex2.asp)
Exercise I:
Assume you have $1000 and bid rate is
$1.52/£ and ask rate is $1.60 /£.
GBP/USD = 1.5200/1.6000
Meanwhile, the bid rate is quoted as
0.625 £/$ and the ask rate is quoted as 0.6579 £/$.
USD/GBP = 0.6250 /0.6579
If you convert it to £ and then convert
it back to $, what will happen?
Answer:
Sell at bid and buy at ask price (ask is always
higher than bid so you buy high and sell low, since you are dealing with the
bank).
You can either buy and sell dollar:
with $1000, you sell at bid 0.625
£/$ so you get 625£
($1000* 0.625 £/$ = 625£). With
625£, you sell at bid $1.52/£, so you get $950 (625£ * $1.52/£ = $950)
Or with 625£, you can buy $ at ask price 0.6579
Note: It
is easier to use USD/GBP to get £ first, since USD/GBP is based on one
dollar’s equivalent value in £. Then it is easier to use GBP/USD to get back
$, since GBP/USD is based on the equivalent value of £ in $.
Exercise II:
Suppose the spot ask exchange rate is
$1.90 = £1.00 and the spot bid exchange rate is $1.89 = £1.00. If you were to
buy $1,000,000 worth of £ and then sell them 10 minutes later, how much of
your $1,000,000 would be lost by the bid-ask spread? (Hint: You buy at ask
and sell at bid)
Answer:
GBP
at $1.60 /£ and buy $ at 0.6579 £/$. So $1000 / 1.6
$/£ * 0.6579 £/$ = $950
Exercise III: The
AUD/$ spot exchange rate is AUD1.60/$ and the SF/$ is
SF1.25/$. The AUD/SF cross exchange rate is: (answer: 1.2800)
Dollar higher
as strong U.S. data backs a hawkish Fed
PUBLISHED
WED, JAN 25 202311:20 PM ESTUPDATED THU, JAN 26 20234:01 PM EST
Nicolas
Economou | Nurphoto | Getty Images
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/26/dollar-near-eight-month-low-ahead-of-central-bank-meetings.html
The
dollar edged higher against the euro on Thursday after data showed the U.S. economy maintained a strong pace of growth
in the fourth quarter, backing the case for the U.S. Federal Reserve to
maintain its hawkish stance for longer.
Gross domestic product increased at a 2.9%
annualized rate last quarter, the
Commerce Department said in its advance fourth-quarter GDP growth estimate.
The economy grew at a 3.2% pace in the third quarter. Economists polled by
Reuters had forecast GDP rising at a 2.6% rate.
A
separate report from the Labor Department showed initial claims for state
unemployment benefits dropped 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 186,000 for the
week ended Jan. 21.
“A
somewhat mixed picture painted by the U.S. data,” said Stuart Cole, head
macro economist at Equiti Capital in London.
The data point to an economy that is
continuing to show resilience in the face of the rapid monetary tightening so
far delivered by the Fed, Cole said.
“But a
big contributor to this growth story was inventories, a component that is
almost certain to weaken as we go through 2023,” he said.
“I
think it reinforces the expectation of the Fed moving to 25 basis points
moves now,” Cole said.
The
euro was 0.2% lower at $1.08889, but not far from the nine-month high of
$1.09295 touched on Monday. Against the yen, the dollar was up 0.5% at 130.25
yen.
Attention
now turns to next week’s central bank meetings, including the Federal Reserve
and the European Central Bank.
Traders broadly expect the Fed to increase
rates by 25 basis points (bps) next Wednesday, a step down from a 50 bps
increase in December. Meanwhile, the ECB has all but committed to raising its
key rate by half a percentage point next week.
The
Aussie touched a new 7-month high of $0.71425 on growing expectations that
more Reserve Bank of Australia interest rate hikes are due after data showed
Australian inflation surged to a 33-year high last quarter.
The Canadian dollar rose to a two-month high
against its U.S. counterpart on Thursday, a day after the Bank of Canada
raised interest rates as expected in a move that could mark the end of the
central bank’s aggressive tightening campaign.
Part V: Eurodollar,
Eurobond
Eurodollar
The
term eurodollar refers to U.S.
dollar-denominated deposits at foreign banks or at the overseas branches of
American banks. By being located outside the United
States, eurodollars escape regulation by the Federal Reserve Board,
including reserve requirements. Dollar-denominated
deposits not subject to U.S. banking regulations were originally held almost
exclusively in Europe, hence the name eurodollar. They are also widely
held in branches located in the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands.
(https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurodollar.asp)
Euroyen
By ADAM HAYES Updated December 08, 2020, Fact checked by DANIEL RATHBURN
What Are Euroyen?
The term euroyen refers to all Japanese
yen (JPY)-denominated deposits held outside of Japan. It can also refer to
trading in yen in the eurocurrency market.
A
eurocurrency is any currency held or traded outside its country of issue, and
euroyen thus refers to all Japanese yen (JPY) deposits held or traded outside
Japan. The "euro-" prefix in the term arose because originally such
overseas currencies were held primarily in Europe, but that is no longer the
case and a eurocurrency can now
involve any domestic currency that is held anywhere else in the world that
local banking regulations permit.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
· Euroyen refers to deposits denominated in Japanese yen (JPY) held outside of Japan itself.
·
Also
known as offshore yen, the establishment of Euroyen allowed Japan to
liberalize its capital markets and grow its position in international trade.
·
Rates
on euroyen are set against a benchmark: either Euroyen TIBOR or Yen LIBOR.
Understanding Euroyen
Euroyen can also be referred to as "offshore yen," and refers to japanese yen held overseas. The offshore yen market was initially established in December 1986 as part of the liberalization and internationalization of Japanese financial markets and increased the country's stature in terms of global trade.
There are two euroyen benchmark rates: Euroyen TIBOR (published at 1 p.m. Tokyo time, with a panel dominated by Tokyo banks) and the Yen LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate, published at 11:55 a.m. London time with a panel dominated by non-Japanese banks in London).
Both domestic JPY and euroyen TIBOR rates are published by the Japanese Bankers Association (JBA), but after the LIBOR manipulation scandal broke in 2012 they have been published by a focused entity called the JBA TIBOR Administration (JBATA) in an effort to enhance the credibility of the published rates.
Both Yen LIBOR and Euroyen TIBOR rates were caught up in the LIBOR scandal. A number of large banks, both Japanese and foreign, paid hundreds of millions of dollars in settlement of euroyen-related claims and associated penalties arising from the case.
The Intercontinental Exchange, the authority responsible for LIBOR, will stop publishing one-week and two-month USD LIBOR after Dec. 31, 2021. All other LIBOR will be discontinued after June 30, 2023.
Euroyen Examples
Examples
of euroyen would be yen deposits held in U.S. banks or banks elsewhere in
Asia, and yen traded in London. Like
all eurocurrencies, euroyen deposits fall outside the regulatory purview of
the national central bank of the home country, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) in
this case. Therefore, euroyen deposits may offer slightly different interest
rates than those available for yen deposits in Japan.
Rates on JPY deposits in Japan are directly affected by interest rates set by the Bank of Japan and by liquidity in the Japanese money market, and are linked to a rate called Japanese yen Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate (TIBOR). Euroyen deposit rates, by contrast, are set in the eurocurrency market.
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Eurocurrency Markets
· The main benefit of eurocurrency markets is that they are more competitive. They can simultaneously offer lower interest rates for borrowers and higher interest rates for lenders.
·
That is
mostly because eurocurrency markets are less regulated.
·
On the
downside, eurocurrency markets face higher risks, particularly during a run
on the banks.
A eurobond is denominated in a currency other than
the home currency of the country or market in which it is issued. These bonds are frequently grouped together by the
currency in which they are denominated, such as eurodollar or euroyen bonds.
Issuance is usually handled by an international syndicate of financial institutions on behalf of the
borrower, one of which may underwrite the bond, thus guaranteeing purchase of
the entire issue. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurobond.asp
HOMEWORK (CHAPTER 3) (Due with the first mid term
exam)
1.
Is USD expected to rise in 2023? Why or why not?
2.
Is EURO expected to rise in
2023? Why or why not?
3.
“SOFR Is Replacing Libor in the
U.S”. What is Libor? What is SOFT?
5.
Bid/Ask Spread
Compute the bid/ask
percentage spread for Mexican peso retail transactions in which the ask rate
is $.11 and the bid rate is $.10. HINT: BID ASK SPREAD =
(ASK-BID)/ASK (Answer:
9.09%)
6. Indirect Exchange Rate
If the direct
exchange rate of the euro is worth $1.25, what is the indirect rate of the
euro? That is, what is the value of a dollar in euros? (Answer:
0.8€)
7. Cross Exchange Rate
Assume Poland
currency (the zloty) is worth $.17 and the Japanese yen is worth $.008. What
is the cross rate of the zloty with respect to yen? That is, how many yen
equal a zloty? (Answer: 21.25¥)
8. Foreign
Exchange
You just came back
from Canada, where the Canadian dollar was worth $.70.
You still have
C$200 from your trip and could exchange them for dollars at the airport, but
the airport foreign exchange desk will only buy them for $.60. Next week, you
will be going to Mexico and will need pesos. The airport foreign exchange
desk will sell you pesos for $.10 per peso. You met a tourist at the airport
who is from Mexico and is on his way to Canada. He is willing to buy your
C$200 for 1,300 pesos. Should you accept the offer or cash the Canadian
dollars in at the airport? Explain. (Answer: You can only get
$1,200 peso if you accept the offer in the airport)
9.
What is Eurodollar? What is
Euroyen? What is Eurobond?
10.
Why does the world bank make a big cut to its 2023 growth outlook?
Please refer to https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/11/world-bank-global-economy-to-enter-recession.html
World Bank
makes big cut to its 2023 growth outlook, says globe is ‘perilously close’ to
recession
PUBLISHED
TUE, JAN 10 202310:51 PM ESTUPDATED TUE, JAN 10 202311:21 PM EST Jihye Lee
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/11/world-bank-global-economy-to-enter-recession.html
KEY
POINTS
·
The
World Bank slashed its 2023 global economy growth outlook to 1.7% for 2023
from its earlier projection of 3%.
·
It
would mark “the third weakest pace of growth in nearly three decades,
overshadowed only by the global recessions caused by the pandemic and the
global financial crisis,” the World Bank said.
Why the
World bank slashed its global growth outlook
The
World Bank slashed its global growth forecasts from projections it made in mid-2022
on the back of what it sees as broadly worsening economic conditions.
The international development institution
downgraded almost all of its forecasts for advanced economies in the world, cutting
its growth outlook for the global economy to 1.7% for 2023, it said in its latest report, Global Economic Prospects. The
organization earlier projected the world economy to expand by 3% in 2023.
The adjustment was led by a significant
downgrade to its prospects for the U.S. economy — it now forecasts 0.5%
growth from an earlier projection of 2.4%.
The World Bank cut its growth outlook for
China for 2023 from 5.2% to 4.3%, Japan from 1.3% to 1% , and Europe and
Central Asia from 1.5% to 0.1%.
“Global growth has slowed to the extent that
the global economy is perilously close to falling into recession,” the World Bank said, attributing an “unexpectedly rapid and
synchronous” global monetary policy tightening behind the sluggish growth.
The
downgraded estimates would mark “the third weakest pace of growth in nearly
three decades, overshadowed only by the global recessions caused by the
pandemic and the global financial crisis.”
The
World Bank said that tighter monetary
policies from central banks around the world may have been necessary to tame
inflation, but they have “contributed to a significant worsening of global
financial conditions, which is exerting a substantial drag on activity.”
“The United States, the euro area, and China
are all undergoing a period of pronounced weakness, and the resulting
spillovers are exacerbating other headwinds faced by emerging market and
developing economies,” it said.
The global financial organization adjusted
its 2024 forecasts lower as well, to 2.7% from an earlier prediction of 3%
growth.
China is ‘key variable’
A faster-than-expected China reopening poses
great uncertainty for its economic recovery, the World Bank said in its
report.
“The economic recovery [in China] may be
delayed if reopening results in major outbreaks that overburden the health
sector and sap confidence,” the report said. “There is significant
uncertainty about the trajectory of the pandemic and how households,
businesses, and policy makers in China will respond.”
World
Bank President David Malpass said on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” on Tuesday that
“China is a key variable and there may be an upside for China if they push
through Covid as quickly as they seem to be doing.”
“China’s big enough by itself to really lift
global demand and supply,” he said.
“One of the questions for the world would be,
which does it do most — if it’s mostly putting upward pressure on global
demand, then that raises commodity prices. But it also means that the Fed will
be hiking for a longer period of time,” he said.
How companies like Amazon,
Nike and FedEx avoid paying federal taxes (FYI)
PUBLISHED THU, APR 14 20228:05 AM EDT
The current United States tax code allows some of the biggest
company names in the country to not pay any federal corporate income tax.
In fact, at least 55 of the
largest corporations in America paid no federal corporate income taxes on
their 2020 profits, according to the Institute
on Taxation and Economic Policy. The companies include names like Whirlpool,
FedEx, Nike, HP and Salesforce.
“If a large, very profitable company isn’t paying the federal
income tax, then we have a real fairness problem on our hands,” Matthew
Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
(ITEP), told CNBC.
What’s more, it is entirely
legal and within the parameters of the tax code that corporations can end up
paying no federal corporate income tax, which costs the U.S. government
billions of dollars in lost revenue.
″[There’s] a bucket of
corporate tax breaks that are deliberately in the tax code … . And overall,
they cost the federal government roughly $180 billion each year. And for
comparison, the corporate tax brings in about $370 billion of revenue a year,” Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of
the NYU Tax Law Center, told CNBC, citing research from the Tax Foundation.
CNBC reached out to FedEx, Nike, Salesforce and HP for
comment. They either declined to provide a statement or did not respond
before publication.
The 55 corporations cited by
ITEP would have paid a collective total of $8.5 billion. Instead, they
received $3.5 billion in tax rebates, collectively draining $12 billion from
the U.S. government, according to the institute. The figures don’t include corporations that
paid only some but not all of these taxes.
“I think the fundamental issue here is there are two different
ways in which corporations book their profits,” Garrett Watson, senior policy
analyst at the Tax Foundation, told CNBC. “The amount of profits that
corporations may be reporting for financial purposes may be very different
from the profits that they are reporting [for tax purposes.]”
Some tax expenditures, which
come in many different forms, are used by some companies to take advantage of
rules that enable them to lower their effective tax rates.
For example, Gardner’s research into Amazon’s taxes from 2018
to 2021 showed a reported $79 billion of pretax U.S. income. Amazon paid a collective $4 billion in
federal corporate income tax in those four years, equating to an effective
annual tax rate of 5.1%, according to Gardner’s ITEP report, about a
quarter of the federal corporate tax rate of 21%.
Amazon told CNBC in a statement, “In 2021, we reported $2.3 billion
in federal income tax expense, $5.2 billion in other federal taxes, and more
than $4 billion in state and local taxes of all types. We also collected an
additional $22 billion in sales taxes for U.S. states and localities.”
One controversial form of
federal tax expenditure is the offshoring of profits. The foreign corporate income tax —
anywhere between 0% and 10.5% — can incentivize the shifting of profits to
tax havens.
For example, Whirlpool, a U.S. company known for manufacturing
home appliances both in the U.S. and Mexico, was cited in a recent case
involving both U.S. and Mexican taxes.
″[Whirlpool] did that by having the Mexican operation
owned by a Mexican company with no employees, and then having that Mexican
company owned by a Luxembourg holding company that had one employee,” Huang
told CNBC. “And then it tried to claim that due to the combination of the
U.S., Mexico and Luxembourg tax rules ... it was trying to take advantage of
the disconnect between all of those tax systems to to avoid tax and all of
those countries and of court said, no, that goes too far.”
Whirlpool defended its actions in a statement to CNBC: “The
case before the Sixth Circuit has never been about trying to avoid U.S. taxes
on the profits earned in Mexico. This tax dispute has always been about when
those profits are taxed in the U.S. In fact, years before the original Tax
Court decision in 2020, Whirlpool had already paid U.S. tax on 100% of the
profits it earned in Mexico. Simply put, the IRS thought Whirlpool should
have paid those U.S. taxes earlier.”
19 profitable Fortune 100 corporations that
reported they will owe little or no taxes for 2021
How to solve the debt
ceiling problem – by
ChatGPT (Thanks, Adam)
To solve the debt ceiling problem,
Congress may need to increase the limit or agree on spending cuts and revenue
increases to reduce the debt. However, this can be a politically divisive
issue, as raising the debt ceiling may be seen as increasing government
spending, while cutting spending or raising revenue can be politically
unpopular.
References:
"The Debt Limit: History and Recent
Increases" Congressional Research Service, 2021
"Debt Ceiling 101" Committee for a
Responsible Federal Budget, 2021
It's also worth noting that the US has
temporarily suspended the debt ceiling through July 2024, so the issue may
not become relevant until later in the decade.
Chapter 4
Chapter 4 Exchange Rate
Determination
Part I: What determines the strength of a
currency?
Currency value is determined
by demand and supply, if not manipulated by the government.
Q: What factors
determine the strength of a currency?
A: Currency trading is complicated by the fact that there are so many
factors involved. Not only are
there a number of country-specific variables that
go into determining a currency's strength, but there are also other
benchmarks--other currencies, for example, as well as commodities--against
which a currency's strength can be measured.
However,
three crucial factors are as follows:
1.
Interest rates. High interest rates help
promote a strong currency, because foreign investors can get a higher return
by investing in that country. However, the level of interest rates is
relative. You've probably noticed that interest rates on CDs, savings accounts and money market accounts are very
low right now. So are U.S. Treasury bond rates and the U.S. federal funds rate. Ordinarily,
this would weaken the U.S. dollar, except for the fact that interest rates
behind other major world currencies are also low.
3.
Stability. A strong government with a
well-established rule of law and a history of constructive economic policies are
the type of things that attract investment and thus promote a strong
currency. In the case of the U.S. dollar, its strength is further augmented
by the fact that commodities are generally traded in dollars, and many
countries use the dollar as a reserve currency.
http://www.investopedia.com/video/play/main-factors-influence-exchange-rates/ (VIDEO)
Please also read the
following article to learn more about how changes in demand and supply work
on exchange rate.
The foreign exchange market involves
firms, households, and investors who demand and supply currencies coming
together through their banks and the key foreign exchange dealers. Figure 1 (a)
offers an example for the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the
Mexican peso. The vertical axis shows the exchange rate for U.S.
dollars, which in this case is measured in pesos. The horizontal
axis shows the quantity of U.S. dollars being traded in the foreign exchange
market each day. The demand curve (D) for U.S. dollars intersects with the
supply curve (S) of U.S. dollars at the equilibrium point (E), which is an
exchange rate of 10 pesos per dollar and a total volume of $8.5 billion.
Figure 1. Demand
and Supply for the U.S. Dollar and Mexican Peso Exchange Rate. (a) The
quantity measured on the horizontal axis is in U.S. dollars, and the exchange
rate on the vertical axis is the price of U.S. dollars measured in Mexican
pesos. (b) The quantity measured on the horizontal axis is in Mexican pesos,
while the price on the vertical axis is the price of pesos measured in U.S.
dollars. In both graphs, the equilibrium exchange rate occurs at point E, at
the intersection of the demand curve (D) and the supply curve (S).
Figure 1 (b)
presents the same demand and supply information from the perspective of the
Mexican peso. The vertical axis shows the exchange rate for Mexican pesos,
which is measured in U.S. dollars. The horizontal axis shows the quantity of
Mexican pesos traded in the foreign exchange market. The demand curve (D) for Mexican
pesos intersects with the supply
curve (S) of Mexican pesos at the equilibrium point (E), which
is an exchange rate of 10 cents in U.S. currency for each Mexican peso and a
total volume of 85 billion pesos. Note that the two exchange rates
are inverses: 10 pesos per dollar is the same as 10 cents per peso (or $0.10
per peso). In the actual foreign exchange market, almost all of the
trading for Mexican pesos is done for U.S. dollars. What factors would cause
the demand or supply to shift, thus leading to a change in the equilibrium exchange rate? The answer
to this question is discussed in the following section.
One reason to demand a
currency on the foreign exchange market is the belief that the value of the currency
is about to increase. One reason to supply a currency—that
is, sell it on the foreign exchange market—is the
expectation that the value of the currency is about to decline. For
example, imagine that a leading business newspaper, like the Wall Street Journal or the Financial Times, runs an article
predicting that the Mexican peso will appreciate in value. The likely effects
of such an article are illustrated in Figure 2.
Demand for the Mexican peso shifts to the right, from D0 to D1, as investors become eager to purchase pesos.
Conversely, the supply of pesos shifts to the left, from S0 to S1, because investors
will be less willing to give them up. The result is that the equilibrium
exchange rate rises from 10 cents/peso to 12 cents/peso and the equilibrium
exchange rate rises from 85 billion to 90 billion pesos as the equilibrium
moves from E0 to
E1.
Figure 2. Exchange
Rate Market for Mexican Peso Reacts to Expectations about Future Exchange
Rates. An announcement that the peso exchange rate is likely to
strengthen in the future will lead to greater demand for the peso in the
present from investors who wish to benefit from the appreciation. Similarly,
it will make investors less likely to supply pesos to the foreign exchange
market. Both the shift of demand to the right and the shift of supply to the
left cause an immediate appreciation in the exchange rate.
Figure 2 also
illustrates some peculiar traits of supply and demand diagrams in the foreign
exchange market. In contrast to all the other cases of supply and demand you
have considered, in the foreign
exchange market, supply and demand typically both move at
the same time. Groups of participants in the foreign exchange market like
firms and investors include some who are buyers and some who are sellers. An
expectation of a future shift in the exchange rate affects both buyers and
sellers—that is, it affects both demand and supply
for a currency.
The shifts in demand and
supply curves both cause the exchange rate to shift in the same direction; in
this example, they both make the peso exchange rate stronger. However, the
shifts in demand and supply work in opposing directions on the quantity
traded. In this example, the rising demand for pesos is causing the quantity
to rise while the falling supply of pesos is causing quantity to fall. In
this specific example, the result is a higher quantity. But in other cases,
the result could be that quantity remains unchanged or declines.
This example also helps to
explain why exchange rates often move quite substantially in a short
period of a few weeks or months. When investors expect a country’s currency to strengthen in the future, they buy the
currency and cause it to appreciate immediately. The appreciation of the
currency can lead other investors to believe that future appreciation is
likely—and thus lead to even further appreciation.
Similarly, a fear that a currency might weaken
quickly leads to an actual weakening
of the currency, which often reinforces the belief that the currency is going
to weaken further. Thus, beliefs about the future path of exchange
rates can be self-reinforcing, at least for a time, and a large share of the
trading in foreign exchange markets involves dealers trying to outguess each
other on what direction exchange rates will move next.
In class exercise
Think about the changes in demand
and supply when the following changes occur. And draw demand and supply curve
to explain.
1)
Inflation goes up è currency
demand high or low? è currency
value up or down?
2) Real
interest rate goes up è currency demand high or low? è currency value up or down?
1)
Domestic residents’ income goes up è currency demand high or low? è currency value up or down?
· Current account goes up è currency demand high or low? è currency value up or down?
2)
Public debt
goes up è currency
demand high or low? è currency
value up or down?
3) Recession or crisis è currency demand high or low? è currency value up or down?
4) Other accidental events è currency demand high or low? è currency value up or down?
Note:
· For the each of the scenarios
above, can you draw the demand and supply curve?*
· If not yet, please watch the
following video. Supply and demand curves in foreign exchange by
Khan Academy (video)
Part II: Fixed
exchange rate vs. floating exchange rate
The
country cannot, however, fix exchange rates, allow capital to flow
freely and maintain monetary policy
sovereignty.
For example, Country X links its currency, the X pound, to the Y franc at a
one-to-one ratio. This is effective if both Country X and Country Y's central
banks maintain a policy rate of 3%. But if Country Y raises interest
rates to combat rising inflation, investors would spot an opportunity
for arbitrage. X pounds would flood over the border to buy Y francs and
earn the higher interest rate.
Y
francs would in effect become worth more than X pounds. Thus, either Country
X abandons the currency peg and allows the X pound to fall, raises its
policy rate to match Country Y's policy rate abandoning monetary policy
independence or it sets up capital controls to keep X pounds
in the country.
Real-world examples of these trade-offs include
the eurozone where countries have opted for side A of the triangle: they
forfeit monetary policy control to the European Central Bank but
maintain a single currency (in effect a one-to-one peg coupled with
free capital flow). The difficulties of maintaining a monetary union across
economies as different as Germany and Greece have become clear as the latter
has repeatedly appeared poised to drop out of the currency bloc.
Following World War II, the wealthy opted for
side C under the Bretton Woods system, which pegged currencies to the dollar
but allowed them to set their own interest rates. Cross-border capital flows
were so small that the system held for a couple of decades – the exception being Mundell's native Canada, a
situation that gave him special insight into the tensions inherent in
the system. Today, most countries allow their currencies to float,
meaning they opt for side B.
Analysis of
the Best Currency Pairs to Trade
• USD/EUR – This can be
considered the most popular currency pair. In addition, it has the lowest
spread among modern world Forex brokers. This currency pair is associated
with basic technical analysis. The best thing about this currency pair is
that it is not too volatile. If you are not in a position to take any risks,
you can think of selecting this as your best Forex pair to trade, without it
causing you too much doubt in your mind. You can also find a lot of
information on this currency pair, which can help prevent you from making
rookie mistakes.
• USD/GBP
– Profitable pips and possible large jumps have contributed a lot towards the
popularity of this currency pair. However, you need to keep in mind that
higher profits come along with a greater risk. This is a currency pair that
can be grouped into the volatile currencycategory. However, many traders
prefer to select this as their best currency pair to trade, since they are
able to find plenty of market analysis information online.
• USD/JPY
– This is another popular currency pair that can be seen regularly in the
world of Forex trading. It is associated with low spreads, and you can
usually follow a smooth trend in comparison with other currency pairs. It
also has the potential to deliver exciting, profitable opportunities for
traders.
Special
Pairs (Or Exotic Currency Pairs)
Typically the
best pair for you is the one that you are most knowledgeable about. It
can be extremely useful for you to trade the currency from your own country,
if it is not included in the majors, of course. This is only true if your
local currency has some nice volatility too. In general, knowing your
country's political and economical issues results in additional knowledge
which you can base your trades on.
You can find
such information through economic announcements in our Forex calendar, which
also lists predictions and forecasts concerning these announcements. It is
also recommended to consider trading the pairs that contain your local
currency (also known as 'exotic pairs'). In most cases, your local currency pair
will be quoted against USD, so you would need to stay informed about this
currency as well.
• From https://admiralmarkets.com/education/articles/forex-basics/what-are-the-best-currency-pairs-to-trade
Bretton Woods and the Growth of the
Eurodollar Market
January
20, 2022
By Paulina Restrepo Echavarria , Praew Grittayaphong
As
World War II raged on, delegates from 44 Allied nations gathered at a hotel
in Bretton Woods, N. H., to lay
out foundations for the reconstruction of the international financial system.
The hope was to prevent a repetition
of competitive devaluations in the 1930s and to create a stable economic and
financial environment for nations to operate in. This resulted in an
agreement for countries to fix their exchange rates to the U.S. dollar and
the U.S. to peg the dollar to gold.
The fixed exchange rate system constrained
the economic policies of many nations, causing policymakers to adopt
capital/exchange control measures to keep their monetary autonomy. However,
the control measures were not always effective and economic agents around the
world began to find loopholes in the system. Among these was the emergence of
the eurodollar market: a market for short-term deposits denominated in U.S.
dollars at banks outside U.S. territory (PDF), particularly in London.
The
Origins and the Spread of the Eurodollar Market
Although
there are many possible factors that contributed to the development of the
eurodollar market, numerous accounts cited exchange controls implemented by
the U.K. in 1957 as the earliest impetus for this development. In response to
a potential drain on reserves caused by higher inflation and the Suez crisis,
the British government placed severe restrictions (PDF) on sterling credits
to nonresidents and banned the use of sterling to finance third-party
transactions. To circumvent this issue, the London banks started using dollar
deposits as credit instruments for nonresidents.
Another
possible factor that drove the demand for dollar deposits was profitable
investment opportunities in the U.K. and the financial innovation that
followed. During the period of tight monetary policy in the U.K., Midland
Bank was able to seek funds denominated in dollar to obtain sterling at a
lower interest rate. The bank had bid 30-day dollar-denominated deposits at
an interest rate (1.875%) that was higher than the maximum payable under
Regulation Q in the U.S., sold these dollars spot for sterling and bought
dollars back at a premium of 2.125%. This method helped the bank obtain
sterling at the rate of 4% during a time when Bank Rate was 4.5%, according
to a 1998 article by Catherine R. Schenk. With tight monetary policy, relatively relaxed controls on the
forward exchange market and opportunities for profitable interest arbitrage,
the eurodollar market began to expand rapidly.
Rapid
Growth in the Eurodollar
The
figure below shows the estimated size of the eurodollar market during the
heyday of the Bretton Woods era.
Net
Size in the Eurodollar Market
SOURCES:
Bank for International Settlements annual reports, FRED and authors’
calculations.
NOTES:
The figures are based on the dollar liabilities reported by the banks of the
eight reporting European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy,
Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K.) vis-à-vis banks and nonbank
residents outside their own area and vis-à-vis nonbank residents inside the
reporting area. For more information, see the BIS annual report (PDF) for
1969.
We can see that from 1964 to 1969, the
estimated market size of eurodollar market grew over 252% from $75 billion of
2020 dollars to $264 billion. As the U.S. administration tried to control the
outflow of dollars, multinational corporations, eager to find profitable
usage of their surplus dollar balances, and banks, equally eager to
accommodate demand, found way to get around the controls.
Following
its emergence, the eurodollar market played a big role in the Bretton Woods
system and also its breakdown and eventual demise in the early 1970s.
https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/GE*0/futures-prices
For example https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/GEG23/overview
Part III: Will $
collapse?
What Is the U.S. Dollar Index (USDX) and How to Trade It
By JAMES CHEN
Updated August 29, 2022 Reviewed by GORDON SCOTT Fact checked by KIRSTEN
ROHRS SCHMITT
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/usdx.asp
What Is the U.S. Dollar Index (USDX)?
The U.S. dollar index (USDX) is a measure of the
value of the U.S. dollar relative to a basket of foreign currencies. The USDX
was established by the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1973 after the dissolution of
the Bretton Woods Agreement. It is now maintained by ICE Data Indices, a
subsidiary of the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).
The six currencies included in the USDX are often
referred to as America's most significant trading partners, but the index
has only been updated once: in 1999 when the euro replaced the German mark,
French franc, Italian lira, Dutch guilder, and Belgian franc.
Consequently,
the index does not accurately reflect present-day U.S. trade.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·
The U.S. Dollar Index is used to measure the value of the dollar
against a basket of six foreign currencies.
·
These are: the Euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, Canadian dollar,
British pound, and Swedish krona.
·
The index was established shortly after the Bretton Woods
Agreement dissolved in 1973 with a base of 100, and values since then are
relative to this base.
·
The value of the index is a fair indication of the dollar’s
value in global markets.
Understanding the U.S. Dollar Index (USDX)
The index is currently calculated by factoring in
the exchange rates of six foreign currencies, which include the euro (EUR),
Japanese yen (JPY), Canadian dollar (CAD), British pound (GBP), Swedish krona
(SEK), and Swiss franc (CHF).
The euro is, by far, the largest component of the
index, making up 57.6% of the basket. The weights of the rest of the
currencies in the index are JPY (13.6%), GBP (11.9%), CAD (9.1%), SEK (4.2%),
and CHF (3.6%).
The index
started in 1973 with a base of 100, and values since then are relative to
this base. It was established shortly
after the Bretton Woods Agreement was dissolved. As part of the
agreement, participating countries settled their balances in U.S. dollars
(which was used as the reserve currency), while the USD was fully convertible
to gold at a rate of $35/ounce.
An overvaluation
of the USD led to concerns over the exchange rates and their link to the way
in which gold was priced. President Richard Nixon decided to temporarily
suspend the gold standard, at which point other countries were able to choose
any exchange agreement other than the price of gold. In 1973, many foreign
governments chose to let their currency rates float, putting an end to the
agreement.
History of the
U.S. Dollar Index (USDX)
The U.S. Dollar
Index has risen and fallen sharply throughout its history. It reached an
all-time high in 1984 at nearly 165. Its all-time low was nearly 70 in 2007.
Over the last several years, the U.S. dollar index has been relatively
rangebound between 90 and 110.
The index is affected by macroeconomic factors,
including inflation/deflation in the dollar and foreign currencies included
in the comparable basket, as well as recessions and economic growth in those
countries.
The contents of
the basket of currencies have only been changed once since the index started
when the euro replaced many European currencies previously in the index in
1999, such as Germany's predecessor currency, the Deutschemark.
In the coming
years, it is likely currencies will be replaced as the index strives to
represent major U.S. trading partners. It
is likely in the future that currencies such as the Chinese yuan (CNY) and
Mexican peso (MXN) will supplant other currencies in the index due to China
and Mexico being major trading partners with the U.S.
The
USDX uses a fixed weighting scheme based on exchange rates in 1973 that
heavily weights the euro. As a result, expect to see big moves in the fund in
response to euro movements.
An index value
of 120 suggests that the U.S. dollar has appreciated 20% versus the basket of
currencies over the time period in question. Simply put, if the USDX goes up,
that means the U.S. dollar is gaining strength or value when compared to the
other currencies.
Similarly, if
the index is currently 80, falling 20 from its initial value, that implies
that it has depreciated 20%. The appreciation and depreciation results are a
factor of the time period in question.
How to Trade the
USDX
The U.S. dollar
index allows traders to monitor the value of the USD compared to a basket of
select currencies in a single transaction. It also allows them to hedge their
bets against any risks with respect to the dollar. It is possible to
incorporate futures or options strategies on the USDX.
These financial
products currently trade on the New York Board of Trade. Investors can use
the index to hedge general currency moves or speculate. The index is also
available indirectly as part of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds.
For instance,
the Invesco DB U.S. Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is an ETF that tracks the
changes in value of the US dollar via USDX future contracts. The Wisdom Tree
Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund (USDU) is an actively-managed ETF that
goes long the U.S. dollar against a basket of developed and emerging market
currencies.
Invesco DB also
offers its U.S. Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN), which shorts the dollar,
gaining in value when the dollar weakens.
What Does the
Dollar Index Tell You?
The dollar index
tracks the relative value of the U.S. dollar against a basket of important
world currencies. If the index is rising, it means that the dollar is
strengthening against the basket - and vice-versa.
What Currencies
Are in the USDX Basket?
The USDX tracks
the dollar's (USD) relative strength against a basket of foreign currencies.
The weightings have been fixed since 1973 (and later adjusted in 2002 when
the euro replaced many European currencies):
Euro (EUR) - 57.6% weight
Japanese yen (JPY) - 13.6%
Pound sterling (GBP) - 11.9%
Canadian dollar (CAD) - 9.1%
Swedish krona (SEK) - 4.2%
Swiss franc (CHF) - 3.6%
How Do You
Calculate the USDX Index Price?
The USDX is
based on a basket of six currencies with different weightings (see above).
The index calculation is simply the weighted average of the U.S. dollar
exchange rates against these currencies, normalized by an indexing factor
(which is ~50.1435).
USDX =
50.14348112 × EURUSD^-0.576 × USDJPY^0.136 × GBPUSD^-0.119 × USDCAD^0.091 ×
USDSEK^0.042 × USDCHF^0.036
The Bottom Line
The U.S. Dollar Index (USDX) is a relative measure
of the U.S. dollars (USD) strength against a basket of six influential
currencies, including the Euro, Pound, Yen, Canadian Dollar, Swedish Korner,
and Swiss Franc. The index was created in 1973, but remains useful to this
day. The USDX can be used as a proxy for the health of the U.S. economy and
traders can use it to speculate on the dollar's change in value or as a hedge
against currency exposure elsewhere.
Dollar set for biggest two-day fall since 2009 as rate outlook
shifts
PUBLISHED FRI, NOV 11 20222:12 AM ESTUPDATED
FRI, NOV 11 20224:11 PM EST Reuters
The dollar headed for its biggest two-day drop in almost 14
years on Friday, as investors piled into riskier assets after a cooler reading
of U.S. inflation helped temper expectations for the Federal Reserve to keep
raising rates as quickly.
Data on Thursday showed consumer inflation
rose 7.7% year-on-year in October, its slowest rate since January and below
forecasts for 8%.
The dollar staged its biggest drop since late 2015 on Thursday
as Treasury yields plunged, while other currencies - the yen and the pound in
particular - jumped.
Investor risk appetite got an additional boost
from Chinese health authorities easing some of the country’s strict COVID-19
restrictions, including shortening quarantine times for close contacts of
cases and inbound travellers.
The dollar index was down nearly 1.7%, having
lost over 3% in the last two days - its biggest two-day decline since March
2009.
Risk assets including stocks, emerging-market currencies and
commodities rallied. But slowing inflation, while positive for borrowers,
reflects a slowing economic backdrop, analysts said.
“It can be a little dangerous in that the ‘bad
news’ is still out there and could come back to burn us, particularly with
respect to the Fed,” Rabobank currency strategist Jane Foley said.
The dollar has risen by 12% this year against a basket of major
currencies, in light of the Fed’s determination to bring inflation, which
almost hit double digits earlier this year, back towards its target of 2%.
Other central banks have followed suit, with
the exception of the Bank of Japan, and, as a result, the yen has witnessed
its largest decline against the dollar since 1979.
The dollar, which has gained 22% in value
against the yen this year, its steepest gain since 1979′s 24% rise, was
last down 1.6% against the Japanese currency at 138.65 yen.
The futures market shows investors are pricing
in a 71.5% chance of a 50-basis-point U.S. rate increase next month, up from
around 50/50 a week ago.
“We remain reluctant to jump in on the broader
bearish dollar story just yet. First, because it simply appears too early to
call victory in the inflation battle, and more evidence will need to come
from the jobs markets – which has remained exceptionally tight,” ING
strategist Francesco Pesole said.
The yuan also jumped, as investors cheered the slight relaxation
in China’s COVID rules, despite cases rising sharply across the country.
The offshore yuan rallied by as much as 1.3%
to hit its highest in over a month against the dollar, to 7.0592.
Sterling, meanwhile, pared overnight losses
against the dollar and the euro after UK data showed the economy did not
contract by as much as expected in the three months to September, although it
is still entering what is likely to be a lengthy recession.
The pound rose 1.1% against the dollar to
$1.1839, having staged its largest one-day rally the day before since 2017.
The euro extended the previous day’s 2% surge
to rise 1.5% to $1.0356, trading around its highest since August.
It also briefly hit session lows versus the
Swiss franc , after the head of the Swiss National Bank reiterated the
central bank’s commitment to bring inflation down. Against the franc, the
euro was last down 0.42% at 0.9795.
Cryptocurrencies were under pressure again, given ongoing
turmoil in the crypto world after exchange FTX’s fall.
Part IV: In Class
Exercise
Class Exercise1:
Chicago bank expects the exchange rate of the
NZ$ to appreciate from $0.50 to $0.52 in 30 days.
— Chicago bank can borrow $20m on a
short term basis.
— Currency Lending
Rate Borrowing
rate
$ 6.72% 7.20%
NZ$ 6.48% 6.96%
Question: If Chicago bank anticipate NZ$ to
appreciate, how shall it trade? (refer to ppt)
Answer:
◦ NZ$ will appreciate,
so you should buy NZ$ now and sell later. Borrow $à convert to NZ$
today à lend it for 30 days à convert to $ 30 days
later àpayback the $ loan.
◦ Convert
the borrowed $ to NZ$ today. So your NZ$ worth: $20m / 0.50 $/NZ$=40m NZ$.
◦ Lend NZ$
for 6.48% * 30/360=0.54% and get
40m NZ$ *(1+0.54%)=40,216,000 NZ$ 30 days
lateè at new rate $0.52/1NZ$, 40,216,000 NZ$ equals t 40,216,000
NZ$*$0.52/1NZ$ = $20,912,320
◦ Your
borrowed $20m should be paid back for
20m *(1+7.2%* 30/360)=$20.12m.
◦ So the
profit is:
$20,912,320 - $20.12m =$792,320, a pure
profit from thin air!
Class Exercise 2:
Blue Demon Bank expects that the Mexican peso
will depreciate against the dollar from its spot rate of $.15 to $.14 in 10
days. The following interbank lending and borrowing rates exist:
Lending
Rate Borrowing Rate
U.S.
dollar 8.0% 8.3%
Mexican
peso 8.5% 8.7%
Assume that Blue Demon
Bank has a borrowing capacity of either $10 million or 70 million pesos in
the interbank market, depending on which currency it wants to borrow.
a. How
could Blue Demon Bank attempt to capitalize on its expectations without using
deposited funds? Estimate the profits that could be generated from this
strategy.
b. Assume all the preceding information with this exception:
Blue Demon Bank expects the peso to appreciate from its present spot rate of
$.15 to $.17 in 30 days. How could it attempt to capitalize on its
expectations without using deposited funds? Estimate the profits that could
be generated from this strategy.
Answer:
Part a: Blue Demon Bank can capitalize on its expectations
about pesos (MXP) as follows:
1. Borrow
MXP70 million
2. Convert
the MXP70 million to dollars:
a. MXP70,000,000 × $.15
= $10,500,000
3. Lend
the dollars through the interbank market at 8.0% annualized over a 10 day
period. The amount accumulated in 10 days is:
a. $10,500,000 × [1
+ (8% × 10/360)] = $10,500,000 × [1.002222] = $10,523,333
4. Convert
the Peso back to $ at $.14 / peso:
a. $10,523,333
/ $.14 / MXP = MXP 75,166,664
5. Repay
the peso loan. The repayment amount on the peso loan is:
a. MXP70,000,000 × [1
+ (8.7% × 10/360)] =
70,000,000 × [1.002417]=MXP70,169,167
6. The
arbitrage profit is:
a. MXP
75,166,664 - MXP70,169,167 = MXP 4,997,497
7. Convert
back to at $0.14 / MXP
a. We
get back MXP 4,997,497 * $0.14 / MXP = $699,649.6 (solution)
Part b: Blue Demon Bank can capitalize on its expectations
as follows:
1. Borrow
$10 million
2. Convert
the $10 million to pesos (MXP):
a. $10,000,000/$.15
= MXP66,666,667
3. Lend
the pesos through the interbank market at 8.5% annualized over a 30 day
period. The amount accumulated in 30 days
is:
a. MXP66,666,667 × [1
+ (8.5% × 30/360)] = 66,666,667 × [1.007083] =
MXP67,138,889
4. Repay
the dollar loan. The repayment amount on the dollar loan is:
a. $10,000,000 × [1
+ (8.3% × 30/360)] = $10,000,000 × [1.006917] =
$10,069,170
5. Convert
the pesos to dollars to repay the loan. The amount of dollars to be received
in 30 days (based on the expected spot rate of $.17) is:
a. MXP67,138,889 × $.17
= $11,413,611
HW chapter 4 - Due with the
second mid term exam
Question
1. Choose between increase /
decrease.
US Inflation goes up, $ will
________increase / decrease____________in value__.
US Real interest rate goes
up, $ will ________increase / decrease___________ in value__.
US Current account goes up,
$ will ________increase / decrease________ in value__.
US Recession or crisis, $
will ________increase / decrease________ in value__.
For each scenario, please
draw a demand and supply curve to support your conclusion.
- please
refer to the PPT of this chapter for how to draw demand and supply
curver Chapter 4 PPT
Question 2: DO you think the
US$ will collapse in the near future? Why or why not?
Question 3: What is currency
carry trade? Do you have a plan to carry on a currency carry trade?
Question 4: Suppose you
observe the following exchange rates: €1 = $.7; £1 = $1.40;
and €2.20 = £1.00. Starting with $1,000,000, how can you make money?(Answer: get £ first. Your profit is
$100,000)
Question 5:
Assume you have £1000 and
bid rate is 1.60$/£ and ask rate is 1.66$/£. If you convert it to £ and then
convert it back to $, what will happen? (Answer:
$963.86 and lose $36.14. Sell low and buy high here. So sell £ at bid and buy
£ at ask )
Question 6:
Suppose you start with $100
and buy stock for £50 when the exchange rate is £1 = $2. One year later, the
stock rises to £60. You are happy with your 20 percent return on the stock,
but when you sell the stock and exchange your £60 for dollars, you find that
the pound has fallen to £1 = $1.75. What is your return to your initial
investment of $100? (Answer: 5%)
Question 7:
Baylor Bank believes the New
Zealand dollar will depreciate over the next five days from $.52 to $.5. The
following annual interest rates apply:
Currency Lending
Rate Borrowing
Rate
Dollars 5.50% 5.80%
New
Zealand dollar
(NZ$) 4.80% 5.25%
Baylor
Bank has the capacity to borrow either NZ$11 million or $5 million. If Baylor
Bank’s forecast if correct, what will its dollar profit be from speculation
over the five day period (assuming it does not use any of its existing
consumer deposits to capitalize on its expectations)? (Answer: 0.44 million NZ$ profit)
Question 9: What is USDX?
Please refer to https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/usdx.asp
Argentina faces $1.1 billion debt repayment
deadline as IMF protests simmer
By Adam
Jourdan and Miguel Lo Bianco, January 27, 2022
BUENOS
AIRES, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Argentina is
facing deadlines for nearly $1.1 billion in debt repayments to the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) by Tuesday amid uncertainty over
whether the South American country will pay and tense talks to revamp around
$40 billion in loans.
The
grains-producing country, which has been battling currency and debt crises
for years, is due to pay back $730
million to the IMF on Friday and another $365 million on Tuesday though
officials have not confirmed plans to pay.
Cabinet
Chief Juan Manzur said there was "political decisiveness and eagerness
to pay" the IMF, according to official news outlet Telam.
The IMF
did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the looming payments.
That
has hit sovereign bond prices, some of which have tumbled to below 30 cents
on the dollar. More hard-left politicians within the ruling Peronist
coalition have also started hardening their rhetoric against the IMF.
"What we are proposing is not only to stop
paying the debt and break with the IMF, but to restructure the entire economy
according to the needs of the majority," said Celeste Fierro as she
marched in the city outside the central bank building.
Fierro, like others in the march, said the
country should not pay back its IMF debts: "We believe in ... breaking
with the IMF and ignoring this debt, which is a scam."
Vilma
Ripol, another marcher, said the payments should be suspended and that
Congress should investigate the debt
to avoid a repeat of the 2001 economic crisis.
"It was a disaster in 2001 that took us
years to recover and we had paid,"
she said. "We kept paying and our society kept on going down. Enough
already."
Currency crisis of Argentina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998%E2%80%932002_Argentine_great_depression
The 2002 crisis of the Argentine peso, however,
shows that even a currency board arrangement cannot be completely safe from a
possible collapse. When
the peso was first linked to the U.S. Dollar at parity in February 1991 under
the Convertibility Law, initial economic effects were quite positive:
Argentina's chronic inflation was curtailed dramatically and foreign
investment began to pour in, leading to an economic boom. Over time, however,
the peso appreciated against the majority of currencies as the U.S. Dollar
became increasingly stronger in the second half of the 1990s. A strong peso
hurt exports from Argentina and caused a protracted economic downturn that
eventually led to the abandonment of the peso-dollar parity in 2002. This
change, in turn, caused severe economic and political distress in the
country. The unemployment rate rose above 20 percent and inflation reached a
monthly rate of about 20 percent in April 2002. In contrast, Hong Kong was
able to successfully defend its currency board arrangement during the Asian
financial crisis, a major stress test for the arrangement. Although there is
no clear consensus on the causes of the Argentine crisis, there are at least three factors that are related
to the collapse of the currency board system and ensuing economic crisis:
·
The lack of fiscal discipline
·
Labor market inflexibility
·
Contagion from the financial crises in
Russia and Brazil.
While
the currency crisis is over, the debt problem has not been completely
resolved. The government of Argentina ceased all debt payments in December
2001 in the wake of persistent recession and rising social and political
unrest. In 2004, the Argentine government made a 'final' offer amounting to a
75 percent reduction in the net present value of the debt. Foreign
bondholders rejected this offer and asked for an improved offer. In early 2005, bondholders finally agreed
to the restructuring, under which they took a cut of about 70 percent on the
value of their bond holdings.
First midterm - 2/20/2023
First Mid Term Exam Study Guide
· close book close notes
· in class exam
Multiple Choice questions
(32*2.5=80)
1. What is fixed exchange rate system? Floating? Currency board?
2. What is euroyen, Eurodollar, europound, euroeuro
3. What is Impossible Trinity
4. What is BOP? Current account? Capital account?
5. Direct quote? Indirect quote?
6. What is bid ask spread? What is bid price? Ask price? (from dealer’s perspective)
7. European central bank and monetary policy
8. USDX?
9. LIBOR? SOFR?]
Short answer questions (10*2=20
points)
$ value changes due to inflation and interest rate
changes. Draw graphs to demonstrate.
Chapter
5 Currency Derivatives
Let’s watch the following videos to
understand how the forward and future markets work.
Forward contract introduction
(video, khan academy)
Futures introduction (video, khan
academy)
For class discussion:
1.
How can forward contract and futures contract help reduce risk?
2. What is
margin? What is initial margin? What is maintenance margin? What is a margin
call? Why is margin call important to the margin account holder? When the
margin account holder receives a margin call, what shall she do? What will
happen if she takes no actions?
3. Why does
margin account value change constantly?
4. What does “mark to market” mean?
1. Difference
between the two?
Forward contract:
· Privately
negotiated;
· Non-transferable;
· customized
term;
· carried
credit default risk;
· fully
dependent on counterparty;
· Unregulated.
Future contract:
· Quoted
in public market
· Actively
traded
· Standardized
contract
· Regulated
· No
counterparty risk
(FYI)
F = forward rate
S = spot rate
r1 = simple interest rate of the term currency
r2 = simple interest rate of the base currency
T = tenor (calculated to the appropriate day count conversion)
2. Future market
Margin account and margin call
CME (Chicago Merchandise Exchange)
EURO FX PRICES for Wed, Feb 22nd, 2023
https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/E6*0/all-futures
Contract |
Last |
Change |
Open |
High |
Low |
Previous |
Volume |
Open Int |
Time |
Links |
1.13159 |
-0.00082 |
1.13230 |
1.13585 |
1.13064 |
1.13241 |
149,093 |
N/A |
10:43 CT |
||
1.13210 |
-0.00190 |
1.13315 |
1.13640 |
1.13100 |
1.13400 |
104,626 |
678,267 |
10:42 CT |
||
1.13620 |
+0.00090 |
1.13425 |
1.13670 |
1.13425 |
1.13530 |
85 |
2,793 |
07:24 CT |
||
1.13565 |
-0.00075 |
1.13590 |
1.13855 |
1.13565 |
1.13640 |
162 |
1,330 |
09:12 CT |
||
1.13610 |
-0.00160 |
1.13700 |
1.14000 |
1.13470 |
1.13770 |
1,050 |
10,179 |
10:40 CT |
||
1.13955s |
+0.00045 |
N/A |
1.13955 |
1.13955 |
1.13910 |
N/A |
N/A |
02/22/22 |
||
1.14090 |
-0.00220 |
1.14200 |
1.14200 |
1.14090 |
1.14310 |
280 |
1,817 |
10:09 CT |
||
1.14640 |
-0.00230 |
1.15015 |
1.15015 |
1.14640 |
1.14870 |
208 |
2,197 |
10:09 CT |
||
1.15405s |
+0.00085 |
0.00000 |
1.15695 |
1.15045 |
1.15320 |
5 |
72 |
02/22/22 |
||
1.15940s |
+0.00065 |
0.00000 |
1.15940 |
1.15940 |
1.15875 |
0 |
23 |
02/22/22 |
Euro Future Contract Specifications
https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/E6H19
Short
and long position and payoff
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13WxmRt75Y8
For a long position, its payoff:
Value at maturity (long position) = principal * ( spot
exchange rate at maturity – settlement price)
Value at maturity (short position) = -principal * (
spot exchange rate at maturity – settlement price)
Note: In the calculator,
principal is called contract size
The currency spot
rate is the current quoted rate that a currency, in
exchange for another currency, can be bought or sold at. The two currencies
involved are called a "pair." If an investor or hedger conducts a
trade at the currency spot rate, the exchange of currencies takes place at
the point at which the trade took place or shortly after the trade. Since
currency forward
rates are based on the currency spot rate, currency
futures tend to change as the spot rates changes”./////
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currencyfuture.asp
Exercise
1: Amber sells a March
futures contract and locks in the right to sell 500,000 Mexican pesos at
$0.10958/Ps (peso). If the spot exchange rate at maturity is $0.095/Ps, the
value of Amber’s position on settlement is?
Answer:
-500000*(0.095-0.10958)
Exercise
2: Amber purchases a March
futures contract and locks in the right to sell 500,000 Mexican pesos at
$0.10958/Ps (peso). If the spot exchange rate at maturity is $0.095/Ps, the
value of Amber’s position on settlement is?
Answer:
500000*(0.095-0.10958)
Exercise
3: Amber sells a March futures
contract and locks in the right to sell 500,000 Mexican pesos at $0.10958/Ps
(peso). If the spot exchange rate at maturity is $0.11/Ps, the value of
Amber’s position on settlement is?
Answer:
-500000*(0.11-0.10958)
Exercise
4: Amber purchases a March
futures contract and locks in the right to sell 500,000 Mexican pesos at
$0.10958/Ps (peso). If the spot exchange rate at maturity is $0.11/Ps, the
value of Amber’s position on settlement is?
Answer:
500000*(0.11-0.10958)
Exercise
3: You expect peso to depreciate
on 4/4. So you sell peso future contract (6/17) on 4/4 with future rate of
$0.09/peso. And on 6/17, the spot rate is $0.08/peso. Calculate the value of
your position on settlement
HW of
chapter 5 part I (Due with the
second mid-term)
1. Consider
a trader who opens a short futures position. The contract
size is £62,500; the maturity is six months, and the settlement price is
$1.60 = £1; At maturity, the price (spot rate) is $1.50 = £1. What is his
payoff at maturity?
(Answer: £6250)
2. Consider
a trader who opens a long futures position. The contract size is £62,500; the maturity
is six months, and the settlement price is $1.60 = £1; At maturity, the price
(spot rate) is $1.50 = £1. What is his payoff at maturity?
(Answer: -£6250)
3. Consider
a trader who opens a short futures position. The contract
size is £62,500, the maturity is six months, and the
settlement price is $1.40 = £1; At maturity, the price (spot rate) is $1.50 =
£1. What is his payoff at maturity?
(Answer:
-£6250)
4. Consider a
trader who opens a long futures position. The contract size is £62,500, the maturity
is six months, and the settlement price is $1.40 = £1; At
maturity, the price (spot rate) is $1.50 = £1. What is his payoff at maturity?
5. What is Euro
Futures contract? What is Micro Euro Futures Contract? Please refer to the
articles at
6. Watch this video and explain the following
concepts.
· What is margin account?
· What is mark to market?
· What is initial margin?
· What is maintenance margin?
· What is margin call?
· How is margin call triggered?
· What will happen after a margin call is
received?
7.
Watch
the video on Corn price made in April 2022. Do you believe that it is crucial for corn farmers to
utilize futures contracts as a risk management strategy, as discussed in the
video? What are your reasons for or against this approach?
Chicago Mercantile
Exchange (CME) (FYI)
By JAMES CHEN Updated June 20, 2021
https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/products.html#assetClass=sg-48&cleared=Options
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poRK317iMZ4
What Is the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange?
The Chicago Mercantile
Exchange (CME), colloquially known as the Chicago Merc, is an organized
exchange for the trading of futures and options. The CME trades futures, and
in most cases options, in the sectors of agriculture, energy, stock indices,
foreign exchange, interest rates, metals, real estate, and even weather.
CME was originally called the Chicago Butter and Egg Board and
was used for trading agricultural products, such as wheat and corn.
In the 1970s the CME added financial futures, followed shortly
by precious metals, Treasuries, and other assets.
In 2007, the CME merged with the Chicago Board of Trade to
create CME Group, one of the world's largest financial exchange operators.
CME Group now owns several other exchanges in different cities.
Nowadays, CME is also known for trading unusual commodities like
Bitcoin futures and weather derivatives.
Understanding the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (CME)
Founded in 1898, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange began life as
the "Chicago Butter and Egg Board" before changing its name in
1919. It was the first financial exchange to "demutualize" and
become a publicly traded, shareholder-owned corporation in 2000.
The CME launched its first futures contracts in 1961 on frozen
pork bellies. In 1969, it added financial futures and currency contracts
followed by the first interest rate, bond, and futures contracts in 1972.
Creation of CME Group
In 2007, a merger with the Chicago Board of Trade created the
CME Group, one of the largest financial exchanges in the world. In 2008, the
CME acquired NYMEX Holdings, Inc., the parent of the New York Mercantile
Exchange (NYMEX) and Commodity Exchange, Inc (COMEX). By 2010, the CME
purchased a 90% interest in the Dow Jones stock and financial indexes.
The CME grew again in 2012 with the purchase of the Kansas City
Board of Trade, the dominant player in hard red winter wheat. And in late
2017, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange began trading in Bitcoin futures.
According to the CME Group, on
average it handles 3 billion contracts worth approximately $1 quadrillion
annually. In 2021 CME Group ended open
outcry trading for most commodities, although outcry trading continues in the
Eurodollar options pit. Additionally, the CME Group operates CME Clearing, a
leading central counterparty clearing provider.
CME Futures and Risk
Management
With uncertainties always present in the world, there is a demand
that money managers and commercial entities have tools at their disposal to
hedge their risk and lock in prices that are critical for business
activities. Futures allow sellers of
the underlying commodities to know with certainty the price they will receive
for their products at the market. At the same time, it will enable consumers
or buyers of those underlying commodities to know with certainty the price
they will pay at a defined time in the future.
While these commercial entities use futures for hedging,
speculators often take the other side of the trade hoping to profit from
changes in the price of the underlying commodity. Speculators assume the risk
that the commercials hedge. A large family of futures exchanges such as the
CME Group provides a regulated, liquid, centralized forum to carry out such
business. Also, the CME Group provides settlement, clearing, and reporting
functions that allow for a smooth trading venue.
CME is one of the only regulated markets for trading in Bitcoin
futures.
CME Regulation
CME is regulated by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which oversees all commodities and
derivatives contracts in the United States. The CFTC is responsible for oversight of brokers and merchants,
conducts risk surveillance of derivatives trades, and investigates market
manipulation and other abusive trade practices. It also regulates trading in
virtual assets, such as Bitcoin.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange
vs. Chicago Board of Trade
The Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) is another Chicago-based
futures exchange, founded in 1848. The CBOT originally focused on
agricultural products, such as wheat, corn, and soybeans; it later expanded
to financial products such as gold, silver, U.S. Treasury bonds, and energy.
The CME merged with the CBOT in 2006, in a move approved by shareholders of
both organizations.
Example of Chicago Mercantile
Exchange
Most commodities can be traded anywhere, but there's one you can
only trade at the CME: weather. CME is
the only futures exchange to offer derivatives based on weather events,
allowing traders to bet on cold temperatures, sunshine, or rainfall. In
2020, the CME traded as many as 1,000 weather-related contracts per day, with
a total annual volume of over $1 billion.
(http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/fx/g10/euro-fx_contract_specifications.html)
Contract Unit |
125,000 euro |
||
Trading Hours |
Sunday - Friday 6:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. (5:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Chicago Time/CT) with a 60-minute break each day beginning at 5:00 p.m.
(4:00 p.m. CT) |
||
Minimum Price Fluctuation |
Outrights: .00005 USD per EUR increments ($6.25 USD). |
||
Product Code |
CME Globex: 6E |
||
Listed Contracts |
Contracts listed for the first 3 consecutive months and 20
months in the March quarterly cycle (Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec) |
||
Settlement Method |
Deliverable |
||
Termination Of Trading |
9:16 a.m. Central Time (CT) on the second business day immediately
preceding the third Wednesday of the contract month (usually Monday). |
||
Settlement Procedures |
Physical Delivery |
||
Position Limits |
|||
Exchange Rulebook |
|||
Block Minimum |
|||
Price Limit Or Circuit |
|||
Vendor Codes |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unM_0Vh00K4
Foreign Exchange Market
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qvrRRTBYAk
Bearish option strategies example onoptionhouse
Option Strategy graphs
Future Trading Guide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jA7c1_Jtvg
How to Trade Euro FX Futures & Options
https://insigniafutures.com/learn-to-trade-euro-fx-futures/
What
is a commodity futures contract?
A
commodity futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a particular
commodity at a future date. The price and the amount of the commodity are fixed at the time of
the agreement (purchase / sale). Similar to trading stocks, commodity futures
contracts trade on regulated futures exchanges such as the CME
(Chicago Mercantile Exchange) or the ICE (Intercontinental Exchange).
These contracts typically can be bought and sold throughout the duration of
the contract. The majority of commodity futures contracts are liquidated
prior to the delivery / expiration date.
A
commodity futures option gives the purchaser the right to buy or sell a
particular futures contract at a future date for a particular price. These
contracts can also be bought and sold throughout the duration of the
contract’s term.
The Futures Contract:
Euro
FX futures – ticker symbol: 6E.
The
Euro Currency, known, as Euro FX futures and options, allow you to take
positions on the value of the euro currency versus the U.S. dollar. These
deep and liquid currency contracts grant traders wide exposure to the economy
of the Eurozone, a monetary union of
19 of the 28 European Union member states which have adopted the euro as
their common currency.
The Eurozone ranks as the fourth largest trading partner of U.S.
Euro FX futures and options are valuable tools for gaining or hedging
exposure to the euro as well as managing exposures to the U.S. dollar. Given
the importance of these two currencies in the world economy, you can see
increased activity in times of global market volatility driven by interest
rate changes, inflation announcements and other monetary policy changes as
well as payroll, unemployment and geopolitical events.
All futures & options contracts have symbols which are used to
identify the contracts you wish to trade. For the Euro FX the root symbols
are…
Futures: 6E
Options: EUU
As these are ‘futures’ contracts, there will be contracts
available to trade with different months & years. Many traders will choose to trade the
most active month, also known as the “front” month, as this will typically be
the contract with the most trading volume.
When
placing an order, you will identify the exact contract you wish to trade by
appending the month and year codes to the root symbol. For example, if you wish to trade a
September 2020 Euro FX futures contract, the full symbol will be: 6E.U20
In this example, 6E is the root symbol (a period is then
inserted), U is the month code for September and 20 is the last two digits of
the contract year. A period is always used between the root symbol and
the month/year code.
Trade Entry:
When trading futures and options, you can either go long (buy) if you
think prices will rise or go short (sell) if you think prices will drop.
To enter a futures contract trade, we will enter the following
information into the trading platform.
• Number of contracts to be traded
• Trade direction – Buy 0r Sell
• Exact contract symbol – i.e. 6E.U20
• Order Type: Market, Limit or Stop
• Order Price (if Limit or Stop order)
• Order Duration: Day (current trading session) or GTC (Good Till
Canceled)
Once your order has been entered, our trading platform will give you
a ticket number for the order as well as a notification when the order gets
filled. If/when the order is executed, you will then have either a long or
short position depending on the Trade Direction you chose. You can modify or cancel any working order
prior to it being filled or expiring.
Determining
Profit or Loss:
The Euro FX futures contract trades in 0.00005 point increments. As
each contract is equal to 125,000 Euros, a 0.00005 price move equates to
$6.25 (0.00005 x 125,000). If Euro FX prices were to move up or down .00200
points, that would equate to $250.00 +/-.
For this example, let’s assume you went long (bought) one (1)
September 2020 Euro FX futures contract at a price of 1.12750. If Sep’20 Euro
FX futures prices were to rise to 1.13085, that would be a 0.00335 point gain
or $418.75 (.00335 x 125,000). Conversely, if the Sep’20 Euro FX price
dropped to 1.12410, that would be a 0.0034 point loss or $425 (0.0034 x 125,000).
Margin Requirements:
How
much money do I need to trade?
When
trading commodity futures contracts, the futures exchanges will set what are
called Margin Requirements for each commodity. Margins in futures trading is NOT similar to
margins in stock/equity trading. Think of margin requirements as a
performance bond. The dollar amount you must have available in your account
in order to trade one particular commodity futures contract. To view the
current, initial margin requirements for the Euro FX (or any other major
futures contract), please visit our Margin Requirements web page. You’ll find
the margin requirement for this contract under the ‘Currencies’ section of
the table.
Micro Euro Currency Futures Contract
https://insigniafutures.com/micro-euro-currency-futures/
At 1/10 the
size of the full Euro FX futures contract, the Micro Euro Currency futures
contract can be used for gaining or hedging exposure to
the euro as well as managing exposures to the U.S. dollar. Given the importance of these two
currencies in the world economy, you can see increased activity in times of
global market volatility driven by interest rate changes, inflation announcements
and other monetary policy changes as well as payroll, unemployment and
geopolitical events.
How Risky Are Futures? (FYI)
By THE INVESTOPEDIA TEAM Updated July 13, 2022 Reviewed by JEFREDA R.
BROWN
Futures
are financial derivatives—contracts that allow for the delivery of some
underlying asset in the future, but with a price determined today in the
market. While they are
classified as financial derivatives, that does not inherently make them more
or less risky than other types of financial instruments. Indeed, futures
can be very risky since they allow speculative positions to be taken with a
generous amount of leverage.
But, futures can also be used to hedge, thus reducing somebody's
overall exposure to risk. Here we consider both sides of the risk coin with
respect to trading futures.
KEY
TAKEAWAYS
·
A futures contract is an arrangement between two
parties to buy or sell an asset at a particular time in the future for a
particular price.
·
The intended reason that companies or investors
use future contracts is as a hedge to offset their risk exposures and limit
themselves from any fluctuations in price.
·
Because futures traders can take advantage of far
greater leverage than the underlying assets in many cases, speculators can
actually face increased risk and margin calls that magnify losses.
What Are Futures?
Futures, in and of themselves, are not any riskier than other types
of investments, such as owning equities, bonds, or currencies. That is because
futures prices depend on the prices of those underlying assets, whether it is
futures on stocks, bonds, or currencies.
Trading
the S&P 500 index futures contract cannot be said to be substantially riskier
than investing a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the same index, or by owning
the individual stocks that make up the index.
Moreover, futures tend to be highly liquid. For instance, the
U.S. Treasury bond futures contract is one of the most heavily traded
investment assets in the world.
As with any similar
investment, such as stocks, the price of a futures contract may go up or
down. Like equity investments, they do carry more risk than guaranteed,
fixed-income investments. However, the actual practice of trading futures
is considered by many to be riskier than equity trading because of the
leverage involved in futures trading.
Hedging Equals Less Risk
Futures contracts were initially invented and popularized as a way for
agricultural producers and consumers to hedge commodities such as wheat,
corn, and livestock.
A hedge is an investment made
to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in another asset. Normally, a
hedge consists of taking an offsetting position in a related security—and so
futures contracts on corn, for example, could be sold by a farmer at the time
that he plants his seed. When harvest time comes, the farmer can then sell
his physical corn and buy back the futures contract.
This strategy is known as a forward hedge, and effectively locks in
the farmer's selling price for his corn at the time he plants it—it doesn't
matter if the price of corn rises or falls in the interim, the farmer has
locked in a price and therefore can predict his profit margin without worry.
Likewise, when a company knows that it will be making a purchase in
the future for a particular item, it should take a long position in a futures
contract to hedge its position.
For example, suppose that Company X knows that in six months it will
have to buy 20,000 ounces of silver to fulfill an order. Assume the spot
price for silver is $12/ounce and the six-month futures price is $11/ounce.
By buying the futures contract, Company X can lock in a price of $11/ounce.
This reduces the company's risk because it will be able to close its futures
position and buy 20,000 ounces of silver for $11/ounce in six months.
Futures
contracts can be very useful in limiting the risk exposure that an investor
has in a trade. Just like the farmer
or company above, an investor with a portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other
assets can use financial futures to hedge against a drop in the market. The
main advantage of participating in a futures contract is that it removes the
uncertainty about the future price of an asset. By locking in a price for
which you are able to buy or sell a particular item, companies are able to
eliminate the ambiguity having to do with expected expenses and profits.
Leverage Equals More Risk
Leverage is the ability to margin investments with an investment of
only a portion of their total value. The maximum leverage available in
purchasing stocks is generally no more than 50%.
Futures trading, however,
offers much greater leverage—up to 90% to 95%. This means that a trader can
invest in a futures contract by putting up only 10% of the actual value of
the contract. The leverage magnifies the effect of any price changes in
such a way that even relatively small changes in price can represent
substantial profits or losses. Therefore, a relatively small drop in the
price could lead to a margin call or forced liquidation of the position.
Because
of the leverage used in futures trading, it is possible to sustain losses
greater than one's original investment. Conversely, it is also possible to realize
very large profits. Again, it is not that the actual asset a trader is
investing in carries more inherent risk; the additional risk comes from the
nature and process of how futures contracts are traded.
To handle the additional leverage wisely, futures traders have to
practice superior money management by using prudent stop-loss orders to limit
potential losses. Good futures traders are careful not to over-margin
themselves, but instead to maintain enough free, uncommitted investment
capital to cover draw-downs in their total equity. Trading futures contracts
requires more trading skill and hands-on management than traditional equity
investing.
Chapter 5 Part II
Currency Option market
NASDAQ OMX PHLX (Philadelphia Stock Exchange)
trades more than 2,600 equity options, sector index options and U.S.
dollar-settled options on major currencies. PHLX offers a combination of
cutting-edge electronic and floor-based options trading.
Nasdaq: http://www.nasdaq.com/includes/swiss-franc-specifications.stm
1. What is Call and put
option? Difference between the two?
American call option (video, khan academy)
American put option (video, khan academy)
Call payoff diagram (video, khan academy)
Put payoff diagram (video, khan academy)
For
discussion:
·
When shall you consider a call
option?
·
When shall you buy a put
option?
·
Can you draw a call payoff
diagram?
·
What about a put payoff
diagram?
2. Calculate the payoff for
both call and put?
· For call: Profit = Spot rate – strike
price – premium; if option is exercised (when spot rate > strike price)
Or, Profit
= -premium, if option is not exercised (expired when spot
rate < strike
price)
In general, profit = max((spot rate – strike price -
premium), -premium ) ---------- Excel syntax
Excel payoff diagram for
call and put options (very helpful)
(Thanks to Dr. Greene http://www2.gsu.edu/~fncjtg/Fi8000/dnldpayoff.htm)
Calculator of Call and
Put Option
Example: Jim is a speculator . He buys a British pound
call option with a strike of $1.4 and a December settlement date. Current
spot price as of that date is $1.39. He pays a premium of $0.12 per unit for
the call option. Just before the expiration date, the spot rate of the
British pound is $1.41.At that time, he exercises the call option and
sells the pounds at the spot rate to a bank. One option contract specifies
31,250 units. What is Jim’s profit or loss? Assume Linda is the seller of the
call option. What is Linda’s profit or loss?
(refer to ppt. Answer:
Spot rate is
$1.39, Jim’s total profit: -0.12*31250
Spot rate is
$1.41, Jim’s total profit: (1.41-1.4-0.12)*31250=(-0.11)*31250
Spot rate is
$1.39, Linda’s total profit: 0.12*31250
Spot rate is $1.41,
Linda’s total profit: -((1.41-1.4-0.12)*31250)=0.11*31250
*** the loss
of taking the long position of the option is just the gain of taking the
short position. It is a zero sum game.
· For put: Profit = strike price - Spot rate –
premium, if option is exercised (when spot rate < strike price)
Or, Profit =
-premium, if option is not exercised (expired when spot
rate > strike price)
In general, profit = max((strike price - spot rate - premium),
-premium ) ---------- Excel syntax
Example A speculator bought a put
option (Put premium on £ = $0.04 / unit, X=$1.4, One contract specifies
£31,250 )
He exercise the option shortly
before expiration, when the spot rate of the pound was $1.30. What is his
profit? What is the profit of the seller? (refer to ppt) When spot rate was $1.5, what are the profits of
seller and buyer?
Answer:
Spot rate is
$1.30, option buyer’s total profit: (1.4 - 1.3 – 0.04) *31250
Spot rate is
$1.50, option buyer’s total profit: -0.04*31250
Spot rate is $1.30,
option seller’s total profit: -(1.4 - 1.3 – 0.04) *31250
Spot rate is
$1.50, option seller’s total profit: 0.04*31250
*** the loss
of taking the long position of the option is just the gain of taking the
short position. It is a zero sum game.
www.jufinance.com/option_diagram
HW
Chapter 5 Part II (Due with the
second mid term exam)
4. You purchase a put option
on Swiss francs for a premium of $.05, with an exercise price of $.50. The option
will not be exercised until the expiration date, if at all. If the spot rate
on the expiration date is $.58, how
much is the payoff of this long option? And your profit? (And also, please
draw the payoff diagram to both the long and short put option holders,
optional, for extra credits. www.jufinance.com/option_diagram).
(Answer: -$0.05; 0)
5. Optional assignment for critical thinking: Set up a
practice account at https://www.cmegroup.com/education/practice.html
and click on the “trading simulator” to start trading on the future market.
Choose a specific future contract, such as euro future contract expired in March,
and you can start the game.
Chapter 7 International Arbitrage And
Interest Rate Parity
Summary of current interest rates of a large
number of central banks
https://www.global-rates.com/en/interest-rates/central-banks/central-banks.aspx
|
|
|
COUNTRY |
DEPOSIT
INTEREST RATE |
INFLATION
RATE |
DIFFERENCE |
Zimbabwe |
92% |
269% |
-177% |
Argentina |
70.07% |
83% |
-12.93% |
Venezuela |
36% |
114% |
-78% |
Moldova |
19.5% |
33.97% |
14.47% |
Uzbekistan |
17.9% |
12.2% |
5.7% |
Madagascar |
13.75% |
9.31% |
4.44% |
Hungary |
12.5% |
20.1% |
-7.6% |
Georgia |
11.81% |
11.5% |
0.31% |
Uganda |
10.05% |
10% |
0.05% |
Brazil |
10.03% |
7.17% |
2.86% |
Egypt |
9.1% |
15% |
-5.9% |
Source: Trading Economics
https://www.gobankingrates.com/banking/which-country-interest-rates/
For class
discussion:
·
Why not invest in the above countries for higher interest rates?
(hint: Interest rate levels determined by the supply and demand of credit: an increase in the demand for money or credit will raise
interest rates)
·
For US residents, how can you make profits from
currency carry trades?
·
How can a country’s real interest rate be as
high as over 150%? Shall you consider investing in that country?
Zimbabwe’s Interest Rates
Zimbabwe's central bank cut its policy rate
by 50 bps to 150% on February 2nd, 2023, saying monthly inflation has been trending
down since the last quarter of 2022. Consumer prices went up 1.1% from a
month earlier in January, easing from a 2.4% rise in December, prompting the
annual rate to ease to 229.8% from 243.8%. The central bank added that its
tight monetary policy stance will continue. source: Reserve Bank of
Zimbabwe
Argentina’s Interest Rates
Argentina's central bank maintained its
benchmark interest rate at 75% in its February meeting, as annual inflation
runs near 100%. source: Central Bank of Argentina
Venezuela Interest Rate https://tradingeconomics.com/venezuela/interest-rate
Calendar |
GMT |
Reference |
Actual |
Previous |
Consensus |
TEForecast |
|
2022-06-16 |
01:30 PM |
52% |
49% |
||||
2022-08-11 |
05:40 PM |
69.5% |
60% |
||||
2023-02-16 |
06:30 PM |
75% |
75% |
75.0% |
The Central Bank of Venezuela (Banco Central de Venezuela,
BCV) is not responsible for setting interest rates.
For class discussion:
How come the interest rates went up in Argentina in 2023, and is this
development positive for the country's inhabitants?
Part 1 of
chapter 7: Currency carry trade
What is a Currency Carry Trade
A
currency carry trade is a strategy in which an investor sells a certain
currency with a relatively
low
interest rate and uses the funds to purchase a different currency yielding a
higher interest rate.
A
trader using this strategy attempts to capture the difference between the
rates, which can often
be
substantial, depending on the amount of the leverage used.
Japan
Interest Rate
By
Bill Camarda @ https://www.americanexpress.com/us/foreign-exchange/articles/yen-carry-trade-role-in-recession/
Abstract:
As the global financial crisis of 2007-2008
unfolded, triggering Herculean efforts by central banks to stabilize
financial markets through aggressive monetary and fiscal stimuli, some
observers pointed to the yen carry
trade as a key driver of the bubble that led up to the crisis – and a contributor that helped deepen the crisis as the
trades unwound.
A decade later, the yen carry trade appears to
be undergoing a revival, as the interest rate spreads between the U.S. and
Japan are widening again. It's worth considering the yen carry trade's
role in the Great Recession, why it happened, and any lessons that emerge
from that episode of economic history.
What is the Yen Carry Trade?
Carry trades involve borrowing in currencies with
low interest rates and investing the proceeds in currencies where interest
rates are higher, thereby earning relatively easy profits. The "Law of One
Price" economic theory predicts that the profit opportunities from price
differences of this kind should quickly disappear, as arbitrage rebalances
the prices of assets across markets. But carry trade opportunities have
often lingered, offering sustained opportunities for profit, and a growing
body of academic research now helps to explain that persistence.
For nearly two decades before
the global financial crisis, the yen-dollar carry trade was often among the
most prominent carry trades. It grew because the Bank of Japan kept interest
rates extremely low from the mid-1990s onward in an attempt to reignite
Japan's stagnant economy, while the U.S. Federal Reserve generally
maintained higher interest rates. The
spread between Japanese and U.S. interest rates encouraged many foreign
exchange traders to sell yen they had borrowed at low rates and buy dollars
they could lend at higher rates.
When the Fed started to raise
interest rates in the mid-2000s, the widening spread between U.S. and
Japanese rates triggered a sudden increase in the yen-dollar carry
trade. The trade grew rapidly in
the run-up to the global financial crisis, as even individual currency
traders joined hedge funds, banks, and other financial institutions in
pursuit of higher returns.
How Did the Yen Carry Trade Affect the Global
Financial Crisis?
From 2004-2007, rapid growth
in yen carry trades made far more dollars available for investment in the
U.S. While some of this money was invested in U.S. Treasury bonds, much of it
found its way into higher-yielding assets such as collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs) and U.S. subprime residential mortgage backed securities
(RMBS) – assets whose prices collapsed in 2007-8.
As the bubble burst and the Great Recession
began, the Fed dropped interest rates precipitously, eliminating the differences
in rates between Japan and the U.S.; the basis for the yen carry trade
disappeared. Yen carry trades quickly unwound, reducing dollar liquidity.
Japanese investors, and yen-leveraged American and European investors, sold
RMBSes, CDOs and other diverse assets and debt, purchasing dollars which they
then sold for yen. This contributed to the collapse of those assets' prices,
which in turn added to an extraordinary demand for dollars. The Fed responded by
undertaking aggressive quantitative easing – i.e., pouring new dollars into
the economy.
The yen carry trade had worked when the
yen-dollar exchange rate was relatively stable, or when the yen declined
against the dollar – as
it did by roughly 20 percent from 2004-2008. But in the wake of Lehman Brothers'
September 2008 collapse, the yen rose rapidly along with USD while most other
currencies fell by comparison. Japanese investors sold risky
dollar-denominated assets and bought yen with the proceeds, pushing the yen
up vs. the dollar. American investors who had borrowed in cheaper yen to fund
dollar-denominated investments faced rising FX costs in carrying their yen
loans. They rushed to sell dollars (and other currencies) to buy yen they
could use to repay their yen loans, pushing the yen exchange rate even
higher. These events contributed significantly to the volatility then roiling
currency markets.
What's Happened Since
A few years after the global financial crisis,
Japan's expansionary economic policies contributed to a re-emergence of the
yen carry trade, as the yen's value dropped by 26 percent and significant
differences between U.S. and Japanese interest rates reappeared. Yen
carry trades increased by 70 percent between 2010 and 2013. However, by
early 2018, yen carry trade strategies had racked up four straight quarters
of losses. The outlook for the yen carry trade seemed poor: the yen was
rising against other currencies, traders expected the Bank of Japan to
tighten the reins on economic growth and raise interest rates, and traders anticipated
higher volatility in connection with growing international trade frictions.
But in August 2018, the Bank
of Japan announced that it would keep interest rates extremely low for an
indefinite period. Observers noted that the Fed had already raised interest
rates several times, and was projecting five rate hikes through the end of
2019. Meanwhile, in the second quarter of 2018, Bloomberg found
borrowing yen to purchase dollar assets earned investors an exceptionally
attractive return of 4.9 percent, taking into account fluctuations in
exchange rates, levels of interest, and the funding costs.
It isn't yet clear how long
the recent revival of the yen carry trade will be sustained. Historically,
the yen has often been viewed as a safe haven currency. If increased
volatility drives FX traders to safety, the yen's value could rise, making
the carry trade less profitable.
But if the yen carry trade
does keep growing, it could again impact exchange and interest
rates. When spreads between interest rates widen, traders inevitably
seek to take advantage of them. The experience of 2007-2008 teaches that this
can lead to market distortions and even bubbles.
Homework chapter 7-1 (Due with second
mid term exam)
1. What are the risks and awards associated with
currency carry trade?
2. The
interest rate in Argentina has reached 75% this year. Do you suggest engaging
in currency carry trade with Argentina? Why or why not? Please refer to the following
video. What is suggested by the host? Do you think that his strategy will
work? Why or why not?
how
to do the carry trade. (VIDEO, BY Robert Booker)
3.
Would you recommend the currency carry trade strategy to your friends
who are US investors? If so, which currency pair would you recommend that has
a strong and reliable currency and a high interest rate in the country?
Published Feb 15, 2023 • 2 minute read
Argentina’s central bank is set to hold its benchmark interest rate
steady at 75% this week despite inflation gaining pace once more, but hopes
of a potential rate cut early this year are fading as prices heat up, bank
sources told Reuters.
The South American country hiked rates through most of last year. It
put the breaks on monetary tightening in October, and has since left the
benchmark rate unchanged on hopes that inflation, running near 100% annually,
was cooling.
Although
monthly inflation has ticked up since December, the central bank is not
expected to make a new hike. Consumer prices rose 6% in January and inflation
clocked in at 99% on an annual basis, the government said on Tuesday.
An official central bank source said a rate hike debate was not
expected to be “on the agenda” ahead of the board’s weekly meeting on
Thursday. The bank normally makes rate decisions mid-month, though these can
come at other times.
A central bank adviser told Reuters on condition of anonymity that
the rate was unlikely to be raised or lowered this month.
A period of slowing inflation in the second half of last year had
seeded hopes that there could be a cut in early 2023.
“At the end of last year it was thought that inflation would decrease
slowly and for this reason a possible drop in rates was even analyzed, but
now the reality has changed and it does not seem appropriate to make monetary
changes,” the person said.
Analysts agreed a hike was
unlikely.
“It should be held steady given that the nominal annual monetary
policy rate of 75% is consistent with inflation of almost 6.3% per month,”
said Roberto Geretto at Argentina investment fund Fundcorp.
“Even if it goes slightly above this number, there would be no great
pressure from that side to raise (rates).”
Mauro Mazza of Bull Market Brokers said he expected the bank to leave
both the benchmark ‘Leliq’ rate and repo rates steady. He flagged worries
about rising Treasury issuance, with the government raising the rates it
offered to roll over debt.
Argentina holds elections in October, with the embattled Peronist
ruling coalition fighting to avoid defeat by the conservative opposition,
which leads in the polls with voters worried about inflation and economic
malaise.
The
government might walk a fine line between tamping down inflation and
supporting growth, said Gustavo Ber from
the consulting firm Estudio Ber.
“It is an election year, and all decisions will be short-term,” he
said. “It seems unlikely the BCRA (central bank) will move the rate now.”
(Reporting by Jorge Otaola; Editing by Adam Jourdan and David
Gregorio)
Chapter 7 Part II Interest Rate Parity
In class exercises
1. Locational arbitrage
Exercise 1: Bank1
–
bid Bank1-ask Bank2-bid
Bank2-ask
£ in $: $1.60 $1.61 $1.62 $1.63
How can you arbitrage?
Answer: Buy pound at bank1’s ask price and sell pound at bank2’s
bid price. Profit is $0.01/pound
For instance, with $1,610, you can buy £
at bank 1 @ $1.61/£ and get back £1,000.
Then, you can sell £ at bank 2 @ $1.62/£
and get back $1,620, and make a profit of $10.
Pound is cheaper in bank 1 but more
expensive in bank 2. Therefore, you can arbitrage.
Hint: Always buy from dealer at ask
price, and sell to dealer at bid price.
Bank1
–
bid Bank1-ask Bank2-bid
Bank2-ask
£ in
$: $1.6 $1.61 $1.61 $1.62
How can you arbitrage?
(Answer: Buy pound at bank1’s ask price and sell pound at
bank2’s bid price. No Profit )
For instance, with $1,610, you can buy £
at bank 1 @ $1.61/£ and get back £1,000.
Then, you can sell £ at bank 2 @ $1.61/£
and get back $1,610, and make a profit of $0.
Pound is cheaper in bank 1 but more
expensive in bank 2. However, there is a bid ask spread, or fees charged by
dealers. So no arbitrage opportunities.)
Hint: Always buy from dealer at ask
price, and sell to dealer at bid price.
Exercise 2: If you start with $10,000 and conduct one round
transaction, how many $ will you end up with ?
(Answer: ($10000
/ 0.64($/NZ$)) – the amount obtained from north bank.
($10000 / 0.64($/NZ$)) * 0.645
($/NZ$) = $10078.13)
Hint: Always buy from dealer at ask
price, and sell to dealer at bid price.
2. Triangular arbitrage
Exercise 1: £ is quoted at $1.60. Malaysian Rinnggit (MYR)
is quoted at $0.20 and the cross exchange rate is £1 = MYR 8.1. How can you
arbitrage?
Answer: Either $ è MYR è £ è $, or $ è £ è MYR è $, one way or another, you should make money. In this
case, it is the latter one. Imagine you have $1,600 è 1,000
Approach one: Yes, $ è GBP è MYR è $ could make a profit of $20.
Approach two: No, $ è MYR è GBP è $ does not work.
Exercise 2:
How can you arbitrage with the above
information?
Answer:
Approach 1: Yes. Same as above but
sell at bid and buy at ask. Only two rounds: USDà GBPàMYR, or, USD àMYRàGBP. One way make money and the other one lose
money. We start with $1,610 è buy
GBP at ask price, so get 1,000 GBP è sell GBP
for rinngit @ 1 GBP = 8.1 MYR; so get
8,100 MYR è sell Rinngit for
$ @ bid price. 8,100 MYR = 8,100 * 0.20 = $1,620, a
profit of $10 out of $1,610 initial investment.
The other round is: 1,610$ è 8,009.95 MYR (=1,610/0.201) è976.8GBP (=1,610/0.201/8.2) è 1,562.9 USD (=1,610/0.201/8.2*1.6) è a loss of 47.1 USD, so not a good deal
Approach 2: No, it does not work.
3. Covered Interest Arbitrage (CIA):
Covered interest
arbitrage is a financial strategy that involves taking advantage of
differences in interest rates between two countries to make a profit. The goal
of covered interest arbitrage is to exploit the difference between the
interest rate in the country where the investor borrows funds and the
interest rate in the country where the investor will invest those funds.
Here's how it works:
·
The investor borrows money in a country where interest
rates are lower than in another country.
·
The investor then converts the borrowed funds into the
currency of the country where they want to invest.
·
The investor then invests the borrowed funds in that
country's financial markets, such as buying bonds or depositing the funds in
a bank account.
·
The investor also enters into a forward contract to sell
the invested funds at a predetermined exchange rate and date, which will
cover the borrowed funds plus interest.
·
When the forward contract matures, the investor repays the
borrowed funds plus interest and receives the proceeds from the investment.
The profit
comes from the difference between the interest rate earned on the invested
funds and the interest rate paid on the borrowed funds, minus any costs
associated with the transaction. This strategy is called "covered"
because the investor has hedged their foreign exchange risk by entering into
a forward contract.
Exercise 1: Assume you have $800,000 to invest.
Current spot rate of pound is $1.60. 90 day forward rate of pound is $1.60.
90 day interest rate in US is 2%. 90 day interest rate in UK is
4%. How can you arbitrage?
Answer: Convert at spot rate for pound and then deposit pound in UK
bank. 90 days later, convert back to $ at forward rate. Refer to the above
graph for details)
Exercise 2: You have $100,000 to invest for one year.
How can you benefit from engaging in CIA?
Answer: Again, buy at ask and sell at bid. Convert at
spot rate for pound and then deposit pound in European bank. One year later,
convert back to $ at forward rate. ($100,000 / 1.13)*(1+6.5%) *1.12 =
$105,558. However, if keep the money in US, you can get $100,000*(1+6%) =
$106,000 So better to deposit in US and do not participate in CIA)
Interest rate parity (IRP)
· The interest rate parity implies that the
expected return on domestic assets = the exchanged rate adjusted expected
return on foreign currency assets.
IRP is based on that “Investors cannot earn
arbitrage profits” by
For discussion:
Assume the current spot rate of GBP is 1.5$/£. Interest rate in US is 5% and Interest rate
is UK is 10%. Shall you invest in US for 5% or shall you invest in UK for a
higher return?
***Answer***: It should make no difference at all! Please
explain.
Invest in US, return = 5%. Invest in UK,
return = 5% as well. Why?
You can borrow at 5% in US, then convert
to GBP at 1.5$/GBP, then deposit in US for 10%, convert back to $ at the
forward rate, and this forward rate would be 1.4318$/GBP, then your return
would be 5%.
$1500 è 1000 GBP è1100 GBP one year later è 1100 GBP * (1.4318$/GBP) =$1574.98, we start from
$1500, and 1574.98/1500-1 = 5% of return
Forward
rate = 1.4318 $/GBP. Why?
The
returns for either approach should both equal to 5%.
So
invest in US, by the end of the year, the account value = $1500 *(1+5%)
Invest
in UK, 1000 GBP *(1+10%) * Forward rate
Both
investments should provide the same returns to investors, since the financial
market is efficient è
no arbitrage opportunity
$1500
*(1+5%) =1000 GBP *(1+10%) * Forward rate è
Forward rate = $1500 *(1+5%) / 1000 GBP *(1+10%) = 1.4318$/GBP
Equation of IRP:
or
S$/¥:
spot rate how many $ per ¥. ¥ is the base currency and $ is quoted currency
F$/¥:
forward rate;
So, F = S
*(1+ interest rate of quoted currency) / (1+ interest rate of base currency)
Why?
Deposit in ¥
@ the ¥’s rate and then convert back to F (forward rate)
= Convert to $ at spot rate and deposit at
$’s rate
So, (1+rate¥)*F
= S* (1+rate$) è F = S*
(1+rate$) /((1+rate¥)
Or,
S¥/$:
spot rate how many ¥ per $. ¥ is the base $ quoted
F¥/$:
forward rate;
So, F = S
*(1+ interest rate of quoted currency) / (1+ interest rate of base currency)
Why?
Deposit in $
@ the $’s rate and then convert back to F (forward rate)
= Convert to ¥ at spot rate and deposit at
¥’s rate
So, (1+rate$)*F
= S* (1+rate¥) è F = S*
(1+rate¥) /((1+rate$)
Or,
The basic equation for
calculating forward rates with the U.S. dollar as the base currency is:
Forward Rate = Spot Rate * [(1 +
Interest Rate of quoted currency) / (1 + Interest Rate of based
currency)]
Spot rate:
¥/$, or USD/YEN (Yen is quoted and $ is based)
Or,
Forward Rate = Spot
Rate * ( Interest Rate of quoted
currency - Interest Rate of based currency +1 )
Implications of IRP Theory
·
If IRP theory holds, then it can negate the possibility of
arbitrage. It means that even if investors invest in domestic or foreign
currency, the ROI will be the same as if the investor had originally invested
in the domestic currency.
·
When domestic interest rate is below foreign interest
rates, the foreign currency must trade at a forward discount. This is
applicable for prevention of foreign currency arbitrage.
·
If a foreign currency does not have a forward discount or
when the forward discount is not large enough to offset the interest rate
advantage, arbitrage opportunity is available for the domestic investors. So,
domestic investors can sometimes benefit from foreign investment.
·
When domestic rates exceed foreign interest rates, the
foreign currency must trade at a forward premium. This is again to offset
prevention of domestic country arbitrage.
·
When the foreign currency does not have a forward premium
or when the forward premium is not large enough to nullify the domestic
country advantage, an arbitrage opportunity will be available for the foreign
investors. So, the foreign investors can gain profit by investing in the
domestic market.
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/international_finance/interest_rate_parity_model.htm
Exercise 1: i$ is
8%; iSF is 4%; If spot rate S
=0.68 $/SF, then how much is F90 (90 day forward rate)?
Answer:
S =0.68 $/SF è CHF/USD = 0.68, so CHF is base currency
and USD is the quoted currency.
So, F = 0.68*(1+8%/4) / (1+4%/4) = 0.6867
$/CHF (or CHF/USD = 0.6867)
Exercise 2: i$ is
8%; iyen is 4%; If spot rate S =
0.0094 $/YEN, then how much is F180 (180 day forward rate)?
Answer:
S = 0.0094 $/YEN, so $ is the quoted
currency, Yen is the base currency.
F = S *(1+
interest rate of quoted currency) / (1+ interest rate of base)è F=0.0094*(1+8%/2)/(1+4%/2) = 0.0096 $/YEN
Exercise 3: i$ is 4% and i£ is
2%. S is $1.5/£ and F is $2/£. Does IRP hold? How can you arbitrage? What is
the forward rate in equilibrium?
Answer:
S = $1.5/£, so $ is the quoted currency,
£ is the base currency.
F = S *(1+
interest rate of quoted currency) / (1+ interest rate of base)è F=(1.04/1.02)*1.5 = $1.529/£, F at $2/£
is too high.
When F=$2/£, what can US investors do to make arbitrage profits?
For example, US investor
·
can borrow 1,000 $, and pay back
$1,040 a year later.
·
Convert to £ now at spot rate and get $1,000/1.5$/£ = 666.67 £
·
deposit in UK @ 2%
·
so one year later, get back
666.67 £*(1+2%)=680£
·
convert to $ at F rate
·
so get back 680 £ * 2$/£ =
$1,360
·
So the investor can make a
profit of 1,360 -1040 = $320 profit.
The forward rate is set too high. It
should be set around $1.529/£, so that the arbitrage opportunity will be
eliminated.
Exercise 4: i$ is 2%
and i£ is 4%. S is $1.5/£ and F is $1.1/£.
Does IRP hold? How can you arbitrage? What is the forward rate in equilibrium?
Answer:
S = $1.5/£, so $ is the quoted currency,
£ is the base currency.
F = S *(1+
interest rate of quoted currency) / (1+ interest rate of base)è F=(1.02/1.04)*1.5 = $1.471/£, so F at
$1.1/£ is too low.
When F=$1.1/£, what can US investors do to make arbitrage profits?
For example, US investor
·
can borrow 1,000 $, and pay back
$1,040 a year later.
·
Convert to £ now at spot rate and get $1,000/1.5$/£ = 666.67 £
·
deposit in UK @ 4%
·
so one year later, get back
666.67 £*(1+4%)=693.33£
·
convert to $ at F rate
·
so get back 680 £ * 1.1$/£ =
$762.67
·
So the investor will lose
money: $762.67 -1040 = -247.33, a loss.
The forward rate is set too low. It
should be set around $1.471/£.
SO US investors should let this CIA (covered
interest rate arbitrage) go, but UK investor could consider borrow money in
UK to generate risk free profits. So the trade by UK investors will force
forward rate to drop to its equilibrium price based on IRP.
Rule of Thumb:
· All that is required to make a covered
interest arbitrage profit is for interest rate parity not to hold.
· The key to determining whether to start
CIA is to compare the differences in interest rate to the forward premium
(=
F/S-1, or =forward rate / spot rate -1).
Spot exchange rate |
S($/£) |
= |
$2.0000/£ |
360-day forward rate |
F360($/£) |
= |
$2.0100/£ |
U.S. discount rate |
i$ |
= |
3.00% |
British discount rate |
i£ |
= |
2.5% |
1. With above information and $1,000 in hand,
any opportunities?
2. When F360($/£)
= $2.50/£?
3. When F360($/£)
= $1.90/£
Answer:
1.
Either
CIA make 3% or deposit in US also 3%. F is priced correctly.
2.
F
is too high for US residents. So US investors can take advantage of this high
Forward rate; borrow at local rate and trade in FX market
3. F is too low. So UK investors
can borrow at local rate and trade in FX market.
Homework chapter 7-2 (due with
final)
1. Suppose that
the one-year interest rate is 5.0 percent in the United States and 3.5
percent in Germany, and the one-year forward exchange rate is $1.3/€. What
must the spot exchange rate be? (Hint: the question is asking for the
spot rate, given forward rate. ~~ $1.2814/€ ~~)
2. Imagine that can
borrow either $1,000,000 or €800,000 for one year. The one-year interest rate
in the U.S. is i$ = 2%
and in the euro zone the one-year interest rate is i€ =
6%. The one-year forward exchange rate is $1.20 = €1.00; what must the spot
rate be to eliminate arbitrage opportunities? (1.2471$/€. It does not
matter whether you borrow $ or euro)
3. Image that the future
contracts with a value of €10,000 are available. The
information of one year interest rates, spot rate and forward rate available
are as follows.
Question: profits that you
can make with one contract at maturity?
Exchange
rate Interest
rate APR
So($/€) $1.45=€1.00 Interest
rate of $ 4%
F360($/€) $1.48=€1.00 Interest
rate of € 3%
Hint: The future contract is available, so you
can buy 10,000 euro in the future to buy the
futures contract. So at present, you can
borrow €9,708.3 (=10,000 euro /
1.03) euro and use the money 360 days later to purchase the future contract
of €10,000, since € interest rate is 3%. Let’s see you can make money or not.
Convert €9,708.3 to $ at spot rateè get back €9,708.3
*1.45 $/€= $14,077.67 è deposit at US @4% interest rate, and get back
$14,077.67 *(1+4%) = $14,640.78 è convert at F rate, and get back $14,640.78 / 1.48 $/€ =9,892.417 euro
, less than 10,000 euro è so this round of trading is not a good
idea.
However, if the F rate is $1.46/euro or even less, then you can get
back $14,640.78 / 1.46 $/€ > 10,000 euro, so you can do better by doing so
than simply depositing money in euro with 3% interest rate.
4. Image that you find
that interest rate per year is 3% in Italy. You also realize that the spot
rate is $1.2/€ and forward rate (one year maturity) is $1.18/€.
Question: Use IRP to
calculate the interest rate per year in US. (1.28%)
5. Suppose the current bid-ask prices for the
US dollar (USD) and the British pound (GBP) are as follows:
New York foreign
exchange market: Bid = 1 USD = 0.7485 GBP, Ask = 1 USD = 0.7495 GBP
London foreign
exchange market: Bid = 1 USD = 0.7950 GBP, Ask = 1 USD = 0.7960 GBP
Assume that there
are no transaction costs or other barriers to arbitrage.
Questions:
· What is the
potential profit from a locational arbitrage transaction, and how would you
execute it?
· What effect would
this arbitrage have on the bid-ask spreads in the two markets?
Hint: a) To execute the
arbitrage, an investor would buy USD in New York with GBP at the ask price,
and then sell the USD for GBP in London at the bid price. Specifically, the
investor would do the following:
· Buy 1 USD in New
York at the ask price of 0.7495 GBP.
· Convert the 1 USD to
GBP in London at the bid price of 0.7950 GBP.
· Sell the GBP for USD
in New York at the bid price of 0.7485 GBP.
· Pocket the
difference.
b) The effect of
this arbitrage would be to increase the demand for USD in New York and the
supply of USD in London, which would push up the bid price and push down the
ask price in New York, and push down the bid price and push up the ask price
in London. This process would continue until the bid-ask spreads in the two
markets converge to eliminate the profit opportunity from the arbitrage.
6) Suppose the
exchange rates for three currencies - US dollars (USD), Euros (EUR), and
British pounds (GBP) - are as follows:
· 1 USD = 0.85 EUR
· 1 EUR = 0.75 GBP
· 1 USD = 0.63 GBP
Assume that there
are no transaction costs or other barriers to arbitrage.
Questions: a) Is there an
opportunity for triangular arbitrage starting with US dollars (USD)? If so,
what is the potential profit and how would you execute it?
b) What effect would
this arbitrage have on the exchange rates between the three currencies?
Hint: a) There is an
opportunity for triangular arbitrage starting with USD. To execute the
arbitrage, an investor would use the three exchange rates to create a
triangular loop that begins and ends with the same currency. The investor
would do the following:
Buy EUR with USD:
Convert 1 USD to EUR at the rate of 1 USD = 0.85 EUR.
Buy GBP with EUR:
Convert the €0.85 to GBP at the rate of 1 EUR = 0.75
GBP.
Buy USD with GBP:
Convert the £0.6375 to USD at the rate of 1 USD = 0.63 GBP
Calculate the profit:
The profit from this transaction is the difference between the initial and
final USD amounts, which is …
b) This arbitrage
would have the effect of increasing the demand for GBP and decreasing the
demand for USD and EUR in the London market, while increasing the demand for
USD and EUR and decreasing the demand for GBP in the New York and Frankfurt
markets. This would cause the exchange rates to adjust until the profit
opportunity from the arbitrage is eliminated. Specifically, the USD/EUR rate
in New York would decrease, the EUR/GBP rate in London would increase, and
the USD/GBP rate in Frankfurt would decrease.
7) Question: Suppose the
exchange rates for US$/GBP, GBP/JPY, and JPY/US$ are 1.25, 150, and 0.008,
respectively. Is there an opportunity for triangular arbitrage? Why or why
no?
Hint: Try convert
US$1 into GBP, then into JPY, and finally back into US$.
Starting with US$1,
we can buy 0.8 GBP by exchanging it at the rate of 1 US$/1.25 GBP. Then, we
can use the 0.8 GBP to buy JPY at the rate of 1 GBP/150 JPY, which gives us
120 JPY. Finally, we can convert the 120 JPY back into US$ by exchanging it
at the rate of 1 JPY/0.008 US$, which gives us US$,,,,,
The followings are
useful websites
Exchange rate forecast
http://exchangerateforecast.com/
Daily FX News(has news, technical analysis and live rates):http://www.dailyfx.com/
Technical analysis _ chart example book
http://www.forex-charts-book.com/
Forex Trend lines
http://www.forextrendline.com/
Historical currency rate
http://www.xe.com/currencytables/
Historical currency chart
http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/
Forex trading demo
http://www.fxcm.com/forex-trading-demo/
Purchasing power parity (cartoon)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0icL5zlQww
Uncovered interest rate parity (UIP) states
that the difference in interest rates between two countries equals the
expected change in exchange rates between those two countries.
Theoretically, if the interest rate differential between two countries is 3%,
then the currency of the nation with the higher interest rate would be
expected to depreciate 3% against the other currency.
In reality,
however, it is a different story. Since the introduction of floating exchange
rates in the early 1970s, currencies of countries with high interest rates
have tended to appreciate, rather than depreciate, as the UIP equation
states. This well-known conundrum, also termed the “forward
premium puzzle,” has been the subject of several
academic research papers.
The anomaly
may be partly explained by the “carry trade,” whereby speculators borrow in low-interest
currencies such as the Japanese yen, sell the borrowed amount and invest the
proceeds in higher-yielding currencies and instruments. The Japanese yen was
a favorite target for this activity until mid-2007, with an estimated $1
trillion tied up in the yen carry trade by that year.
Relentless
selling of the borrowed currency has the effect of weakening it in the
foreign exchange markets. From the beginning of 2005 to mid-2007, the
Japanese yen depreciated almost 21% against the U.S. dollar. The Bank of
Japan’s target rate over that period ranged from 0 to
0.50%; if the UIP theory had held, the yen should have appreciated against
the U.S. dollar on the basis of Japan’s lower interest
rates alone.
Covered interest parity (CIP)
involves using forward or futures contracts to cover exchange rates, which can
thus be hedged in the market. Meanwhile, uncovered interest rate parity
involves forecasting rates and not covering exposure to foreign exchange risk
– that is, there are no forward rate contracts,
and it uses only the expected spot rate.
There is no theoretical difference between
covered and uncovered interest rate parity when the forward and expected spot
rates are the same.
Implications of IRP Theory
If IRP theory holds, then it can negate the possibility of
arbitrage. It means that even if investors invest in domestic or foreign
currency, the ROI will be the same as if the investor had originally invested
in the domestic currency.
When domestic interest rate is below foreign interest
rates, the foreign currency must trade at a forward discount. This is
applicable for prevention of foreign currency arbitrage.
If a foreign currency does not have a forward discount or
when the forward discount is not large enough to offset the interest rate
advantage, arbitrage opportunity is available for the domestic investors. So,
domestic investors can sometimes benefit from foreign investment.
When domestic rates exceed foreign interest rates, the
foreign currency must trade at a forward premium. This is again to offset
prevention of domestic country arbitrage.
When the foreign currency does not have a forward premium
or when the forward premium is not large enough to nullify the domestic
country advantage, an arbitrage opportunity will be available for the foreign
investors. So, the foreign investors can gain profit by investing in the
domestic market.
Let’s have some fun with ChatGPT – generate
Interest Rate Parity Calculator by ChatGPT
Here are step-by-step instructions:
1. Ask
ChatGPT to generate an interest rate parity calculator using JavaScript in
HTML format. You can ask something like: "Hey ChatGPT, could you please
generate an interest rate parity calculator using JavaScript in HTML format
to calculate the forward exchange rate, given the spot rate and current
interest rates?"
2. ChatGPT
should respond with the code for the calculator. Copy the code to your
clipboard.
3. Open
Notepad or any other text editor and paste the code into a new document.
4. Save
the file as an HTML file. You can name it anything you like, but make sure
the file extension is ".html". For example, you can name it
"interest_rate_parity_calculator.html".
5. Open
the saved HTML file in your web browser (e.g. Chrome, Firefox, etc.) by
double-clicking on the file or right-clicking and selecting "Open
with". The interest rate parity calculator should load and be ready to
use.
6. Test
the calculator by entering different values for the domestic and foreign
interest rates, spot exchange rate, and days to maturity. Make sure the
calculated forward exchange rate is correct and matches your expectations.
7. If
you find any issues with the calculator, you can ask ChatGPT to generate it
again with the desired changes.
Or use the code from my experiment with
ChatGPT earlier this week
<!DOCTYPE
html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Interest Rate Parity
Calculator</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Interest Rate Parity
Calculator</h1>
<p>Enter the following
information:</p>
<form>
<label
for="domestic-rate">Domestic interest rate:</label>
<input type="number" id="domestic-rate"
name="domestic-rate" step="0.01"><br>
<label
for="foreign-rate">Foreign interest rate:</label>
<input type="number"
id="foreign-rate" name="foreign-rate"
step="0.01"><br>
<label
for="spot-rate">Spot exchange rate:</label>
<input type="number"
id="spot-rate" name="spot-rate"
step="0.0001"><br>
<label
for="days-to-maturity">Days to maturity:</label>
<input type="number"
id="days-to-maturity"
name="days-to-maturity"><br>
<button type="button"
onclick="calculate()">Calculate</button>
</form>
<p id="result"></p>
<script>
function calculate() {
// Get the values entered in the form
fields
var domesticRate =
parseFloat(document.getElementById("domestic-rate").value);
var foreignRate = parseFloat(document.getElementById("foreign-rate").value);
var spotRate =
parseFloat(document.getElementById("spot-rate").value);
var daysToMaturity =
parseInt(document.getElementById("days-to-maturity").value);
// Calculate the forward exchange rate
using the interest rate parity formula
var forwardRate = spotRate *
Math.pow((1 + (domesticRate/100)), (daysToMaturity/365)) / Math.pow((1 +
(foreignRate/100)), (daysToMaturity/365));
// Display the forward exchange rate on
the page
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "The
forward exchange rate is " + forwardRate.toFixed(4);
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
Try this Triangular Arbitrage
Calculator for your homework
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Triangular Arbitrage</title>
<script>
function checkArbitrage() {
// Get exchange rates
from user input
var usdjpy =
parseFloat(document.getElementById("usdjpy").value);
var jpyeur =
parseFloat(document.getElementById("jpyeur").value);
var eurusd =
parseFloat(document.getElementById("eurusd").value);
// Calculate implied
exchange rates
var usdeur = 1 /
eurusd;
var jpyusd = 1 /
usdjpy;
var
eurjpy = 1 / jpyeur;
// Calculate cross
rates
var crossRate1 =
usdjpy * jpyeur;
var crossRate2 =
eurusd * jpyusd;
var crossRate3 =
eurjpy * eurusd;
// Check for arbitrage
opportunity
if (crossRate1 >
crossRate2 * crossRate3) {
var startingUSD = 1;
var
startingEUR = startingUSD * usdjpy;
var
startingJPY = startingEUR * jpyeur;
var
endingUSD = startingJPY * eurusd;
var
profit = endingUSD - startingUSD;
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML
= "Arbitrage opportunity exists! Starting with " +
startingUSD.toFixed(2) + " USD, you can make a profit of " +
profit.toFixed(2) + " USD.";
} else {
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML
= "No arbitrage opportunity.";
}
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Triangular Arbitrage Checker</h1>
<p>Enter exchange rates for three currency
pairs:</p>
<p>US$/JPY: <input type="text"
id="usdjpy" /></p>
<p>JPY/EUR: <input type="text"
id="jpyeur" /></p>
<p>EUR/US$: <input type="text"
id="eurusd" /></p>
<button
onclick="checkArbitrage()">Check Arbitrage</button>
<p id="result"></p>
</body>
</html>
For example:
Second Mid-term exam (3.29)
Review
Video in Class (Must watch)
Second Midterm Exam Study Guide
(close book close notes, in class)
Chapter 5
2.
What is a forward contract?
3.
What is a future contract?
4.
Is it necessary to deliver the underlying asset in a futures
contract?
5.
What are the differences between forward and futures contracts?
6.
When should you consider purchasing a futures contract?
7.
When should you consider selling a futures contract?
8.
Can you explain what a put option is? When is it advisable to
purchase a put option?
9.
What is a call option and when is it appropriate to buy one?
10.
Under what circumstances can you make a profit by exercising a
put option?
11.
Under what circumstances can you make a profit by exercising a
call option?
12.
What is a forward premium or discount?
13.
Can you define spot rate? What is the settlement rate in a
futures contract?
14.
Ask to draw call and put option (long position) payoff diagram,
given strike price
Chapter 7
15.
What is the definition of
Interest Rate Parity (IRP)?
16.
What are the consequences when IRP does not hold?
17.
What factors can cause IRP to not hold?
18.
If IRP holds, what is the best investment strategy?
19.
Can you earn more from IRP or CIA? What distinguishes them?
20.
Questions on currency carry trade.
Covered interest arbitrage is a financial strategy
that involves taking advantage of differences in interest rates between two
countries to make a profit. The goal of covered interest
arbitrage is to exploit the difference between the interest rate in the
country where the investor borrows funds and the interest rate in the country
where the investor will invest those funds.
Here's how it works:
·
The investor borrows money in a country where interest
rates are lower than in another country.
·
The investor then converts the borrowed funds into the
currency of the country where they want to invest.
·
The investor then invests the borrowed funds in that
country's financial markets, such as buying bonds or depositing the funds in
a bank account.
·
The investor also enters into a forward contract to sell
the invested funds at a predetermined exchange rate and date, which will
cover the borrowed funds plus interest.
·
When the forward contract matures, the investor repays the
borrowed funds plus interest and receives the proceeds from the investment.
The profit
comes from the difference between the interest rate earned on the invested
funds and the interest rate paid on the borrowed funds, minus any costs
associated with the transaction. This strategy is called "covered"
because the investor has hedged their foreign exchange risk by entering into
a forward contract.
Uncovered interest arbitrage, also known as
speculative arbitrage, is a financial strategy that involves taking advantage
of differences in interest rates between two countries to make a profit
without hedging against foreign exchange risk.
Unlike covered interest arbitrage, where an
investor hedges their foreign exchange risk through a forward contract,
uncovered interest arbitrage involves borrowing money in one country with a
lower interest rate and investing it in another country with a higher
interest rate, without hedging the exchange rate risk.
Here's how it works:
The investor borrows money in a country
where interest rates are lower than in another country.
The investor then converts the borrowed
funds into the currency of the country where they want to invest.
The investor then invests the borrowed funds
in that country's financial markets, such as buying bonds or depositing the
funds in a bank account.
When the investment matures, the investor
converts the proceeds back into their original currency, hoping that the
exchange rate has not moved against them.
If the exchange rate has moved in their
favor, the investor repays the borrowed funds plus interest and pockets the
profit from the difference between the interest rates and the exchange rate.
However, if the exchange rate has moved
against the investor, the profit may be reduced or eliminated, and the
investor may even incur a loss. Uncovered interest arbitrage is considered
riskier than covered interest arbitrage since it exposes the investor to
foreign exchange risk.
Chapter
8 Purchasing Power Parity, International Fisher Effect
Part I: PPP
1) Purchasing power parity (PPP)
Purchasing power parity (cartoon) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0icL5zlQww
|
· A theory which states that exchange rates between
currencies are in equilibrium when their purchasing power is the same in
each of the two countries. · This means that the exchange rate between two countries
should equal the ratio of the two countries' price level of a fixed basket
of goods and services. · When a country's domestic price level is increasing
(i.e., a country experiences inflation), that country's exchange rate must
depreciated in order to return to PPP. |
· The basis for PPP is the "law of one
price": In the
absence of transportation and other transaction costs, competitive markets
will equalize the price of an identical good in two countries when the
prices are expressed in the same currency. · There are some caveats with this law of one price (for
class discussion) · (1) transportation costs, barriers to trade,
and other transaction costs, can be significant. · (2) there must be competitive markets for the
goods and services in both countries. · (3) tradable goods; immobile goods such as
houses, and many services that are local, are of course not traded between
countries. What else? Your opinion? |
|
2) The Law of one price THEORY:
All else being equal
(no transaction costs), a product’s price should be the same in all markets
So price in $ sold in US =
price in $ sold in Japan after conversion to $ from ¥
P$ = P ¥ * Spot Rate $/¥
Where
the price of the product in US dollars (P$), multiplied by the
spot exchange rate (S, dollar per yen), equals the price of the product
in Japanese yen (P¥)
Or, S = P$/ P ¥
|
· No. · Exchange rate movements in the short term are
news-driven. · Announcements about interest rate changes, changes in
perception of the growth path of economies and the like are all factors
that drive exchange rates in the short run. · PPP, by comparison, describes the long
run behaviour of exchange rates. · The economic forces behind PPP will eventually equalize
the purchasing power of currencies. This can take many years, however. A
time horizon of 4-10 years would be typical. · What else? Your opinion? |
4)
How to calculate PPP? ---- Use big mac index
· PPP states that the spot exchange rate is determined by
the relative prices of similar basket of goods.
· The simplest way to calculate purchasing power parity between
two countries is to compare the price of a "standard" good that is
in fact identical across countries.
· Every year The Economist magazine
publishes a light-hearted version of PPP: its "Hamburger
Index" that compares the price of a McDonald's hamburger around the
world. More sophisticated versions of PPP look at a large number of goods and
services.
· One of the key problems is that people in different
countries consumer very different sets of goods and services, making it
difficult to compare the purchasing power between countries.
· For class discussion: can we use bitcoin as another goods
to calculate PPP?
Using Hamburgers to Compare Wealth
- Big mac index explained video
|
The
currencies listed below are compared to the US Dollar. A green bar
indicated that the local currency is overvalued by the percentage figure
shown on the axis; the currency is thus expected to depreciate against the
US Dollar in the long run. A red bar indicates undervaluation of the local
currency; the currency is thus expected to appreciate against the US Dollar
in the long run (based on old data) |
The
currencies listed below are compared to the Euro.
6) Where can I get more information?
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• OECD National Accounts: The OECD
publishes PPPs for all OECD countries. You can
retrieve a table with the OECD's 1950-2015 PPP rates. This is a
comma-seprated file that can be easily imported into a spreadsheet
program.
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PPPGDP from https://www.oecd.org/fr/sdd/purchasingpowerparities-frequentlyaskedquestionsfaqs.htm 1.
What are PPPs? PPPs
are the rates of currency conversion that equalize the purchasing power of
different currencies by eliminating the differences in price levels between
countries. In their simplest form, PPPs are simply price relatives that
show the ratio of the prices in national currencies of the same good or
service in different countries. PPPs are also calculated for product groups
and for each of the various levels of aggregation up to and including GDP. 2.
How PPPs are calculated? The
calculation is undertaken in three
stages. ·
The first stage is at the product level,
where price relatives are calculated for individual goods and services. A
simple example would be a litre of Coca-Cola. If it costs 2.3 euros in
France and 2.00$ in the United States then the PPP for Coca-Cola between
France and the USA is 2.3/2.00, or 1.15. This means that for every dollar
spent on a litre of Coca-Cola in the USA, 1.15 euros would have to be spent
in France to obtain the same quantity and quality - or, in other words, the
same volume - of Coca-Cola. ·
The second stage is at the product group
level, where the price relatives calculated for the products in the group
are averaged to obtain unweighted PPPs for the group. Coca-cola is for
example included in the product group “Softdrinks and Concentrates”. ·
And the third stage is at the aggregation
levels, where the PPPs for the product groups covered by the aggregation
level are weighted and averaged to obtain weighted PPPs for the aggregation
level up to GDP (in our example, aggregated levels are Non-alcoholic
beverages, Food…). The weights used to aggregate the PPPs in the third
stage are the expenditures on the product groups as established in the
national accounts. You will find detailed information on the calculation in
the “EUROSTAT-OECD Methodological manual on purchasing power parities
(PPPs)”, Chapter 12. 3.
What are the major uses of PPPs? The major use of PPPs is as a
first step in making inter-country comparisons in real terms of gross
domestic product (GDP) and its component expenditures. GDP is the aggregate used most frequently to represent
the economic size of countries and, on a per capita basis, the economic
well-being of their residents. Calculating PPPs is the first step in the
process of converting the level of GDP and its major aggregates, expressed
in national currencies, into a common currency to enable these comparisons
to be made. There are also other uses and recommendations that can be find
in details in the EUROSTAT-OECD Methodological manual on purchasing power
parities (PPPs)” Chapter 1, box 1.5 Uses
of Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) 4.
What are the products included in
the basket of goods and services used for the calculation of PPPs and how
many are they? The
basket of goods and services priced for the PPP exercise is a sample of all
goods and services covered by GDP. The final product list covers
around 3,000 consumer goods and services, 30 occupations in government, 200
types of equipment goods and about 15 construction projects. The large number of products is to enable countries to
identify goods and services which are representative of their domestic
expenditures. |
|
· the relative change in prices between countries over
a period of time determines the change in exchange rates
· if the spot rate between 2 countries starts in
equilibrium, any change in the differential rate of inflation between them
tends to be offset over the long run by an equal but opposite change in the spot
rate
Math equation: ef= Ih-
If or ((1+ Ih)/(1+If)
-1= ef; ef: change in exchange rate
(1+ 9%) /(1+5%)
-1 = ef = 4% , and 1£=1.6$, so the new
rate of £ =1.6*(1+4%) = 1.66 £/$.
Example
2: 1£=1.6$. US inflation rate is 5%. UK inflation
is 9%. What will happen? Calculate the new exchange rate using the PPP
equation.
ef = Ih – If, Ih=
5%, If =9%, so ef =
5%-9% = -4%, so the old rate is that 1£=1.6$. The new rate should be 4%
lower. So new rate is that 1£=1.6*(1-4%) = 1.536$
Example 3:
1£=1.2€. Inflation rate in Germany is 4%. UK
inflation is 9%. What will happen? Calculate the new exchange rate using the
PPP equation.
Home currency is euro and foreign currency is
pound. ef = Ih – If, Ih=
4%, If =9%, so ef =
4%-9% = -5%, so the old rate is that 1£=1.2€. The new
rate should be 5% lower. So new rate is that 1£=1.2*(1-5%) = 1.14€
Determine which two
currencies you would like to compare for purchasing power parity. The formula
for purchasing power parity requires two prices in different currencies to
calculate the price ratio:
S (purchase power parity
ratio) = Price 1/Price 2
In this case, P1 refers to
one price in a specific currency, and P2 refers to another price in a
different currency.
For instance, suppose you
want to calculate the purchasing price parity between the United States and
Mexico. Your comparison prices will be in U.S. dollars and Mexican pesos.
Determine which product is
commonly available in both the United States and Mexico. For simplicity,
we'll compare the price of Coca Cola in both countries. Although comparing
one common product is one strategy, economic analysts may also select a group
of common products to calculate a more broad measure of purchasing power
parity. This group of products is commonly called a basket of goods and may
include food staples such as bread, milk and other related items. Although
the basket approach may be broader, the single item method helps illustrate
the calculation in simpler terms.
Research the prices of Coca
Cola in Mexico and the United States. The purchasing power parity formula
requires you to know the price of the item you are comparing. Assume for this
example that a 12-ounce can of Coca Cola costs $1.50 in U.S. dollars and $9
Mexican pesos. Divide the $9 pesos by $1.50. The result is the price ratio
for purchasing power parity. To illustrate the calculation refer to the
following:
S = P1/P2
S = 9/1.50
S = 6
Compare the result of the purchasing
power parity to the currency exchange rate between the United States and
Mexico. Assume that the exchange rate between the Mexican peso and U.S.
dollar is 5.7 pesos for every dollar. Recall that for purchasing power parity
to exist, the exchange rate and the purchasing power parity ratio must be
equal. The purchasing power parity ratio of 6 and a $5.7 peso per dollar
exchange rate between the currencies in Mexico and the United States
indicates that the purchasing power of the peso and the dollar are similar
but not exact. This means that Mexican and U.S. consumers have similar
purchasing power with their respective currencies.
However, if the exchange
rate between the dollar and the peso suddenly changed to $17 pesos per dollar
and the purchasing power parity ratio remained at 6, the purchasing power
parity calculation shows a loss of purchasing power for Mexican consumers
relative to the U.S. consumers. ?
----- FROM WWW.SAMPLING.COM
February 11, 2022
The Big Mac Index in 2022
Entertaining
https://fxssi.com/big-mac-index
Who hasn't tried or at least heard of a famous Big Mac at
McDonald's fast-food restaurants? However, few people know that it gave rise
to the so-called Big Mac Index, which compares the value of currencies of
different countries.
What is the Big Mac Index?
The Big Mac Index is the
price of the burger in various countries that are converted to one currency
(such as the US dollar) and used to measure purchasing power parity.
It all started in 1986 when The Economist magazine decided to
estimate the currencies' value by country based on the prices of Big Mac at
McDonald's fast-food restaurants.
Thus, The Economist introduced a simple indicator of the
fundamental value of currencies globally.
What does the Big Mac Index show, and why exactly was it taken
as an indicator?
It's pretty simple. Big Mac is the most well-known product in
McDonald's' fast-food chain. Besides, the same ingredients are used for Big
Mac in any country: meat, bread, cheese, lettuce, onions, etc. Therefore, The
Economist experts use Big Mac alone instead of determining the cost of a
consumer basket (more complex method) for each country.
Big Mac Index Table as of Q1 2022
The most relevant Big Mac Index so far (as of January 2022) is
presented in the table below.
Let's analyze these data a bit.
The Russian ruble exchange rate expressed in the Big Mac Index
in January 2022 is 23.24 ruble per dollar.
Considering that the current market rate of the Russian
currency is about 77.42 ruble, rather than 23.24 per US dollar, the ruble is
undervalued by approximately 70%.
Thus, the Russian ruble is the world’s most undervalued (cheapest) currency according to the Big
Mac Index.
In 2019, the Russian ruble was the most undervalued (by 64.5%)
currency worldwide.
Big Mac costs $1.86 in Turkish. While the price of the burger
in the United States is $5.81, the Turkish currency exchange rate is 4.30
lira per dollar in terms of the Big Mac Index.
However, the lira is cheaper in Forex – about 13.42 lira per US dollar (as of January 2022).
Therefore, we can conclude that the market undervalues the Turkish currency
by almost 68%.
In the list of the world’s most undervalued currencies, the Russian ruble and the
Lebanese pound are accompanied by the Malaysian ringgit (undervalued by
58.92%), Indonesian rupian (undervalued by 59.31%), and the Romanian leu
(undervalued by 58.65%). Notably, the currencies of India, Pakistan, the
Philippines, and other low-income countries are not in the top five most
undervalued currencies in 2022.
As for the most highly
valued currencies, the statistics by countries show that the world’s most overvalued (expensive) currency is
the francs in Switzerland.
Considering that Big Mac costs 6.98 francs in Switzerland, the
USD/CHF rate expressed in the Big Mac Index terms should be 1.12 francs per
dollar. However, the value of this pair is currently quoted around 0.93 in
Forex, which makes the Swiss currency overvalued by the market by 20.16%.
Norwegian krone overvalued by the market by 10.03%.
According to the Big Mac Index authors, Euro is also
undervalued by the market. The average Big Mac price in the Eurozone is
$4.95, meaning the currency is undervalued by 14.72%.
Notably, according to the
Big Mac Index, all major currency pairs, except the Swiss franc and Norwegian
krone, are undervalued against the US dollar.
Can We Use This Knowledge in
Trading?
We can hardly do it in the short
and medium terms, but the Big Mac Index can serve as a helpful assistant
while long-term trading.
For example, it can be used
as a filter when opening positions in the Forex market. After all, if the
Japanese yen is significantly oversold against the US dollar, traders should
refrain from opening long positions on USD/JPY.
We can draw similar
conclusions for other Forex currency pairs.
The key thing to remember is that the Big Mac Index is an accurate
indicator of the fundamental value of currencies, and traders can benefit
from its use in trading.
Big Mac's price is up 40%,
and it isn’t a good sign
This famous American burger price is outpacing cost of living,
and it’s not a good sign.
Updated Thu, Feb 17 2022
https://www.cnbc.com/select/big-mac-index-what-you-need-to-know/
There are few things that are as synonymous with American
culture as the iconic Big Mac burger from McDonald’s. Invented in 1957 by an early McDonald’s franchisee, the Big Mac remains a very
popular fast-food item.
And because of its global popularity, The Economist invented
the “Big Mac index” in 1986 as a unique way to track the price of the famous
sandwich against other currencies. The index incorporates the concept of
purchasing-power parity, which is the way to track the strength of an
individual currency, and what ‘purchasing power’ it has.
So why does this matter to you? Well the price of a Big Mac
has risen a staggering 40% over the last 10 years. And because the price of a
Big Mac embodies multiple economic factors including the cost of labor,
transportation, food and overall inflation — it leads some to believe the sandwich is one way to
understand current inflation rates and purchasing power of the U.S. dollar.
Select analyzed the Big Mac index, what it means for consumers
and how you can fight back against the rising costs of everyday items.
The Big Mac index, and what it means for you
The index has been studied by many, including the St. Louis
Federal Reserve. It describes the ‘burgernomics’ as “a convenient market basket of goods through which the
purchasing power of different currencies can be compared.” The sandwich itself contains several
goods and services between the two buns, such as: food prices (obviously),
labor, power, transportation and more. And because the sandwich exists in so
many places around the world, some look at the burger as a way to gauge
purchasing power of different currencies.
While the Big Mac is a tasty sandwich, the index is not a
foolproof economic indicator of purchasing-power parity. Diana
Furchtgott-Roth, adjunct professor of Economics at George Washington
University told Select it’s “junk food economics” for several reasons,
because “in a lot of the world Big Macs are not the
cheapest food and not aimed at lowest-income residents.” And in some countries, Big Macs are not
available at all due to cultural reasons.
Without diving deep into economic theory, the Big Mac index is
noteworthy as it demonstrates the staggering inflation we’re experiencing. And in some cases, the sandwich is rising in price faster than
several economic measurements. The burger now costs an average of $6.05 in the
U.S., a 40% increase over the last 10 years. Here’s how other items and economic factors have fared during the
last decade:
The Consumer Price Index has gone up 22%
The cost of living index is up 37%
A barrel of oil is down -21%
Raw coffee is up 12%
The U.S. raw food price index is up a modest 7%
And this trend of consumer goods skyrocketing in price is not
only a Big Mac trend. Other goods and services have mirrored the same trend
over the last decade, including:
Rent prices are up 40%
Home prices have soared 107%.
Used car prices are up 39%
So what does all of this data mean to you? Well it’s no surprise, life has become
increasingly expensive. From Dec. 2020 to Dec. 2021, inflation was at a
staggering 7%. And in the last year, the Big Mac sandwich is up an identical
7%. For context, a ‘healthy’ rate of inflation is generally 2-3%
year-over-year.
Unfortunately, there’s nothing we can do to
control inflation. So if you’re craving a Big Mac, fries
and soda, you’ll now be paying between $8-10, depending
on where you live. However, there are steps everyone can take to control how
inflation impacts your wallet.
Simple ways you can battle inflation of goods
Thomas Racca, manager on the Personal Finance Team at Navy
Federal Credit Union told Select a few ways on how everyone can easily fight
against inflation on daily purchases, and how to stay on track to accomplish
larger financial goals.
Evaluate your budget. If you haven’t adjusted your budget recently, you may have noticed common
expenses like fuel and groceries going up. Even if it’s only by a few dollars, adjusting your budget can help you
keep track where each dollar is going.
Try a new budgeting technique. There are ample ways to track
your spending with a budget. It could be as simple as writing everything
down, using an automated budgeting app, or even adjusting how you budget can
help you save during inflation.
Reroute some money for a period of time. This suggestion is a
bit more risky as it can throw off your monthly budget and should be done in
moderation. Racca told Select, “if you created an emergency
savings fund before the pandemic, consider using some of that money towards
your expenses.” So for the time being, you may consider
taking some money out of your emergency fund or not making the same monthly
contributions. It may be better to invest this money instead, in index funds
for example, where you may get a better return over the long run. But with
rising inflation, you may be pressed to unfortunately spend more on the same
purchases you’d normally make.
Consider changing your grocery list. If you regularly shop at
a higher-end grocery store, it may be helpful to transition to a more
budget-conscious store, or even consider buying in bulk. Additionally, take a
look at what you buy normally and analyze what has risen in price the most,
and consider cutting back on those items. Notably, beef and dairy products
have soared by over 13%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Bottom line
The Big Mac is just one sign among many that life is getting
expensive, fast. And whether you’re buying the iconic
sandwich, grocery shopping or even looking for a new home, you’ve likely had some sticker shock. However,
there may be light at the end of the tunnel as the Federal Reserve is
planning on raising interest rates to quell inflation rates that haven’t been seen in over 40 years.
Part II: International Fisher Effect
7) International Fisher Effect
Fisher Effect: Nominal
interest rate (R) = real interest rate (r) + inflation (I)
By assuming real interest
rates in two countries are the same, we conclude that inflation moves along
with the nominal interest rate which is observable and reported.
The international
Fisher effect (sometimes
referred to as Fisher's open hypothesis) is a hypothesis in international finance that suggests differences
in nominal
interest rates reflect expected changes in the spot exchange
rate between countries. The hypothesis specifically states that a
spot exchange rate is expected to change equally in the opposite direction of
the interest rate differential; thus, the currency of the country with the higher nominal interest rate
is expected to depreciate against the currency of the country with the lower
nominal interest rate, as higher nominal interest rates reflect an
expectation of inflation.
Suppose the current spot exchange
rate between the United States and the United Kingdom is 1.4339 GBP/USD.
Also suppose the current interest rates are 5 percent in the U.S. and 7
percent in the U.K. What is the expected spot exchange rate 12 months from
now according to the international Fisher effect?
Solution: The effect estimates future exchange rates based
on the relationship between nominal interest rates. Multiplying the current
spot exchange rate by the nominal annual U.S. interest rate and dividing by
the nominal annual U.K. interest rate yields the estimate of the spot
exchange rate 12 months from now.
$1.4339*(1+5%)/(1+7%) = $1.4071
The
expected percentage change in the exchange rate is a depreciation of 1.87%
for the GBP (it now only costs $1.4071 to purchase 1 GBP rather than
$1.4339), which is consistent with the expectation that the value of the currency
in the country with a higher interest rate will depreciate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Fisher_effect
Calculator for
IFE and relative PPP
Example
4: If the interest rate of US is 10% and
that of UK is 5%, which country’s
currency will appreciate, by how much? Imagine 1£=1.6$.
Home currency is $ and foreign currency is €. ef = Rh – Rf, Rh= 10%, Rf =5%,
so ef = 10%-5% =
5%, so the old rate is that 1£=1.6$. The new rate should be 5% higher. So new
rate is that 1£=1.6*(1+5%) = 1.68$
Example
5: If the interest rate of US is 5% and
that of UK is 10%, which country’s
currency will appreciate, by how much? Imagine 1£=1.6$.
Home currency is $ and foreign currency is £. ef = Rh – Rf, Rh=
5%, Rf =10%, so ef = 5%-10% = -5%, so the old rate
is that 1£=1.6$. The new rate should be 5% lower. So new rate
is that 1£=1.6*(1-5%)
Homework chapter 8 (due with the Final)
1.
If a Big Mac costs $2 in the United States and
300 yen in Japan, what is the estimated exchange rate of yen/ $ as hypothesized
by the Big Mac index? (Answer: 150 yen /$)
2.
Interest
rates are currently 2% in the US and 3% in Germany. The current
spot rate between the € and $ is $1.5/€. What is the expected spot rate in
one year if the international Fisher effect holds? (Answer:1.4854$/€)
3.
You find that inflation in Japan just reduced
to 1.3%, while in US, the inflation rate just increased to 3%. You also
observed that the spot rate for yen was $0.0075 before the adjustment by
economists. With new inflation released, the demand and supply for currencies
will drive the exchange rate to a new equilibrium price.
Question: Use
PPP to estimate the new exchange rate for yen. (Answer:0.0076$/yen)
4.
You observed the nominal interest rate
(annual) just increased to 6% in China, while the nominal annual interest
rate is 3% in US. The spot rate for Chinese Yuan is $6.8 before the
adjustment.
Question: Use
IFE to estimate the new spot rate for Chinese Yuan after the interest rate
changes. (Answer:6.6075$/RMB. Note: Dollar is more valuable. In this example, RMB becomes
the more valuable currency. Sorry for the mistake)
5.
How would you define the Big Mac Index and what is the reasoning behind
using the Big Mac as a metric for determining currency value?
6.
According to OECD, What are the products
included in the basket of goods and services used for the calculation of PPPs
and how many are they?
https://www.oecd.org/fr/sdd/purchasingpowerparities-frequentlyaskedquestionsfaqs.htm
ChatGPT is Popular. How AI and Web3 are Combined?
(FYI)
https://medium.com/oneblock-community/chatgpt-is-popular-how-ai-and-web3-are-combined-444cff31e870
The Combination of AI+Web3
PWC predicts that AI will contribute $15.7 trillion to the global
economy by 2030, resulting in a 14% increase in global GDP. With the
development of AI technology, AI will not only be noticed as a separate
technology, the combination of AI and other technologies is gradually
becoming a general trend. It is constantly influencing other existing
technologies and industries, and Web3 is no exception. What role will AI play
in the Web3 decentralized world?
Why Should AI be Combined with Web3?
From the perspective of the development of
AI technology, the decentralized nature of Web3 provides a guarantee for
its long-term development. The generation of AI models requires a large
database, and most users who provide data not only fail to get paid for AI
products, but are ignored. Web giants have monopolized AI-generated content
and profited from it.
In Web3, creators can have full control over their data, AI models
and digital assets. Users can repurpose or share data as they wish. AI models
can be trained according to the personal knowledge and experience of the
creator.
Application of AI in Combination with Web3
In the long term, the future of Web3 is to
combine it with AI technologies, including Machine Learning (ML), which can
be applied to different stacks of Web3. In particular:
AI + Public Chain
The public chain mainly includes different
components such as consensus layer, data layer, incentive layer and contract.
In the consensus mechanism layer, AI can increase blockchain security by
quickly mining data and predicting behavior to detect fraud and stop attacks,
increasing blockchain security. In addition, ML predictions can be used to
trade to create a scalable consensus protocol. At the same time, the chain
quickly aggregates global data, allowing AI to perform machine learning at a
faster speed and larger data scale, and allowing AI models to grow rapidly.
2. AI + Protocol
Web3 can integrate ML capabilities by using
smart contracts and protocols. For example, AI can determine your DeFi credit
score by browsing your online data, which will be able to predict as
accurately as possible how likely you are to repay your debt. If such AI is
successfully deployed as a protocol, it has the potential to double the scale
of DeFi. Because it will solve two major problems with traditional financing:
intermediaries and collateral.
3. AI + DApp
This application trend is more prominent in
NFT. For example, by adding ML functionality to NFTs, NFTs will transform
from static images into artefacts with intelligent behavior. These NFTs are
able to dynamically adjust based on their owner’s profile. In addition, AI is
used to build games that can change the scene, difficulty level and tasks
depending on the player’s mood.
Admittedly, we also need to face the current
problem of AI. That is, how to achieve meaningful AI and Web3 integration? It
effectively cleans up the centralization issues in AI and creates a more
secure and fair network, which requires the joint efforts of developers in
Web3.
AI Empowers Metaverse
AI can greatly expand the boundaries of existing Web3 in many aspects
such as on-chain data analysis, security auditing, and privacy protection.
Among them, the current hot Metaverse is an application example supported by
the development of AI technology. For example, Sony recently entered the
Metaverse field with a new wearable motion tracking system called Mocopi. The
system will allow users to use full-body movement to create videos of their
avatars. The development of AI allows us to see more possibilities of the
decentralized Metaverse.
AI + Virtual Man
At present, many companies use the method to
make extreme expressions on light field equipment and film them for K-frames,
which is a very time-consuming and labor-intensive step, but it is the only
way to avoid the “Valley of Terror” effect. However, AI can use machine
learning to achieve complex simulation and deformation, refining 3D facial
models and motion simulation to help character creation in time. Digital
humans in the Metaverse world can transform from static images to intelligent
figures with dialogue, real-time reactions and feedback.
2. AI + Virtual Scenes
With the advent of the digital era, the
demand for virtual scenes is increasing. It is no longer possible to design
every inch of the virtual world in a purely manual way, as thousands of
square kilometres of virtual worlds need to be created. The AI-driven art
tools don’t need to manually adjust parameters. They can quickly develop
virtual scenes and simulate scene dynamics in real time, facilitating the
creation of the vibrant Metaverse world.
3. AI + Virtual Items
With AI-driven functions, complex processes
such as modeling and replicating are no longer required. Real-world objects
are reconstructed in three dimensions using visualization and 3D scanning.
The simple operation can not only release the creative potential of designers
and creators, but also become a good helper for users in the Metaverse world.
For example, scan objects such as ornaments, books and other objects in life
into 3D models.
Chapter 11: Managing Transaction Exposure
Transaction
exposure is the level of uncertainty businesses involved in international
trade face. Specifically, it is the risk that currency
exchange rates will fluctuate after a firm has already undertaken a
financial obligation. A high level of vulnerability to shifting exchange
rates can lead to major capital losses for these international businesses.
One way that firms can limit their exposure to changes in the exchange rate
is to implement a hedging strategy. Through hedging
using forward rates, they may lock
in a favorable rate of currency exchange and avoid exposure to risk.
The danger of transaction
exposure is typically one-sided. Only the business that completes a
transaction in a foreign currency may feel the vulnerability. The entity that
is receiving or paying a bill using its home currency is not subjected to the
same risk. Usually, the buyer agrees to buy the product using foreign money.
If this is the case, the hazard comes it that foreign currency should
appreciate, costing the buyer to spend more than they had budgeted for the
goods.
Suppose that a United
States-based company is looking to purchase a product from a company in
Germany. The American company agrees to negotiate the deal and pay for the
goods using the German company's currency, the euro. Assume that when
the U.S. firm begins the process of negotiation, the value of the euro/dollar
exchange is a 1-to-1.5 ratio. This rate of exchange equates to one euro being
equivalent to 1.50 U.S. dollars (USD).
Once the agreement is
complete, the sale might not take place immediately. Meanwhile, the exchange
rate may change before the sale is final. This risk of change is transaction
exposure. While it is possible that the values of the dollar and the euro may
not change, it is also possible that the rates could become more or less
favorable for the U.S. company, depending on factors affecting the currency
marketplace. More or less favorable rates could result in changes to
the exchange rate ratio, such as a more favorable 1-to-1.25 rate or
a less favorable 1-to-2 rate.
Regardless of the change in
the value of the dollar relative to the euro, the Belgian company experiences
no transaction exposure because the deal took place in its local
currency. The Belgian company is not affected if it costs the U.S. company
more dollars to complete the transaction because the price was set
as an amount in euros as dictated by the sales agreement.
(https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/transactionexposure.asp)
Types of foreign exchange exposure
Transaction Exposure – measures changes in the value of
outstanding financial obligations incurred prior to a change in exchange
rates but not to be settled until after the exchange rate changes
Operating (Economic)Exposure – also called economic exposure, measures the
change in the present value of the firm resulting from any change in expected
future operating cash flows caused by an unexpected change in exchange rates
Translation Exposure – also called accounting exposure,
is the potential for accounting derived changes in owner’s equity to occur
because of the need to “translate” financial statements of foreign
subsidiaries into a single reporting currency for consolidated financial
statements
Tax Exposure – the tax consequence of foreign exchange exposure varies by
country, however as a general rule only realized foreign
losses are deductible for purposes of calculating income taxes
\
What
is transaction exposure
Example of transaction exposure
Purchasing or selling on credit
goods or services when prices are stated in foreign currencies
Borrowing or lending funds when
repayment is to be made in a foreign currency
Being a party to an unperformed
forward contract and
Otherwise acquiring assets or
incurring liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
How to reduce the transaction exposure risk?
1. 1. Forward (Future) Market Hedge
2. 2.
Money Market Hedge
3. 3.
Options Market Hedge: call and put
· To hedge a foreign
currency payable buy calls on the currency.
· To hedge a
foreign currency receivable buy puts on the currency.
Exercise
1: Hedging currency
payable
A
U.S.–based importer of Italian bicycles
· In
one year owes €100,000 to an Italian supplier.
· The
spot exchange rate is $1.18 = €1.00
· The
one year forward rate is $1.20 = €1.00
· The
one-year interest rate in Italy is i€ =
5%
· The
one-year interest rate in US is i$ = 8%
— Call option exercise
price is $1.2/ € with premium of $0.03.
How to
hedge the currency payable risk
a. With
forward contract?
b. With
money market?
c. With
call option? Can we use put option?
Answer: Need €100,000
one year from now to pay the payable and plan to hedge the risk of overpaying
for the payable one year from now.
1) With
forward contract:
Buy the
one year forward contract @$1.20 = €1.00. So need
100,000€*1.2$/€ = $120,000
one year from now. So the company needs to come up with $120k for this
payable obligation.
2) With
money market:
Need €100,000 one year from now, and the rate is 5% in Italy, so
can deposit €100,000/(1+5%) = €95238.10
now.
For
this purpose, need to convert from € to
$: €95238.10*$1.18 /€=$112380.98.
Imagine
the company does not have that much of cash and it borrows @8%. So one year
from now, the total $ required to pay back to the banks is: $112380.98
*(1+8%) = $121371.43. So the company needs to come up
with $121371.43for this payable obligation.
Summary: Borrow
$112380.98 @8% and convert to €95238.10 at present;
One year later, the company can get the €100,000 and
needs to pay back to the bank a total of $121371.43.
3) With
call option:
Imagine
the rate one year later is $1.25/€. So should
exercise the call option and the cost one year later should be
€100,000
*(1.2+0.03) $/€ = $123000, lower than the actual cost
without the call option. So $123k is the most that the company needs to
prepare for this payable obligation. USING CALL OPTION, THE ACTAUL PAYMENT
COULD BE A LOT LESS, DEPENDING ON THE ACTAUL EXCHANGE RATE ONE YEAT LATER.
Exercise
2: Hedging currency receivable
(refer to the PPT of chapter 11 for answers)
· A
U.S.–based exporter of US bicycles to Swiss
distributors
· In
6 months receive SF200,000 from an Swiss distributor
· The
spot exchange rate is $0.71 = SF1.00
· The
6 month forward rate is $0.71 = SF1.00
· The
one-year interest rate in Swiss is iSF = 5%
· The
one-year interest rate in US is i$ = 8%
· Put
option exercise price is $0.72/ SF with premium of $0.02.
How to
hedge the currency payable risk
a. With
forward contract?
b. With
money market?
c. With
call option? Can we use put option?
Answer: Will
receive SF200000 six month from now as receivable and plan to
hedge the risk of losing value in the receivable six month from now.
1) With
forward contract:
Sell
the one year forward contract @$0.71 = €1.00. So get
200,000SF * 0.71$/SF = $142,000 six month from now. So the company could
receive $142k with forward contract.
2) With
money market:
Get SF200000
six month from now, and the rate is 5% in Swiss (or 2.5% for six months), so
can borrow SF 200,000/(1+2.5%) = SF195121.95 now.
And can
convert @ spot rate to SF195121.95 * 0.71$/SF = $138536.59. This is
the money you have now.
So six
month from now, the total you have in the bank is: $138536.59*(1+4%) =
$144078.05. And you can use the SF200000 receivable to pay back the
loan. So the company could receive $144078.05 with money
market.
Summary: Borrow SF195121.95
@5% at present; six month later, the company can get
the SF200,000 receivable and payback the loan. Meanwhile, convert
the borrowed SF to $ and deposit in US banks @ 8%.
3) With
put option: With SF200000 received six month later, need
to converting it back to $. So can buy put option which allows to sell SF for
$ at the exercise price $0.72/ SF.
Imagine
the rate one year later is $0.66/ SF. So should exercise the put option
and the total amount of $ six month later should be SF
200,000 *(0.72-0.02) $/ SF = $140000. So $140k is the LEAST that
the company CAN OBTAIN. USING PUT OPTION, THE ACTAUL INCOME COULD
BE A LOT MORE, DEPENDING ON THE ACTAUL EXCHANGE RATE ONE YEAT LATER.
Homework of Chapter 11
(due with final)
1. Suppose that your company will be
billed £10 million payable in one year. The money market interest
rates and foreign exchange rates are given as follows. How to hedge the risk
for parable using forward contract. How to hedge the risk using money market?
How to hedge risk using call option?
Call option exercise price The U.S. one-year interest
rate: |
$1.46/ €
with premium of $0.03 6.10% per annum |
The U.K. one-year interest rate: |
9.00% per annum |
The spot exchange rate: |
$1.50/£ |
The one-year forward exchange rate |
$1.46/£ |
(Answer: With forward contract: $14.6
million; Money market: $14.6million; Call option: $14.9million)
2. Suppose that your company will be
billed £10 million receivable in one year. The money market
interest rates and foreign exchange rates are given as follows. How to hedge
the risk for parable using forward contract. How to hedge the risk using
money market? How to hedge risk using put option?
put option exercise price The U.S. one-year interest
rate: |
$1.46/ €
with premium of $0.03 6.10% per annum |
The U.K. one-year interest rate: |
9.00% per annum |
The spot exchange rate: |
$1.50/£ |
The one-year forward exchange rate |
$1.46/£ |
(Answer: With forward contract: $14.6 million; Money market: $14.6million; Put option: $14.3million)
Question 3: Multiple Choice Questions
(hint: each question has a hidden answer)
1.
What is the primary purpose of hedging receivables and payables?
a)
To eliminate exchange rate risk
b)
To eliminate interest rate risk
c)
To generate profits
d)
To reduce tax liabilities
Answer: a) To eliminate exchange rate
risk
2.
Which of the following is NOT a method of hedging receivables and payables?
a)
Forward contracts
b)
Options contracts
c)
Future contacts
d)
Money market
wer: c) Spot contracts
3.
What is a receivable?
a)
A payment that is owed to a company by its customers
b)
A payment that a company owes to its suppliers
c)
A payment that a company makes to its shareholders
d)
A payment that a company makes to its employees
Answer: a) A payment that is owed to
a company by its customers
4.
What is the primary risk associated with receivables in international
finance?
a)
Credit risk
b)
Exchange rate risk
c)
Interest rate risk
d)
Regulatory risk
Answer: b) Exchange rate risk
5.
What is a payable?
a)
A payment that a company owes to its suppliers
b)
A payment that is owed to a company by its customers
c)
A payment that a company makes to its shareholders
d)
A payment that a company makes to its employees
Answer: a) A payment that a company
owes to its suppliers
6.
Which of the following is a method of hedging payables in international
finance using call options?
a)
Buying a call option to sell the underlying currency
b)
Buying a call option to buy the underlying currency
c)
Buying a put option to sell the underlying currency
d)
Buying a put option to buy the underlying currency
Answer: b) Buying a call option to
buy the underlying currency
7.
Which of the following is a benefit of using call options to hedge payables?
a)
Unlimited potential gains
b)
Limited potential losses
c)
Guaranteed fixed exchange rate
d)
No premium payment required
Answer: b) Limited potential losses.
8.
Which of the following is a method of hedging receivables in international
finance using put options?
a)
Buying a call option to sell the underlying currency
b)
Buying a call option to buy the underlying currency
c)
Buying a put option to sell the underlying currency
d)
Buying a put option to buy the underlying currency
Answer: d) Buying a put option to buy
the underlying currency
9.
Which of the following is a benefit of using put options to hedge
receivables?
a)
Unlimited upside potential
b)
Limited downside risk
c)
Fixed exchange rate
d)
No premium payment required
Answer: b) Limited downside risk
10.
Which of the following is a method of hedging payables in international
finance using a forward contract?
a)
Selling the underlying currency forward
b)
Buying the underlying currency forward
c)
Buying a put option on the underlying currency
d)
Selling a call option on the underlying currency
Answer: b) Buying the underlying
currency forward
11.
Which of the following is a benefit of using a forward contract to hedge payables?
a)
No premium payment required
b)
Unlimited upside potential
c)
Fixed exchange rate
d)
Limited downside risk
Answer: c) Fixed exchange rate
12.
Which of the following is a disadvantage of using a forward contract to hedge
payables?
a)
Requires payment of a premium
b)
Limited upside potential
c)
Unlimited downside risk
d)
Exposure to counterparty risk
Answer: d) Exposure to counterparty
risk
Gold prices could notch an all-time high soon —
and stay there
PUBLISHED WED, MAR 22 202312:33 AM
EDTUPDATED THU, MAR 23 20235:01 AM EDT
Lee Ying Shan @LEEYINGSHAN
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/22/gold-price-could-hit-high-amid-svb-credit-suisse-bank-problems.html
KEY POINTS
·
Gold prices have more room to rise and could
go as high as $2,600 per ounce.
·
Investors have been turning to gold and
Treasurys after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse’s
struggles.
·
Gold’s all-time high was $2,075 in August
2020, according to Refinitiv data.
Gold prices have more room to run as global
banks struggle and the U.S. Federal Reserve renders another interest rate
decision, potentially breaking all-time highs — and staying there.
“A sooner Fed pivot on rate hikes will
likely cause another gold price surge due to a potential further decline in
the U.S. dollar and bond yields,” said Tina Teng from financial services
company CMC Markets. She expects gold will trade between $2,500 to $2,600 an
ounce.
Gold is trading at $1,940.68 per ounce. On
Monday, it breached $2,000 to strike its highest since March 2022. Gold has
risen around 10% since early March when SVB was hit by a bank run.
Gold’s all-time high was $2,075 in August 2020, according to
Refinitiv data. Demand from central banks will likely keep wind in its sails.
“Continued central bank buying of gold bodes
well for long-term prices,” said CEO Randy Smallwood of Wheaton Precious
Metals, a precious metals streaming company.
I think it’s very plausible that we see a
strong performance in gold over the coming months. The stars appear to be
aligning for gold which could see it break new highs before long.
Demand for gold skyrocketed to an 11-year
high in 2022, owing to “colossal central bank purchases,” according to
the World Gold Council. Central banks bought a 55-year high of 1,136 tons of
gold last year.
Fitch: Gold prices will stay at highs
In late March, Fitch Solutions predicted
that gold would notch a high of $2,075 “in the coming weeks.” The firm based
that outlook on “global financial instability,” adding that it expects gold
to “remain elevated in the coming years compared to pre-Covid levels.”
Gold prices soar amid banking turmoil
Craig Erlam, a senior market analyst at
foreign exchange company Oanda, agrees with Fitch’s buoyant outlook.
“I think it’s very plausible that we see a
strong performance in gold over the coming months. The stars appear to be
aligning for gold which could see it break new highs before long,” he said.
“Interest rates are at or near their
peak, cuts are now being priced in sooner than anticipated on the back of
recent developments in the banking sector,” said Erlam, who added that he
thinks that dynamic will boost gold demand, even if it coincides with a
softer dollar.
Fed’s next moves
Investors are closely watching the Federal Reserve’s next moves and
their impact on gold prices.
The Fed began their two-day meeting on
Tuesday, where it’s widely expected to approve a 25 basis point rate hike
Wednesday, though predictions vary among analysts.
“Overall, the Fed will have to choose
between higher inflation or a recession, and either outcome is bullish for
gold,” said Nicky Shiels, head of metals strategy at precious metals firm
MKS Pamp. She forecasts gold to extend to $2,200 per ounce.
A weakening of the dollar may support gold prices, according to
HSBC’s chief precious metals analyst James Steel, who expects a 25 basis
point hike from the Fed.
Gold and the greenback
“What we saw earlier [last] week was the
simultaneous events of both gold and the dollar. And that’s quite unusual,”
Steel said, referring to the rise in gold prices and the dollar last week.
There’s usually an inverse relationship between
gold prices and the U.S. dollar. But investors tend to like the perceived
safety of U.S. Treasurys and gold simultaneously during periods of financial
stress.
“This scenario does not happen often but
when it does — it is always a sign of elevated investor concerns,” Steel
said.
Term Project Review on 4/10/2023
Class
Video Excel Session Part
I (Thanks, Maggie)
Class
Video Excel Session Part
II (Thanks, Maggie)
Chapter 16 –
Country Risk Analysis
Example of Countries with Low Political Risk
Country |
Continent |
Population |
Political Risk Level |
Reasons for Low Political Risk |
Iceland |
Europe |
387,758 |
Very Low |
· Stable
democratic institutions · strong rule
of law and protection of property right · low
corruption levels · high
respect for human rights · low risk of
armed conflicts or terrorism · high
economic development and social welfare · peaceful
political environment with low levels of political instability or social
unrest. |
Switzerland |
Europe |
8.8 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Norway |
Europe |
5.5 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Finland |
Europe |
5.5 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Sweden |
Europe |
10.3 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
New Zealand |
Oceania |
4.9 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Denmark |
Europe |
5.85 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Canada |
North America |
38.66 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Australia |
Oceania |
26.3 million |
Very Low |
Same as above |
Luxembourg |
Europe |
654,328 |
Very Low |
Same as above |
https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/political_risk_short_term/
https://willistowerswatson.turtl.co/story/political-risk-index-winter-2022-2023-gated/page/12/1
Examples of Countries with High Political Risk
Country |
Continent |
Population |
Political Risk Level |
Reasons for High Political Risk |
Afghanistan |
Asia |
41 million |
High |
· Ongoing
armed conflicts with various insurgent groups · political
instability due to frequent changes in government · terrorism
by extremist groups, widespread corruption and bribery · weak
governance with lack of effective law enforcement and judicial system · lack of
rule of law and protection of property rights · challenges
in implementing reforms and maintaining social stability. |
Syria |
Asia |
18.6 million |
High |
o
Ongoing civil war with multiple factions and foreign
interventions o
political instability due to the complex and protracted
conflict o
terrorism by various extremist groups o
widespread human rights violations o
sanctions imposed by the international community o
challenges in rebuilding and stabilizing the country |
Yemen |
Asia |
31.6 million |
High |
Ø Ongoing
armed conflicts between government forces and rebel groups Ø political instability
with multiple factions vying for power Ø humanitarian
crisis with widespread poverty and lack of basic services Ø terrorism
by extremist groups Ø lack of
rule of law and weak governance Ø challenges
in achieving political reconciliation and peace building. |
Venezuela |
South America |
28.2 million |
High |
v Economic
crisis with hyperinflation and severe shortages of basic goods v political
instability with the ongoing power struggle between the government and
opposition v corruption and
embezzlement of state funds, erosion of democratic institutions and rule of
law v social
unrest and protests, sanctions imposed by the international community v challenges
in achieving economic and political stability. |
Democratic Republic of Congo |
Africa |
97.1 million |
High |
ü Ongoing
armed conflicts with various rebel groups and militias ü political
instability with frequent changes in government ü widespread
corruption and embezzlement of state funds ü human
rights violations ü weak governance
with lack of effective law enforcement and judicial system ü challenges
in achieving peace, stability, and development. |
Somalia |
Africa |
17.1 million |
High |
· Ongoing
armed conflicts between government forces and various insurgent groups · political
instability with lack of effective central government · terrorism
and piracy in the coastal regions · lack of
effective law enforcement and judicial system · lack of
basic infrastructure and services, including education and healthcare · challenges
in achieving political reconciliation and state-building. |
South Sudan |
Africa |
11.6 million |
High |
o
Ongoing armed conflicts between government forces and rebel
groups o
political instability with multiple factions vying for power
o
humanitarian crisis with widespread displacement and food
insecurity o
lack of effective governance and state institutions o
human rights violations o
challenges in achieving political stability, peace, and
development. |
Libya |
Africa |
7.1 million |
High |
Political instability with multiple competing governments
and armed factions
armed conflicts and terrorism by various groups
lack of effective government institutions and rule of law
security challenges with widespread violence and lawlessness
economic challenges with dependence on oil revenues
challenges in achieving political reconciliation and
stability. |
Zimbabwe |
Africa |
15.5 million |
High |
Ø Economic
challenges with hyperinflation and unemployment Ø political instability
with lack of effective governance Ø corruption
and embezzlement of state funds Ø erosion of
democratic institutions and human rights Ø lack of
rule of law and protection of property rights Ø social
unrest and protests Ø challenges
in achieving economic recovery |
https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/political_risk_short_term/
https://willistowerswatson.turtl.co/story/political-risk-index-winter-2022-2023-gated/page/12/1
Chapter 18 Long Term Debt Financing - Interest
rate swap
Intro:
• All
firms—domestic or multinational, small or large,
leveraged, or unleveraged—are sensitive to interest rate movements in
one way or another.
• The
single largest interest rate risk of the nonfinancial firm (our focus in this
discussion) is debt service
– The
multicurrency dimension of interest rate risk for the MNE is a complicating
concern.
• The
second most prevalent source of interest rate risk for the MNE lies in its
portfolio holdings of interest-sensitive securities
Example: Consider a firm
facing three debt strategies
– Strategy #1: Borrow $1
million for 3 years at a fixed rate
– Strategy #2: Borrow $1
million for 3 years at a floating rate, LIBOR + 2% to be reset annually
(LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate,)
– Strategy #3: Borrow $1
million for 1 year at a fixed rate, then renew the credit annually
– Although the lowest cost of
funds is always a major criterion, it is not the only one
• Strategy #1 assures itself
of funding at a known rate for the three years
– Sacrifices the ability to
enjoy a fall in future interest rates for the security of a fixed rate of
interest should future interest rates rise
• Strategy #2 offers what #1
didn’t, flexibility (and, therefore, repricing risk)
– It too assures funding for
the three years but offersrepricing risk
when LIBOR changes
– Eliminates credit risk as
its spread remains fixed
• Strategy #3 offers more
flexibility but more risk;
– In the second year the firm
faces repricing and credit
risk, thus the funds are not guaranteed for the three years and neither is
the price
– Also, firm is borrowing on
the “short-end” of the yield curve which is typically upward sloping—hence, the
firm likely borrows at a lower rate than in Strategy #1
Volatility, however, is far greater on the short-end
than on the long-end of the yield curve.
What is
interest rate swap?
Swaps are contractual agreements to exchange or swap a
series of cash flows
– Whereas a forward rate
agreement or currency forward leads to the exchange of cash flows on just one
future date, swaps lead to cash flow exchanges on several future dates
• If the agreement is to swap
interest payments—say, fixed for a floating—it is termed an interest
rate swap
– Most commonly,
interest rate swaps are associated with a debt service, such
as the floating-rate loan described earlier
– An agreement between two
parties to exchange fixed-rate for floating-rate financial obligations is
often termed a plain vanilla swap
– This type of swap forms
the largest single financial derivative market in the world.
Why Interest-rate
Swaps Exist
• If company A (B)
wants a floating- (fixed-) rate loan, why doesn’t it just do it from the
start? An explanation commonly put forward is comparative
advantage!
• Example: Suppose that two
companies, A and B, both wish to borrow $10MM for 5 years and have been
offered the following rates:
Fixed Floating
Company
A 10% 6
month LIBOR+0.3%
Company
B 11.2% 6month
LIBOR+1.0%
Note:
·
Company A anticipates the interest
rates to fall in the future and prefers a floating rate loan. However, company A can get a better deal in
a fixed rate loan.
·
On the contrary, company B
anticipates the interest rates to rise and therefore prefers a fixed rate
loan. Company B’s comparative advantage is in getting a floating rate loan.
·
So both companies could be
better off with a interest rate swap contract.
– The difference between the
two fixed rates (1.2%) is greater than the difference between the two
floating rates (0.7%)
• Company B has a comparative
advantage in floating-rate markets
• Company A has a comparative
advantage in fixed-rate markets
• In fact, the combined
savings for both firms is 1.2% - 0.70% = 0.50%
Solution:
A: Receive fixed rate 10.5% from B, pay LIBOR + 0.55% to B, and
pay 10% to bank
è
Final outcome: A could pay the
debt at 10% interest rate to the bank with the10.5% interest received from Bè leaving A
with 0.5% under A’s control.
è
Since A needs to pay B at
LIBOR + 0.55% and A has kept 0.5% previously
è
A’s net result = LIBOR + 0.55%
- 0.5% = LIBOR + 0.05% = LIBOR + 0.05%
è
A anticipates the rates to go down
and prefers to pay at a flexible rate.
è
Eventually, A gets LIBOR +
0.05%, better than the rate A could obtain from the bank directly which is
LIBOR + 0.3%, so A would benefit from this interest rate swap deal.
B: Receive
LIBOR + 0.55% from A, pay 10.5% to A,
and pay LIBOR + 1% to bank
è
Final outcome: B could pay the
debt at LIBOR + 1% interest rate to
the bank with the LIBOR + 0.55%
interest received from Aè leaving B with -0.45%.
è
Since B needs to pay A at
10.5% and B still have -0.45% debt previously
è
B’s net result = 10.5% + 0.45%
= 10.95%
è
B anticipates the rates to go
up and prefers to pay at a fixed rate.
è
Eventually, B gets 10.95%,
better than the rate B could obtain from the bank directly which is 11.2%, so
B would benefit from this interest rate swap deal.
Plain vanilla swap: An agreement between two
parties to exchange fixed-rate for floating-rate financial obligations
How Do Currency Swaps Work?
By CORY MITCHELL Updated September 22, 2021, Reviewed by GORDON
SCOTT
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042315/how-do-currency-swaps-work.asp
What Is a
Currency Swap?
A currency swap
is a transaction in which two parties exchange an equivalent amount of money with
each other but in different currencies. The parties are essentially loaning
each other money and will repay the amounts at a specified date and exchange
rate. The purpose could be to hedge exposure to exchange-rate risk, to
speculate on the direction of a currency, or to reduce the cost of borrowing
in a foreign currency.
The parties involved in currency swaps are usually financial
institutions, trading on their own or on behalf of a non-financial
corporation. Currency swaps and FX
forwards now account for a majority of the daily transactions in global
currency markets, according to the Bank for International Settlements.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
·
Two parties exchange
equivalent amounts of two different currencies and trade back at a later
specified date.
·
Currency swaps are often
offsetting loans, and the two sides often pay each other interest on amounts
exchanged.
·
Financial institutions conduct
most of the FX swaps, often on behalf of a non-financial corporation.
·
Swaps can be used to hedge
against exchange-rate risk, speculate on currency moves, and borrow foreign
exchange at lower interest rates.
How a Currency
Swap Works
In a currency swap, or FX swap, the counter-parties exchange
given amounts in the two currencies. For example, one party might receive 100
million British pounds (GBP), while the other receives $125 million. This
implies a GBP/USD exchange rate of 1.25. At the end of the agreement, they
will swap again at either the original exchange rate or another pre-agreed
rate, closing out the deal.
FX Swaps and
Exchange Rates
Swaps can last for years, depending on the individual agreement,
so the spot market's exchange rate between the two currencies in question can
change dramatically during the life of the trade. This is one of the reasons institutions
use currency swaps. They know exactly
how much money they will receive and have to pay back in the future. If they
need to borrow money in a particular currency, and they expect that currency
to strengthen significantly in the coming years, a swap will help limit their
cost in repaying that borrowed currency.
FX Swaps and
Cross Currency Swaps
A currency swap is often referred to as a cross-currency swap,
and for all practical purposes, the two are basically the same. But there can
be slight differences. Technically, a cross-currency swap is the same as an
FX swap, except the two parties also exchange interest payments on the loans
during the life of the swap, as well as the principal amounts at the
beginning and end. FX swaps can also involve interest payments, but not all
do.
There are a number of ways interest can be paid. Both parties
can pay a fixed or floating rate, or one party may pay a floating rate while
the other pays a fixed.
In addition to
hedging exchange-rate risk, this type of swap often helps borrowers obtain
lower interest rates than they could get if they needed to borrow directly in
a foreign market.
Real-World
Example
Consider a company that is holding U.S. dollars and needs
British pounds to fund a new operation in Britain. Meanwhile, a British
company needs U.S. dollars for an investment in the U.S. The two seek each
other out through their banks and come to an agreement where they both get
the cash they want without having to go to a foreign bank to get a loan,
which would likely involve higher interest rates and increase their debt
loads. Currency swaps don't need to
appear on a company's balance sheet, while a loan would.
What Are the
Pros and Cons of a Currency Swap?
Peter Hann, Last Modified Date: March 06, 2022
A currency swap
occurs when two parties agree to exchange the principal and interest of a
loan in one currency for the principal and interest of a loan in another
currency. The intention of the swap is to hedge against currency fluctuations
by reducing the exposure to the other currency and increasing the certainty
of future cash flows. An enterprise might also achieve a lower rate of
interest by looking for a low-interest loan in another currency and engaging
in a currency swap. The costs involved
in arranging the transaction might be a disadvantage, and as with other
similar transactions, there also is a risk that the other party to the swap
might default.
A structure often used in a currency swap is including only the
principal of the loan in the arrangement. The parties agree to swap the
principal of their loans at a specified time in the future at a specified
rate. Alternatively, the exchange of
the principal of the loans might be combined with an interest rate swap,
whereby the parties would also swap the streams of interest on the loans.
In some cases,
the currency swap would relate only to the interest on the loans and not the
principal. The two interest streams would be
swapped over the life of the agreement. These interest streams are in
different currencies, so the payments generally would be made by each party
in full, rather than being netted off into one payment as might occur if only
one currency is involved.
The advantage of
currency swaps is that they bring together two parties who each have an
advantage in a particular market. The arrangement enables each party to
exploit a comparative advantage. For example, a domestic company might be able to borrow on more
favorable terms than a foreign company in a particular country. It therefore
would make sense for the foreign company entering that market to look for a
currency swap.
Costs that might
arise for an enterprise looking for a foreign currency swap include the
expense of finding a willing counterparty. This might be done through the services of an intermediary or
by direct negotiation with the other party. The process might be expensive in
terms of fees charged by an intermediary or the cost of management time in
negotiation. There also will be legal
fees for drawing up the currency swap agreement.
The expenses of
setting up a currency swap might make it unattractive as a hedging mechanism
against currency movements in the short term. In the longer term, where there
is increased risk, the swap might be cost effective in comparison with other
types of derivative. A disadvantage is that, in any such arrangement, there
is a risk that the other party to the contract might default on the arrangement.
Homework of
chapter 18 (due with final)
1.
How did
Goldman Sacks help Greece to cover its debt using currency swap? (Hint: Goldman Sachs helped the Greek government to mask the
true extent of its deficit with the help of a derivatives deal (Goldman
Sachs arranged a secret loan of 2.8 billion euros for Greece, disguised as an off-the-books “cross-currency swap”.—a
complicated transaction in which Greece's foreign-currency debt was converted
into a domestic-currency obligation using a fictitious market exchange rate.) that legally
circumvented the EU Maastricht deficit rules. At some point the so-called cross currency
swaps will mature, and swell the country's already bloated deficit https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/goldmans-greek-gambit/)
2.
What are the
pros and cons associated with establishing a currency swap?
3.
Explain what
is an interest rate swap using an example.
4. Company AAA will borrow $1,000,000 for ten years at a floating rate. Company BBB will borrow for ten years at a fixed rate for $1,000,000. Refer to the following for details.
|
|
Fixed-Rate Borrowing Cost |
Floating-Rate Borrowing Cost |
|
|
|
Company AAA |
10% |
LIBOR |
|
|
|
Company BBB |
12% |
LIBOR + 1.5% |
|
|
Note: ·
Company AAA anticipates
the interest rates to fall in the future and prefers a floating rate
loan. However, company AAA can get a
better deal in a fixed rate loan. ·
On the contrary, company
BBB anticipates the interest rates to rise and therefore prefers a fixed
rate loan. Company BBB’s comparative advantage is in getting a floating
rate loan. ·
So both companies could be
better off with a interest rate swap contract. Assume that a swap bank help the
two parties. 1 According to the swap contract, Firm BBB will pay the swap
bank on $1,000,000 at a fixed rate of 10.30% 2 The swap bank will pay firm
BBB on $1,000,000 at the floating
rate of (LIBOR - 0.15%). 3 Firm AAA needs to pay the swap bank
on $1,000,000 at the floating rate of (LIBOR - 0.15%); 4 The swap bank will pay firm AAA on
$10,000,000 at a fixed rate of 9.90%. Please answer the following
questions. · Show the value of this swap to firm
AAA? (answer: Firm AAA can save $500
each year) · Show the value of this swap to firm
BBB? ( answer:
Firm BBB will save $500 per year) · Show the value of the swap to the swap bank. (answer: The swap bank can earn $4,000 each year) |
|
||||
Hint: Just write down all relevant transactions for each player,
and sum them up. For example, AAA pays 10% and LIBOR-0.15%, and receive 9.9% è net result: 10% - 9.9% + LIBOR-0.15% = LIBOR
-0.05%, a saving of 0.05%, since if AAA gets the debt from the bank, AAA’s
interest rate would be LIBOR. Similarly, for BBB, pay LIBOR + 1.5% - (LIBOR -0.15%) + 10.3% = 11.95%, a
saving of 0.5%, since BBB could get 12% interest rate if BBB gets the loan
from the bank directly; To the SWAP Bank, its net result = Receive 10.3% from
BBB, and pays 9.9% to AAA, and receive LIBOR-0.15% from AAA and pays
LIBOR-0.15% to BBB, so net result = 10.3% - 9.9% +(LIBOR -0.15%) –
(LIBOR=0.15%) = 0.4%, the profit of the SWAP bank.)
Goldman
Sachs details 2001 Greek derivative trades
By
Reuters Staff
LONDON, Feb 22, 2010 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs GS.N has
defended the cross-currency derivatives it conducted for Greece in 2001 which
reduced the country's debt as a common currency risk management procedure
consistent with EU debt reporting rules. The US bank said that it did the
deals to reduce foreign denominated liabilities of Greece, which had become a
priority following the nation's entry into the single European currency.
“The Greek government has stated (and we agree) that these
transactions were consistent with the Eurostat principles governing their use
and application at the time,”
said Goldman Sachs in a
statement on its website on Sunday.
Details on the nine-year old swaps have re-emerged after
several months of concern about Greece‘s budget and debt levels.
The country has battled to establish credibility over reducing
its budget deficit, which at just under 13 percent is more than four times
the 3 percent level stipulated by Maastrict.
Goldman has explained the derivatives in the context of EU
rules on unhedged foreign currency debt which stated that these had to be
converted into euros using the year-end currency rate.
Therefore a rise in the dollar or yen, currencies in which
Greece had frequently issued debt, increased the country’s reported debt.
To mitigate this currency risk, in December 2000 and in June 2001, Greece conducted cross-currency
swaps and restructured its cross-currency swap portfolio with Goldman Sachs
at a historical implied foreign exchange rate, the U.S. investment bank
said.
This was a practice commonly undertaken by European
sovereigns, Goldman Sachs said.
These transactions reduced
Greece’s foreign denominated debt in euro terms by 2.367 billion euros and,
in turn, decreased Greece’s debt as a percentage of GDP by just 1.6%, from
105.3% to 103.7%.
To offset a fall in the value
of the swap portfolio Greece and Goldman Sachs entered into a long-dated
interest rate swap.
The new interest rate swap
was on the back of a newly issued Greek bond, where Goldman Sachs paid the
bond coupon for the life of the trade and received the cash flows based on
variable interest rates.
In total the currency and
interest rate hedges reduced the Greece’s debt by a total of 2.3 billion
euros.
Greek
debt crisis: How easy is it to swap currencies?
Published
July 2015
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33462294
The
euro was meant to cast the Greek drachma into the book of obsolete
currencies, a note somewhere between the Rhodesian dollar and the brass
dupondius coins used in ancient Rome.
Yet as
the Greek government battles to satisfy its creditors, and avoid exiting the
single currency, its citizens face the very real possibility that the drachma
- or an alternative - could return.
While
there have been high-profile cases of countries switching currencies, in many
ways Greece's situation is unique. Here are some things Athens has to
consider.
We do not know what plans, if any, Greece has
to replace the euro. But nor would we expect to.
A mere
hint from any government that the money in their citizen's pockets will soon
become worthless would send people rushing to the banks.
If the
Syriza-led government is preparing an alternative currency, such plans will
have been worked out in secret. This might involve a foreign firm creating
the new notes.
A
precedent is post-war Germany. In 1948, confidence in the currency had
collapsed.
The
allies, keen to restore economic stability, printed billions of Deutsche
marks, as the new currency was called, and in a matter of days distributed it
around the country. It was quickly accepted.
Whether
Greece has the capacity for such a dramatic move is unclear, but the German
case shows how decisive action can work.
Greece already has capital controls in place
- which can be a precursor to a new currency
Another
example of a successful currency switch came in 1993 after Czechoslovakia
spilt.
A
currency union between the new Czech and Slovak nations lasted just 38 days,
when it became clear the faltering Slovakian economy could not keep pace with
its neighbour.
As in
Germany, notes were printed in secret and distributed around the country with
the help of the army.
But
also important were the capital controls and bans on cross-border transfers,
which kept money in state banks and prevented speculative flows between the
two nations.
Greece already has capital controls, and its
banks are closed, so in theory it has a head start, were it to introduce a
new currency.
After
the "Velvet Revolution" of 1989, Czechoslovakia had an amicable
"Velvet Divorce", including a currency split
So you
have printed wads of new notes and have your bank system on a tight leash.
You now need to find a way to introduce the new currency, and phase out the
old.
This is
where it gets tricky. It took years of planning and careful transition to
introduce the euro, yet Greece would have to bring a new currency in days.
Greece might run its new money side-by-side
with the old, meaning shops for a period would accept both.
Citizens could only be allowed to swap a set
amount of euros for cash, and be forced to deposit the rest, as the Czechs
and Slovaks were compelled too.
The government would have to decide on an
exchange rate to convert balances into the new currency. But would foreign buyers
of Greek goods want to be paid in drachma?
In an
interview with Britain's the Daily Telegraph, former Greek finance minister
Yanis Varoufakis suggested his country
could issue "California-style IOUs" as a way of introducing
liquidity into a system thirsty for cash.
He was referring to California in 2009, when
the US state, reeling from the financial crisis and unable to meet its bills,
gave IOUs to contractors in lieu of payments.
This is
not as outlandish as it sounds - the European Central Bank reportedly
examined a scenario where the Greek state paid civil servants in IOUs.
The move would buy Greece time, and could
ease the way to a formal new currency.
But
unless such notes can easily be exchanged for goods, this would not help
ordinary Greeks such as pensioners who rely on cash.
Greece
already has the means to print more euros at its press in Holargos, a suburb
of Athens, which once pumped out drachma.
Developing
new banknotes is expensive, and difficult - the notes must be secure and be
able to be recognised by cash machines - so such a scenario has appeal.
But
this would not be the euro, but rather a "euro" - a parallel Greek
version of the currency that is likely to devalue rapidly.
Greece
could also look to its Balkan neighbours Kosovo and Montenegro if it fails to
reach a deal. Despite the objections of the European authorities, both have
unilaterally adopted the euro.
Such a
move would give Greece a stable, internationally-recognised currency - but
one in which they had no say.
Slovakia's
economy may have been struggling when it abandoned its currency union with
the Czech Republic, but it bounced back and later qualified for eurozone
membership.
Estonia
was the first to leave the Soviet rouble. Although the new currency was
unstable at first, its adoption helped the country towards a successful
free-market economy.
And having your own currency is not just a
financial decision, but a point of national pride.
South
Sudan introduced a new currency after it split from the north four years ago.
Inflation has been a problem ever since, but for many in South Sudan it was
an important way of asserting their new sovereignty.
Long-term
damage
East Germany
is arguably still paying the price for adopting the Deutsche mark after
reunification.
East
Germans were able to exchange their eastern marks one to one - great for
individuals, but industry was unable to compete with the advanced West German
economy.
Introducing
a new currency is possible - former Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus
called it "a simple administrative thing to do" but its success
depends on more than technical considerations.
Anything can be used as money, so long as
there is confidence in it - it seems bizarre
to think that Chinese traders once used cowrie shells, but imagine what they
would make of Bitcoins.
A Greek break with the euro is unlikely to be
clean, as its former currency will remain in circulation. It is unclear how readily a Greek society already divided over the
euro would take to something new.
Greek
Debt Crisis
How
Goldman Sachs Helped Greece to Mask its True Debt
Goldman Sachs helped the Greek government to mask
the true extent of its deficit with the help of a derivatives deal that
legally circumvented the EU Maastricht deficit rules. At some point the so-called
cross currency swaps will mature, and swell the country's already bloated
deficit.
Von
Beat Balzli, 08.02.2010, 18.55 Uhr, Zur Merkliste hinzufügen
Greeks
aren't very welcome in the Rue Alphones Weicker in Luxembourg. It's home to
Eurostat, the European Union's statistical office. The number crunchers there
are deeply annoyed with Athens. Investigative reports state that important
data "cannot be confirmed" or has been requested but "not
received."
Creative accounting took priority when it
came to totting up government debt. Since 1999, the Maastricht rules threaten
to slap hefty fines on euro member countries that exceed the budget deficit
limit of three percent of gross domestic product. Total government debt
mustn't exceed 60 percent.
The Greeks have never managed to stick to the
60 percent debt limit, and they only adhered to the three percent deficit
ceiling with the help of blatant balance sheet cosmetics. One time, gigantic military expenditures were left out, and another
time billions in hospital debt. After recalculating the figures, the experts
at Eurostat consistently came up with the same results: In truth, the deficit each year has been far greater than the three
percent limit. In 2009, it exploded to over 12 percent.
Now,
though, it looks like the Greek figure jugglers have been even more brazen
than was previously thought. "Around
2002 in particular, various investment banks offered complex financial
products with which governments could push part of their liabilities into the
future," one insider recalled, adding that Mediterranean countries
had snapped up such products.
Greece's debt managers agreed a huge deal
with the savvy bankers of US investment bank Goldman Sachs at the start of
2002. The deal involved so-called cross-currency swaps in which government
debt issued in dollars and yen was swapped for euro debt for a certain period
-- to be exchanged back into the original currencies at a later date.
Fictional
Exchange Rates
Such transactions are part of normal
government refinancing. Europe's governments obtain funds from investors
around the world by issuing bonds in yen, dollar or Swiss francs. But they
need euros to pay their daily bills. Years later the bonds are repaid in the
original foreign denominations.
But in the Greek case the US bankers devised
a special kind of swap with fictional exchange rates. That enabled Greece to
receive a far higher sum than the actual euro market value of 10 billion
dollars or yen. In that way Goldman Sachs secretly arranged additional credit
of up to $1 billion for the Greeks.
This credit disguised as a swap didn't show
up in the Greek debt statistics. Eurostat's reporting rules don't
comprehensively record transactions involving financial derivatives.
"The Maastricht rules can be circumvented quite legally through
swaps," says a German derivatives dealer.
In
previous years, Italy used a similar trick to mask its true debt with the
help of a different US bank. In 2002 the Greek deficit amounted to 1.2
percent of GDP. After Eurostat reviewed the data in September 2004, the ratio
had to be revised up to 3.7 percent. According to today's records, it stands
at 5.2 percent.
At some
point Greece will have to pay up for its swap transactions, and that will
impact its deficit. The bond maturities range between 10 and 15 years.
Goldman Sachs charged a hefty commission for the deal and sold the swaps on
to a Greek bank in 2005.
The
bank declined to comment on the controversial deal. The Greek Finance
Ministry did not respond to a written request for comment.
4/26 (3-5:30 PM) Final Exam (in class, non-cumulative, multiple choice,
two calculation questions)
Study guide (chapters 8, 11, 18)
Final Review
Video (in class 4/20/2023)
Video
explaining the Interest rate swap question
Part
I - Multiple choice and true/false questions (2 points each; 2*40=80 points;
only chapters 8, 11 and 18; close book close notes)
Chapter 8
1.
What is the theory of purchasing power
parity (PPP)?
2.
How does PPP affect exchange rates?
3.
How can PPP be used to compare the
standard of living in different countries?
4.
What is interest rate parity?
5.
How does Interest Rate Parity affect the
exchange rate between two currencies?
6.
How does the law of one price relate to
purchasing power parity?
7.
How can investors take advantage of
deviations from interest rate parity through carry trades?
8.
What is Currency Carry Trades?
Chapter 11
9.
How to hedge transaction exposure? (hint:
option, forward contract, money market)
10. How
to hedge with options (hint: receivable and payable use either put or call
options)
11. Explain
the concept of forward contracts as a hedging strategy.
12. Discuss
the advantages and disadvantages of using forward contracts as a hedging
strategy.
13. Explain
how forward contracts differ from other hedging strategies, such as
options
14. Explain
how a company can use the money market to hedge its payables.
15. Explain
how a company can use the money market to hedge its receivables.
16. How
can a put option be used to hedge a receivable transaction, and what are the
potential benefits and drawbacks of this strategy?
17. What
are the main differences between hedging a receivable transaction with a put
option versus using a forward contract?
18. How
can a call option be used to hedge a payable transaction, and what are the
potential benefits and drawbacks of this strategy?
Chapter 18
19. Define
an interest rate swap and explain its purpose.
20. Explain
the fixed-for-floating interest rate swap
21. Discuss
the benefits and risks of using interest rate swaps to manage interest rate
risk.
22. Define
a currency swap and explain its purpose.
23. Discuss
the benefits and risks of using currency swaps to manage foreign exchange
risk.
24. Explain
the concept of counterparty risk and how it applies to currency swaps.
25. Explain
the concept of plain vanilla swap?
1.
Part II - Calculation part (Total 20 points, two questions, no
need of calculator; Show works to earn partial credits)
1.
Big Mac Index question: Given the price of
Big Mac in US and in Japan, calculate the exchange rate based on the Big Mac
Index (no need of calculator)
2.
Interest rate swap: calculate the net
outcome of each party involved, including two multinational firms and the
swap bank (similar to the homework question, as below)
FYI
Company AAA will borrow
$1,000,000 for ten years at a floating rate. Company BBB will borrow for ten
years at a fixed rate for $1,000,000. Refer to the following for details.
|
|
Fixed-Rate Borrowing
Cost |
Floating-Rate Borrowing Cost |
|
|
|
Company AAA |
10% |
LIBOR |
|
|
|
Company BBB |
12% |
LIBOR + 1.5% |
|
|
Note: ·
Company AAA anticipates the
interest rates to fall in the future and prefers a floating rate loan. However, company AAA can get a better
deal in a fixed rate loan. ·
On the contrary, company
BBB anticipates the interest rates to rise and therefore prefers a fixed
rate loan. Company BBB’s comparative advantage is in getting a floating
rate loan. ·
So both companies could be
better off with a interest rate swap contract. Assume that a swap bank help the two
parties. 1
According to the swap contract, Firm BBB will pay the swap bank on
$1,000,000 at a fixed rate of 10.30% 2
The swap bank will pay firm BBB on $1,000,000 at the floating rate of (LIBOR - 0.15%). 3
Firm AAA needs to pay the swap bank on $1,000,000 at the floating
rate of (LIBOR - 0.15%); 4
The swap bank will pay firm AAA on $10,000,000 at a fixed rate of
9.90%. Please answer the following questions. •
Show the value of this swap to firm AAA? (answer: Firm AAA can save
$500 each year) •
Show the value of this swap to firm BBB? ( answer: Firm BBB will
save $500 per year) |
|||||
Solution
Just write down all relevant transactions for each
player, and sum them up. For example, AAA pays 10% and LIBOR-0.15%, and
receive 9.9% è net result: 10% - 9.9% + LIBOR-0.15% = LIBOR -0.05%, a
saving of 0.05%, since if AAA gets the debt from the bank, AAA’s interest
rate would be LIBOR. Similarly, for BBB, pay LIBOR + 1.5% - (LIBOR -0.15%) + 10.3% = 11.95%, a
saving of 0.5%, since BBB could get 12% interest rate if BBB gets the loan
from the bank directly; To the SWAP Bank, its net result = Receive 10.3% from
BBB, and pays 9.9% to AAA, and receive LIBOR-0.15% from AAA and pays
LIBOR-0.15% to BBB, so net result = 10.3% - 9.9% +(LIBOR -0.15%) –
(LIBOR=0.15%) = 0.4%, the profit of the SWAP bank.)
__ _ _ __ __ _ __| |_
_ __ _| |_(_) ___ _ __
/ _` | '__/ _` |/ _` | |
| |/ _` | __| |/ _ \| '_ \
| (_| | | | (_| | (_| | |_| | (_| | |_| | (_) | | | |
\__, |_| \__,_|\__,_|\__,_|\__,_|\__|_|\___/|_| |_|
|___/
╔═╗───────────╔╗───────╔╗╔╗
║╔╬═╦═╦╦═╦╦╦═╗║╚╦╦╦╗╔═╗║╚╬╬═╦═╦╗
║╚╣╬║║║║╬║╔╣╬╚╣╔╣║║╚╣╬╚╣╔╣║╬║║║║
╚═╩═╩╩═╬╗╠╝╚══╩═╩═╩═╩══╩═╩╩═╩╩═╝
───────╚═╝