FIN310 Class Web Page, Fall ' 24
Instructor: Maggie Foley
Jacksonville University
The
Syllabus Risk
Tolerance Assessment Term
Project
Weekly SCHEDULE, LINKS, FILES and Questions
Chapter |
Coverage,
HW, Supplements -
Required |
References
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intro |
Discussion: How to pick stocks (finviz.com) How To Win The MarketWatch Stock Market Game
Daily earning announcement: http://www.zacks.com/earnings/earnings-calendar IPO schedule: http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/ipo-calendar |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of the Financial Market U.S. Regional Banks
Crisis in 2023
Video on youtube (fyi)
1.
Background:
2.
The Trigger:
3.
Contagion Effect:
4.
Government and
Regulatory Response:
5.
Lessons Learned:
Key
Takeaways
The U.S. economy in
August 2024
· Economic Growth:
· Inflation and Monetary Policy:
· Financial Markets:
· Fiscal Policy:
· Election Uncertainty:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part I –
The Feds: Steering Monetary Policy Quiz2 Fed Introduction Video by Invideo.ai (FYI) 1.
The Federal Reserve System: Structure and Roles
·
The Federal Reserve
System:
·
Board of Governors:
·
12 Regional Federal
Reserve Banks:
·
Regional Bank Presidents:
2.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC): Decision-Making Body
·
Composition of the FOMC:
·
Functions and
Responsibilities:
3.
The Interest Rate Decision-Making Process
·
Data Analysis:
·
Discussion and Debate:
·
Voting:
·
Public Communication:
4.
Key Concepts and Tools in Monetary Policy
(Continued)
·
Federal Funds Rate
(Continued):
·
Open Market Operations:
·
Discount Rate:
·
Reserve Requirements:
·
Quantitative Easing (QE):
·
Dual Mandate:
5.
Critical Thinking Points
·
Who Makes the Decisions?: ·
FOMC Members:
Understand the distinct roles of the Board of Governors and the regional
Federal Reserve Bank Presidents in the decision-making process. Recognize the
influence of each member, especially the Fed Chair, and how their
backgrounds, economic philosophies, and regional concerns shape their
decisions. ·
Rotation System:
Consider how the rotation of voting rights among regional bank presidents
ensures a broad range of perspectives are considered in monetary policy. ·
How Is Policy Decided?: ·
Data-Driven Decisions:
Reflect on the importance of data in shaping monetary policy. Explore how
different economic indicators, like unemployment, inflation, and GDP growth,
influence the FOMC’s decisions. ·
Diverse Opinions:
Examine how the diversity of opinions within the FOMC can lead to complex
policy debates. Consider the impact of dissenting votes and what they reveal
about the challenges of setting a single monetary policy in a diverse and
dynamic economy. ·
Communication Strategy:
Analyze the importance of clear communication from the Fed, especially in
managing market expectations and maintaining public confidence in the
economy. ·
What Tools Does the Fed
Use?: ·
Impact of Interest Rates:
Delve into how changes in the federal funds rate ripple through the economy,
affecting everything from mortgage rates to business investment decisions.
Explore the effectiveness and limitations of this tool in different economic
conditions. ·
Role of Open Market
Operations: Study how the Fed uses OMOs to manage
the money supply and control short-term interest rates. Understand the
strategic use of buying and selling securities and how these actions
influence the broader economy. ·
Use of Non-Traditional
Tools: Investigate the circumstances under
which the Fed might use tools like QE. Consider the potential risks and
benefits of such interventions and how they differ from traditional monetary
policy actions. ·
Why Does the Fed Matter?:
6. 12 Regional Federal
Reserve Bank Presidents
Nomination Process:
1. Selection by the Regional Board of Directors: The president of each of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks is selected by the bank's board of directors. The board of directors consists of nine members, divided into three classes: · Class A: Three members representing member banks. · Class B: Three members representing the public, elected by member banks. · Class C: Three members representing the public, appointed by the Board of Governors. The Class B and Class C directors play a primary role in the selection process, with the final candidate needing to be approved by the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C. 2. Approval by the Board of Governors: Once the regional board of directors selects a candidate, the appointment must be approved by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Term Duration:
7. Federal Reserve Chair
and Vice Chair
Nomination Process:
· Nomination by the President: The Chair and Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve Board are nominated by the President of the United States from among the sitting members of the Board of Governors. · Confirmation by the Senate: The nominations must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate through a majority vote. Term Duration:
8.
Board of Governor
Nomination
Process:
Term
Duration:
Summary
9. Chair The Fed Simulation Game Game
1: https://lewis500.github.io/macro/ Game
2: https://www.fedchairsim.com/ Homework 1-1: Understanding
the Role of the Fed Chair (due with the first midterm exam) Objective: Play the FOMC Simulation Game and analyze the challenges faced by the Federal Reserve Chair. Provide thoughtful advice based on your experience with the simulation and understanding of monetary policy. Instructions: 1.
Play the Simulation: 2.
Reflection Questions: o Challenges
as Fed Chair:
o Advice
to Fed Chair Jerome Powell:
|
In Plain Enlgish Fed St. Louise
(Cool video about Fed)
***** FRB – Federal Reserve Banks ******* Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's Boardroom Video
(youtube)
https://www.atlantafed.org/about/atlantafed/directors
The
Fed Explains Monetary Policy (video) The
Tools of Monetary Policy (video) Segment
406: Open Market Operations(video of Philadelphia Fed) ********** Fed Funds Rate *********
Release
date: July 1, 2024 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS What
is the Fed Fund rate (youtube) Segment 406: Open Market Operations (youtube, by the Fed)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part II – The Mechanics of
Monetary Policy: Tools and Outcomes Quiz1 Quiz3 Introduction to Monetary Policy
Monetary
policy involves the actions undertaken by a central bank, such as the Federal
Reserve in the United States, to influence the availability and cost of money
and credit to help promote national economic goals. It revolves around
managing the economy's money supply and interest rates to control inflation,
stabilize currency, and achieve a sustainable level of economic growth and
employment. Key Tools of Monetary Policy
1.
Open Market Operations
(OMOs):
2.
The Discount Rate:
3.
Reserve Requirements:
Goals of Monetary Policy
Outcomes of Monetary Policy
Challenges in Monetary Policy
Homework 1-2: Monetary Policy (due
with the first midterm exam) 1. Explore the interactive simulation at https://www.jufinance.com/fin310_24f/money_interest.html
to understand the relationship between money supply and interest rates. Question: Based on current economic indicators, do you support the
Federal Reserve's decision to lower interest rates in September 2024? Provide
reasons for your stance. 2. Velocity of Money
Simulation Engage
with the simulation game at https://www.jufinance.com/fin310_24f/chair_fed.html
to learn about the dynamics between money supply, interest rates, and the
velocity of money. Question: What is the concept of the velocity of money? How can
changes in interest rates influence this monetary indicator? What is the
current velocity of money according to the latest data? In your opinion, is
this velocity too high, too low, or optimal for the current economic
environment? |
Nominal Interest Rates and the Market for Money Beggs, Jodi. "How Money Supply and Demand Determine Nominal Interest Rates." ThoughtCo, Apr. 5, 2023, thoughtco.com/nominal-interest-rates-and-money-supply-and-demand-1147766. Like many
economic variables in a reasonably free-market economy, interest rates are
determined by the forces of supply and demand. Specifically, nominal interest rates, which is the
monetary return on saving, is determined by the supply and demand of money in an economy. There is more than one
interest rate in an economy and even more than one interest rate on
government-issued securities. These interest rates tend to move in tandem, so
it is possible to analyze what happens to interest rates overall by looking
at one representative interest rate. What Is the Price of Money? Like other supply and demand
diagrams, the supply and demand for money is plotted with the price
of money on the vertical axis and the quantity of money in the economy on the
horizontal axis. But what is the "price" of money? As it turns out, the price
of money is the opportunity cost of holding money. Since cash doesn't earn
interest, people give up the interest that they would have earned on non-cash
savings when they choose to keep their wealth in cash instead. Therefore,
the opportunity cost of money, and, as a
result, the price of money, is the nominal interest rate. Graphing the
Supply of Money The supply of
money is pretty easy to describe graphically. It is set at the discretion of
the Federal Reserve, more colloquially
called the Fed, and is thus not directly affected by interest rates. The Fed
may choose to alter the money supply because it wants to change the nominal
interest rate. Therefore, the supply of
money is represented by a vertical line at the quantity of money that the Fed
decides to put out into the public realm. When the Fed increases the money
supply this line shifts to the right. Similarly, when the Fed decreases the
money supply, this line shifts to the left. As a reminder, the Fed
generally controls the supply of money by open-market operations where it
buys and sells government bonds. When it buys bonds, the economy gets the
cash that the Fed used for the purchase, and the money supply increases. When
it sells bonds, it takes in money as payment, and the money supply decreases.
Even quantitative easing is just a variant
on this process. Graphing the Demand for Money The demand for
money, on the other hand, is a bit more complicated. To understand it, it's
helpful to think about why households and institutions hold money, i.e.,
cash. Most importantly,
households, businesses and so on use the money to purchase goods and
services. Therefore, the higher the dollar value of aggregate output, meaning
the nominal GDP, the more money the players in the
economy want to hold to spend it on this output. However, there's an
opportunity cost of holding money since money doesn't earn interest. As the
interest rate increases, this opportunity cost increases, and the quantity of
money demanded decreases as a result. To visualize this process, imagine a
world with a 1,000 percent interest rate where people make transfers to their
checking accounts or go to the ATM every day rather than hold any more cash
than they need to. Since the demand for money
is graphed as the relationship between the interest rate and quantity of
money demanded, the negative relationship between the opportunity cost of
money and the quantity of money that people and businesses want to hold
explains why the demand for money slopes downward. Just like with other demand curves, the demand for money shows
the relationship between the nominal interest rate and the quantity of money
with all other factors held constant, or ceteris paribus. Therefore, changes
to other factors that affect the demand for money shift the entire demand
curve. Since the demand for money changes when nominal GDP changes, the
demand curve for money shifts when prices (P) or real GDP (Y) changes. When
nominal GDP decreases, the demand for money shifts to the left, and, when
nominal GDP increases, the demand for money shifts to the right. Equilibrium in the Money Market As in other
markets, the equilibrium price and quantity are
found at the intersection of the supply and demand curves. In this graph, the
supply of and demand for money come together to determine the nominal
interest rate in an economy. Equilibrium in a market is
found where the quantity supplied equals the quantity demanded because
surpluses (situations where supply exceeds demand) pushes prices down and
shortages (situations where demand exceeds supply) drive prices up. So, the
stable price is the one where there is neither a shortage nor a surplus. Regarding the money market,
the interest rate must adjust such that people are willing to hold all of the
money that the Federal Reserve is trying to put out into the economy and
people aren't clamoring to hold more money than is available. Changes in the Supply of Money When the
Federal Reserve adjusts the supply of money in an economy, the nominal
interest rate changes as a result. When the Fed increases the money supply,
there is a surplus of money at the prevailing interest rate. To get players
in the economy to be willing to hold the extra money, the interest rate must
decrease. This is what is shown on the left-hand side of the diagram above. When the Fed decreases the
money supply, there is a shortage of money at the prevailing interest rate. Therefore,
the interest rate must increase to dissuade some people from holding money.
This is shown on the right-hand side of the diagram above. This is what happens when
the media says that the Federal Reserve raises or lowers interest rates—the
Fed isn't directly mandating what interest rates are going to be but is
instead adjusting the money supply to move the resulting equilibrium interest
rate. Changes in the Demand for Money Changes in the
demand for money can also affect the nominal interest rate in an economy. As
shown in the left-hand panel of this diagram, an increase in the demand for
money initially creates a shortage of money and ultimately increases the
nominal interest rate. In practice, this means that interest rates increase
when the dollar value of aggregate output and expenditure increases. The right-hand panel of the
diagram shows the effect of a decrease in demand for money. When not as much
money is needed to purchase goods and services, a surplus of money
results and interest rates must decrease to make players in the economy
willing to hold the money. Using Changes in the Money Supply to Stabilize
the Economy In a growing
economy, having a money supply that increases over time can have a
stabilizing effect on the economy. Growth in real output (i.e., real GDP)
will increase the demand for money and will increase the nominal interest
rate if the money supply is held constant. On the other hand, if the
supply of money increases in tandem with the demand for money, the Fed can
help to stabilize nominal interest rates and related quantities (including
inflation). That said, increasing the
money supply in response to a demand increase that is caused by an increase
in prices rather than an increase in output is not advisable, since that
would likely exacerbate the problem of inflation rather than have a
stabilizing effect. Key Takeaways:
1.
Concept of Nominal Interest Rates:
2.
The Price of Money:
3.
Supply and Demand Representation:
4.
Market Equilibrium:
5.
Impact of Federal Reserve Actions:
6.
Influence of Demand Changes:
7.
Stabilizing the Economy Through Monetary Policy:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter 2 What is Money Part I What is Money?
Let’s start by Playing a game https://www.jufinance.com/game/money_supply.html · There is no single "correct" measure of
the money supply: instead, there are several measures, classified along a
spectrum or continuum between narrow and broad monetary
aggregates. • Narrow measures include only the most liquid
assets, the ones most easily used to spend (currency, checkable deposits).
Broader measures add less liquid types of assets (certificates of deposit, etc.)
· M0: In
some countries, such as the United Kingdom, M0 includes bank reserves, so M0
is referred to as the monetary base, or narrow money. · MB: is
referred to as the monetary base or total currency. This
is the base from which other forms of money (like checking deposits, listed
below) are created and is traditionally the most liquid measure of the money
supply. · M1: Bank
reserves are not included in M1. (M1 and
Components @ Fed St. Louise website)
· M2:
Represents M1 and "close substitutes" for M1. M2 is a broader
classification of money than M1. M2 is a key economic indicator used to
forecast inflation. (M2 and components @
Fed St. Louise website) · M3: M2
plus large and long-term deposits. Since 2006, M3 is no longer published by
the US central bank. However, there are still estimates produced by
various private institutions. (M3 and components at
Fed St. Louise website) Let’s watch this money
supply video: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m0
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m1
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m2 Key Takeaway: VIDO (FYI) by
invideo.ai
·
Definition: M0 represents the most
basic form of money, including physical currency (coins and paper money) in circulation
and reserves held by banks at the central bank. It is the foundation of the
money supply and the most liquid form of money. ·
Role: M0 is crucial because it
forms the base upon which the broader money supply (M1 and M2) is built. It
reflects the amount of cash and bank reserves that can be quickly used by
banks to meet withdrawal demands or create more money through lending.
·
Stimulating
Economic Activity:
The growth in M1 and M2 during the pandemic helped stimulate economic activity
by making more funds available for spending and investment, which was crucial
for economic recovery. ·
Inflationary
Pressure:
The significant increase in the money supply has also raised concerns about
inflation, as more money in circulation can lead to rising prices if it
outpaces economic growth. ·
Central
Bank Policy:
The Federal Reserve closely monitors these trends and adjusts policies, such
as interest rates, to balance economic growth with inflation control,
ensuring that the expansion of M1 and M2 does not lead to excessive
inflation. Homework (due with the first midterm
exam)
Imagine you're the Chair of the Federal Reserve during the
COVID-19 pandemic. You have to make decisions that will affect M0, M1, and
M2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part II What is Fractional
Reserve Banking System? The Money
Multiplier (video)
Money creation in a fractional reserve system | Financial
sector | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Fractional Reserve Banking By JULIA KAGAN Updated August 10, 2022, Reviewed by SOMER
ANDERSON What Is Fractional Reserve Banking? Fractional reserve
banking is a system in which only a
fraction of bank deposits are backed by actual cash on hand and available for
withdrawal. This is done to theoretically expand the economy by freeing
capital for lending. Today, most economies' financial systems use
fractional reserve banking. KEY TAKEAWAYS ·
Fractional reserve
banking describes a system whereby banks can loan out a certain amount of the
deposits that they have on their balance sheets. ·
Banks are required
to keep on hand a certain amount of the cash that depositors give them, but
banks are not required to keep the entire amount on hand. ·
Often, banks are
required to keep some portion of deposits on hand, which is known as the
bank's reserves. ·
Some banks are exempt
from holding reserves, but all banks are paid a rate of interest on reserves. Understanding
Fractional Reserve Banking Banks are required to
keep on hand and available for withdrawal a certain amount of the cash that
depositors give them. If someone deposits $100, the bank can't lend out the
entire amount. Nor are banks required to keep the entire amount on hand. Many central banks have historically
required banks under their purview to keep 10% of the deposit, referred to as
reserves. This requirement is set in the U.S. by the Federal Reserve and is
one of the central bank's tools to implement monetary policy. Increasing the
reserve requirement takes money out of the economy while decreasing the
reserve requirement puts money into the economy. Historically, the
required reserve ratio on non-transaction accounts (such as CDs) is zero,
while the requirement on transaction deposits (e.g., checking accounts) is 10
percent. Following recent efforts to stimulate economic growth, however, the
Fed has reduced the reserve requirements to zero for transaction accounts as
well. Fractional Reserve
Requirements Depository
institutions must report their transaction accounts, time and savings
deposits, vault cash, and other reservable obligations to the Fed either
weekly or quarterly. Some banks are exempt from holding reserves, but all banks are paid a rate of interest on
reserves called the "interest rate on reserves" (IOR) or the
"interest rate on excess reserves" (IOER). This rate acts as an
incentive for banks to keep excess reserves. Reserve requirements
for banks under the Federal Reserve Act were set at 13%, 10%, and 7%
(depending on what kind of bank) in 1917. In the 1950s and '60s, the Fed had
set the reserve ratio as high as 17.5% for certain banks, and it remained
between 8% to 10% throughout much of the 1970s through the 2010s. During this period,
banks with less than $16.3 million in assets were not required to hold
reserves. Banks with assets of less than $124.2 million but more than $16.3
million had to have 3% reserves, and those banks with more than $124.2
million in assets had a 10% reserve requirement. Beginning March 26, 2020, the 10% and 3% required reserve ratios
against net transaction deposits was reduced to 0 percent for all banks, essentially
removing the reserve requirements altogether. Prior to the
introduction of the Fed in the early 20th century, the National Bank Act of
1863 imposed 25% reserve requirements for U.S. banks under its charge. Fractional Reserve Multiplier Effect "Fractional reserve" refers to the
fraction of deposits held in reserves. For example, if a bank has $500
million in assets, it must hold $50 million, or 10%, in reserve. Analysts reference an
equation referred to as the multiplier equation when estimating the impact of
the reserve requirement on the economy as a whole. The equation provides an estimate for the amount of money created
with the fractional reserve system and is calculated by multiplying the
initial deposit by one divided by the reserve requirement. Using the
example above, the calculation is $500 million multiplied by one divided by
10%, or $5 billion. This is not how money is actually created but only a way to
represent the possible impact of the fractional reserve system on the money
supply. As such, while is useful for economics professors, it is generally
regarded as an oversimplification by policymakers. What Are the Pros of Fractional Reserve Banking? Fractional reserve banking permits banks to use funds (i.e., the
bulk of deposits) that would be otherwise unused and idle to generate returns
in the form of interest rates on new loans—and to make more money available
to grow the economy. It is thus able to better allocate capital to where it
is most needed. What Are the Cons of Fractional Reserve Banking? Fractional reserve banking could catch a bank short of funds
on hand in the self-perpetuating panic of a bank run. This occurs when
too many depositors demand their cash at the same time, but the bank only
has, say 10% of deposits in liquid cash available. Many U.S. banks were
forced to shut down during the Great Depression because too many customers
attempted to withdraw assets at the same time. Nevertheless, fractional
reserve banking is an accepted business practice that is in use at banks
worldwide. Where Did Fractional
Reserve Banking Originate? Nobody knows for sure
when fractional reserve banking originated, but it is certainly not a modern
innovation. Goldsmiths during the Middle Ages were thought to issue demand
receipts for gold on hand that exceeded the amount of physical gold they had
under custody, knowing that on any given day only a small fraction of that
gold would be demanded. In 1668, Sweden's
Riksbank introduced the first instance of modern fractional reserve banking. Example:
You deposited $1,000 in a local bank
Homework of chapter 2 (due with the first mid term) 1.
Imagine that you
deposited $5,000 in Bank A. Reserve ratio is 0.1. Imagine that the fractional banking system
is fully functioning. After Eight cycles, what is the
amount that has been deposited and what is the total amount that has been
lent out? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter 11 - 14:
Commercial Banking and Investment Banking PPT2 Commercial banking II (Balance
sheet) Part I – Commercial
Bank’s Financial Statement Analysis Quiz Let’s Play a
game on Banks’ Balance Sheet Wells Fargo’s Balance Sheet https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/wfc/financials
Wells Fargo’s Income Statement https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/wfc/financials
Understanding
How Banks Operate: A Case Study on Wells Fargo (based on a prior study) Quiz
1. Introduction to Banking Operations
Banks
are essential financial institutions that play a vital role in the economy.
They manage money, facilitate transactions, provide credit, and offer various
financial services to individuals, businesses, and governments. We'll use
Wells Fargo's financial data as a case study to illustrate these concepts. 2. Core Functions of a Bank
Deposits
and Loans:
Interest
Income and Net Interest Margin (NIM):
Investments:
Fee-Based
Services:
3. Understanding Key Financial Statements
Balance
Sheet:
Income
Statement:
4. Wells Fargo Case Study: Key Financial
Metrics (2020-2023)
Using
Wells Fargo's financial data, let's explore key metrics that indicate the
bank's financial health: Total
Revenue:
Cost
of Revenue:
Net
Income:
Operating
Income (EBIT):
Total
Assets and Liabilities:
5. Identifying Bank Vulnerabilities
Declining
Net Interest Margin (NIM):
High
Loan Defaults:
Increasing
Cost of Revenue:
High
Leverage:
Declining
Liquidity:
6. Safety Tips for Managing and Analyzing
Banks
Diversify
Assets:
Maintain
Adequate Reserves:
Monitor
Loan Quality:
Ensure
Liquidity:
Stress
Testing and Scenario Analysis:
Regulatory
Compliance:
7. Practical Application: Analyzing Wells
Fargo
Here’s how we can apply these concepts using Wells Fargo’s data:
8. Conclusion on Wells Fargo
Wells
Fargo’s financial performance from 2020 to 2023 demonstrates
a bank that has effectively managed its operations despite various economic
challenges. The consistent growth in revenue and net income, coupled with
stable asset management, reflects the bank’s strong
financial position. However, the significant rise in the cost of revenue in
2023 could be a potential risk factor that needs to be monitored closely. |
Part III: Governmental Regulations on
Banking Industry (FYI) A Brief History of U.S. Banking
Regulation (FYI) By MATTHEW
JOHNSTON Reviewed by
MICHAEL J BOYLE on July 30, 2021 https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011916/brief-history-us-banking-regulation.asp As early as
1781, Alexander Hamilton recognized that “Most commercial nations have found
it necessary to institute banks, and they have proved to be the happiest
engines that ever were invented for advancing trade.” Since then, America has
developed into the largest economy in the world, with some of the biggest
financial markets in the world. But the path from then to now has been
influenced by a variety of different factors and an ever-changing regulatory
framework. The changing nature of that framework is best characterized by the
swinging of a pendulum, oscillating between the two opposing poles of greater
and lesser regulation. Forces, such as the desire for greater financial
stability, more economic freedom, or fear of the concentration of too much
power in too few hands, are what keep the pendulum swinging back and forth. Early Attempts
at Regulation in Antebellum America From the
establishment of the First Bank of the United States in 1791 to the National
Banking Act of 1863, banking regulation in America was an experimental mix of
federal and state legislation.1 2 The regulation was motivated, on the
one hand, by the need for increased centralized control to maintain stability
in finance and, by extension, the overall economy. While on the other hand,
it was motivated by the fear of too much control being concentrated in too
few hands. Despite
bringing a relative degree of financial and economic stability, the First Bank
of the United States was opposed to being unconstitutional, with many fearing
that it relegated undue powers to the federal government. Consequently, its
charter was not renewed in 1811. With the government turning to state banks
to finance the War of 1812 and the significant over-expansion of credit that
followed, it became increasingly apparent that financial order needed to be
reinstated. In 1816, the Second Bank of the United States would receive a
charter, but it too would later succumb to political fears over the amount of
control it gave the federal government and was dissolved in 1836. Not only at
the federal level, but also at the level of state banking, obtaining an
official legislative charter was highly political. Far from being granted on the
basis of proven competence in financial matters, successful acquisition of a
charter depended more on political affiliations, and bribing the legislature
was commonplace. By the time of the dissolution of the Second Bank, there was
a growing sense of a need to escape the politically corrupt nature of
legislative chartering. A new era of “free banking” emerged with a number of
states passing laws in 1837 that abolished the requirement to obtain an
officially legislated charter to operate a bank. By 1860, a majority of
states had issued such laws. In this
environment of free banking, anyone could operate a bank on the condition,
among others, that all notes issued were back by proper security. While this
condition served to reinforce the credibility of note issuance, it did not
guarantee immediate redemption in specie (gold or silver), which would serve
to be a crucial point. The era of free banking suffered from financial
instability with several banking crises occurring, and it made for a
disorderly currency characterized by thousands of different banknotes
circulating at varying discount rates. It is this instability and disorder
that would renew the call for more regulation and central oversight in the
1860s. Increasing
Regulation from the Civil War to the New Deal The free
banking era, characterized as it was by a complete lack of federal control
and regulation, would come to an end with the National Banking Act of 1863
(and its later revisions in 1864 and 1865), which aimed to replace the old
state banks with nationally chartered ones. The Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC) was created to issue these new bank charters as well as
oversee that national banks maintained the requirement to back all note
issuance with holdings of U.S. government securities. While the new
national banking system helped return the country to a more uniform and
secure currency that it had not experienced since the years of the First and
Second Banks, it was ultimately at the expense of an elastic currency that could
expand and contract according to commercial and industrial needs. The growing
complexity of the U.S. economy highlighted the inadequacy of an inelastic
currency, which led to frequent financial panics occurring throughout the
rest of the nineteenth century. With the
occurrence of the bank panic of 1907, it had become apparent that America’s
banking system was out of date. Further, a committee gathered in 1912 to
examine the control of the nation’s banking and financial system. It found
that the money and credit of the nation were becoming increasingly
concentrated in the hands of relatively few men. Consequently, under the
presidency of Woodrow Wilson, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was approved to
wrest control of the nation’s finances from banks while at the same time
creating a mechanism that would enable a more elastic currency and greater
supervision over the nation’s banking infrastructure. Although the
newly established Federal Reserve helped to improve the nation’s payments
system and created a more flexible currency, it's a misunderstanding of the
financial crisis following the 1929 stock market crash served to roil the
nation in a severe economic crisis that would come to be known as the Great
Depression. The Depression would lead to even more banking regulation
instituted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt as part of the provisions under
the New Deal. The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 created the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which implemented regulation of deposit
interest rates, and separated commercial from investment banking. The Banking
Act of 1935 served to strengthen and give the Federal Reserve more
centralized power. 1980s
Deregulation and Post-Crisis Re-Regulation The period
following the New Deal banking reforms up until around 1980 experienced a
relative degree of banking stability and economic expansion. Still, it has
been recognized that the regulation has also served to make American banks
far less innovative and competitive than they had previously been. The heavily
regulated commercial banks had been losing increasing market share to
less-regulated and innovative financial institutions. For this reason, a wave
of deregulation occurred throughout the last two decades of the twentieth
century. In 1980,
Congress passed the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control
Act, which served to deregulate financial institutions that accept deposits
while strengthening the Federal Reserve’s control over monetary policy.6 Restrictions on the opening of bank
branches in different states that had been in place since the McFadden Act of
1927 were removed under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act of 1994. Finally, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 repealed
significant aspects of the Glass-Steagall Act as well as the Bank Holding Act
of 1956, both of which had served to sever investment banking and insurance
services from commercial banking.7 From 1999
onwards, a bank could now offer commercial banking, securities, and insurance
services under one roof. All of this
deregulation helped to accelerate a trend towards increasing the complexity
of banking organizations as they moved to greater consolidation and
conglomeration. Financial institution mergers increased with the total number
of banking organizations consolidating to under 8000 in 2008 from a previous
peak of nearly 15,000 in the early 1980s.8 While banks
have gotten bigger, the conglomeration of different financial services under
one organization has also served to increase the complexity of those
services. Banks began offering new financial products like derivatives and
began packaging traditional financial assets like mortgages together through
a process of securitization. At the same
time that these new financial innovations were being praised for their
ability to diversify risk, the sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2007 that
transformed into a global financial crisis and the need for the bailout of
U.S. banks that had become “too big to fail” has caused the government to
rethink the financial regulatory framework. In response to the crisis, the
Obama administration passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act in 2010, aimed at many of the apparent weaknesses within the
U.S. financial system.9 It may take
some time to see how these new regulations affect the nature of banking
within the U.S. The Bottom
Line In antebellum America, numerous attempts at increased centralized control and regulation of the banking system were tried, but fears of concentrated power and political corruption served to undermine such attempts. Nevertheless, as the banking system grew, the need for ever-increasing regulation and centralized control, led to the creation of a nationalized banking system during the Civil War, the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, and the New Deal reforms under Roosevelt.4 While the increased regulation |