Central hub for FIN301 Corporate Finance.
Prior semester website:
FIN301 Spring 2026
Theme:
Hands-on learning in FIN301: Chapter 3 is a Financial Statement Analysis Lab, and Chapter 4 is a Financial Ratio Analysis Lab. Students build statements, use real-company data, calculate ratios, and interpret results through applied work rather than lecture-only instruction.
🪙 GOLD vs. 📈 STOCKS — Grandma's $1,000 Challenge8/20
Grandma gives you $1,000. You must choose all gold or
all stocks. Listen to different opinions, think about markets and risk,
and decide what you would do.
Quiz 1 — Group Work of 3
What is your choice: GOLD or STOCKS?
Show your rationale. Work together in a group of 3
and be ready to explain why your group made that choice.
Class Notes (collapse) — Chapters 1–2
1) Six parts of the financial system
Money
To pay for purchases and store wealth (fiat money, fiat currency).
Financial Instruments
Transfer resources from savers to investors and transfer risk to those best equipped to bear it.
Financial Markets
Buy and sell financial instruments.
Channel funds from savers to investors, thereby promoting economic efficiency.
Affect personal wealth and the behavior/decisions of business firms.
Financial Institutions
Provide access to financial markets, collect information, and provide services.
Financial intermediary: helps move funds from savers to investors.
Central Banks
Monitor financial institutions and stabilize the economy.
Regulatory Agencies
Provide oversight for the financial system.
2) Five core principles of finance
Time has value.
Risk requires compensation.
Information is the basis for decisions.
Markets determine prices and allocate resources.
Stability improves welfare.
Ch 5 Time Value of Money
8/25 & 8/27 & 9/1
PV/FV, annuities, perpetuities, EAR/APR, and timeline setup.
Match units: if the rate is monthly, then n is months and cash flows are monthly.
2) Single cash flow formulas
FV:FV = PV(1+r)^n
PV:PV = FV/(1+r)^n
n:n = ln(FV/PV)/ln(1+r)
r:r = (FV/PV)^(1/n) − 1
3) Annuities (equal payments)
Ordinary annuity (payments at end): Excel type=0
Annuity due (payments at beginning): Excel type=1
Key Excel:PMT, PV, FV, NPER, RATE
4) Excel TVM functions (ABS if you want positive answers)
Goal
Excel
Typical inputs
Future value
=ABS(FV(rate,nper,pmt,pv,[type]))
rate, nper, pmt, pv
Present value
=ABS(PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,[type]))
rate, nper, pmt, fv
Payment
=ABS(PMT(rate,nper,pv,fv,[type]))
rate, nper, pv, fv
Rate
=RATE(nper,pmt,pv,fv,[type])
nper, pmt, pv, fv
Number of periods
=NPER(rate,pmt,pv,fv,[type])
rate, pmt, pv, fv
Sign rule: Excel treats money you pay out as negative and money you receive as positive.
If your answer shows up negative, your signs are probably inconsistent (or use ABS() for presentation).
5) APR vs EAR
APR is nominal annual rate. Monthly periodic rate is APR/12.
EAR includes compounding: EAR = (1+APR/m)^m − 1.
Excel:=EFFECT(APR,m) and =NOMINAL(EAR,m)
6) NPV / NFV quick rule
NPV() assumes the first cash flow is at t=1. If there is a time-0 cash flow, add it separately.
Example:=-100 + NPV(0.10,40,40,40)
NFV: compute PV first, then compound: FV(rate,n,0,-PV,0)
Common mistakes:
(1) Using APR as the periodic rate,
(2) mixing months/years,
(3) forgetting type=1 for annuity due,
(4) putting time-0 cash flow inside NPV().
Hands-on Chapter 3 lab: build and analyze an income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement using real-company data; connect the statements and calculate free cash flow.
Suppose you already own Apple and want to add another stock.
If Apple and Walmart have a relatively low correlation (assume about 0.11), combining them can reduce portfolio volatility more than combining Apple with another stock that moves very similarly to Apple.
Why Walmart? Different business model / demand drivers can help reduce co-movement.
That does not guarantee higher return, but it can improve the portfolio’s risk-return tradeoff.
Practical idea: Start with the stock you already have (e.g., Apple), then look for a second stock with solid fundamentals and lower correlation rather than just chasing another high-return stock.
7) Systematic vs. unsystematic risk
Unsystematic risk (firm-specific risk): company events (lawsuits, management issues, product failures). This risk can be reduced by diversification.
Systematic risk (market risk): economy-wide risk (interest rates, recessions, inflation, market shocks). This risk cannot be diversified away.
CAPM focuses on systematic risk.
8) Beta (β): the CAPM risk measure
Beta measures systematic (market) risk, not total risk.
β = 1.0: same market sensitivity as the market.
β > 1.0: more sensitive than the market (higher systematic risk).
β < 1.0: less sensitive than the market (lower systematic risk).
β = 0: no market sensitivity (theoretical benchmark).
β < 0: moves opposite the market (rare, but possible for hedging-type assets).
9) CAPM formula (required return)
CAPM:R̂ = Rf + β ( Rm − Rf )
Rf = risk-free rate
Rm = expected market return
(Rm − Rf) = market risk premium (MRP)
R̂ = required return (or cost of equity estimate in many applications)
Interpretation: A higher beta means a larger risk premium above the risk-free rate, so CAPM gives a higher required return.
10) Security Market Line (SML)
The SML is the graph of CAPM required return versus beta.
Y-axis: required return
X-axis: beta
Intercept:Rf
Slope:(Rm − Rf) (market risk premium)
Change
What happens to SML?
Risk-free rate increases (MRP unchanged)
SML shifts upward in parallel (same slope)
Market risk premium increases
SML gets steeper (larger slope)
11) Using the Chapter 6 calculators (JUFinance)
One-Stock Return/Risk Calculator: use for expected return, variance, and SD of a single stock.
Two-Stock Portfolio Calculator: test different weights and correlation assumptions to see diversification effects.
CAPM Calculator: compute required return using risk-free rate, beta, and market return (or market risk premium).
12) Common mistakes (watch these on quizzes/exams)
Using % values incorrectly (e.g., entering 12 instead of 0.12 in formulas/calculators).
Confusing expected return with standard deviation.
Assuming portfolio SD is a simple weighted average.
Forgetting correlation/covariance in two-stock portfolio risk.